101. Why we need a centralized repository for isotopic data
- Author
-
Michelle Dohm, Brian Hayden, Shawn A. Steffan, Gabriel J. Bowen, Christopher J. O. Baker, Jorrit H. Poelen, Joseph A. Cook, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, Carla Cicero, Laura Russell, David C. Bloom, Christopher T. Yarnes, Thure E. Cerling, Chris Harrod, Jonathan N. Pauli, Robert E. Gropp, Suzanne E. Pilaar Birch, Chris Jordan, Seth D. Newsome, Craig S. Cook, Keith A. Hobson, Bruce J. MacFadden, Gary R. Graves, Craig A. Stricker, Prarthana S. Dharampal, Mark D. Uhen, and Merav Ben-David
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Engineering ,Multidisciplinary ,Knowledge management ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Atomic energy ,Control (management) ,Information technology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Global network ,Organizational structure ,Quality (business) ,business ,Quality assurance ,media_common - Abstract
Organizational structure for the proposed IsoBank. A central executive group would oversee four subcommittees (SC): Information technology, integrative disciplinary, education and training, and analytical expertise. GNIP, Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation; IAEA, International Atomic Energy Association; QA/QC, quality assurance/quality control.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF