Search

232 Background: ctDNA genotyping is increasingly used to evaluate patient eligibility for genomics-driven treatments ( e.g., PARP inhibitors) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but low ctDNA-fraction (ctDNA%) causes false negatives and is unpredictable. We investigated whether a machine-learning model exploiting routine clinical prognostic markers can predict if a mCRPC patient will have sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA testing. Methods: We analysed plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) collected at baseline prior to first-line therapy from 463 consecutive mCRPC patients. ctDNA% was quantified using somatic allele frequencies and genome-wide copy number profiles via deep targeted sequencing. We built an XGBoost model (70:30 train-test split) using 18 clinical factors to predict synchronously measured ctDNA% (binary classification >2% or ≤2%, i.e., the conventional ctDNA% limit of detection for mutations employed by commercial tests), with performance evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics. Results: Median age was 73 (range: 45-98) and 86% of patients had ECOG 0-1. Median ctDNA% was 5% (range: 0-89%) and correlated with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden, including total cfDNA concentration (ng/mL of plasma, reflecting cfDNA released by both normal and tumor cells; Spearman ρ=0.55), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) per upper limit of normal (ULN) ( ρ=0.46), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) per ULN ( ρ=0.41), PSA ( ρ=0.3), presence of liver metastases, and ≥10 bone lesions. We trained an XGBoost model incorporating these and 13 additional clinical factors achieving an AUC for ctDNA >2% of 0.83 (F1 score: 0.79). SHAP interpretability scores indicated that cfDNA concentration most strongly informed prediction of ctDNA >2%, followed by ALP/ULN and PSA—consistent with our prior bivariate rank correlations—whereas features associated with initial prostate cancer diagnosis (Gleason Grade Group, de novo versus metachronous M1 disease) were less informative. Recognizing that comprehensive and standardised clinical annotation is not always available in real-world settings, we built a secondary parsimonious ctDNA%-prediction tool restricted to 8 highly informative and clinically practical factors (cfDNA concentration, ALP/ULN, LDH/ULN, PSA, albumin, ECOG, liver metastases, lung metastases) and flexible to incomplete input data, achieving a comparable AUC for ctDNA>2% of 0.76. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a machine learning framework to estimate ctDNA% in patients with mCRPC. This point-of-care tool would enable prioritisation of mCRPC patients for ctDNA somatic genotyping with a predicted ctDNA >2%, versus tissue or germline-only testing in patients with a predicted ctDNA ≤2%.

407 Background: Active surveillance is routinely recommended to manage patients (pts) with clinical stage I (CSI) germ cell testicular tumors (GCT), the most common presentation of newly diagnosed GCT. Circulating plasma miR371a-3p (miR371) has shown high sensitivity and specificity in pts with metastatic non teratoma GCT or in pts with clinically detectable testicular GCT prior to orchiectomy. However, limited data are available about this biomarker accuracy to detect minimal residual disease post-orchiectomy in pts on active surveillance for early stage disease. Methods: CSI GCT pts with available plasma samples after radical orchiectomy enrolled in the British Columbia provincial biobank research program were selected for this study. RT-PCR was used for qualitative miR371 analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV) and AUC in predicting tumor recurrence were evaluated for miR371 and compared to the same operating characteristics of current gold standard diagnostic tests. Relapse free survival (RFS) was correlated to post-orchiectomy miR371 (positive or negative) status. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity, unpaired t-test for comparison of miR371 expression. RFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were estimated using the log rank test, 2-sided and with 5% significance threshold. Results: With a median follow-up of 41 months, 101 pts with CSI GTCwere included, of whom 35 (34.6%) experienced a disease relapse during the follow-up. miR371 was positive in 22/35 (62.8%) of the relapsed pts. miR371 positivity preceded clinical evident disease by a median of 3 months (range: 1-12 months).The specificity and PPV were 100% (95% CI: 94.5 - 100 for both), sensitivity 62.8% (95% CI: 44.9 - 78.5), NPV 83.5% (95% CI: 76.7 - 88.6) and AUC 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71 - 0.91). No false positive results were observed. The RFS of the pts with positive post-orchiectomy miR371 was significantly shorter (median: 3.5 months vs. not reached; p seminoma). Conclusions: miR371 has high specificity and PPV in detecting GCT at an early stage and could be used to guide treatment selection after orchiectomy. Further studies, including the SWOG S1823 clinical trial, are ongoing or have been planned in this setting for validation of clinical utility.

646 Background: Currently available first-line treatment regimens for mRCC include pembrolizumab-axitinib (ICI-TKI) and ipilimumab-nivolumab (ICI-ICI). Although both regimens are superior to sunitinib, direct comparisons between ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI are lacking and real-world data are sparse. Methods: Through BC Cancer pharmacy data and patient access programs queries, we identified 319 mRCC patients who were treated with first line ICI-TKI or ICI-ICI between May 2019 and March 2022. Patients’ charts were reviewed for baseline characteristics, including International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria, pharmacy data, pathology and radiology reports, treatment toxicity, rationale for treatment choice when available, progression and survival outcomes. Treatment groups were compared using standard descriptive statistics; survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan Meier and Cox Regression analyses. Results: Among the first 214 patients, 64.9% and 35.1% received first line ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI, respectively. The most commonly cited reason for choosing ICI-ICI was unavailability of a publicly funded alternative at the time of prescription. IMDC risk group distribution was markedly different between regimens; in ICI-TKI patients, favorable, intermediate and poor-risk patients respectively represented 60.3%, 28.8% and 10.9%, versus 10.2%, 56.9% and 32.9% in ICI-ICI patients (p

170 Background: In the primary analysis of the phase 3 MAGNITUDE study, NIRA/AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations. Here, we report results from IA2 of secondary endpoints in MAGNITUDE. Methods: 423 eligible pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations (HRR+ cohort) were randomized 1:1 to receive NIRA/AAP (n = 212) or placebo (PBO)/AAP (n = 211). At the prespecified IA2, secondary endpoints (time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC], time to symptomatic progression [TSP], overall survival [OS]) were formally assessed and the primary rPFS endpoint was updated in the HRR+ cohort, with sensitivity analysis performed for the subgroup of pts with BRCA alterations. Results: Updated descriptive rPFS results at IA2 (cutoff: June 17, 2022) were consistent with the primary analysis in the HRR+ cohort. In the BRCA subgroup, NIRA/AAP extended median rPFS to 19.5 mos vs 10.9 mos with PBO/AAP. NIRA/AAP led to statistically significant benefit in TSP in the HRR+ cohort with consistent benefit in the BRCA subgroup. Continued consistent improvement of TCC was seen with NIRA/AAP in the HRR+ cohort and in the BRCA subgroup. There was a trend towards improved OS with NIRA/AAP in the BRCA subgroup in the primary stratified analysis and the multivariate analysis (MVA), accounting for imbalances in key baseline characteristics. BRCA pts treated with NIRA/AAP experienced delayed time to worst pain intensity (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44, 1.12; nominal P = 0.1338) and pain interference (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40, 1.12; nominal P = 0.1275) compared to PBO/AAP. The safety profile at IA2 was consistent with that of the primary analysis, with no new safety signals observed. Conclusions: With 26.8 months of median follow-up, there was a statistically significant and meaningful clinical benefit in TSP and meaningful clinical benefit in TCC. Additionally, updated rPFS results from MAGNITUDE IA2 were consistent with the primary analysis; OS benefit was not conclusive due to immaturity and will be followed through to final analysis. Taken together, these data continue to support the use of NIRA/AAP in pts with mCRPC and BRCA alterations or select other HRR gene alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641 . [Table: see text]

