Search

Background: Many academic medical centers (AMC) transfer patients who require admission but not tertiary care to partner community hospitals from their emergency departments (ED). These transfers alleviate ED boarding but may worsen existing healthcare disparities. We assessed whether disparities exist in the transfer of patients from one AMC ED to a community hospital General Medical Service., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients screened for transfer between April 1 and December 31, 2021. During the screening process, the treating ED physician determines whether the patient meets standardized clinical criteria and a patient coordinator requests patient consent. We collected patient demographics data from the electronic health record and performed logistic regression at each stage of the transfer process to analyze how individual characteristics impact the odds of proceeding with transfer., Results: 5558 patients were screened and 596 (11%) ultimately transferred. 1999 (36%) patients were Black or Hispanic, 698 (12%) had a preferred language other than English, and 956 (17%) were on Medicaid or uninsured. A greater proportion of Black and Hispanic patients were deemed eligible for interhospital transfer compared to White patients and a greater proportion of Hispanic patients completed transfer to the community hospital (p < 0.017 after Bonferroni correction). After accounting for other demographic variables, patients older than 50 (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.40), with a preferred language other than English (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.62), and from a priority neighborhood (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.61) were more likely to be eligible for transfer, while patients who were male (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.10-2.05) and younger than 50 (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.20-2.78) were more likely to consent to transfer (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Health disparities exist in the screening process for our interfacility transfer program. Further investigation into why these disparities exist and mitigation strategies should be undertaken., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify risk factors of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure at a US pediatric hospital without a co-located ICU., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0 to 18 years who were started on HFNC in the emergency department or inpatient unit at a community hospital over a 16-month period. Children with chronic medical conditions were excluded. Outcome was HFNC failure, defined as HFNC need greater than floor limit, noninvasive positive pressure, or mechanical ventilation. In bivariate analysis, we compared demographic and clinical factors between those with and without failure. We included variables in a multivariable model on the basis of statistical significance. We used Poisson regression with robust error variance to calculate the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of failure for each variable., Results: Of 195 children, 51% had HFNC failure. In adjusted analysis, failure was higher in all age groups <12 months as compared with older children. For example, children aged 3 to 5 months had a higher risk of failure compared with patients 12 months or older (aRR 1.85, confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.54). Patients with an asthma exacerbation had a higher risk of failure (aRR 1.39, CI 1.03-1.88). Patients whose respiratory rate or heart rate did not improve also had a higher risk of failure (aRR 1.73, CI 1.24-2.41; aRR 1.47, CI 1.14-1.90)., Conclusions: Patients who were younger, had asthma, and did not have improved respiratory rate or heart rate after HFNC were more likely to experience HFNC failure., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation alone for low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with the addition of systemic thrombolysis for high-risk PE. However, treatment recommendations for intermediate-risk PE are not well-defined. Due to bleeding risks associated with systemic thrombolysis, ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) has evolved as a promising treatment modality. USAT is thought to decrease the rate of major bleeding by using localized delivery with lower thrombolytic dosages. Currently, there is little guidance on the implementation of USAT in the real-world clinical setting. This study was designed to evaluate our experience with USAT at this single community hospital with a newly initiated Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT). All patients identified by the PERT with an acute PE diagnosed by a computed tomography (CT) scan from January 2021 to January 2023 were included. During the study period, there were 89 PERT activations with 40 patients (1 high-risk and 37 intermediate-risk PE) receiving USAT with alteplase administered at a fixed rate of 1 mg/h per catheter for 6 h. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score within 48 h after USAT. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding within 72 h. The mean age was 57.4 ± 17.4 years and 50% (n = 20) were male, 17.5% (n = 7) had active malignancy, and 20% (n = 8) had a history of prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE. The mean PESI score decreased from baseline to 48 h post-USAT (84.7 vs 74.9; p  = 0.025) and there were no major bleeding events. The overall hospital length of stay was 7.5 ± 9.8 days and ICU length of stay was 2.2 ± 2.8 days. This study outlined our experience at this single community hospital which resulted in an improvement in PESI scores and no major bleeding events observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: To investigate the impact of an Internet + WeChat platform-based "trinity" remote rehabilitation model involving the hospital, community, and family on stroke patient rehabilitation nursing., Methods: 159 patients with stroke who were discharged from Beijing Luhe Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, were selected and divided into a control group (79 cases) and an experimental group (80 cases) by the random drawing method. The control group was given routine nursing, and the experimental group was given remote rehabilitation nursing intervention by using the WeChat network platform based on the control group. Limb function [Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA)] and activities of daily living [Modified Barthel Index (MBI)] were evaluated at enrollment and at the end of 3 months, 6 months and 12 months in both groups. The compliance and satisfaction surveys in the two groups were evaluated after 6 months and 12 months of intervention., Results: (1) Before the intervention, there was no statistical significance in FMA score between the two groups (t = 0.798, P > .05). After 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of intervention, the FMA score in the two groups was increased compared with that before intervention (t = 2.463, P < .05), and the FMA scores in the experimental group at the above time points were higher than those in the control group (ts = 7.057, 14.285, Ps < .05). (2) There was no statistical difference in MBI scores between the two groups before intervention (t = 0.798, P > .05). After 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of intervention, the MBI score in the two groups was increased compared with that before intervention (t = 0.232, P < .05), and MBI scores in the experimental group at the above time points were higher compared to the control group (ts = 4.959, 8.842, 8.131, Ps < .05). (3) The compliance scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group after 6 months and 12 months of intervention (ts = 4.959, 8.842, 8.131, Ps < .05). (4) The satisfaction survey scores in the experimental group after 6 months and 12 months of intervention were higher than those in the control group (ts = 2.120 ~ 14.554, Ps < .05)., Conclusion: The Hospital-community-family "trinity" stroke rehabilitation model on the WeChat network platform holds significant importance. Enhancing limb function and daily living for stroke patients improves their quality of life and lessens reliance on caregivers. This positively impacts both survivors' well-being and healthcare resources. Increased patient satisfaction and compliance suggest a potential revolution in post-stroke care, favoring a more patient-centered approach. Overall, this model has transformative potential for stroke treatment, offering holistic and patient-focused strategies. Its success promises better rehabilitation outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost reduction, while paving the way for innovative research in stroke treatment and rehabilitation.

This research explored the relationship between visibility and the level of security risks as perceived by nurses and physicians in emergency departments (EDs). Security in EDs has been reported as a major global concern, and visibility has been identified as a design factor impacting behavior. However, few previous studies have rigorously investigated the role of visibility in reduction of ED security risks with evidence-based design approach. There is a lot of significant questions about how visibility impacts the reduction of security issues in EDs., Methods: How visibility may influence ED security was explored via qualitative methods in five EDs using semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 17 clinical staff and 48 hr of field observations. The coding process for both interviews and observational notes followed the principles of naturalistic inquiry., Results: The findings suggest security risks can be decreased by improving visibility. Medical staff (registered nurses and physicians) felt more secure in the EDs with higher visibility., Discussion: This study provides a framework to identify preferable levels of visibility in EDs and proposes design strategies to minimize security issues. Registered nurses and physicians can improve their team's sense of security by considering visibility throughout their daily practices., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The chimney technique, fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair are endovascular options in patients with a juxtarenal, suprarenal or type IV thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. The chimney technique has specific advantages and disadvantages. A retrospective single center study was performed to describe the results., Patients and Methods: All consecutive patients in whom the chimney technique was used between 1th January 2011 and 31th December 2020 were included. We excluded patients who needed a revision of an existing EVAR and patients with a para-anastomotic aneurysm. Outcomes were reported in accordance with the reporting standards., Results: 38 Patients were included in the study, a total of 59 chimney grafts were deployed. At a median follow-up duration of 26.6 months, there were 9 patients with occlusion of the chimney graft. In 1 patient an iliac renal bypass was performed. In the other patients the renal function stabilized and no further therapy was necessary. All chimneys in the mesenteric arteries remained patent. Gutter endoleak was seen in 5 patients, 3 patients were successfully treated and in the other 2 patients the gutter endoleak disappeared spontaneously., Conclusions: Conclusions should be drawn carefully as this is a retrospective non-comparative study. Results from 38 patients treated with the chimney technique are presented. Chimney graft occlusion rate was 15.3% at the end of follow-up. However, the majority (77.8%) of the occluded stents were self-expandable stents, stressing the importance of selecting the right devices., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.H. is a proctor for Boston Scientific. The other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Objectives: Coordination of care across health care settings is needed to ensure safe patient transfers. We examined the effects of the ECHO-Care Transitions program (ECHO-CT) on readmissions, skilled nursing facility (SNF) length of stay (LOS), and costs., Design: This is a prospective cohort study evaluating the ECHO-CT program. The intervention consisted of weekly 90-minute teleconferences between hospital and SNF-based teams to discuss the care of recently discharged patients., Setting and Participants: The intervention occurred at one small community hospital and 7 affiliated SNFs and 1 large teaching hospital and 11 associated SNFs between March 23, 2019, and February 25, 2021. A total of 882 patients received the intervention., Methods: We selected 13 hospitals and 172 SNFs as controls. Specific hospital-SNF pairings within the intervention and control groups are referred to as hospital-SNF dyads. Using Medicare claims data for more than 10,000 patients with transfers between these hospital-SNF dyads, we performed multivariable regression to evaluate differences in 30-day rehospitalization rates, SNF lengths of stay, and SNF costs between patients discharged to intervention and control hospital-SNF dyads. We split the post period into pre-COVID and COVID periods and ran models separately for the small community and large teaching hospitals., Results: There was no significant difference-in-differences among intervention compared to control facilities during either post-acute care period for any of the outcomes., Conclusions and Implications: Although video-communication of care plans between hospitalists and post-acute care clinicians makes good clinical sense, our analysis was unable to detect significant reductions in rehospitalizations, SNF lengths of stay, or SNF Medicare costs. Disruption of the usual processes of care by the COVID pandemic may have played a role in the null findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Communication gaps, whether incomplete or fragmented communication, have been the cause of many disasters in human civilisation. Coordination of healthcare is directly related to proper communication and handoffs among multidisciplinary teams throughout multiple shifts during a patient's hospitalisation., Local Problem: Patient surveys and direct patient feedback at Mayo Clinic Health System in Mankato, Minnesota, indicated that patient communication with physicians and nurses had declined in 2017 and 2018. Viewing this as an opportunity for improvement, our leadership initiated several changes to increase physician and nurse communication with patients, which resulted in no notable improvements., Methods: A systematic quality improvement approach was implemented by using Six Sigma methodology. Stakeholders from multidisciplinary teams were assembled as the project team. The five steps of Six Sigma methodology (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control) were followed to create a quality improvement intervention., Intervention: We developed a standardised and easy-to-use bedside team rounding tool to improve patient communication with physicians and nurses., Results: Postintervention patient satisfaction top-box scores exceeded target improvements for both physician (from 78.5% to 82.0%, p<0.01) and nurse (from 80.5% to 83.1%, p=0.04) communication domains. Physicians had a 33-point increase in percentile rank (from 41st to 74th percentile rank), and nurses had a 25-point increase in percentile rank (from 59th to 84th percentile rank). This increase in communication ranked our institution at the top of national benchmark organisations., Conclusions: Overwhelmingly positive patient feedback was achieved, and postintervention employee satisfaction was primarily positive when compared with preintervention satisfaction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Best practices in onboarding are well-established, but surgeons frequently receive suboptimal introductions to new practice settings. At the same time, increasing regionalization of surgical programs and strategic alignments between academic and community hospitals have increased the demand for surgeons to practice at multiple sites with variable resources and institutional cultures. In response to this growing problem, we developed and implemented a surgeon onboarding program in an academic-affiliated community hospital. This pilot demonstrated excellent process adherence, user satisfaction, and significant improvements in preparedness to practice. We therefore conclude that robust onboarding is feasible and can be readily implemented by a local team to promote safe transitions in practice settings for surgeons., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a paucity of validated selection tools to assess which patients can safely and predictably undergo same-day or 23-hour discharge in a community hospital. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of our patient selection too to identify patients who are candidates for outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a community hospital., Methods: A retrospective review of 223 consecutive (unselected) primary TJAs was performed. The patient selection tool was retrospectively applied to this cohort to determine eligibility for outpatient arthroplasty. Utilizing length of stay and discharge disposition, we identified the proportion of patients discharged home within 23 hours., Results: We found that 179 (80.1%) patients met eligibility criteria for short-stay TJA. Of the 223 patients in this study, 215 (96.4%) patients were discharged home; 17 (7.9%) were on the day of surgery, and 190 (88.3%) within 23 hours. Of the 179 eligible patients for short-stay discharge, 155 (86.6%) patients were discharged home within 23 hours. Overall, the sensitivity of the patient selection tool was 79%, the specificity was 92%, the positive predictive value was 87% and the negative predictive value was 96%., Conclusion: In this study, we found that more than 80% of patients undergoing TJA in a community hospital are eligible for short-stay arthroplasty with this selection tool. We found that this selection tool is safe and effective at predicting short-stay discharge. Further studies are needed to better ascertain the direct effects of these specific demographic traits on their effects on short-stay protocols., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to summarize the administration model of a COVID-19 designated hospital transformed from a community hospital to improve the emergency capacity of community hospitals and the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment of medical staff in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzed the surrounding environment, ward layout, area management, treatment process, medical staff, and patient management of the designated community hospital. From February 5, 2020, to February 18, 2020, the designated community hospital has received 198 COVID-19 mild and general patients (including 41 in the hospital at the beginning of the period). Among them, 39 were transferred to module hospitals, 131 were discharged, and 28 were in the hospital at the end of the period, and none of them became severe. There were 41 medical staff, and none of them had COVID-19 infection. We have achieved excellent results in the prevention and control stratagems implemented in this new community-designated hospital that specializes in treating patients with COVID-19. Its diagnosis and treatment model has completed the treatment of COVID-19 patients successfully. After adjustment, this community hospital can shoulder the critical task of being a designated hospital for COVID-19, which includes admission, isolation, and therapy of suspected and mild COVID-19 patients, reducing the medical burden of superior hospitals. Our experience provides concepts for community hospitals to temporarily undertake medical responsibilities to reduce the spread of COVID-19 during the pandemic.

Introduction: Robotic extended totally extraperitoneal hernia (eTEP) repair is a novel technique for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with retromuscular placement of mesh. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for robotic eTEP hernia repair using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis for two general surgeons-one with dedicated fellowship training in robotic eTEP technique (surgeon 2) and another without robotic eTEP-specific training (surgeon 1)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 98 patients undergoing robotic eTEP hernia repair from July 2020 to February 2022 for two surgeons. RA-CUSUM method was applied to the overall operative time (OT) in minutes, adjusting for transversus abdominis release (TAR)., Results: Figures 3 (surgeon 1) and 4 (surgeon 2) illustrate the three phases in the RA-CUSUM graphs of OT. For surgeon 1, the cases for each phase were determined: phase 1 (1 to 12), phase 2 (13 to 24), and phase 3 (25 to 51). For surgeon 2, the three phases were similarly determined as 1 to 8, 9 to 32, and 33 to 47, respectively. A significant (p = 0.017) difference existed for the OTs between phases 1 (262 ± 69) and 3 (192 ± 63.0) for surgeon 1. OT compared to the risk-adjusted value stabilized after case 12 and decreased after case 24 for surgeon 1; it began to decrease after case 8 for surgeon 2., Conclusions: The initial learning curve for surgeon 1 reached its plateau after 12 cases, shorter than comparable studies. This was likely due to the surgeon's intentional focus on learning this technique through courses, proctoring, and active mentorship. The flat learning curve seen in surgeon 2's series illustrates the value of experience gained during fellowship training. Our data support that, given the right resources and support, a short learning curve for eTEP is attainable for community surgeons without prior training in the technique., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To explore differences in costs and lengths of stay for cancer patients admitted to National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, nondesignated academic medical centers, and community hospitals in New York State., Data Sources: We use patient-level data from the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System Hospital Inpatient Discharges dataset for the years 2017-2019., Study Design: We employ ordinary least squares and Poisson regressions to compare hospital costs and length of stay for cancer patients, controlling for hospital type, patient demographics, and patient health. Our key outcomes are differences in costs and lengths of stay., Data Collection: We use data on patient demographics, total treatment costs, and lengths of stay for patients discharged from New York hospitals with cancer-related diagnoses between 2017 and 2019., Principal Findings: We determine that inpatient costs were 27% higher (95% CI 0.252, 0.285), but length of stay was 12% shorter (95% CI -0.131, -0.100), in Comprehensive Cancer Centers relative to community hospitals., Conclusions: The results imply that, in New York State, Comprehensive Cancer Centers are a magnet for more complex oncology cases and administer more expensive treatments. That expertise, however, seems to be responsible for more efficient care delivery and thorough discharge planning, allowing for shorter average lengths of stay., (© 2023 Health Research and Educational Trust.)

