Search

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are tumour fragments engrafted into mice for preclinical studies. PDXs offer clear advantages over simpler in vitro cancer models - such as cancer cell lines (CCLs) and organoids - in terms of structural complexity, heterogeneity, and stromal interactions. Here, we characterise 231 colorectal cancer PDXs at the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic levels, along with their response to cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor used clinically for metastatic colorectal cancer. After evaluating the PDXs' quality, stability, and molecular concordance with publicly available patient cohorts, we present results from training, interpreting, and validating the integrative ensemble classifier CeSta. This model takes in input the PDXs' multi-omic characterisation and predicts their sensitivity to cetuximab treatment, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve > 0.88. Our study demonstrates that large PDX collections can be leveraged to train accurate, interpretable drug sensitivity models that: (1) better capture patient-derived therapeutic biomarkers compared to models trained on CCL data, (2) can be robustly validated across independent PDX cohorts, and (3) could contribute to the development of future therapeutic biomarkers. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) could contribute to understanding how colorectal cancer (CRC) responds to targeted therapies like cetuximab. Here, the authors characterise the response to cetuximab in 231 CRC PDXs using multiomics and develop an integrative ensemble classifier - CeSta - to predict sensitivity to cetuximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Variants in the RAS family (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) are among the most common mutations found in cancer. About 19% patients with cancer harbor RAS mutations, which are typically associated with poor clinical outcomes. Over the past four decades, KRAS has long been considered an undruggable target due to the absence of suitable small-molecule binding sites within its mutant isoforms. However, recent advancements in drug design have made RAS-targeting therapies viable, particularly with the approval of direct KRASG12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib, for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRASG12C mutations. Other KRAS-mutant inhibitors targeting KRASG12D are currently being developed for use in the clinic, particularly for treating highly refractory malignancies like pancreatic cancer. Herein, we provide an overview of RAS signaling, further detailing the roles of the RAS signaling pathway in carcinogenesis. This includes a summary of RAS mutations in human cancers and an emphasis on therapeutic approaches, as well as de novo, acquired, and adaptive resistance in various malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study explores the benefits of targeted-immunotherapy combination in third-line or beyond treatment for microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting. Methods: Patients with MSS mCRC who were treated with either a targeted-immunotherapy combination or targeted therapy alone in the third-line or beyond setting at our hospital from August 2018 to August 2022 were included in the study. Inclusion criteria comprised patients treated with targeted therapy alone or in combination with immunotherapy. Effectiveness was compared between treatments, and patients with the potential to benefit from targeted-immunotherapy combination were identified. Results: Among 71 patients, 31 received targeted therapies alone (TT group) and 40 received a combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy (TI group). The TI group had higher objective response rates (20% vs 3.2%) and disease control rates (82.5% vs 58.1%). The median progression-free survival was significantly better in the TI group (4.6 vs 4.1 months, P = 0.027). Liver metastasis was associated with poor prognosis, while patients with only lung metastases had the longest median progression-free survival of 12.3 months with combination therapy. Conclusion: The study indicates that targeted-immunotherapy combination offers more benefits than targeted therapy alone for MSS mCRC in the third-line or beyond setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cancer Research on Prevention & Treatment is the property of Cancer Research on Prevention & Treatment Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Breast cancer has become the malignant tumor with the first incidence and the second mortality among female cancers. Most female breast cancers belong to luminal-type breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. These breast cancer cells all have different driving genes, which constantly promote the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an important breast cancer-related gene, which can promote the progress of breast cancer. It has been proved in clinical and basic research that over-expressed and constitutively activated STAT3 is involved in the progress, proliferation, metastasis and chemotherapy resistance of breast cancer. STAT3 is an important key target in luminal-type breast cancer and HER2-positive cancer, which has an important impact on the curative effect of related treatments. In breast cancer, the activation of STAT3 will change the spatial position of STAT3 protein and cause different phenotypic changes of breast cancer cells. In the current basic research and clinical research, small molecule inhibitors activated by targeting STAT3 can effectively treat breast cancer, and enhance the efficacy level of related treatment methods for luminal-type and HER2-positive breast cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The third-line treatment for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) has limited efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SHR-8068 (an anti-CTLA-4 antibody), combined with adebrelimab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody), and bevacizumab in refractory non-microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) CRC. Method: This study is a prospective, open-label, single-center phase Ib/II clinical trial. Patients with pathologically confirmed pMMR/non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who have failed =2 lines prior standard systemic treatments will be enrolled (n=36). The Ib phase will evaluate two dosing regimens of SHR-8068 in combination therapy (n=9 each dosage): SHR-8068 (1 mg per kilogram, every six weeks, intravenously) or SHR-8068 (4 mg per kilogram, every twelve weeks, intravenously) combined with adebrelimab (1200 mg, every three weeks, intravenously) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg per kilogram, every three weeks, intravenously). The efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these regimens will be assessed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of SHR-8068. Those of RP2D group from the phase Ib will be included in the phase II. The study will go to include 18 additional patients according to the onesample log-rank test design in the phase II. The primary endpoint of the Ib phase is safety, with secondary endpoints including the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and quality of life (QOL). The primary endpoint for phase II was PFS, with secondary endpoints