Search

Biomechanical analysis of gait relies on the use of lower-limb musculoskeletal models. Most models are based on a generic model which takes into account the subject's skeletal dimensions by isotropic or anisotropic rescaling. Alternatively, personalized models can be built based on information from magnetic resonance (MR) images. We have studied the effect of these approaches on muscle-tendon lengths (MTLs) and moment-arm lengths (MALs) for 16 major muscles of the lower limb of a normal adult during both normal and pathologic gait. For most muscles, the MTL and MAL calculated using the rescaled generic models showed high correlation values, but large offsets when compared to values calculated using personalized models. MTL and MAL differences with the personalized model are only slightly smaller for an anisotropic than for an isotropic rescaled model. Gait kinematics influenced the observed inter-model differences and correlations due to an altered range of joint angles in both gait patterns. In conclusion, both generic rescaling methods failed to accurately estimate absolute values for MTL and MAL calculated using the personalized model. However, the magnitude of MTL and MAL changes during normal and pathologic gait corresponded between all three models for most muscles. Since rescaling depends strongly on modelling assumptions and cannot fully take into account subject-specific musculoskeletal geometry, interpretation of MTL and MAL even in normal adult subjects requires extreme caution.

Advanced biomechanical analysis of muscle function during gait relies on the use of a musculoskeletal model. In clinical practice, personalization of the model is usually limited to rescaling a generic model to approximate the patient's anthropometry, even in the presence of bony deformities, as in the case of cerebral palsy (CP). However, the current state of the art in biomechanics allows highly detailed subject-specific models to be built based on magnetic resonance (MR) images. We hypothesized that moment arm length (MAL) calculations from MR-based models would be more accurate than those from rescaled generic musculoskeletal models. Our study compared hip muscle MAL estimated by (1) a personalized model based on full-leg MR scans and (2) a rescaled generic model of both lower limbs in six children presenting with increased femoral anteversion. Personalized MR-based models were created using a custom-built workflow. Rescaled generic models were created based on three-dimensional positions of anatomical markers measured during a standing trial. For all 12 lower limb models, the hip flexion, adduction and rotation MAL of 13 major muscles were analyzed over a physiological range of hip motion using Software for interactive musculoskeletal modelling (SIMM) (Motion Analysis Corporation, USA). Our results showed that rescaled generic models, which do not take into account the subject's femoral geometry, overestimate MAL for hip flexion, extension, adduction, abduction and external rotation, but underestimate MAL for hip internal rotation. The differences in MAL introduced by taking the aberrant femoral geometry into account in the MR-based model were consistent with major gait characteristics presented in CP patients.