177 Background: EPI-7386 is a next generation aniten, a novel class of compounds designed to inhibit androgen receptor (AR) activity by binding to the N-terminal domain. Preclinical data supports disruption of AR regulated gene transcription even in the presence of resistance mechanisms including ligand-binding domain point mutations and truncated splice variants. Here we report results of the Part 1a first-in-human trial of EPI-7386 in mCRPC (NCT04421222). Methods: This Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation (Part 1a) and expansion (Part 1b) trial was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of EPI-7386 in mCRPC patients (pts) progressing on standard of care treatment, including next generation antiandrogen(s) and chemotherapy. Originally designed to assess up to 5 doses of EPI-7386 (200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 mg QD), two additional cohorts were added examining 400 and 600 mg BID due to 600 mg QD showing exposure saturation while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Results: 31 pts were enrolled in the QD cohorts and 8 in the BID cohorts. Pts had a median of 4 lines of prior therapy for mCRPC: 83% received abiraterone and at least one next generation AR inhibitor, and 58% had at least one line of prior chemotherapy. No DLTs were observed; EPI-7386 was safe and well tolerated at all doses/schedules evaluated. All related adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1 and 2 and consistent with AEs associated with second-generation antiandrogens. For doses above 400 mg QD, exposures were at or above those associated with antitumor activity in animal models. Evidence of antitumor activity (including significant and durable PSA responses and/or decreases in ctDNA, and/or radiographically documented tumor shrinkage) were observed in pts with fewer than 3 lines of treatment for mCRPC, no visceral metastases and no prior chemotherapy (9/31 pts). Conclusions: Part 1a treatment with EPI-7386 monotherapy was safe, well tolerated up to a daily dose of 1200 mg (600 mg BID), achieved target clinical exposures and showed preliminary signals of antitumor activity in heavily-pretreated mCRPC. Part 1b is open with enrollment focused on pre-chemotherapy, post-second generation antiandrogen treated mCRPC pts in one cohort, and treatment-naïve non-mCRPC pts in a window of opportunity proof-of-concept second cohort. Two doses will be evaluated (600 mg BID and QD) based on FDA Project Optimus recommendations. Clinical trial information: NCT04421222 .

172 Background: NIRA/AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations, particularly in BRCA, in the phase 3 MAGNITUDE study. As a practical measure, pts were permitted to receive up to 4 mos of AAP (in 1L mCRPC) prior to randomization to allow time for genomic testing. We evaluated the impact of AAP run-in treatment on the efficacy of NIRA/AAP. Methods: 423 pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIRA/AAP or placebo (PBO)/AAP. At the prespecified second interim analysis, a sensitivity analysis based on the duration of AAP run-in was conducted. Pts with BRCA alterations were also analyzed separately. Results: Median duration of prior AAP treatment received was 1.9 (range, 0.3–4.1) mos. Pts receiving AAP ≤2 mos had similar benefit (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS] hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.30]; time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC] HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.24-1.11]; time to symptomatic progression [TSP] HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.13-0.79]; Table) to pts not receiving any prior AAP. rPFS benefit was not demonstrated in pts who had previously received AAP >2 – 4 mos: HR, 1.47 (95% CI, 0.66-3.30). Findings were consistent in the BRCA population. Conclusions: Pts receiving a short run-in (≤2 mos) of AAP alone obtained similar benefit from NIRA/AAP as those who received both NIRA/AAP together for initial treatment of mCRPC. While interpretation of data is limited by the small sample size and event numbers, for pts where NIRA/AAP is being considered as therapy, AAP may be initiated during HRR testing and combination treatment should be initiated expeditiously once HRR positivity is established to attain maximal treatment benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641 . [Table: see text]

PURPOSE Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing provides a minimally invasive method for tumor molecular stratification. Commercial ctDNA sequencing is increasingly used in the clinic, but its accuracy in metastatic prostate cancer is untested. We compared the commercial Guardant360 ctDNA test against an academic sequencing approach for profiling metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Plasma cell-free DNA was collected between September 2016 and April 2018 from 24 patients with clinically progressive metastatic prostate cancer representing a range of clinical scenarios. Each sample was analyzed using Guardant360 and a research panel encompassing 73 prostate cancer genes. Concordance of somatic mutation and copy number calls was evaluated between the two approaches. RESULTS Targeted sequencing independently confirmed 94% of somatic mutations identified by Guardant360 at an allele fraction greater than 1%. AR amplifications and mutations were detected with high concordance in 14 patients, with only three discordant subclonal mutations at an allele fraction lower than 0.5%. Many somatic mutations identified by Guardant360 at an allele fraction lower than 1% seemed to represent subclonal passenger events or non–prostate-derived clones. Most of the non- AR gene amplifications reported by Guardant360 represented single copy gains. The research approach detected several clinically relevant DNA repair gene alterations not reported by Guardant360, including four germline truncating BRCA2/ ATM mutations, two somatic ATM stop gain mutations, one BRCA2 biallelic deletion, 11 BRCA2 stop gain reversal mutations in a patient treated with olaparib, and a hypermutator phenotype in a patient sample with 42 mutations per megabase. CONCLUSION Guardant360 accurately identifies somatic ctDNA mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, but low allele frequency mutations should be interpreted with caution. Test utility in metastatic prostate cancer is currently limited by the lack of reporting on actionable deletions, rearrangements, and germline mutations.

Summary Background Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and enzalutamide are both used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to determine the best sequence in which to use both drugs, as well as their second-line efficacy. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial done in six cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with newly-diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without neuroendocrine differentiation and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated random number table to receive either abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally once daily plus prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily until PSA progression followed by crossover to enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily (group A), or the opposite sequence (group B). Treatment was not masked to investigators or participants. Primary endpoints were time to second PSA progression and PSA response (≥30% decline from baseline) on second-line therapy, analysed by intention-to-treat in all randomly assigned patients and in patients who crossed over, respectively. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02125357 . Findings Between Oct 21, 2014, and Dec 13, 2016, 202 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either group A (n=101) or group B (n=101). At the time of data cutoff, 73 (72%) patients in group A and 75 (74%) patients in group B had crossed over. Time to second PSA progression was longer in group A than in group B (median 19·3 months [95% CI 16·0–30·5] vs 15·2 months [95% CI 11·9–19·8] months; hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·45–0·97, p=0·036), at a median follow-up of 22·8 months (IQR 10·3–33·4). PSA responses to second-line therapy were seen in 26 (36%) of 73 patients for enzalutamide and three (4%) of 75 for abiraterone (χ2 p Interpretation Enzalutamide showed activity as a second-line novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, whereas abiraterone acetate did not, leading to a longer time to second PSA progression for the sequence of abiraterone followed by enzalutamide than with the opposite treatment sequence. Our data suggest that using a sequencing strategy of abiraterone acetate followed by enzalutamide provides the greatest clinical benefit. Funding Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Prostate Cancer Canada, Movember Foundation, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Terry Fox New Frontiers Program, BC Cancer Foundation, Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, Janssen, and Astellas.

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert’s treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. Patient summary In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients.

Olaparib is the first Health Canada-approved agent in metastatic prostate cancer to use a companion diagnostic to identify alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM. As olaparib is introduced, clinicians must learn to access and interpret germline and somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, and how to manage affected patients who appear to have distinct clinical features. The traditional model of referring patients to a hereditary cancer clinic (HCC) for germline testing is likely impractical in this disease, as the metastatic prostate cancer patient population would be overwhelming. Alternate approaches to this are clinician-ordered genetic testing (so-called “mainstreaming”), out-of-pocket payment for third-party private company genetic testing, or germline testing done in conjunction with somatic testing, particularly cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Germline testing alone is not sufficient for identifying Olaparib-eligible patients, as less than half of BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alterations are germline in origin, but it is critically important to identify family members who are carriers so that risk-reduction measures can be undertaken. Somatic testing is not widely available in Canada, but some patients can access it through research protocols or by paying out-of-pocket. Somatic testing can be performed on archival or fresh solid tissue biopsy samples, or through whole blood samples to access plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Both testing approaches have relative advantages and disadvantages, but neither may be informative in all patients and, therefore, ideal somatic NGS pathways should provide options for both tissue and ctDNA testing. We advocate that clinicians begin discussions with their provincial lab formularies, HCC, and molecular pathology labs to highlight the importance of germline and somatic testing in this population and identify pathways for patient access. While olaparib has approval for use in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM-altered mCRPC, emerging evidence suggests that PARP inhibitors have variable activity in these three genes, with BRCA2 alterations appearing to be the most responsive. Retrospective and prospective series have reported varying outcomes to standard of care therapies, such as ARATs and taxane-based chemotherapy, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alterations, such as BRCA2. In the absence of high-level evidence showing a lack of benefit, we believe this patient population should still be considered for these treatments. In addition, platinum-based chemotherapy appears to have activity in DDR gene-altered mCRPC and should be considered another option when access to olaparib is not possible. At present, there is no evidence to support an optimal treatment sequence in this patient population, therefore, physician and patient preferences will need to be taken into consideration when selecting therapies. As olaparib and other PARP inhibitors are tested in different disease states and in combination with other therapies, we will likely see a more refined approach to use of these agents and management of this new biomarker-defined patient population.

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in blood plasma is an emerging tool for clinical cancer genotyping and longitudinal disease monitoring

EPI-506 is the first of a new class of drugs targeting the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the androgen receptor (AR), potentially overcoming known resistance mechanisms to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) among men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).Patients with mCRPC who had progressed on prior ARPI were enrolled in this phase 1 open-label, adaptive 3 + 3 dose escalation study. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability of oral EPI-506. Secondary objectives included determination of the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor efficacy.28 mCRPC patients were enrolled into 7 dose cohorts of EPI-506 ranging from 80-3600 mg given once daily and 1800 mg given twice daily. Six DLTs occurred in 4 patients; Grade 4 elevated amylase; Grade 3 abdominal pain; Grade 3 elevated ALT and Grade 3 elevated AST; Grade 2 nausea and Grade 1 vomiting which resulted in study drug intake of 75% of the expected dose during the DLT assessment period. The most common drug-related adverse events included diarrhea, nausea and fatigue. Six patients had a PSA decline not meeting PSA response criteria. The study was terminated prior to reaching the MTD due to poor oral bioavailability.This phase 1 trial established the safety of EPI-506 and provides proof of concept for targeting the AR NTD. Next generation compounds with improved bioavailability and potency are in clinical development.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The final analysis of TITAN confirmed improvement in long-term outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) with apalutamide (APA) + androgen depri...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The phase 3 TITAN and SPARTAN studies demonstrated improved outcomes with the addition of apalutamide (APA) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); outcomes included prolo...

Ethnicity might be associated with treatment outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with apalutamide in East Asians with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). The original phase 3 Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen (TITAN) trial was conducted at 260 sites in 23 countries. This subgroup analysis included patients enrolled in 62 participating centers in China, Japan, and Korea. Radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and PSA changes from baseline were compared between groups in the East Asian population. The intent-to-treat East Asian population included 111 and 110 participants in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively. The 24-month radiographic PFS rates were 76.1% and 52.3% in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively (apalutamide vs placebo: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.506; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.302-0.849; P = 0.009). Median time to PSA progression was more favorable with apalutamide than placebo (HR = 0.210; 95% CI, 0.124-0.357; P < 0.001). Median maximum percentages of PSA decline from baseline were 99.0% and 73.9% in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively. The most common adverse event (AE) was rash in the apalutamide group, with a higher rate than that in the placebo group (37.3% vs 9.1%). The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs were rash (12 [10.9%]) and hypertension (12 [10.9%]) for apalutamide. The efficacy and safety of apalutamide in the East Asian subgroup of the TITAN trial are consistent with the global results.

Introduction: Rapid progress in diagnostics and therapeutics for the management of prostate cancer (PCa) have created areas where high-level evidence to guide practice is lacking. The Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) conducted its second Canadian consensus forum to address areas of controversy in the management of PCa and provide recommendations to guide treatment. Methods: A panel of PCa specialists discussed topics related to the management of PCa. The core scientific committee finalized the design, questions and the analysis of the consensus results. Attendees then voted to indicate their management choice regarding each statement/topic. Questions for voting were adapted from the 2019 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference. The thresholds for agreement were set at ≥ 75% for ‘consensus agreement’, > 50% for “near-consensus”, and ≤ 50% for “no consensus”. Results: The panel was comprised of 29 PCa experts including urologists (n=12), medical oncologists (n= 12), and radiation oncologists (n= 5). Voting took place for 65 pre-determined questions and three ad hoc questions. Consensus was reached for 34 questions, spanning a variety of areas including biochemical recurrence, treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive PCa, management of non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant PCa, bone health, and molecular profiling. Conclusions: The consensus forum identified areas of consensus or near-consensus in more than half of the questions discussed. Areas of consensus typically aligned with available evidence, and areas of variability may indicate a lack of high-quality evidence and point to future opportunities for further research and education.

PURPOSE Our objective was to evaluate operating characteristics, particularly specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), by mapping plasma miR371 expression to actual clinical events in patients with a history of germ cell tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eleven male patients with a history of or newly diagnosed germ cell tumors were evaluable. Biospecimens obtained before confirmed clinical events were analyzed for miR371 expression with blinding of providers and laboratory personnel to analytic results or clinical status, respectively. Cases (patients with clinically confirmed active germ cell malignancy [aGCM]) and controls (patients with no clinically confirmed aGCM) were assigned over the course of the management. Patients were assigned risk status (high, low, or moderate) based on the composite clinical picture at time points in management. RESULTS Considering all cases and controls and results of prospectively obtained biosamples analyzed for miR371 expression, 46 (35%) of 132 samples had clinically confirmed aGCM over the course of management; 44 (96%) of these 46 patients had plasma miR371 expression (true positives) with no false positives. Two (4%) of 46 patients had no miRNA expression despite pathologic confirmation of aGCM (false negatives). Plasma miR371 expression in confirmed aGCM had a specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 96%, 100%, and 98%, respectively. Interpretation of sensitivity and negative predictive value is limited by modest follow-up. Specificity and sensitivity were 100% and 98%, 100% and 92%, and 100% and 97% in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. CONCLUSION Plasma miR371 expression predicts aGCM with high specificity and positive predictive value. Although other operating characteristics of miR371 await longer follow-up for more complete definition, the findings of a highly specific liquid biopsy strongly support moving forward with large-scale, real-world clinical trials to further define full operating characteristics and to identify clinical utility and areas of patient benefit.

INTRODUCTION: Germline variants in androgen metabolism genes may influence clinical response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in advanced prostate cancer. We sought to investigate the prognostic significance of germline variants in androgen metabolism genes with respect to overall survival (OS) after ADT, and to associate germline variants with tumor genomic features. METHODS: Germline and somatic whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data were evaluated in a cohort of 101 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Survival analyses were performed to identify polymorphisms associated with impaired OS after primary ADT. Germline variants found to be prognostic of OS were associated with tumor somatic DNA-sequence alterations based on WGS performed on paired metastasis biopsies from the same 101 patients. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed based on tumor RNA-sequencing data to identify genomic pathways differentially expressed in patients with germline variants. RESULTS: A comprehensive literature review identified 17 candidate polymorphisms in nine androgen metabolism genes that have been previously shown to have an association with response to ADT in prostate cancer. Of these, the variant rs1856888 allele located 13kb upstream of HSD3B1 was found to be significantly associated with impaired OS (P=0.029). Variant rs1856888 was commonly co-inherited with the well-characterized HSD3B1(1245A>C) polymorphism, and there was a trend towards shorter median OS in patients with HSD3B1(1245A>C) compared to homozygous wild-type patients (P=0.052). While HSD3B1 germline variants were not associated with common somatic tumor DNA alterations, they were associated with increased tumor expression of cell proliferation and cell cycle genes. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a comprehensive assessment of germline variants in androgen metabolism genes and highlights HSD3B1 polymorphisms as prognostic of OS after ADT and associated with an aggressive gene expression tumor profile in mCRPC.

