101. Challenging misinformation and engaging patients: characterizing a regenerative medicine consult service
- Author
-
Smith, Cambray, Martin-Lillie, Charlene, Higano, Jennifer Dens, Turner, Leigh, Phu, Sydney, Arthurs, Jennifer, Nelson, Timothy J, Shapiro, Shane, and Master, Zubin
- Subjects
Medical Biotechnology ,Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Regenerative Medicine ,Aging ,Clinical Research ,Management of diseases and conditions ,7.1 Individual care needs ,Good Health and Well Being ,Adolescent ,Adult ,Aged ,Aged ,80 and over ,Child ,Child ,Preschool ,Communication ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,Female ,Humans ,Infant ,Interviews as Topic ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Minnesota ,Osteoarthritis ,Patient Navigation ,Patient Participation ,Referral and Consultation ,Retrospective Studies ,Young Adult ,consultation service ,ethical ,evidence-based medicine ,information for patients ,patient education ,patient navigation ,regenerative medicine education ,responsible translation ,unproven stem cell therapies ,Developmental Biology ,Medical biotechnology ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Aim: To address the unmet needs of patients interested in regenerative medicine, Mayo Clinic created a Regenerative Medicine Consult Service (RMCS). We describe the service and patient satisfaction. Materials & methods: We analyzed RMCS databases through retrospective chart analysis and performed qualitative interviews with patients. Results: The average patient was older to elderly and seeking information about regenerative options for their condition. Patients reported various conditions with osteoarthritis being most common. Over a third of consults included discussions about unproven interventions. About a third of patients received a clinical or research referral. Patients reported the RMCS as useful and the consultant as knowledgeable. Conclusion: An institutional RMCS can meet patients' informational needs and support the responsible translation of regenerative medicine.
- Published
- 2020