101. Brief report: Validation of a quantitative HIV risk prediction tool using a national HIV testing cohort
- Author
-
Richard E. Rothman, Douglas A.E. White, Michael S. Lyons, Lucy Bradley-Springer, Emily Hopkins, Meggan M. Bucossi, Alia Al-Tayyib, Allison L. Sabel, Mark W. Thrun, Jonathan D. Campbell, and Jason S. Haukoos
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,MEDLINE ,HIV Infections ,Hiv testing ,Hiv risk ,Risk Assessment ,Article ,Cohort Studies ,Young Adult ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Young adult ,Routine screening ,business.industry ,virus diseases ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,Infectious Diseases ,Immunology ,Cohort ,Very low risk ,Female ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Routine screening is recommended for HIV detection. HIV risk estimation remains important. Our goal was to validate the Denver HIV Risk Score using a national cohort from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patients of 13 years and older were included, 4,830,941 HIV tests were performed, and 0.6% newly diagnosed infections were identified. Of all visits, 9% were very low risk (HIV prevalence = 0.20%), 27% low risk (HIV prevalence = 0.17%), 41% moderate risk (HIV prevalence = 0.39%), 17% high risk (HIV prevalence = 1.19%), and 6% very high risk (HIV prevalence = 3.57%). The Denver HIV Risk Score accurately categorized patients into different HIV risk groups.
- Published
- 2015