The clinical and pharmaceutical interventions of pharmacy professionals are considered impactful inputs towards optimised patient care and safety, by rationalising prescriptions, enhancing therapeutic choices and reducing and preventing medication errors and adverse effects. Pharmacy interventions (PIs), related to the identification, prevention and resolution of drug-related problems, should be recorded for optimal clinical governance and potential health outcomes.Between October 2020 and October 2021, the community hospitals at Powys Teaching Health Board recorded 158 PIs, corresponding to 0.4 interventions per staff per week. Only two members of the team were recording these PIs. Poor indicative PIs can result in lost opportunities for medication optimisation and prescribing rationalisation, increased costs and unidentified training potential.The aims of this project were (1) to record 180 interventions between 22 November 2021 and 8 April 2022 (20 weeks), corresponding to an average threefold increase, compared to the interventions recorded between October 2020 and October 2021 (52 weeks); (2) to have all hospital pharmacy staff recording at least one intervention during the same period.The number of interventions recorded and the number of pharmacy staff recording each intervention were two process measures. The project was completed through two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and applied theory on managing change in healthcare.The most successful intervention influencing positively the process measures was the implementation of a new Pharmacy Intervention Record Tool (xPIRT) toolkit that included an online recording tool (xPIRT) and an interactive panel with up-to-date results from all interventions recorded (xPIRT Dashboard). Motivating change was proven to be one of the best determinants of user satisfaction and engagement that contributed to meet the project's targets. xPIRT Dashboard provided staff the capacity to act on possible personal motivators and the possibility to improving care with medicines on their wards. The implementation of xPIRT toolkit was able to increase the representativity and significance of PIs recorded by the hospital pharmacy team, and it is expected to be used for personal professional development, demonstrating team activity and impact, service planning, prescribing practice optimisation and to identify education/training needs. This toolkit can be easily applied and adapted to other health organisations, settings and services., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Context: Goals of care conversations for seriously ill hospitalized patients are associated with high-quality patient-centered care., Objectives: We aimed to assess the prevalence of documented goals of care conversations for rural hospitalized patients compared to nonrural hospitalized patients., Methods: We retrospectively assessed goals of care documentation using a template note for adult patients with predicted 90-day mortality greater than 30% admitted to eight rural and nine nonrural community hospitals between July 2021 and April 2023. We compared predictors and prevalence of goals of care documentation among rural and nonrural hospitals., Results: Of the 31,098 patients admitted during the study period, 21% were admitted to a rural hospital. Rural patients were more likely than nonrural patients to be >65 years old (89% vs. 86%, P = <.0001), more likely to live in a neighborhood classified in the highest quintile of socioeconomic disadvantage (40% vs. 16%, P = <.0001), and less likely to receive a palliative care consult (8% vs. 18%, P = <.0001). Goals of care documentation occurred less often for patients admitted to rural vs. nonrural community hospitals (2% vs. 7%, P < .0001). In the base multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds of goals care documentation were lower in rural vs. nonrural community hospitals (aOR 0.4, P = .0232). In a second multivariable logistic regression model including both patient characteristics and severity of illness, the odds of goals of care documentation in rural community hospitals were no longer statistically different than nonrural community hospitals (aOR 0.5, P = .1080). Patients who received a palliative care consult had a lower prevalence of goals of care documentation in rural vs. nonrural hospitals (16% vs. 37%, P = <.0001)., Conclusion: In this study of 17 rural and nonrural community hospitals, we found low overall prevalence of goals of care documentation with particularly infrequent documentation occurring within rural hospitals. Future study is needed to assess barriers to goals of care documentation contributing to low prevalence of goals of care conversations in rural hospital settings., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Roommates of unrecognized nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cases are at a higher acquisition risk; however, optimal surveillance strategies are unknown., Methods: Using simulation, we analyzed surveillance testing and isolation strategies for MRSA among exposed hospital roommates. We compared isolating exposed roommates until conventional culture testing on day 6 and a nasal polymerase chain reaction test on day 3 (PCR3) with/without day 0 culture testing (Cult0). The model represents MRSA transmission in medium-sized hospitals using data and recommends best practices from the literature and Ontario community hospitals., Results: Cult0 + PCR3 incurred a slightly lower number of MRSA colonizations and 38.9% lower annual cost in the base case compared to Cult0 + culture testing on day 6 because the reduced isolation cost compensated for the increased testing cost. The reduction in MRSA colonizations was due to a 54.5% drop in MRSA transmissions during isolation as PCR3 reduced the exposure of MRSA-free roommates to new MRSA carriers. Removing the day 0 culture test from Cult0 + PCR3 increased total cost, the number of MRSA colonization, and missed cases by $1,631, 4.3%, and 50.9%, respectively. Improvements were higher under aggressive MRSA transmission scenarios., Discussion and Conclusions: Adopting direct nasal polymerase chain reaction testing for determining post-exposure MRSA status reduces transmission risk and costs. Day 0 culture would still be beneficial., (Copyright © 2023 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Capacity challenges at quaternary hospitals cause delays or denials in patient transfers from community hospitals that can compromise quality and safety. Repatriation is an innovative approach to increase capacity at the quaternary hospital by transferring a patient back to their originating community hospital after the quaternary portion of their care is completed., Methods: A repatriation program was implemented