101. Improving charge collection with delafossite photocathodes: a host–guest CuAlO 2 /CuFeO 2 approach
- Author
-
Yang Li, Kevin Sivula, Mathieu S. Prévot, Néstor Guijarro, IRCELYON-Catalyse Hétérogène pour la Transition Energétique (CATREN), Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon (IRCELYON), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), and Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)
- Subjects
Photocurrent ,Scaffold ,Materials science ,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment ,Band gap ,Nanotechnology ,02 engineering and technology ,General Chemistry ,Electron ,engineering.material ,010402 general chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,01 natural sciences ,0104 chemical sciences ,Delafossite ,Electrode ,engineering ,[CHIM]Chemical Sciences ,General Materials Science ,Nanometre ,0210 nano-technology ,Mesoporous material - Abstract
p-Type delafossite CuFeO2 has recently been reported as a promising candidate for direct photoelectrochemical solar water reduction in alkaline conditions. However, despite its favorable optical band gap energy and light absorption, this material suffers from poor electron–hole separation that limits its optimum thickness to a few hundred nanometers. This limitation can be addressed by a host–guest strategy, where a mesoporous p-type scaffold is used to support a thin-film of the light absorber. Here we demonstrate this host–guest approach for the first time with CuFeO2 using p-type transparent CuAlO2 as a scaffold. Optimizing the scaffold layer thickness at 2 μm resulted in a 2.4-fold increase in photocurrent in the presence of O2—a sacrificial electron scavenger—reaching 2.4 mA cm−2 at +0.4 V vs. RHE. Moreover, comparing the performance to host–guest electrodes prepared with an insulating SiO2 scaffold as a control suggested that the observed improvement with CuAlO2 was due to a decreased recombination stemming from improved charge separation in addition to improved charge transport through the scaffold compared to the CuFeO2 film alone.
- Published
- 2016