Purpose Increasing the survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) may affect the demand for palliative radiation to bone (PRTB). Our aim was to characterize the use of PRTB in patients who died of PCa in British Columbia between 2003 and 2015. Methods and Materials All patients with a diagnosis of PCa who died during the study period (n = 23,260) were identified from a population-based provincial registry. Patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed. PRTB utilization rate was calculated by year and location. Survival was calculated from the first and the last course of PRTB. Results A total of 5701 patients died of PCa, with a median survival from diagnosis of 5.2 years. The overall PRTB utilization rate was 38.6%, with an increasing trend over time. Multiple courses of PRTB were frequent, with 51% of patients receiving ≥2 courses of PRTB. Of the patients who died of PCa (15.2% of the PRTB cohort), 5.4% received PRTB within the last 4 weeks of life, 60% of whom received multiple fractions. Rural areas had a lower referral rate and lower use of PRTB. Patients with longer survival tended to receive multiple courses of treatment. The median survival after the first course of PRTB increased from 8.2 months in 2003 to 2004 to 9.4 months in 2013 to 2014 (P = .04). Conclusions PRTB is only used in a minority of patients dying of PCa. The majority who die of PCa after PRTB do so within a year of their first course. The use of multifractionation was common in the last 4 weeks of life. Survival after first PRTB increased minimally over time, and additional research is required to identify its association with recent changes in practice. The referral rate and PRTB utilization rate differ between rural and nonrural locations, underlying the importance of accessibility and referral for utilization of PRTB. Investigating other barriers and ensuring equitable access to radiation are needed.

18F-DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-18F-fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid), a prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeting radiotracer, has shown promise as a prostate cancer imaging radiotracer. We evaluated the safety, sensitivity, and impact on patient management of 18F-DCFPyL in the setting of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Methods: Subjects with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy or curative-intent radiotherapy were included in this prospective study. The subjects underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging. The localization and number of lesions were recorded. The uptake characteristics of the 5 most active lesions were measured. A pre- and posttest questionnaire was sent to treating physicians to assess the impact on management. Results: One hundred thirty subjects were evaluated. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT localized recurrent prostate cancer in 60% of cases with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≥0.4 to

Background Several systemic therapeutic options exist for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can molecularly profile metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and can influence decision-making, but remains untested in mCSPC. Objective To determine ctDNA abundance at de novo mCSPC diagnosis and whether ctDNA provides complementary clinically relevant information to a prostate biopsy. Design, setting, and participants We collected plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 53 patients newly diagnosed with mCSPC and, where possible, during treatment. Targeted sequencing was performed on cfDNA and DNA from diagnostic prostate tissue. Results and limitations The median ctDNA fraction was 11% (range 0–84%) among untreated patients but was lower (1.0%, range 0-51%) among patients after short-term (median 22d) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). TP53 mutations and DNA repair defects were identified in 47% and 21% of the cohort, respectively. The concordance for mutation detection in matched samples was 80%. Combined ctDNA and tissue analysis identified potential driver alterations in 94% of patients, whereas ctDNA or prostate biopsy alone was insufficient in 19 cases (36%). Limitations include the use of a narrow gene panel and undersampling of primary disease by prostate biopsy. Conclusions ctDNA provides additional information to a prostate biopsy in men with de novo mCSPC, but ADT rapidly reduces ctDNA availability. Primary tissue and ctDNA share relevant somatic alterations, suggesting that either is suitable for molecular subtyping in de novo mCSPC. The optimal approach for biomarker development should utilize both a tissue and liquid biopsy at diagnosis, as neither captures clinically relevant somatic alterations in all patients. Patient summary In men with advanced prostate cancer, tumor DNA shed into the bloodstream can be measured via a blood test. The information from this test provides complementary information to a prostate needle biopsy and could be used to guide management strategies. Sequencing data were deposited in the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under study identifier EGAS00001003351.

Purpose Several studies have reported that among patients with localized prostate cancer, black men have a shorter overall survival (OS) time than white men, but few data exist for men with advanced prostate cancer. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare the OS in black and white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated in phase III clinical trials with docetaxel plus prednisone (DP) or a DP-containing regimen. Methods Individual participant data from 8,820 men with mCRPC randomly assigned in nine phase III trials to DP or a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race was based on self-report. The primary end point was OS. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic importance of race (black v white) adjusted for established risk factors common across the trials (age, prostate-specific antigen, performance status, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and sites of metastases). Results Of 8,820 men, 7,528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 (5%) were Asian, and 368 (4%) were of unknown race. Black men were younger and had worse performance status, higher testosterone and prostate-specific antigen, and lower hemoglobin than white men. Despite these differences, the median OS was 21.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 22.5 months) versus 21.2 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 21.7 months) in black and white men, respectively. The pooled multivariable hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91) demonstrates that overall, black men have a statistically significant decreased risk of death compared with white men ( P < .001). Conclusion When adjusted for known prognostic factors, we observed a statistically significant increased OS in black versus white men with mCRPC who were enrolled in these clinical trials. The mechanism for these differences is not known.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood plasma is an emerging tool for clinical cancer genotyping and longitudinal disease monitoring. However, integration of ctDNA tests into clinical management is critically impeded by the poor understanding of the distinct somatic populations comprising bulk ctDNA—including their relationship to synchronous metastatic tissue, and their temporal dynamics during standard-of-care treatment. Prior approaches relying on targeted and/or low-resolution techniques (e.g. targeted exon sequencing, low-pass (shallow) whole-genome sequencing; WGS) do not permit comprehensive dissection of clonal architecture and unbiased analysis of putative resistance mechanisms. Methods: We performed deep WGS on serial plasma ctDNA (median depth: 185×) and synchronous metastatic tissue biopsies with high tumor purity from 35 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We developed a subclonal reconstruction algorithm optimized for our data enabling resolution of per-patient evolutionary histories and ctDNA clonal composition. ctDNA nucleosome footprinting was used to infer mRNA abundance in synchronously biopsied metastases and androgen receptor (AR) transcription factor activity at 3224 AR binding sites (ARBS). Results: We comprehensively assess all classes of genomic alterations and demonstrate that ctDNA harbors greater populational heterogeneity than metastatic tissue (pT aging-associated mutation signature during subclonal differentiation. Although driver alterations were largely concordant between tissue and ctDNA, each individual metastasis contributed only a minor share of total ctDNA (average ctDNA contribution: 17%). By comparing serial ctDNA before and after clinical progression on potent AR pathway inhibitors, we reveal population restructuring converging solely on AR copy augmentation as the dominant genomic driver of acquired treatment-resistance. Nucleosome depletion at transcription start-sites is highly correlated with same-patient metastatic tissue mRNA abundance, indicating that ctDNA fragmentomics can recapitulate transcriptomic patterns in metastatic lesions. Most ctDNA samples exhibited strong ARBS nucleosome depletion which correlated with AR gene copy number (R=0.36, p=0.003). Finally, serial ctDNA nucleosome profiling at ARBS revealed adaptive transcriptomic resistance to AR pathway inhibitors, including lineage switch to a neuroendocrine-like (AR-low) state. Conclusions: We show that the populations comprising ctDNA are typically complex and more heterogeneous than those found in bulk WGS of a synchronous metastasis. Our work advocates for liquid biopsy as a comprehensive multi-omic discovery tool for cancers with high ctDNA fractions. Citation Format: Cameron Herberts, Matti Annala, Joonatan Sipola, Sarah W. Ng, Xinyi E. Chen, Anssi Nurminen, Olga Korhonen, Aslı D. Munzur, Kevin Beja, Elena Schönlau, Cecily Q. Bernales, Elie Ritch, Jack V. Bacon, Nathan A. Lack, Matti Nykter, Rahul Aggarwal, Eric J. Small, Martin E. Gleave, David A. Quigley, Felix Y. Feng, Kim N. Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt. Clonal architecture and evolution of treatment-resistant prostate cancer via deep whole-genome ctDNA sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3625.

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease and genomic subtyping offers an opportunity to better understand underlying disease biology. Here, we performed transcriptional profiling by RNA-Seq (n=582) and targeted genomic sequencing by FoundationONE CDx (n=743) from prostate cancer tumor specimens in the phase III IPATential150 trial of first-line ipatasertib (Ipat) plus abiraterone (Abi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (N=1101). Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis of the 582 samples with RNA-Seq with Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) reveals four consensus subtypes. This includes an immune/cell cycle-high, an AR signature/cell cycle-high, a stroma program-enriched, and an ERG fusion-enriched subtype. Subgroups of patients with immune/cell cycle-high and AR signature/cell cycle-high tumors had the shortest radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and were characterized by high MYC and cell cycle-related gene signatures. Patients with AR signature/cell cycle-high tumors showed the greatest increase in rPFS with Ipat + Abi vs. Placebo (Pbo) + Abi (HR = 0.58). Cluster n Enriched processes Median rPFS (Pbo + Abi) (months, 95% CI) Median rPFS (Ipat + Abi) (months, 95% CI) HR (95% CI) NMF1 84 Immune processes, metabolism, cell cycle 10.3 (8.3 - 12.7) 13.9 (10.9 - 16.4) 0.77 (0.47 - 1.28) NMF2 165 Androgen response signature, cell cycle, MYC signature 11.9 (8.8 - 16.5) 20.9 (16.4 - NA) 0.58 (0.38 - 0.90) NMF3 156 Fibroblast, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, TGFb 20.0 (16.4 - NA) 22.3 (15.6 - 24.9) 0.96 (0.59 - 1.56) NMF4 177 ERG fusion 18.4 (13.8 - 23.8) 24.7 (16.2 - NA) 0.78 (0.50 - 1.20) Citation Format: Zhen Shi, Malgorzata Nowicka, Johann de Bono, Kim N. Chi, Christopher Sweeney, Cora N. Sternberg, David Olmos, Sergio Bracarda, Christophe Massard, Nobuaki Matsubara, Josep Garcia, Geng Chen, Matthew Wongchenko, Shahneen K. Sandhu. Molecular subtyping in prostate cancer associate with outcomes to abiraterone and ipatasertib treatment from the phase III IPATential150 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6317.

5066 Background: TITAN, a phase 3 PBO-controlled study in patients (pts) with mCSPC, showed APA + ADT improved radiographic progression-free survival and OS vs PBO + ADT. In this exploratory analysis, we report the relationships between biomarkers and OS in TITAN. Methods: Circulating tumor (ct)DNA and genomic aberrations in 17 PC-related genes, including androgen receptor (AR), were assessed at baseline (BL; 114 pts) and end of study treatment (EOST; 129 pts) using next-generation sequencing. ctDNA was assessed qualitatively; genomic aberrations were assessed within ctDNA-positive samples as inactivation (heterozygous/homozygous deletion or single nucleotide variant [SNV]) or activation (amplification or SNV). Associations of detected ctDNA/aberrations at BL or EOST with OS, and biomarkers at EOST with OS on subsequent therapies, were evaluated using univariate or multivariate analyses and Cox proportional hazards model; results were stratified by treatment arm. Results: Among pts from both treatment groups, 36% had detectable ctDNA, of which 27% had any genomic AR aberration and 24% had AR gene amplification at BL; prevalence of these biomarkers increased significantly from BL to EOST (Table). The most prevalent non-AR aberrations at BL ( TP53, homologous recombination repair [HRR] pathway, PTEN, RB1, and PIK3CA genes) increased at EOST but not significantly (Table). Among assessed aberrations, presence of ctDNA or any AR genomic aberrations at BL (HR, 1.9 or 6.7; all p < 0.05) and any AR genomic aberrations or PI3K pathway activation at EOST (1.7, p < 0.05 or 2.2, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with poor OS in multivariate analyses from both treatment groups. In univariate analyses of pts who received subsequent therapy (chemotherapy: 106; hormonal therapy: 161), worse OS was associated only with PIK3CA activation, PI3K pathway activation, or TP53 inactivation at EOST (3.7, p < 0.05; 2.4, p < 0.05; 3.0, p < 0.01, respectively) in chemo-treated pts. A small sample size in some biomarker subgroups limits interpretation. Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating data from TITAN show that presence of ctDNA or select AR and non-AR biomarkers at BL or EOST were associated with poor OS. The predictive value of these biomarkers for survival in mCSPC needs further confirmation. Clinical trial information: NCT02489318. [Table: see text]

TPS5110 Background: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 improves outcome in men with metastatic, PSMA positive CRPC post androgen pathway inhibitor therapy and taxane chemotherapy compared to standard care (excluding chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radium-223 and investigational drugs; Sartor et al, NEJM 2021). The relative efficacy, adverse event experience and impact on QOL of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 compared to docetaxel chemotherapy in this patient population is unknown. We hypothesize that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 will improve radiographic PFS (rPFS) compared to docetaxel chemotherapy with a favourable safety and tolerability profile. Methods: CCTG PR21 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group randomized phase II trial with a primary objective to compare rPFS between [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7.4 GBq (+/- 10%) IV q 6 weekly (maximum 6 cycles) versus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q 3 weekly (maximum 12 cycles). Secondary objectives are to compare the two arms with respect to: 6-month PFS rate (PCWG3 and RECIST 1.1), second rPFS after crossover to the alternate therapy, time to commencement of 3rd line systemic therapy, OS, PSA decline from baseline, clinical benefit rate and adverse events. Tertiary objectives include evaluation of QOL (FACT-P and EQ5D-5L), cost effectiveness, ctDNA and radiographic based prognostic and predictive biomarkers, dosimetry based approach to measurement of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 activity and creation of tissue and image biobanks. Key eligibility criteria include: mCRPC with PSMA positive disease using 18F or 68Ga radionuclide label, progression on ADT + ARPI therapy (using PSA, RECIST 1.1 or PCWG3 criteria) and adequate organ function. Statistical Design: Patients are allocated in 1:1 ratio to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or docetaxel balanced for stratification factors of ECOG PS, LDH, visceral metastases, previous docetaxel in the castration sensitive setting > 1 year prior to enrollment as well as centre. Assuming a 6-month median rPFS for the control group, the detection of a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 with 80% power using a 1-sided 5% level test will require accrual of 200 participants in 24 months with 12-month follow-up to trigger the primary analysis. Conduct to Date: Study activation Dec 17 2020. Enrollment as of January 31 2022: 25. The DSMC last reviewed and recommended continuation of the trial in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04663997.

5060 Background: Results from the international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 MAGNITUDE study demonstrated that NIRA + AAP improved radiographic progression-free survival, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and time to symptomatic progression, with manageable toxicity in pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations (9-gene panel). Here, we report HRQoL and pain in MAGNITUDE. Methods: Eligible pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations were randomized 1:1 to NIRA + AAP or placebo (PBO) + AAP orally daily in 28-day cycles. Pts had ECOG status ≤1 and a Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score ≤3 in prescreening. HRQoL assessments on day 1 of specified cycles included Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P) and BPI-SF. Changes from baseline were compared between treatment arms using repeated measures analysis. Proportional hazards regression models were used to compare time to deterioration (TTD) in worst pain intensity between arms. Results: Compliance for FACT-P and BPI-SF was > 80%. Most pts maintained low pain levels over time. Repeated measures analyses showed no clinically meaningful differences in pain over time or between arms. Median TTD in pain intensity was not reached in either arm. At the 25th percentile, there was a trend toward longer TTD in pain intensity with NIRA + AAP vs PBO + AAP (11.1 vs 10.1 mo; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61-1.24). HRQoL was maintained with NIRA + AAP, with no clinically meaningful differences in FACT-P total score over time or between arms. There was a trend toward greater worsening in early cycles on FACT-P physical wellbeing with NIRA + AAP vs PBO + AAP, driven by events within the known safety profile of NIRA + AAP (worsening of side effect bother, lack of energy, and nausea); however, overall, most pts reported minimal side effect burden (Table). Conclusions: In MAGNITUDE, most pts maintained low pain levels and positive HRQoL over time, with no clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms, further supporting the use of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations. Side effect burden was perceived as low in both arms. Although more pts on NIRA+AAP reported worsening side effects, the symptoms were generally perceived as mild. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641. [Table: see text]

5056 Background: Ipat + abiraterone (abi) significantly reduced the risk of radiographic disease progression vs placebo (pbo) + abi in pts with mCRPC and PTEN loss tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC; HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.98; P=0.034) but not in ITT pts (HR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.99; P=0.043; Sweeney Lancet 2021). A greater risk reduction was seen in pts with PTEN loss by NGS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.95). We describe the efficacy and safety of pbo + abi vs ipat + abi at the second interim analysis (IA) of overall survival (OS) and explore the impact of AKT pathway alterations. Methods: Pts with mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to ipat (400 mg/d) + abi (1000 mg/d) + prednisone (5 mg bid) or pbo + abi + prednisone. Coprimary endpoints were investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria in pts with PTEN loss tumors by IHC (PTEN loss in ≥50% of tumor cells) and in ITT pts. Secondary endpoints in both populations included OS, objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and PCWG3 and time to pain progression (TPP). Ad hoc analyses assessed pts with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN alterations by NGS vs wildtype (WT). Results: Median follow-up was 31 mo (cutoff: 2021 Sept 30). In PTEN loss by IHC pts, median OS was 35.8 mo (n=261) with pbo + abi and 36.8 mo (n=260) with ipat + abi (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.21; P=0.665); in ITT pts, median OS was 36.7 mo (n=554) with pbo + abi and 40.3 mo (n=547) with ipat + abi (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.07). With longer follow-up, the safety profile was consistent with that of the primary analysis. In the full NGS evaluable population (n=743), ipat + abi was associated with better outcomes in pts with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN alterations (Table). Among pts with PTEN loss tumors by NGS (205 of the evaluable 518 pts), median OS was 29.8 mo (n=102) with pbo + abi and 35.8 mo (n=103) with ipat + abi (unstratified HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.19). Conclusions: At the second IA, no significant improvement in OS was observed with ipat + abi in pts with PTEN loss by IHC. Exploratory analyses in pts with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN alterations by NGS suggest that these patients have poorer prognosis but may derive greater benefit from ipat + abi. Clinical trial information: NCT03072238. [Table: see text]

5020 Background: NIRA + AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations in the Phase 3 MAGNTUDE study. There is a paucity of data supporting use of PARP inhibitors in pts with HRR gene alterations other than BRCA1/2. We report on the efficacy of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and a qualifying single gene HRR alteration other than BRCA1/2. Methods: A pre-specified analysis was undertaken of the primary endpoint (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS] by BICR), secondary endpoints (time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC], time to symptomatic progression [TSP], overall survival [OS]), as well as time to PSA progression (TPSA) and overall response rate (ORR) across 186 pts (91 randomized to NIRA + AAP, 95 to PBO + AAP) with an alteration in the ATM, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, or PALB2 gene (excluding cooccurring alterations) . This analysis of individual alterations was not powered for formal statistical inference. Given the rarity of some alterations, groups based on functional similarity are also presented. Results: (Table). Pts with PALB2 or CHEK2 alterations had consistent improvement across all endpoints. In pts with ATM alterations benefit was observed in TCC, TSP, TPSA and ORR. There was benefit only in TPSA and ORR for pts with CDK12 alterations. When combined into functional groups, pts with an alteration in the HRR-Fanconi pathway ( BRIP1, FANCA, and PALB2) as well as pts with a HRR associated alteration ( CHEK2 or HDAC2) showed improvement in all endpoints. Conclusions: These data support the overall conclusions of the MAGNITUDE primary analysis and support benefit of NIRA + AAP in pts with HRR mutations beyond BRCA1/2. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641. [Table: see text]

5055 Background: Deleterious alterations in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) TP53, RB1, and PTEN are potential markers of small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (SCNP), and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) resistance. We examined the outcomes and clinical features of mCRPC patients (pts) harboring biallelic loss in 0, 1, 2 or all 3 TSGs. Methods: We identified 210 consecutive mCRPC pts providing ≥1 plasma cell-free DNA sample with ≥20% circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) during their mCRPC disease course. ctDNA% ≥20% enabled sensitive characterization of biallelic TSG loss (including by homozygous deletions and mutation plus somatic loss-of-heterozygosity; LOH). Patient records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, SCNP histology, and presence of liver metastases. We investigated associations between TSG loss and the following clinical outcomes: PSA response (PSA decline ≥50% (PSA50 RR)), progression free survival (PFS) on 1L therapy, and overall survival (OS) from 1L therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 0.4-112.4) and OS event rate was 95%. Median age at 1L mCRPC was 71 years (range: 48-98). Most pts were ECOG PS 0-1 (79%) and 13% had liver metastases. 91% received ARPI for 1L mCRPC and 7% received ARPI for castration-sensitive disease. TP53 was primarily inactivated by somatic mutation plus LOH (90%), whereas RB1 (71%) and PTEN (86%) were more commonly inactivated by homozygous deletions. Compared to pts without evidence of biallelic TSG loss, pts with loss of 3 TSGs were significantly enriched for de-novo M1 disease (86 vs. 60%, p=0.05) and liver metastases (28.5 vs. 6.8%, p

Background Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA+P), when added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival and disease progression over dual placebos added to ADT in the LATITUDE clinical trial (NCT01715285). The objective of this study was to assess event-driven medical resource utilization (MRU) of ADT plus AA+P (ADT+AA+P) versus ADT plus dual placebos (ADT+placebos) in LATITUDE. Methods Event-driven MRU data from LATITUDE while patients were on treatment were used for analyses. Types of MRU included overnight hospitalizations and length of stay (LOS), emergency room (ER) visits, radiotherapy, surgery, imaging, and specialist and general practitioner (GP) visits. Rates by treatment (per 100 person-years) and rate ratios comparing ADT+AA+P with ADT+placebos were estimated with zero-inflated Poisson regression. The difference in the average hospital LOS between arms was assessed with repeated measures regression analyses. Reasons for hospitalization were explored. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Results A total of 1199 patients were enrolled in LATITUDE. Significantly lower rates of hospitalization (a 24% reduction), imaging (a 36% reduction), and radiotherapy (a 50% reduction) were observed with ADT+AA+P versus ADT+placebos. There was a nonsignificant trend of lower rates of specialist visits and surgery. The rates of ER and GP visits and the average LOS per hospitalization episode were similar across arms. The most common hospitalization reasons were genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and respiratory tract symptoms/disorders. The results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Adding AA+P to ADT does not increase MRU and leads to lower rates of hospitalization, imaging, and radiotherapy. This likely reflects the more favorable clinical outcomes with ADT+AA+P therapy.