at a large quaternary care teaching hospital over a one-year period (2020 to 2021). The authors characterized the rate of successful repatriation and associated patient characteristics, determined the impact on quaternary hospital capacity in terms of bed days saved, and estimated the resultant number of backfilled admissions that could be accommodated. The research team also monitored the rate of readmissions for repatriations back to the quaternary hospital., Results: Overall, 215 repatriations were attempted, and 103 (47.5%) were successful. The most common diagnoses were sepsis (13, 12.6%), stroke (12, 11.7%), intracranial bleed (10, 9.7%), gastrointestinal perforation/obstruction (9, 8.7%), and trauma (9, 8.7%). The median length of stay at the quaternary hospital was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-20) and 12 days (IQR 4-26) at the community hospital. There were 2,842 bed days saved at the quaternary hospital, with a backfill opportunity of 431 admissions. The readmission rate to the quaternary hospital was 1.9%., Conclusion: By dynamically matching patient need with hospital capability at different phases of the patient's care, Repatriation can save bed days at the quaternary hospital, creating capacity to improve access for patients needing timely transfer. The low observed readmission rate suggests that repatriation is safe., (Copyright © 2023 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies have demonstrated that timely podiatric surgery consultation results in positive patient outcomes. However, there are limited studies focused on readmission rates in teaching community hospitals. The primary aim of this study is to determine if consulting podiatric services was associated with lower 30-day readmission rates and impact on length of stay in patients with lower extremity wounds. The secondary aim was to investigate medical and socio-economic factors associated with better outcomes. This study was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A retrospective chart review utilizing the hospital's electronic medical record system identified patients with lower extremity wounds (based on ICD-10 codes) admitted between July 2018 and December 2020. The results showed a 3-fold decrease in 30-day readmission rates in patients with podiatric surgery consultation compared to patients without consultation with lower extremity wounds (4.2% vs 11.3%, p = .03). Multivariate regression models showed patients with gangrene (AOR = 7.61; p = .04) or osteomyelitis (AOR = 9.07; p = .013) had a higher likelihood of readmission than patients with venous ulcer (reference category) after controlling for podiatric consultation. Among the group of patients with podiatric consultation, earlier podiatric consultations resulted in decreased length of stay. This study identifies prior amputation history and lack of podiatric consultation increased 30-day readmission rates., (Copyright © 2023 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify the prevalence of group reporting of hospital community benefit efforts to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and understand hospital and community characteristics associated with this practice., Design: The study was based on data collected from publicly available community benefit reports from 2010 to 2019, as well as secondary data from the 2020 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey. The sample was drawn from the entire nonprofit US hospital population reporting community benefit activities. The analytic plan employed descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis., Setting: The United States., Participants: All data are self-reported by US hospitals, either through the publication of community benefit reports (IRS Form 990 Schedule H) or a response to the AHA Annual Survey., Main Outcome Measures: Analyzed variables include whether a hospital reported its community benefit expenditures individually or as a group member; community benefit spending as a percentage of hospital operating expenses; and whether the hospital was part of a multihospital system, with consideration of hospital and community characteristics., Results: Between 2010 and 2019, more than 40% of hospitals participated in group reporting, with most doing so consistently. System membership and hospital size were significantly and positively tied to group reporting, with state community benefit policy tied to the lower prevalence of group reporting., Conclusions: The high prevalence of group reporting limits accountability to communities and restricts an accurate assessment of community benefit expenditures, counter to policy intentions. Stakeholders should consider what modifications to reporting rules could be made to promote transparency and to ensure that the effects of community benefit policies align with intentions., Competing Interests: No conflicts of interest exist for any of the authors., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study examined approaches that nonprofit hospitals use to evaluate community benefit activities in the Community Health Needs Assessment/Implementation Plan (CHNA/IP) process., Design: Content analysis of CHNAs/IPs completed between 2018 and 2021 from a 20% stratified random sample (n = 503) of US nonprofit hospitals., Main Outcome Measures: A coding sheet was used to record details about the evaluation content reported by hospitals in their CHNAs/IPs. Evaluation was coded into 4 categories: (1) no mention of evaluation; (2) description of evaluation without reporting any measures; (3) reporting reach (number of people served) only; and (4) reporting social/health outcomes. For logistic regression analyses, categories 1 and 2 were grouped together into "no evaluation measures" and categories 3 and 4 were grouped into "evaluation measures" for binary comparison. Multinomial logistic regression was also used to individually examine categories 3 and 4 compared with no evaluation measures., Results: While a majority of nonprofit hospitals (71.4%, n = 359) mentioned evaluation in their CHNAs, almost half (49.7%, n = 250) did not report any evaluation measures. Among the 50.3% (n = 253) of hospitals that reported evaluation measures, 67.2% (n = 170) only reported reach. Fewer than 1 in 5 hospitals (16.5%, n = 83) reported social/health outcomes. Hospitals that hired a consultant (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.43) and system members (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.75) had higher odds of reporting evaluation measures. Using hospitals that reported no measures as the base category, system members (AOR = 7.71; 95% CI, 2.97-20.00) also had significantly higher odds of reporting social/health outcomes, while rural locations had lower odds (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94)., Conclusions: Although hospitals are required to evaluate the impact of actions taken to address the health needs identified in their CHNAs, few hospitals are reporting social/health outcomes of such activities. This represents a missed opportunity, as health/social outcomes could be used to inform the allocation of resources to maximize community benefits and the expansion of successful community initiatives., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To implement a collaborative, interdisciplinary team approach to reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) through nurse empowerment and engagement., Methods: This quality improvement project was conducted at a 288-bed community hospital. The Donabedian model was used to design this intervention. The authors used a collaborative, interdisciplinary team approach for pressure injury prevention and management, utilizing nurse empowerment and engagement as driving forces to reduce HAPI rates., Results: The incidence of HAPI decreased from a peak of 5.30% in April 2019 down to 0% from August 2019 to December 2020., Conclusions: Pressure injuries are key quality indicators for patient safety and avoidance of patient harm. Through nurse empowerment and engagement, HAPIs were avoided, resulting in improved quality care outcomes and maintenance of a safe patient environment., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Given the impact of environmental pollution on health and health inequity, there may be substantial value in integrating assessment and response to pollution into nonprofit hospital community benefit processes. Such hospital engagement has not yet been studied., Objectives: We take a preliminary step of inquiry in investigating if nonprofit hospitals in New York State (NYS) assess, identify, or respond to environmental pollution as part of community benefit processes., Design: This study is of retrospective, observational design. Data were abstracted from community health needs reports (2015-2017), associated implementation plans, and related IRS (Internal Revenue Service) filings from a randomly geographically stratified selection of NYS nonprofit hospitals., Participants: The sample includes 53 hospitals from 23 counties. The sampling frame consists of NYS nonspecialty private nonprofit hospitals., Main Outcome Measures: Dichotomous findings for the following: (1) engagement of environmental pollution in the process of assessment of community health needs; (2) environmental pollution concern identified as a priority community health need; (3) strategic planning present to address pollution identified as community health need; and (4) action taken on same., Results: We found that 60.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.74) of hospitals evidenced some form of assessment of environmental pollution and 18.9% (95% CI, 0.09-0.32) identified pollution as a priority community health need. However, no hospital went on to take independent or collaborative planning or action to address pollution. In additional analysis, we found that social justice in hospital mission was a positive predictor of assessment of environmental pollution., Conclusions: For NYS hospitals, we found a substantial presence of assessment and identification of pollution as a community health concern. Our finding of the absence of response to environmental pollution represents a gap in community benefit implementation. This indicates a yet untaken opportunity to address racial and economic environmental health injustices and to improve population health., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

A susceptible-infectious-susceptible (SIS) model for simulating healthcare-acquired infection spread within a hospital and associated community is proposed. The model accounts for the stratification of in-patients into two susceptibility-based risk groups. The model is formulated as a system of first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with appropriate initial conditions. The mathematical analysis of this system is demonstrated. It is shown that the system has unique global solutions, which are bounded and non-negative. The basic reproduction number ([Formula: see text]) for the considered model is derived. The existence and the stability of the stationary solutions are analysed. The disease-free stationary solution is always present and is globally asymptotically stable for [Formula: see text], while for [Formula: see text] it is unstable. The presence of an endemic stationary solution depends on the model parameters and when it exists, it is globally asymptotically stable. The endemic state encompasses both risk groups. The endemic state within only one group only is not possible. In addition, for [Formula: see text] a forward bifurcation takes place. Numerical simulations, based on the anonymised insurance data, are also presented to illustrate theoretical results., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: To decrease preventable maternal mortality, providing health education to all parties is mandatory. Good knowledge, including awareness of pregnant women regarding obstetric danger signs (ODS), leads to appropriate practices and services. The knowledge of ODS varies among countries and regions. Since the data in rural regions of Thailand remains unavailable, this study aimed to identify the prevalence of good ODS knowledge and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal services at a Thai community hospital., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, analytical study in 415 singleton pregnant women who visited the antenatal clinic at Wang Saphung Hospital, Loei, Thailand. A well-trained research assistant interviewed all participants using the data record form containing twenty items on the demographic and obstetric data and sixteen items on ODS knowledge. An ODS score of at least 75% (12 points) was considered a good level of knowledge., Results: A total of 275 participants (66.27%) had good knowledge of ODS. The most recognized ODS was vaginal bleeding whereas the least recognized ODS during pregnancy was convulsion; the least recognized ODS during labor and delivery was retained placenta. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the predictive factors of good OBS knowledge included a higher education level, maternal age of at least 20 years, and having medical personnel as a source of knowledge., Conclusions: In a rural setting of Thailand, two-thirds of pregnant women had good ODS knowledge. Identifying those at risk for fair and poor ODS knowledge and prompt management for the vulnerable subgroups might help decrease maternal mortality., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2023 Koovimon P et al.)

