101. A plea for a unified approach to sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy in Romania: results from a prospective multicentric trial
- Author
-
Cristian Nedelcu, Cristina Tocia, Andreea Bengus, Lucian Negreanu, Monica State, Theodor Voiosu, Andrei Voiosu, Ioan Sporea, Claudia Puscasu, Tudor Moga, Gabriel Constantinescu, Bogdan Mateescu, and Eugen Dumitru
- Subjects
Endoscopic ultrasound ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,complications ,medicine.drug_class ,Sedation ,Guidelines as Topic ,Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ,Endosonography ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,anesthesiologist ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypnotics and Sedatives ,guidelines ,Prospective Studies ,endoscopy ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Romania ,Gastroenterologists ,Middle Aged ,RC31-1245 ,Endoscopic Procedure ,Endoscopy ,Anesthesiologists ,sedation ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Sedative ,Emergency medicine ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Observational study ,Female ,gastroenterologist ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
Background. Adequate sedation is a prerequisite for quality endoscopic examination of the digestive tract. We aimed to evaluate the current practices and safety profile of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in Romania and its impact on the technical success of the procedure and procedure-related adverse events. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicentric, observational study including all patients undergoing digestive endoscopic procedures under various degrees of sedation. We collected data regarding the endoscopic procedure, type and degree of sedation, drug regimens, personnel in charge of sedation, and relevant patient related information. The main study outcome was the rate of sedation-related adverse events; secondary study outcomes included procedure-related adverse events and the impact of sedation on procedure success. Results. 1,043 consecutive endoscopic procedures from eight Romanian endoscopy units were included in our study. Sedation regimens were highly variable between participating centers, with 566 (54%) of procedures being performed under sedation provided by an anaesthesiologist. Sedation-related adverse events occurred in 40 cases (3.8%), most of them were mild respiratory and cardiovascular events and all reversed spontaneously. On multivariate analysis, male gender, procedure type (endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and deep sedation were risk factors for complications. The endoscopy unit, ASA status, age and type of sedative did not influence the complication rate. Conclusion. In conclusion, sedation for endoscopic procedures is generally safe, despite a high variability in sedation practices between centers in Romania. Establishing a national guideline on sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy will ensure consistent and safe practice for these procedures.
- Published
- 2021