Recent innovations in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer have improved patient outcomes. Nonetheless, this disease remains fatal and additional treatment approaches are needed. Greater understanding of the molecular landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has revealed recurrent alterations in key pathways amenable to therapeutic targeting. One such pathway is DNA repair, particularly alterations in genes directly or indirectly associated with homologous recombination repair found in up to one-quarter of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Olaparib, an inhibitor of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, has recently gained approval for the treatment of mCRPC harboring alterations in homologous recombination repair genes. This review will provide a summary of evidence regarding PARP inhibition in the treatment of mCRPC, with a specific focus on olaparib.Lay abstract The genetic material in cells, called DNA, is continually exposed to factors which can damage it. This damage must be corrected, which is done through specific DNA damage repair pathways. Mutations, which can be inheritable or arise just in the cancer itself, can occur in genes involved in DNA damage repair that impair the repair process. In 20–30% of prostate cancers, mutations are involved in genes associated with the homologous recombination repair pathway which can be taken advantage of for therapeutic effect by targeting an alternate repair pathway involving a protein called PARP. Olaparib, an inhibitor of PARP, was recently shown to improve outcomes in patients with advanced, metastatic prostate cancer harboring mutations in homologous recombination repair genes and subsequently gained approval for the treatment of such patients. This review will provide a summary of evidence regarding PARP inhibition in the treatment of prostate cancer, with a specific focus on olaparib.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains fatal despite recent advances. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lutetium-177 ((177)Lu)–PSMA-617 is a radioligand therapy that delivers beta-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment. METHODS: We conducted an international, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating (177)Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with at least one androgen-receptor–pathway inhibitor and one or two taxane regimens and who had PSMA-positive gallium-68 ((68)Ga)–labeled PSMA-11 positron-emission tomographic–computed tomographic scans. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either (177)Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for four to six cycles) plus protocol-permitted standard care or standard care alone. Protocol-permitted standard care excluded chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radium-223 ((223)Ra), and investigational drugs. The alternate primary end points were imaging-based progression-free survival and overall survival, which were powered for hazard ratios of 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Key secondary end points were objective response, disease control, and time to symptomatic skeletal events. Adverse events during treatment were those occurring no more than 30 days after the last dose and before subsequent anticancer treatment. RESULTS: From June 2018 to mid-October 2019, a total of 831 of 1179 screened patients underwent randomization. The baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. The median follow-up was 20.9 months. (177)Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard care significantly prolonged, as compared with standard care, both imaging-based progression-free survival (median, 8.7 vs. 3.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.40; 99.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.57; P

Molecular stratification can improve the management of advanced cancers, but requires relevant tumor samples. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is poised to benefit given a recent expansion of treatment options and its high genomic heterogeneity. We profile minimally-invasive plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples from 104 mUC patients, and compare to same-patient tumor tissue obtained during invasive surgery. Patient ctDNA abundance is independently prognostic for overall survival in patients initiating first-line systemic therapy. Importantly, ctDNA analysis reproduces the somatic driver genome as described from tissue-based cohorts. Furthermore, mutation concordance between ctDNA and matched tumor tissue is 83.4%, enabling benchmarking of proposed clinical biomarkers. While 90% of mutations are identified across serial ctDNA samples, concordance for serial tumor tissue is significantly lower. Overall, our exploratory analysis demonstrates that genomic profiling of ctDNA in mUC is reliable and practical, and mitigates against disease undersampling inherent to studying archival primary tumor foci. We urge the incorporation of cell-free DNA profiling into molecularly-guided clinical trials for mUC. In metastatic urothelial carcinoma, it has not been established whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can replace archival primary tissue to assess mutations and biomarkers. Here, the authors show high mutation concordance between ctDNA and tumour tissue, with high consistency in serial samples.

LBA4 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advances, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains invariably fatal. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in mCRPC lesions. 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a targeted radioligand therapy that delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and surrounding microenvironment. Method: VISION was an international, randomized, open-label phase III study evaluating 177Lu-PSMA-617 in men with PSMA-positive mCRPC previously treated with next-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibition and 1–2 taxane regimens. PSMA positivity (threshold greater than liver) was determined by central review of 68Ga-PSMA-11 scans. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks x 6 cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone. SOC was investigator determined but excluded cytotoxic chemotherapy and radium-223. The alternate primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) using PCWG3 criteria by independent central review (ICR) and overall survival (OS). Under the null hypothesis, median rPFS was assumed to be 4 months and OS 10 months for 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC for a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.00. Under the alternative hypothesis, median rPFS was assumed to be 6 months for a HR of 0.67 and median OS was assumed to be 13.7 months for a HR of 0.7306. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR), and time to first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE). Results: Between 4 June 2018 and 23 October 2019, 831 of 1179 screened patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC (n = 551) or SOC only (n = 280). Median study follow-up was 20.9 months at the data cut-off (27 January 2021). Treatment groups were balanced in terms of demographics and baseline characteristics. 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC significantly improved rPFS versus SOC alone (median rPFS, 8.7 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.40 [99.2% CI: 0.29, 0.57]; p < 0.001, one-sided). The alternate primary endpoint of OS was also significantly improved versus SOC alone (median OS, 15.3 vs 11.3 months; HR, 0.62 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.74]; p < 0.001, one-sided). All key secondary endpoints were statistically significant between the treatment arms in favor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC, including ICR-determined ORR (29.8% vs 1.7%), ICR-determined DCR (89.0% vs 66.7%) and time to first SSE (median time, 11.5 vs 6.8 months; HR, 0.50). While a higher rate of high-grade treatment-emergent adverse events was observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (52.7% vs 38.0%), therapy was well tolerated. Conclusions: 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC treatment is a well-tolerated regimen that improves rPFS and prolongs OS compared with SOC alone in men with advanced-stage PSMA-positive mCRPC, supporting its adoption as a standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT03511664.

Background: The PI3K/AKT and androgen-receptor pathways are dysregulated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPCs); tumours with functional PTEN-loss status have hyperactivated AKT signalling. Dual pathway inhibition with AKT inhibitor ipatasertib plus abiraterone might have greater benefit than abiraterone alone. We aimed to compare ipatasertib plus abiraterone with placebo plus abiraterone in patients with previously untreated mCRPC with or without tumour PTEN loss. Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 200 sites across 26 countries or regions. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC who had progressive disease and Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1; permuted block method) to receive ipatasertib (400 mg once daily orally) plus abiraterone (1000 mg once daily orally) and prednisolone (5 mg twice a day orally) or placebo plus abiraterone and prednisolone (with the same dosing schedule). Patients received study treatment until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal from the study, or study completion. Stratification factors were previous taxane-based therapy for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, type of progression, presence of visceral metastasis, and tumour PTEN-loss status by immunohistochemistry. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to the treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were investigator-assessed radiographical progression-free survival in the PTEN-loss-by-immunohistochemistry population and in the intention-to-treat population. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03072238. Findings: Between June 30, 2017, and Jan 17, 2019, 1611 patients were screened for eligibility and 1101 (68%) were enrolled; 554 (50%) were assigned to the placebo–abiraterone group and 547 (50%) to the ipatasertib–abiraterone group. At data cutoff (March 16, 2020), median follow-up duration was 19 months (range 0–33). In the 521 (47%) patients who had tumours with PTEN loss by immunohistochemistry (261 in the placebo–abiraterone group and 260 in the ipatasertib–abiraterone group), median radiographical progression-free survival was 16·5 months (95% CI 13·9–17·0) in the placebo–abiraterone group and 18·5 months (16·3–22·1) in the ipatasertib–abiraterone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·77 [95% CI 0·61–0·98]; p=0·034; significant at α=0·04). In the intention-to-treat population, median progression-free survival was 16·6 months (95% CI 15·6–19·1) in the placebo–abiraterone group and 19·2 months (16·5–22·3) in the ipatasertib–abiraterone group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·71–0·99]; p=0·043; not significant at α=0·01). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 213 (39%) of 546 patients in the placebo–abiraterone group and in 386 (70%) of 551 patients in the ipatasertib–abiraterone group; adverse events leading to discontinuation of placebo or ipatasertib occurred in 28 (5%) in the placebo–abiraterone group and 116 (21%) in the ipatasertib–abiraterone group. Deaths due to adverse events deemed related to treatment occurred in two patients (

