101. The 4-hour standard is a meaningful quality indicator: correlation of performance with emergency department crowding
- Author
-
Ian Higginson, Justin Whyatt, A Kehoe, and Jason E Smith
- Subjects
Resuscitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Occupancy ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Correlation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Quality (business) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,media_common ,Quality Indicators, Health Care ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Retrospective cohort study ,Emergency department ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Crowding ,United States ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Medical emergency ,Metric (unit) ,business ,Emergency Service, Hospital - Abstract
BACKGROUND The 4-h standard performance is a controversial quality indicator. Crowding in emergency departments (EDs) causes increased patient morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between 4-h standard performance and ED crowding as measured by occupancy. METHODS A retrospective observational study was carried out using the computerized Emergency Department Information System. Daily occupancy was considered in three ways: as minutes per day spent at occupancy thresholds of 70, 80, 90 and 100%; as the peak occupancy of resuscitation and majors beds at any point in the day; and as a percentage of the total potential ED bed minutes used during the day. RESULTS An inverse relationship was observed between occupancy and 4-h standard performance using each method. Performance could be sustained at 70% occupancy, but deteriorated in a linear manner at a progressively increasing rate at 80, 90 and 100% occupancy (all P
- Published
- 2016