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges to the evaluation and treatment of cancer, and abrupt resource diversion toward patients with COVID-19 put cancer treatment on hold for many patients. Previous reports have shown substantial declines in cancer screening and diagnoses in 2020; however, the extent to which the delivery of cancer care was altered remains unclear., Objective: To assess alterations in cancer treatment in the US during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) on patients older than 18 years with newly diagnosed cancer from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were accessibility (time to treatment, travel distance, and multi-institutional care), availability (proportional changes in cancer treatment between years), and utilization (reductions by treatment modality, hospital type) of cancer treatment in 2020 compared with 2018 to 2019. Autoregressive models forecasted expected findings for 2020 based on observations from prior years., Results: Of 1 229 654 patients identified in the NCDB in 2020, 1 074 225 were treated for cancer, representing a 16.8% reduction from what was expected. Patients were predominately female (53.8%), with a median age of 66 years (IQR, 57-74 years), similar to demographics in 2018 and 2019. Median time between diagnosis and treatment was 26 days (IQR, 0-36 days) in 2020, and median travel distance for care was 11.1 miles (IQR, 5.0-25.3 miles), similar to 2018 and 2019. In 2020, fewer patients traveled longer distances (20.2% reduction of patients traveling >35 miles). The proportions of patients treated with chemotherapy (32.0%), radiation (29.5%), and surgery (57.1%) were similar to those in 2018 and 2019. Overall, 146 805 fewer patients than expected underwent surgery, 80 480 fewer received radiation, and 68 014 fewer received chemotherapy. Academic hospitals experienced the greatest reduction in cancer surgery and treatment, with a decrease of approximately 484 patients (-19.0%) per hospital compared with 99 patients (-12.6%) at community hospitals and 110 patients (-12.8%) at integrated networks., Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that among patients diagnosed with cancer in 2020, access and availability of treatment remained intact; however, reductions in treated patients varied across treatment modalities and were greater at academic hospitals than at community hospitals and integrated networks compared with expected values. These results suggest the resilience of cancer service lines and frame the economic losses from reductions in cancer treatment during the pandemic.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive seizures are a major source of in-hospital morbidity and a cause of unexplained encephalopathy in critically ill patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential to confirm nonconvulsive seizures and can guide patient-specific workup, treatment, and prognostication. In a 208-bed community hospital, EEG services were limited to 1 part-time EEG technician and 1 EEG machine shared between inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use was restricted to typical business hours. A nursing-led quality improvement (QI) project endeavored to enhance access to EEG by introducing a point-of-care rapid-response EEG program. METHODS: For this project, a multidisciplinary protocol was developed to deploy a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, point-of-care rapid-response EEG platform (Ceribell Inc) in a community hospital's emergency department and inpatient units to streamline neurodiagnostic workups. This QI project compared EEG volume, study location, time-to-EEG, number of cases with seizures captured on EEG, and hospital-level financial metrics of diagnosis-related group reimbursements and length of stay for the 6 months before (pre-QI, using conventional EEG) and 6 months after implementing the rapid-response protocol (post-QI). RESULTS: Electroencephalography volume increased from 35 studies pre-QI to 115 post-QI (3.29-fold increase), whereas the median time from EEG order to EEG start decreased 7.6-fold (74 [34-187] minutes post-QI vs 562 [321-1034] minutes pre-QI). Point-of-care EEG was also associated with more confirmed seizure diagnoses compared with conventional EEG (27/115 post-QI vs 0/35 pre-QI). This resulted in additional diagnosis-related group reimbursements and hospital revenue. Availability of point-of-care EEG was also associated with a shorter median length of stay. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, rapid-response EEG protocol at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in EEG accessibility and seizure diagnosis with hospital-level financial benefits. By expanding access to EEG, confirming nonconvulsive seizures, and increasing care efficiency, rapid-response EEG protocols can enhance patient care., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Delirium is among the most prevalent harmful events in hospitals that is associated with an elevated risk for severe outcomes such as functional decline, falls, longer length of stay, and increased mortality., Objective: To evaluate the impact of the implementation of a multi-component delirium program on the prevalence of delirium and the incidence of falls among patients staying on general medicine inpatient hospital units., Design: A pre-post intervention study using retrospective chart abstraction and interrupted time series analysis., Cohort: Patients were selected from adult patients that stayed at least 1 day on one of the five general medicine units in a large community hospital in Ontario, Canada. A total of 16 random samples of 50 patients per month for 8 consecutive months pre-intervention (October 2017 to May 2018) and 8 months post intervention (January 2019 to August 2019) were selected for a total of 800 patients. There were no exclusion criteria., Intervention: The delirium program included multiple components: education of staff and hospital leadership, twice per day bed-side screen for delirium, non-pharmacological and pharmacological prevention, and intervention strategies and a delirium consultation team., Measurement: Delirium prevalence was assessed using the evidence-based delirium chart abstraction method, CHART-del. Demographic data as well as fall incidence were also collected., Result: Our evaluation showed that the implementation of a multicomponent delirium program led to a reduction in delirium prevalence and fall incidences. The reduction in both delirium and falls was the largest for patients in the ages between 72 and 83 years old and varied across inpatient units., Conclusion: A multi-component delirium program to improve the prevention, recognition, and management of delirium reduces the prevalence of delirium and fall incidence among patients in general medicine units., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

In the spring of 2022 - at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic - Halton Healthcare, a large community hospital corporation in southern Ontario, launched a brand-new leadership development program called "Inspiring Leadership" to support its workforce. Just one year later, the program is having a profound positive impact on the workforce with enhanced engagement and reduced turnover. By investging in people development, organizations can create a compelling employee value proposition, foster cross-continuum partnerships through Ontario Health Teams and community affiliates and, ultimately, advance their strategic objectives. In this article, we will describe the development of this unique program, its evaluation and its impact, with the intent of sharing this learning with other organizations so that they too might realize these benefits., (Copyright © 2023 Longwoods Publishing.)

