101. Comparison of woman-specific versus breast-specific data for reporting screening mammography performance.
- Author
-
Heinzen MT, Yankaskas BC, and Kwok RK
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Breast Diseases pathology, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating diagnostic imaging, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating pathology, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Registries statistics & numerical data, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Breast Diseases diagnostic imaging, Mammography standards, Mammography statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Rationale and Objectives: Screening mammography data can be reported on a breast-specific or woman-specific level, and much mammography data available for research is woman-specific. The purpose of this study was to determine if woman-specific screening mammography data are sufficient for research and reporting by measuring and comparing the accuracy of screening mammography on a breast-specific and on a woman-specific level., Materials and Methods: Definitions for true-positive and false-positive mammography results were developed to distinguish between breast-specific and woman-specific calculations. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of screening mammography were calculated on a breast-specific and on a woman-specific basis for the entire population of the Carolina Mammography Registry and for a randomly selected subset of the population., Results: Only small differences were found in breast-specific versus woman-specific calculations of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for both the entire population and the smaller subset population. For both populations, woman-specific sensitivity and positive predictive values were slightly higher than the same breast-specific values, and woman-specific specificity was slightly lower., Conclusion: For research and reporting, woman-specific data are sufficient.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF