Search

Right ventricle (RV)-to-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling measured by the ratio of echocardiography-derived tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is a meaningful prognostic marker in pulmonary hypertension (PH). It's unclear if balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) alters RV-PA coupling measured by TAPSE/PASP. We reviewed CTEPH patients treated with BPA at our institution who had a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) before BPA and a follow-up TTE at any point during BPA. TAPSE was obtained from the initial and lattermost TTE; hemodynamics were obtained before each BPA session. Between March 2015 to October 2023, there were 228 patients treated with BPA. After excluding post-PTE patients and those without PH, 67 were included. Initial TAPSE/PASP was 0.39 ± 0.21 mm/mmHg. Using previously defined TAPSE/PASP tertiles in PH (<0.19, 0.19-0.32, >0.32 mm/mmHg), there were 6 patients (9%) in low, 30 (45%) in middle, and 31 (46%) in the high tertiles at baseline. The lower TAPSE/PASP tertiles had more severe baseline hemodynamics ( p  < 0.001) compared to the high TAPSE/PASP cohort. At follow-up, TAPSE/PASP improved to 0.47 ± 0.20 mm/mmHg ( p  = 0.023), with 2 (3%), 13 (19%), and 52 (78%) patients in the low, middle, high TAPSE/PASP tertiles, respectively. As patients progress through BPA sessions, the TAPSE/PASP ratio increases, possibly reflecting improved RV mechanics and RV-PA coupling. TAPSE/PASP ratio as a marker of RV-PA coupling can improve with BPA treatment and may be an important measure to follow during treatment of CTEPH., Competing Interests: The authors Jenny Z. Yang served on advisory board for Janssen. Timothy M. Fernandes is a consultant for Penumbra; received research funding from Merck, United Therapeutics, Janssen. Kim M. Kerr received consulting fees from Merck. Nick H. Kim is a consultant for Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pulnovo, United Therapeutics; speaker for Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Merck; and research support from Enzyvant. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Current predictors of clinical outcomes after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are largely limited to preoperative clinical characteristics. N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), a biomarker of right ventricular dysfunction, has not yet been well described as one such predictor. From 2017 to 2021, 816 patients with CTEPH referred to the University of California, San Diego for PTE were reviewed for differences in NT-pro-BNP to predict preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes up to 30 days post-PTE. For analysis, NT-pro-BNP was dichotomized to less than/equal to or greater than 1000 pg/mL based on the mean of the study population. Mean NT-pro-BNP was 1095.9 ±1783.4 pg/mL and median was 402.5 pg/mL (interquartile range: 119.5-1410.8). Of the 816 patients included, 250 had NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL. Those with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL were significantly more likely to have worse preoperative functional class (III-IV) and worse preoperative hemodynamics. Patients with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL also tended to have more postoperative complications including reperfusion pulmonary edema (22% vs. 5.1%, p  < 0.001), airway hemorrhage (8.4% vs. 4.9%, p  = 0.075), residual pulmonary hypertension (11.9% vs. 3.1%, p  < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (4.8% vs. 1.1%, p  = 0.001). Even after adjusting for confounders, patients with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL had a 2.48 times higher odds (95% confidence interval: 1.45-4.00) of reaching a combined endpoint that included the above complications. Preoperative NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL is a strong predictor of more severe preoperative hemodynamics and identifies patients at higher risk for postoperative complications., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be determined by a multidisciplinary team, ideally at a specialized CTEPH referral center. Radiologists contribute to this multidisciplinary process by helping to confirm the diagnosis of CTEPH and delineating the extent of disease, both of which help determine a treatment decision. Preoperative assessment of CTEPH usually employs multiple imaging modalities, including ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning, echocardiography, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and right heart catheterization with pulmonary angiography. Accurate diagnosis or exclusion of CTEPH at imaging is imperative, as this remains the only form of pulmonary hypertension that is curative with surgery. Unfortunately, CTEPH is often misdiagnosed at CTPA, which can be due to technical factors, patient-related factors, radiologist-related factors, as well as a host of disease mimics including acute pulmonary embolism, in situ thrombus, vasculitis, pulmonary artery sarcoma, and fibrosing mediastinitis. Although V/Q scanning is thought to be substantially more sensitive for CTEPH compared with CTPA, this is likely due to lack of recognition of CTEPH findings rather than a modality limitation. Preoperative evaluation for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) includes assessment of technical operability and surgical risk stratification. While the definitive therapy for CTEPH is PTE, other minimally invasive or noninvasive therapies also lead to clinical improvements including greater survival. Complications of PTE that can be identified at postoperative imaging include infection, reperfusion edema or injury, pulmonary hemorrhage, pericardial effusion or hemopericardium, and rethrombosis. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.