101. Physical and cognitive functioning of people older than 90 years: a comparison of two Danish cohorts born 10 years apart
- Author
-
Troels Steenstrup, Matt McGue, Kaare Christensen, Mikael Thinggaard, Anna Oksuzyan, Karen Andersen-Ranberg, James W. Vaupel, and Bernard Jeune
- Subjects
Male ,Gerontology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Activities of daily living ,Denmark ,Longevity ,Physical fitness ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Motor Activity ,Article ,Danish ,03 medical and health sciences ,Grip strength ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Activities of Daily Living ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged, 80 and over ,Geriatrics ,business.industry ,4. Education ,General Medicine ,language.human_language ,Cognitive test ,Cohort ,language ,Female ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background A rapidly increasing proportion of people in high-income countries are surviving into their tenth decade. Concern is widespread that the basis for this development is the survival of frail and disabled elderly people into very old age. To investigate this issue, we compared the cognitive and physical functioning of two cohorts of Danish nonagenarians, born 10 years apart. Methods People in the first cohort were born in 1905 and assessed at age 93 years (n=2262); those in the second cohort were born in 1915 and assessed at age 95 years (n=1584). All cohort members were eligible irrespective of type of residence. Both cohorts were assessed by surveys that used the same design and assessment instrument, and had almost identical response rates (63%). Cognitive functioning was assessed by mini-mental state examination and a composite of five cognitive tests that are sensitive to age-related changes. Physical functioning was assessed by an activities of daily living score and by physical performance tests (grip strength, chair stand, and gait speed). Findings The chance of surviving from birth to age 93 years was 28% higher in the 1915 cohort than in the 1905 cohort (6·50% vs 5·06%), and the chance of reaching 95 years was 32% higher in 1915 cohort (3·93% vs 2·98%). The 1915 cohort scored significantly better on the mini-mental state examination than did the 1905 cohort (22·8 [SD 5·6] vs 21·4 [6·0]; p
- Published
- 2013