including ORR, OS, DCR, safety, and QOL. Identifying biomarkers to predict the efficacy of this regimen is the exploratory study endpoint. Discussion: This proof-of-concept study would provide safety and efficacy signals of this novel combination treatment for the MSS CRCs in the late-line setting. And it may offer new insights on the clinical application of dual immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in the MSS CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Etoposide is a second-line chemotherapy agent widely used for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, we discovered that etoposide treatment induced greater motility potential in four colorectal cancer cell lines. Therefore, we used microarrays to test the mRNA of these cancer cell lines to investigate the mechanisms of etoposide promoting colorectal cancer metastasis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing the gene expression profiles in samples from etoposide-treated cells and untreated cells in all four colorectal cancer cell lines. Next, these genes went through the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway analysis. Among the top 10 genes including the upregulated and downregulated, eight genes had close interaction according to the STRING database: FAS, HMMR, JUN, LMNB1, MLL3, PLK2, STAG1 and TBL1X. After etoposide treatment, the cell cycle, metabolism-related and senescence signaling pathways in the colorectal cancer cell lines were significantly downregulated, whereas necroptosis and oncogene pathways were significantly upregulated. We suggest that the differentially expressed genes LMNB1 and JUN are potential targets for predicting colorectal cancer metastasis. These results provide clinical guidance in chemotherapy, and offer direction for further research in the mechanism of colorectal cancer metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in both the initial and subsequent treatment settings for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In light of these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the use of several ICIs in specific subpopulations of mCRC patients. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of direct comparative RCTs evaluating various treatment options. Consequently, the most effective ICI therapeutic strategy for microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroup and microsatellite instability (MSI) subgroup in the first- and second-line therapies remains undefined. To address this gap, the present study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to ascertain the most effective first- and second-line ICI therapeutic strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the retrieval date ranging from the databases' inception to August 20, 2024. A total of 875 studies were identified, and seven were ultimately included in the analysis after a screening process. A systematic review and network metaanalysis were conducted on the basis of the search results. Results: This comprehensive analysis, comprising seven RCTs, evaluated first-line and second-line immunotherapy regimens in 1,358 patients diagnosed with mCRC. The treatments under investigation consisted of five initial treatments, including three focusing on MSS patients and two on MSI patients, as well as two secondary immunotherapy regimens, both focusing on MSS patients. A total of 1051 individuals underwent first-line treatment, while 307 received second-line treatment. The application of ICIs proved to offer varying degrees clinical benefits when compared to standard-of-care therapy alone, both in two subgroups of the first and the second treatment phases. Of particular note is the performance of Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab, which demonstrated superior efficacy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.130.34),. Moreover, the treatment demonstrated an optimal safety profile, with a relatively low risk of adverse events (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.56), compared to other first-line treatment modalities for MSI subgroup. Regarding MSS subgroup, the improvement of PFS by Nivolumab plus standard-of-care (SOC) was relatively significant (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02). In the realm of second-line therapies for MSS subgroup, the administration of Atezolizumab plus SOC has proven to be an effective approach for prolonging PFS, exhibiting an HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). These findings underscore the clinical benefits and safety profiles of ICIs in the treatment of mCRC across various treatment lines. Conclusions: The clinical application of ICIs in both first- and second-line treatment strategies for patients with mCRC yields substantial therapeutic benefits. A detailed assessment in this study indicates that first-line treatment with Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab may represent an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for MSI subgroup. In terms of MSS subgroup in first-line therapy, Nivolumab plus SOC may be a relative superior choice. In the context of second-line therapy for MSS subgroup, it is evident that a combination of Atezolizumab and SOC represents a preferable option for enhancing PFS. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other ICIs treatment regimens also exhibit great value in various aspects, with the potential to inform the development of future clinical treatment guidelines and provide a stronger rationale for the selection of ICIs in both first- and second-line therapeutic strategies for mCRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with nanoparticle technology represents a transformative approach in precision oncology, particularly in the development of targeted anticancer drug delivery systems. In our study, we found out that the application of AI in the field of drug delivery enhances the value of nanoparticles in increasing the efficiency of drug delivery and decreasing side effects from specifically targeted mechanisms. Moreover, we considered urgent issues that exist in present-day nanoparticle fabrication such as scalability and regulatory issues and suggest AI solutions that would help overcome these issues. In the same manner, we focused on the utilization of AI in enhancing patient-centered treatment through the establishment of drug delivery systems that will complement the genetic and molecular makeup of patients. Additionally, we present evidence suggesting that AI-designed nanoparticles have the potential to be environmentally sustainable alternatives in cancer therapy. AI is presented as capable of creating synergies with bioengineering methods like CRISPR or gene therapy and able to show potential directions for enhancing the efficiency of nanoparticle-based cancer therapies. In implementing these findings, we systematically discuss and highlight ongoing work and potential development trends in AI-aided nanoparticle research, asserting that it has the potential to greatly enhance oncology therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have limited treatment options following standard-of-care therapy. VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity in mCRC in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly in patients without liver metastases. The TKI zanzalintinib (XL092) targets VEGFR, MET and TAM kinases, proteins that are involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and immunosuppression. Zanzalintinib has immunomodulatory properties that may enhance response to ICIs. Presented is the design of STELLAR-303, a global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluating zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab versus regorafenib in patients with non-MSI-H mCRC who progressed during/after or are refractory/intolerant to standard-of-care therapy. The primary end point is overall survival in patients without liver metastases. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT05425940 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Plain Language Summary Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is cancer of the colon or rectum that has spread to other parts of the body, most often to the liver, lungs and abdomen. People with mCRC that has worsened after initial treatment have limited options. Zanzalintinib is a novel oral investigational drug that can slow or stop cancer growth. It works by blocking certain proteins that play important roles in the development, growth and spread of cancer. Zanzalintinib may also help improve the effectiveness of another class of cancer drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which work by activating the patient's immune system to fight cancer. Here, we describe the design of STELLAR-303, an ongoing study that is comparing the effects of combining zanzalintinib and an ICI drug called atezolizumab with an approved treatment for mCRC called regorafenib. About 900 participants with mCRC will be enrolled in the study worldwide. To be included in the study, participants must have mCRC that worsened after previous therapies and must not have a high level of microsatellite instability, which is a specific feature of some mCRCs. Participants will be randomly given one of the two treatments. The main goal of the study is to evaluate zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab compared with regorafenib by measuring the length of time participants are alive after starting treatment, specifically in patients with mCRC that has not spread to the liver. Additionally, the study will look at the side effects with each treatment. The study is currently seeking participants. Tweetable Abstract STELLAR-303 is a randomized phase III study evaluating the novel TKI zanzalintinib plus the ICI atezolizumab in patients with previously treated non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. Patient enrollment is ongoing globally. Article highlights Background & rationale Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options following progression on standard of care therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficient mCRC. However, efficacy of these treatments is limited in non-MSI-H or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) disease. Agents targeting the VEGF pathway in combination with ICIs have been evaluated in non-MSI-H mCRC and have demonstrated encouraging clinical activity. Studies have shown that mCRC patients without liver metastases may derive greater benefit from TKI-ICI combinations than those with liver metastases. Zanzalintinib (XL092) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets MET, VEGFR and the TAM kinases. Inhibition of these kinases may suppress tumor growth and proliferation and promote an immunopermissive tumor microenvironment, which may enhance response to ICIs such as atezolizumab. Zanzalintinib has shown anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with ICIs in the preclinical setting and has demonstrated immunomodulatory effects, increasing pro-inflammatory immune cells and decreasing immunosuppressive cells. STELLAR-303 study design STELLAR-303 (NCT05425940) is a global, open-label, randomized, phase III study. Approximately 874 patients with non-MSI-H mCRC (with and without liver metastases) who have progressed during/after or are intolerant to standard of care therapies will be randomized 1:1 to oral zanzalintinib plus intravenous atezolizumab or to oral regorafenib. Eligibility criteria Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years and have histologically/cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum that is non-MSI-H and pMMR; MSI/MMR status will be documented and determined by tissue-based analysis. A prespecified number of patients with/without liver metastases will be enrolled. Patients must have received standard of care therapy for mCRC and radiographically progressed or be refractory or intolerant to these therapies; progression during treatment or within 4 months of the most recent therapy is required. Patients who received prior zanzalintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine-tipiracil, or PD-L1/PD-1 targeting ICIs are ineligible. End points The primary end point is overall survival (OS) in patients without liver metastases. Secondary end points are OS in all randomized patients (assessed with hierarchical testing); progression-free survival, objective response rate and duration of response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator in patients without liver metastases and in all randomized patients; and safety. Status The study is actively enrolling patients in the USA, Europe and Asia-Pacific regions. Conclusion STELLAR-303 will assess the efficacy and safety of zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab in patients with previously treated non-MSI-H mCRC, a population with unmet need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence indicates that combinations of anti‐EGFR antibodies and KRAS p.G12C (c.34G>T) inhibitors can be an effective treatment strategy for advanced colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)‐mutated colorectal carcinoma might be a distinct tumor subtype. We utilized a prospective cohort incident tumor biobank (including 1347 colorectal carcinomas) and detected KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C) mutation in 43 cases (3.2%) and other KRAS mutations (in codon 12, 13, 61, or 146) in 467 cases (35%). The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)‐low prevalence was similarly higher in KRAS c.34G>T mutants (52%) and other KRAS mutants (49%) than in KRAS‐wild‐type tumors (31%). KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed higher CIMP‐high prevalence (14%) and lower CIMP‐negative prevalence (33%) compared with other KRAS mutants (6% and 45%, respectively; p = 0.0036). Similar to other KRAS mutants, KRAS c.34G>T‐mutated tumors were associated with cecal location, non‐microsatellite instability (MSI)‐high status, BRAF wild type, and PIK3CA mutation when compared with KRAS‐wild‐type tumors. Compared with BRAF‐mutated tumors, KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed more frequent LINE‐1 hypomethylation, a biomarker for early‐onset colorectal carcinoma. KRAS c.34G>T mutants were not associated with other features, including the tumor tissue abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. animalis), pks+Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, or (enterotoxigenic) Bacteroides fragilis. Among 1122 BRAF‐wild‐type colorectal carcinomas, compared with KRAS‐wild‐type tumors, multivariable‐adjusted colorectal cancer‐specific mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.82 (1.05–3.17) in KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)‐mutated tumors (p = 0.035) and 1.57 (1.22–2.02) in other KRAS‐mutated tumors (p = 0.0004). Our study provides novel evidence for clinical and tumor characteristics of KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)‐mutated colorectal carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is insensitive for Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with microsatellite stable (MSS). Genomic data of three CRC cohort, n = 35), and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA CRC cohort, n = 377), were analyzed. A cohort treated with ICIs from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC CRC cohort, n = 110) and two cases from the local hospital were characterized the impact of the HRR mutation on prognosis of CRC. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations were more common in CN and HL cohorts (27.85%; 48.57%) than in TCGA CRC cohort (15.92%), especially in the MSS populations, the frequencies of HRR mutation were higher in CN and HL cohort (27.45%, 51.72%) than in TCGA cohort (6.85%). HRR mutations were associated with high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H). Although HRR mutation uncorrelated with an improved overall survival in the MSKCC CRC cohort (p = 0.97), HRR mutated patients had a significantly improved OS compared to the HRR wildtype population particularly in MSS subgroups (p = 0.0407) under ICI treatment. It probably contributed by a higher neoantigen and increased CD4 + T cell infiltration which found in the TCGA MSS HRR mutated CRC cohort. The similar phenomenon on cases was observed that MSS metastatic CRC patient with HRR mutation seemed more sensitive to ICI after multi-line chemotherapy in clinical practice than HRR wildtype. This finding suggests the feasibility of HRR mutation as an immunotherapy response predictor in MSS CRC, which highlights a potential therapeutic approach for these patients., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

To estimate the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in prolonging survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial was performed. A systematic search was performed to identify randomized trials comparing chemotherapy with observation or supportive care alone. Trials were assessed for quality of reporting, publication bias and heterogeneity. Relative risks for outcomes from published data were pooled using a random-effects model. Seven trials with 614 patients were included. All trials used fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, through a variety of routes and schedules, including intravenous, intra-portal and hepatic arterial infusion. Compared with the 'no-chemotherapy' arm, chemotherapy significantly reduced 1-year mortality (risk ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.81, P < 0.00001). The mortality at 2 years was not significantly different (risk ratio 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-1.00, P = 0.053). Between-trial comparisons demonstrated benefit with a variety of routes and schedules. Chemotherapy significantly prolongs 1-year survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and should be offered to those with good performance status.

Objective: To test the feasibility and effectiveness of a high-frequency short-term group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for recurrent suicide attempters., Method: CBT consisting of eight weekly and two "booster" sessions was given to nine female out-patients who had attempted suicide at least twice, seven of whom had a personality disorder., Results: Four patients dropped out during the treatment; either because they were "chronic repeaters" (i.e., had a history of more than 8 suicide attempts), or because the last suicide attempt was too long ago. Although the patients were generally positive about the content of the therapy, no effects on psychiatric symptomatology or repetition of suicidal behavior could be demonstrated., Conclusions: Based on this experience, and on the two controlled studies of CBT of recurrent suicide attempters published in the literature, it is tentatively concluded that it is difficult to organize a short-term high-frequency group treatment for recurrent suicide attempters with personality disorders, and that CBT may delay repetition of suicidal behavior, but that "major repeaters" (i.e., who made 4 or more suicide attempts) with a borderline personality disorder tend to stay major repeaters.

Background: There are known disparities in incidence and outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) by race and ethnicity. Some of these disparities may be mediated by molecular changes in tumors that occur at different rates across populations. Genetic ancestry is a measure complementary to race and ethnicity that can overcome missing data issues and better capture genetic similarity in admixed populations. We aimed to identify somatic mutations and tumor gene expression differences associated with both genetic ancestry and imputed race and ethnicity. Methods: Sequencing was performed with the Tempus xT NGS 648-gene panel and whole exome capture RNA-Seq for 8454 primarily late-stage CRC patients. Genetic ancestry proportions for five continental groups—Africa (AFR), American indigenous (AMR), East Asia (EAS), Europe (EUR), and South Asia (SAS)—were estimated using ancestry informative markers. To address data gaps, race and ethnicity categories were imputed, resulting in assignments for 952 Hispanic/Latino, 420 non-Hispanic (NH) Asian, 1061 NH Black, and 5763 NH White individuals. We assessed association of genetic ancestry proportions and imputed race and ethnicity categories with somatic mutations in relevant CRC genes and in 2608 expression profiles, as well as 1957 consensus molecular subtypes (CMS). Results: Increased AFR ancestry was associated with higher odds of somatic mutations in APC, KRAS, and PIK3CA and lower odds of BRAF mutations. Additionally, increased EAS ancestry was associated with lower odds of mutations in KRAS, EUR with higher odds in BRAF, and the Hispanic/Latino category with lower odds in BRAF. Greater AFR ancestry and the NH Black category were associated with higher rates of CMS3, while a higher proportion of Hispanic/Latino patients exhibited indeterminate CMS classifications. Conclusions: Molecular differences in CRC tumor mutation frequencies and gene expression that may underlie observed differences by race and ethnicity were identified. The association of AFR ancestry with increased KRAS mutations aligns with higher CMS3 subtype rates in NH Black patients. The increase of indeterminate CMS in Hispanic/Latino patients suggests that subtype classification methods could benefit from enhanced patient diversity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Oncology is the property of Chinese Journal of Oncology / Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: There is limited evidence of comparative results among different treatments for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have failed at least one line of previous systemic therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of systemic treatments among these patients through this investigation. Methods: We collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English up until July 2023, from databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and prominent conference databases, for