Purpose To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer. Results Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib–apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib–AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC. Trial registration no. NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Purpose:Autoantibody responses in cancer are of great interest, as they may be concordant with T-cell responses to cancer antigens or predictive of response to cancer immunotherapies. Thus, we sought to characterize the antibody landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).Experimental Design:Serum antibody epitope repertoire analysis (SERA) was performed on patient serum to identify tumor-specific neoepitopes. Somatic mutation–specific neoepitopes were investigated by associating serum epitope enrichment scores with whole-genome sequencing results from paired solid tumor metastasis biopsies and germline blood samples. A protein-based immunome-wide association study (PIWAS) was performed to identify significantly enriched epitopes, and candidate serum antibodies enriched in select patients were validated by ELISA profiling. A distinct cohort of patients with melanoma was evaluated to validate the top cancer-specific epitopes.Results:SERA was performed on 1,229 serum samples obtained from 72 men with mCRPC and 1,157 healthy control patients. Twenty-nine of 6,636 somatic mutations (0.44%) were associated with an antibody response specific to the mutated peptide. PIWAS analyses identified motifs in 11 proteins, including NY-ESO-1 and HERVK-113, as immunogenic in mCRPC, and ELISA confirmed serum antibody enrichment in candidate patients. Confirmatory PIWAS, Identifying Motifs Using Next-generation sequencing Experiments (IMUNE), and ELISA analyses performed on serum samples from 106 patients with melanoma similarly revealed enriched cancer-specific antibody responses to NY-ESO-1.Conclusions:We present the first large-scale profiling of autoantibodies in advanced prostate cancer, utilizing a new antibody profiling approach to reveal novel cancer-specific antigens and epitopes. Our study recovers antigens of known importance and identifies novel tumor-specific epitopes of translational interest.

IMPORTANCE: Treatment options for platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) are limited, and outcomes remain poor. Nab-paclitaxel is an albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel showing promising activity and tolerability in a prior single-arm trial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel vs paclitaxel in platinum-refractory mUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this investigator-initiated, open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial conducted across Canada and Australia from January 2014 to April 2017, eligible patients had histologically confirmed, radiologically evident mUC of the urinary tract. Mixed histologic findings, except small cell, were permitted provided UC was the predominant histologic finding. All patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy either in the metastatic setting or were within 12 months of perioperative chemotherapy. Patients with prior taxane chemotherapy were not included. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0 to 2 and adequate organ function. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to nab-paclitaxel, 260 mg/m(2), or paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Among 199 patients, median age was 67 (range, 24-88) years; 144 (72%) were men; 167 (84%) were ECOG PS 0-1; 59 (30%) had liver metastases; and 110 (55%) were within 6 months of prior platinum-based chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 16.4 months, there was no significant difference between nab-paclitaxel vs paclitaxel for median PFS (3.4 months vs 3.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 90% CI, 0.68-1.23; 1-sided P = .31). Median overall survival was 7.5 months for nab-paclitaxel vs 8.8 months for paclitaxel (HR, 0.95; 90% CI, 0.70-1.30; 1-sided P = .40); and objective response rate (ORR) was 22% for nab-paclitaxel vs 25% for paclitaxel (P = .97). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with nab-paclitaxel (64/97 [66%]) compared with paclitaxel (45/97 [46%]), P = .009; but peripheral sensory neuropathy was similar (all grades, 72/97 [74%] vs 64/97 [66%]; grade 3/4, 7/97 [7%] vs 3/97 [3%]; P = .27). There were no apparent differences in scores for health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with platinum-refractory mUC, nab-paclitaxel had similar efficacy to paclitaxel; but worse toxic effects. The ORR with either taxane, however, was higher than previously reported and similar to those reported for the immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting that the taxanes remain a reasonable option in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033993

Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death among men with the majority of deaths linked to metastatic disease. Accumulating clinical data have confirmed the substantial survival benefit of the addition of docetaxel or androgen signaling inhibitors to androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Apalutamide, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, has recently been shown to provide an added survival benefit in the treatment of mCSPC and consequently approved for this indication. This review summarizes the body of evidence with regards to the preclinical activity and clinical efficacy of apalutamide with a specific focus on its efficacy in the treatment of mCSPC.

Introduction The Canadian Genito-Urinary Research Consortium conducted a consensus development conference leading to 31 recommendations. We conducted a survey comparing community-based practice with the consensus recommendations on the management of metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Methods An 87-item online questionnaire was sent to 600 community urologists and oncologists involved in the treatment of prostate cancer. Results Based on the 72 responses received, a discordance of ­>25% was observed in 15 recommendations (48%). Of the academic physicians, 89% indicated treating with agents approved for non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer compared to 50% of community physicians (p=0.0005). Discrepancies were also observed for radiation to the prostate for low-volume metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer which was 74% (academic) vs 27% (community), (p

There has been a rapid expansion in treatment options for the management of metastatic prostate cancer, but individual patient outcomes can be variable due to inter-patient tumor heterogeneity. Fortunately, the disease can be stratified on the basis of common somatic features, providing potential for the development of clinically useful prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Tissue biopsy programs and studies leveraging circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have revealed specific genomic alterations that are associated with aggressive disease biology. In this review, we discuss the potential for genomic subtyping to improve prognostication and to help guide treatment selection. We summarize data on associations between AR pathway alterations and patient response to AR signaling inhibitors and other standards of care. We describe the links between detection of different types of DNA damage repair defects and clinical outcomes with targeted therapies such as poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. PI3K signaling pathway inhibitors are also in advanced clinical development and we report upon the potential for these and other novel targeted therapies to have impact in specific molecular subsets of metastatic prostate cancer. Finally, we discuss the growing use of blood-based analytes for prognostic and predictive biomarker development, and summarize ongoing prospective biomarker-driven clinical trials.

Although the importance of T-cell immune responses is well appreciated in cancer, autoantibody responses are less well-characterized. Nevertheless, autoantibody responses are of great interest, as they may be concordant with T-cell responses to cancer antigens or predictive of response to cancer immunotherapies. We performed serum epitope repertoire analysis (SERA) on a total of 1,229 serum samples obtained from a cohort of 72 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and 1,157 healthy control patients to characterize the autoantibody landscape of mCRPC. Using whole-genome sequencing results from paired solid-tumor metastasis biopsies and germline specimens, we identified tumor-specific epitopes in 29 mutant and 11 non-mutant proteins. Autoantibody enrichments for the top candidate autoantigen (NY-ESO-1) were validated using ELISA performed on the prostate cancer cohort and an independent cohort of 106 patients with melanoma. Our study recovers antigens of known importance and identifies novel tumor-specific epitopes of translational interest in advanced prostate cancer.Statement of significanceAutoantibodies have been shown to inform treatment response and candidate drug targets in various cancers. We present the first large-scale profiling of autoantibodies in advanced prostate cancer, utilizing a new next-generation sequencing-based approach to antibody profiling to reveal novel cancer-specific antigens and epitopes.Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of InterestJJA reports receiving consulting income from Janssen Biotech and Merck and honoraria from Astellas for speaker’s fees. MR reports receiving commercial research support from Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Astellas, and Medivation, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Ambrx, Johnson & Johnson, and Bayer. A.R. has received honoraria from consulting with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Dynavax, Genentech, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi, is or has been a member of the scientific advisory board and holds stock in Advaxis, Arcus Biosciences, Bioncotech Therapeutics, Compugen, CytomX, Five Prime, RAPT, ImaginAb, Isoplexis, Kite-Gilead, Lutris Pharma, Merus, PACT Pharma, Rgenix and Tango Therapeutics. FYF serves on the advisory board for Dendreon, EMD Serono, Janssen Oncology, Ferring, Sanofi, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Celgene, consults for Bayer, Medivation/Astellas, Genetech, and Nutcracker Therapeutics, has honoraria from Clovis Oncology, and is a founder and has an ownership stake in PFS Genomics. SGZ and FYF have patent applications with Decipher Biosciences. SGZ and FYF have a patent application licensed to PFS Genomics. SGZ and FYF have patent applications with Celgene. WAH, RW, KK, PSD, and JCS have ownership of stocks or shares at Serimmune, paid employment at Serimmune, board membership at Serimmune, and patent applications on behalf of Serimmune.