this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Phase II or III trials that evaluated at least two therapeutic regimens were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on metastatic sites. The current systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023420498). Results: 30 RCTs were included, with a total of 13,511 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, multi-targeted therapy (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87) and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91) show significant advantages. Targeted therapy (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54-1.57) and local treatment plus chemotherapy (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.23) had comparable performance. For patients with liver metastases, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, aflibercept plus fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy (CTFU), and bevacizumab plus capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy (CTCA) showed the best outcomes in terms of OS. Bevacizumab plus intensified CTFU, bevacizumab plus CTCA, and HAI followed by single-agent chemotherapy (SingleCT) performed the best regarding PFS. For patients with liver-limited metastases, aflibercept plus CTFU is the optimal choice in OS. For PFS, the best options were HAI followed by SingleCT, aflibercept plus CTFU, and panitumumab plus CTFU. For patients with multiple-site metastases, the best treatments were TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, bevacizumab plus CTCA, bevacizumab plus CTFU, and aflibercept plus CTFU. Conclusion: Multi-targeted therapy and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy are the best treatment mechanisms. TAS-102 plus bevacizumab is superior in OS, the combination of anti-VEGF drugs like bevacizumab and aflibercept with standard chemotherapy is the preferred option for CRLM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent and lethal cancer worldwide. Approximately 45% of CRC patients harbor a gain-in-function mutation in KRAS. KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene accounting for approximately 25% of all human cancers. Gene mutations in KRAS cause constitutive activation of the KRAS protein and MAPK/AKT signaling, resulting in unregulated proliferation and survival of cancer cells and other aspects of malignant transformation, progression, and metastasis. While KRAS has long been considered undruggable, the FDA recently approved two direct acting KRAS inhibitors, Sotorasib and Adagrasib, that covalently bind and inactivate KRASG12C. Both drugs showed efficacy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed with a KRASG12C mutation, but for reasons not well understood, were considerably less efficacious for CRC patients diagnosed with the same mutation. Thus, it is imperative to understand the basis for resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors, which will likely be the same limitations for other mutant specific KRAS inhibitors in development. This review provides an update on clinical trials involving CRC patients treated with KRASG12C inhibitors as a monotherapy or combined with other drugs. Mechanisms that contribute to resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors and the development of novel RAS inhibitors with potential to escape such mechanisms of resistance are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the genetic structure and cell metabolism of the primary tumor lesion might be different from metastatic lesions. It is thought that cell-level glucose metabolism may differ due to the difference in RAS wild and mutant mCRC patients' prognosis. In this study, we aimed to compare 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) uptake levels for KRAS mutation status and primary-metastatic tumor localization. Methods: Our study is a retrospective cohort analysis that included RAS mutation status study and staging-oriented 18F-FDG PET/CT conducted on mCRC patients. Results: There was no significant relationship between metastasis and primary tumor maximum Standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values according to the KRAS mutational status (P > 0.05). Patients with liver metastasis along with mutant BRAF mutation status had significantly higher SUVmax values in PET-CT scans (P = 0.04). There was a negative correlation between SUVmax values of lung metastases and overall survival (r = -0.35, P = 0.04). Patients with high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels had significantly higher SUVmax values of lung metastasis than patients with normal CEA levels (P = 0.009). Patients with high CA19-9 levels had significantly higher SUVmax values of liver, peritoneal, and bone metastasis than patients with normal CA19-9 levels (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant correlation between SUVmax values of metastasis and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values. Liver metastasis of right-sided mCRCs had significantly higher SUVmax values (P = 0.03). Conclusion: We could not demonstrate a significant association between KRAS mutation and SUVmax values of PET scan in primary or metastatic tumor sites in advanced CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Hypomagnesemia is a common side effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, which may lead to arrhythmia. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for magnesium (Mg) supplementation in the management of hypomagnesemia in patients with anti-EGFR antibodies. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to address clinical questions regarding these cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Three electronic databases were searched for articles published until June 18, 2021. The main outcomes used were “anti-EGFR antibody” and “hypomagnesemia”. Results: After screening 78 references in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI-web databases, three studies were included in the review. One study revealed the effectiveness of Mg supplementation in the management of hypomagnesemia in patients receiving cetuximab. However, no studies have investigated whether correcting hypomagnesemia can lead to the suppression of arrhythmias as a clinical outcome. Conclusion: Weak evidence suggests that Mg supplementation, as a preventive measure when developing hypomagnesemia following the initiation of anti-EGFR antibody therapy, may prevent the worsening of hypomagnesemia, and subsequently prevent associated arrhythmia occurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch-repair gene deficiency, but the response rate remains low. Value of current biomarkers to predict CRC patients' response to ICIs is unclear due to heterogeneous study designs and small sample sizes. Here, we aim to assess and quantify the magnitude of multiple biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases (to June 2023) for clinical studies examining biomarkers for efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. Random-effect models were performed for meta-analysis. We pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for biomarkers predicting response rate and survival. 36 studies with 1867 patients were included in systematic review. We found that a lower pre-treatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (n=4, HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.21–0.67) predicts good prognosis, higher tumor mutation burden (n=10, OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.16–10.78) predicts response to ICIs, and liver metastasis (n=16, OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.16–0.63) indicates resistance to ICIs, especially when combined with VEGFR inhibitors. But the predictive value of tumor PD-L1 expression (n=9, OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.48–2.14) was insignificant in CRC. Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, tumor mutation burden, and liver metastasis, but not tumor PD-L1 expression, function as significant biomarkers to predict efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. These findings help stratify CRC patients suitable for ICI treatments, improving efficacy of immunotherapy through precise patient management. (PROSPERO, CRD42022346716). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion Statement: Colorectal cancer, ranking as the third most prevalent malignancy globally, substantially benefits from both immunotherapy and VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors. Nevertheless, the use of monotherapy proves inadequate in effectively tackling the heterogeneity of tumors and the intricacies of their microenvironment, frequently leading to drug resistance and immune evasion. This situation underscores the pressing need for innovative strategies aimed at augmenting the effectiveness and durability of treatments. Clinical research demonstrates that the combination of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors (primarily including VEGF/VEGFR-targeted drugs and multi-kinase inhibitors) with immune checkpoint inhibitors creates a synergistic effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Our analysis explores how VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors recalibrate the tumor microenvironment, modulate immune cell functions, and influence the expression of immune checkpoints and cytokines. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the preclinical and clinical feasibility of these combined therapeutic approaches. Despite the potential for toxicity, the significant benefits and prospective applications of these strategies warrant thorough exploration. Exploring the synergistic mechanisms of these combined treatments has the potential to inaugurate a new paradigm in oncology, enabling more personalized and efficacious treatment modalities. Additionally, the synergy between VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and nascent immunotherapies emerges as a promising field of inquiry., Competing Interests: Declarations. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. Patient Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Conflict of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The intestinal stem cell (ISC) niche is vital for maintaining the integrity and function of the intestinal epithelium. ISC populations, characterized by their high proliferation and multipotency, reside within a specialized microenvironment at the base of crypts. Crypt base columnar (CBC) cells at the deepest part of crypts serve as replicating ISCs, while position 4 label-retaining cells (LRCs) located higher up in the crypts are also important for ISC maintenance during experiments. The interplay between CBCs, position 4 LRCs, transient amplifying (TA) cells and other niche components, including the pericrypt stromal cells, ensures a continuous supply of differentiated epithelial cells. Recent advancements in ISC biomarker studies have provided valuable insights into their molecular signatures, regulatory pathways and roles in the pathogenesis of intestinal disorders. Understanding the ISC niche has significant therapeutic implications, as manipulating ISC behaviors and regenerating damaged or diseased intestinal tissue show promise for novel therapeutic approaches. ISC organoids have also provided a platform for studying intestinal diseases and testing personalized therapies. This comprehensive review covers the anatomical composition, physiological regulation, ISC biomarker studies, contribution to intestinal disorder pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications of the ISC niche., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: LM, SB, GKM and PD declare no competing interests. Disclaimer: The authors are solely responsible for the data and the contents of the paper. In no way, the Honorary Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board Members, the Indian Society of Gastroenterology or the printer/publishers are responsible for the results/findings and content of this article., (© 2024. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)

Cancer due to its heterogeneous nature and large prevalence has tremendous socioeconomic impacts on populations across the world. Therefore, it is crucial to discover effective panels of biomarkers for diagnosing cancer at an early stage. Cancer leads to alterations in cell growth and differentiation at the molecular level, some of which are very unique. Therefore, comprehending these alterations can aid in a better understanding of the disease pathology and identification of the biomolecules that can serve as effective biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Metabolites, among other biomolecules of interest, play a key role in the pathophysiology of cancer whose levels are significantly altered while 'reprogramming the energy metabolism', a cellular condition favored in cancer cells which is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Metabolomics, an emerging omics technology has tremendous potential to contribute towards the goal of investigating cancer metabolites or the metabolic alterations during the development of cancer. Diverse metabolites can be screened in a variety of biofluids, and tumor tissues sampled from cancer patients against healthy controls to capture the altered metabolism. In this review, we provide an overview of different metabolomics approaches employed in cancer research and the potential of metabolites as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. In addition, we discuss the challenges associated with metabolomics-driven cancer research and gaze upon the prospects of this emerging field., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the content of this article., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To address the issue that most microsatellite-stable (MSS) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have minimal response to immunotherapy, this meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab and tremelimumab with concomitant treatment in treating MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: All included trials were prospective studies with a median patient age of 63 years, of which 94.2% were MSS/pMMR mCRC patients, with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Based on durvalumab and tremelimumab treatment, one study performed surgical resection on resectable cases, while the other four studies performed radiotherapy or chemotherapy on unresectable cases. Analyses include objective response rate (ORR).etc. for drug activity, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for therapeutic efficacy, and adverse events (AEs) for safety. The risk of bias was assessed by sensitivity analysis., Results: 5 studies involving 228 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed a median OS of 9.26 months, median PFS of 2.53 months, partial response (PR) of 13.6%, stable disease (SD) of 32.8%, ORR of 12.5% and disease control rate (DCR) of 65.4%. AEs were generally low, with pruritus (27.5%), diarrhea (28.8%), and fatigue (53.9%) being the most common, while other AEs occurred at less frequencies., Conclusions: Durvalumab and tremelimumab with concomitant treatment for MSS/pMMR mCRC patients is relatively effective and safe, which is helpful in addressing the problem of mCRC with MSS/pMMR that has minimal response to immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Human Ethics: Not applicable. Consent to Participate Declarations: Not applicable. Standards of Reporting: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and protocols (Prisma-P). Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable. Reviewer Disclosure: Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, necessitating urgent advancements in therapeutic approaches. The emergence of groundbreaking therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapies, oncolytic viruses, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, marks a transformative era in oncology. These innovative modalities, tailored to individual genetic and molecular profiles, hold the promise of significantly enhancing patient outcomes. This comprehensive review explores the latest clinical trials and advancements, encompassing targeted molecular therapies, immunomodulatory agents, and cell-based therapies. By evaluating the strengths, limitations, and potential synergies of these approaches, this research aims to reshape the treatment landscape and improve clinical outcomes for CRC patients, offering new found hope for those who have exhausted conventional options. The culmination of this work is anticipated to pave the way for transformative clinical trials, ushering in a new era of personalized and effective CRC therapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Purpose: As cancer care is increasingly delivered in the home, more tasks and responsibilities fall on patients and their informal care partners. These time costs can present significant mental, physical, and financial burdens, and are undercounted in current measures of time toxicity that only consider care received in formal healthcare settings., Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with gastrointestinal cancer and informal care partners at a single tertiary cancer center between March and October 2023. Interviews explored cancer care tasks conducted when home, associated time burdens, how these time burdens compared to facility-based care, and whether home-based care should be included in objective measures of time toxicity. Two coders transcribed interviews and analyzed data using a grounded theory approach., Results: A single interviewer conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 patients and 18 care partners, and identified five major themes: (1) unexpected home-based care activities are time burdensome; (2) other burdens interact with and impact time burdens; (3) time burdens evolve over the disease course and differentially impact patients and care partners; (4) several factors influence the choice of home-based versus in-facility care; and (5) home-based care is generally perceived as less time-burdensome than in-facility care. Overall, 12 of 33 (36%) participants recommended including days with home-based care in the current contact days measure of time toxicity., Conclusion: In addition to characterizing time burdens associated with home-based cancer care, this study builds on existing literature to explore if and how to incorporate days with home-based care into the contact days measure., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved this study (IRB #: STUDY00018922). The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participate: All participants provided informed consent for study participation. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: In contrast to significant advances in organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer, the contemporary management of early-stage rectal cancer, including the frequency of abdominoperineal resections, remains largely unexplored in the United States. Therefore, we assessed the utilization of neoadjuvant therapy and oncological resections in early-stage rectal cancer patients., Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with cT1-T3N0 rectal cancer who underwent proctectomies between 2016 and 2022 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project proctectomy files. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with abdominoperineal resections and Kendall's tau statistics to evaluate clinical-pathological staging agreement., Results: In all, 3078 patients (29.6% cT1-2N0, 70.4% cT3N0) were included with 55.3% of tumours <5 cm from the anal verge. Overall, 58.2% received neoadjuvant therapy within 3 months of surgery (30.6% for cT1-T2N0 vs. 69.8% for cT3N0, P < 0.001), and 58.6% underwent abdominoperineal resection (55.5% for cT1-T2N0 vs. 59.9% for cT3N0, P = 0.058). The adjusted odds of undergoing abdominoperineal resection were associated with increasing age (OR 1.4 per every 10-year increase; 95% CI 1.2-1.5), cT3N0 tumours (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7) and tumour location <5 cm from the anal verge (OR 10.6; 95% CI 7.7-14.7). There was a weak clinical-pathological T staging correlation (Kendal tau coefficient 0.25; 95% CI 0.20-0.29)., Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients with early-stage rectal cancer with high rates of neoadjuvant therapy, over half of patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and one in five had a pathological complete response. These findings underscore opportunities for organ preservation in early-stage rectal cancer, suggesting that treatments typically reserved for locally advanced disease may extend to early stages with the completion of ongoing clinical trials., (© 2025 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Colorectal cancer exhibits a notable prevalence and propensity for metastasis, but the current therapeutic interventions for metastatic colorectal cancer have yielded suboptimal results. ICIs can decrease tumor development by preventing the tumor’s immune evasion, presenting cancer patients with a new treatment alternative. The increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in CRC has brought several issues. In particular, ICIs have demonstrated significant clinical effectiveness in patients with MSI-H CRC, whereas their efficacy is limited in MSS. Acquired resistance can still occur in patients with a positive response to ICIs. This paper describes the efficacy of ICIs currently in the clinical treatment of CRC, discusses the mechanisms by which acquired resistance occurs, primarily related to loss and impaired presentation of tumor antigens, reduced response of IFN-l and cytokine or metabolic dysregulation, and summarizes the incidence of adverse effects. We posit that the future of ICIs hinges upon the advancement of precise prediction biomarkers and the implementation of combination therapies. This study aims to elucidate the constraints associated with ICIs in CRC and foster targeted problem-solving approaches, thereby enhancing the potential benefits for more patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Creatine is a natural nitrogenous organic acid that is integral to energy metabolism and crucial for proper cell functioning. The kidneys are involved in the first step of creatine production. With kidney transplantation being the gold-standard treatment for end-stage kidney disease, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) may be at risk of impaired creatine synthesis. We aimed to compare creatine homeostasis between KTR and controls. Plasma and urine concentrations of arginine, glycine, guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine were measured in 553 KTR and 168 healthy controls. Creatine intake was assessed using food frequency questionnaires. Iothalamate-measured GFR data were available in subsets of 157 KTR and 167 controls. KTR and controls had comparable body weight, height and creatine intake (all P > 0.05). However, the total creatine pool was 14% lower in KTR as compared to controls (651 ± 178 vs. 753 ± 239 mmol, P < 0.001). The endogenous creatine synthesis rate was 22% lower in KTR as compared to controls (7.8 ± 3.0 vs. 10.0 ± 4.1 mmol per day, P < 0.001). Despite lower GFR, the plasma guanidinoacetate and creatine concentrations were 21% and 41% lower in KTR as compared to controls (both P < 0.001). Urinary excretion of guanidinoacetate and creatine were 66% and 59% lower in KTR as compared to controls (both P < 0.001). In KTR, but not in controls, a higher measured GFR was associated with a higher endogenous creatine synthesis rate (std. beta: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08; 0.33; P = 0.002), as well as a higher total creatine pool (std. beta: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11; 0.33; P < 0.001). These associations were fully mediated (93% and 95%; P < 0.001) by urinary guanidinoacetate excretion which is consistent with production of the creatine precursor guanidinoacetate as rate-limiting factor. Our findings highlight that KTR have a disturbed creatine homeostasis as compared to controls. Given the direct relationship of measured GFR with endogenous creatine synthesis rate and the total creatine pool, creatine supplementation might be beneficial in KTR with low kidney function. Trial registration ID: NCT02811835. Trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02811835. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) predicts of therapeutic response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. We verified the significance of GWMS as a predictive factor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Clinical data were obtained from a prospective trial database, and a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed. GWMS was classified into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). The patients were divided into subgroups according to the treatment arm (cetuximab plus irinotecan or irinotecan alone) and GWMS, and the clinical outcomes were compared between the subgroups. Results: Of the 112 patients, 58 (51.8%) were in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm, and 54 (48.2%) were in the irinotecan arm; 47 (42.0%) were in the HMCC, and 65 (58.0%) were in the LMCC group regarding GWMS. Compared with the LMCC group, the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in the HMCC group in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm (median 1.4 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.001, hazard ratio = 2.56), whereas no significant differences were observed in the irinotecan arm. A multivariate analysis showed that GWMS was an independent predictor of PFS and overall survival (OS) in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively), whereas GWMS did not contribute to either PFS or OS in the irinotecan arm. Conclusions: GWMS was a predictive factor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The optimal drug regimen and sequence are still unknown for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are candidates for third-line (3L) or subsequent treatment. The aim of this study is to know the opinion of experts on the most appropriate treatment options for mCRC in 3L and to clarify certain clinical decisions in Spain. Methods: Using a modified Delphi method, a group of experts discussed the treatment in 3L of patients with mCRC and developed a questionnaire with 21 items divided into 5 sections. Results: After 2 rounds, the 67 panelists consulted agreed on 17 items (81%). They considered that the main objective of 3L is to equally increase survival and improve patients' quality of life (QoL), but preferably the QoL. It was agreed that patients with mCRC in 3L prefer to receive active versus symptomatic treatment. Panelists considered trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) to be the best oral treatment available to them in 3L. In patients with MSI-H or dMMR and BRAF V600E, the panelists mostly prefer targeted treatments. Panelists agreed the use of a therapeutic sequence that not only increases outcomes but also allows patients to be treated later. Finally, it was agreed that FTD/TPI has a mechanism of action that allows it to be used in patients refractory to previous treatment with 5-fluorouracil. Conclusion: The experts agreed with most of the proposed items on 3L treatment of mCRC, prioritizing therapeutic options that increase survival and preserve QoL, while facilitating the possibility that patients can continue to be treated later. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine if the effects of exercise-based cancer rehabilitation on physical functioning, activity (including physical activity) and participation (including quality of life) are maintained at 6 to 12 months. Methods: Electronic databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched from the earliest available time to August 2021. Randomised controlled trials examining the long-term effects (≥ 6 months post-intervention) of exercise-based rehabilitation were eligible for inclusion. Outcome data (e.g. fitness, physical activity, walking capacity, fatigue, depression, quality of life) were extracted and the methodological quality assessed using PEDro. Meta-analyses using standardised mean differences were used to synthesise data and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria were applied. Results: Nineteen randomised controlled trials including 2974 participants were included. Participants who underwent exercise-based rehabilitation had improved physical activity (SMD 0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.51, I2 = 0%), cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD 2.00 ml/kg/min, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.45, I2 = 0%), walking capacity (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.92, I2 = 0%), depression (SMD 0.71, 95% 0.05 to 1.37, I2 = 90%), quality of life (physical functioning component SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.01, I2 = 62%) and sleep (MD 0.69 points, 95% 0.46 to 0.92, I2 = 0%) at 6 to 12 months follow-up. There was no data available on cancer-related mortality or recurrence. Conclusion: Health outcomes of cancer survivors after exercise-based rehabilitation can be maintained after rehabilitation completion. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Cancer survivors can maintain health benefits achieved through exercise-based rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]