Background: An intervention that involved simultaneously implementing clinical pathways for multiple conditions was tested at a tertiary children's hospital and it improved care quality. We are conducting a randomized trial to evaluate this multicondition pathway intervention in community hospitals. Our objectives in this qualitative study were to prospectively (1) identify implementation barriers and (2) map barriers to facilitators using an established implementation science framework., Methods: We recruited participants via site leaders from hospitals enrolled in the trial. We designed an interview guide using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and conducted individual interviews. Analysis was done using constant comparative methods. Anticipated barriers were mapped to facilitators using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior Framework., Results: Participants from 12 hospitals across the United States were interviewed (n = 21). Major themes regarding the multicondition pathway intervention included clinician perceptions, potential benefits, anticipated barriers/challenges, potential facilitators, and necessary resources. We mapped barriers to additional facilitators using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior framework. To address limited time/bandwidth of clinicians, we will provide Maintenance of Certification credits. To address new staff and trainee turnover, we will provide easily accessible educational videos/resources. To address difficulties in changing practice across other hospital units, we will encourage emergency department engagement. To address parental concerns with deimplementation, we will provide guidance on parent counseling., Conclusions: We identified several potential barriers and facilitators for implementation of a multicondition clinical pathway intervention in community hospitals. We also illustrate a prospective process for identifying implementation facilitators., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Background: Malnutrition is a significant public health problem that affects many patients in inpatient settings. Timely identification and addressing malnutrition in an inpatient setting presents an opportunity to improve patient care and reduce costs. There is a clear link between malnutrition, increased length of hospital stay, higher risk of readmissions and infections, skin breakdown, and higher hospital costs due to complications., Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project to increase the number of times patients were accurately diagnosed and successfully coded as malnourished. We used the Define, Measure, Analyse, Intervene, Control (DMAIC) process to complete this project. Data were collected for nearly a year using the Epic Report Tool developed explicitly for the project. Initial data showed that our hospital performed at 20% of patients diagnosed as malnourished, while the industry standard was 33%. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses and dietitians identified critical areas of improvement, including incomplete nutritional assessments by nurses, delayed evaluations by dietitians and lack of documentation by physicians. We addressed these issues by partnering with nurse managers to provide education and individual accountability for missed screenings, expanding dietitian workflows to include an in-person assessment within 24 hours of consultation, and updating physician note templates to include smart phrases that automatically inserted nutritional evaluations from registered dietitians into notes. We also worked with hospital executives and administration to increase buy-in from participating care team members., Results: Our interventions resulted in 100% of malnutrition screening tool being completed, 33% of patients being screened at risk of malnutrition, 98% of nutrition assessments being done within 24 hours of patient admission and 100% of providers documenting malnutrition findings., Conclusions: Our study found an immediate and significant increase in the number of times malnutrition was diagnosed and ultimately coded during billing with our interventions. This highlights the importance of timely identification and addressing malnutrition in an inpatient setting to improve patient care and reduce costs. The DMAIC process and multidisciplinary team approach proved to be effective in identifying and addressing the barriers to malnutrition diagnosis in our hospital setting., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to review the complication rate of percutaneous tracheostomies performed by a single surgeon in a community teaching hospital., Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance in a community hospital setting between 2009 and 2017. Patients older than the age of 18 requiring percutaneous tracheostomy were chosen for this retrospective study. Patients who were medically unstable, had no palpable neck landmarks, and inadequate neck extension were excluded. Indications for percutaneous tracheostomy included patients who had failed to wean from mechanical ventilation, required pulmonary toileting, or in whom airway protection was required., Results: Of the 600 patients who received percutaneous tracheostomy, 589 patients were included in the study. Intraoperative complication (2.6%) and postoperative complication rates (11.4%) compared similarly to literature reported rates. The most common intraoperative complications were bleeding, technical difficulties, and accidental extubation. Bleeding, tube obstruction, and infection were the most common postoperative complications. Overall burden of comorbidity, defined by Charlson Comorbidity Index, and coagulopathy were also found to be associated with higher complication rates. The decannulation rate at discharge was 46.3%., Conclusion: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a safe alternative to open tracheostomies in the community setting for appropriately selected patients.

Background: Recent evidence suggests tenecteplase at an intravenous dose of 0.25 mg/kg is as safe and efficacious as intravenous alteplase standard dose and demonstrates a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile for treatment of acute ischemic stroke., Objective: The purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of alteplase versus tenecteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke at a large community hospital health system following conversion in the preferred formulary thrombolytic., Methods: Prior to converting, medication safety and operationalization analyses were conducted. A multicenter, retrospective medical record review was performed for patients who received alteplase 6 months prior to formulary thrombolytic conversion and for tenecteplase 6 months post-conversion for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Primary outcomes included the rate of symptomatic intracranial and extracranial hemorrhage complications. Secondary outcomes included door-to-needle time, reduction in National Institute Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours and at discharge, order-to-administration time, and thrombolytic errors. The rates of hemorrhage were compared using binomial regression., Results: Of the 287 patients reviewed, 115 received alteplase and 172 received tenecteplase. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications occurred in 1 patient (1%) who received alteplase compared with 3 patients (2%) who received tenecteplase ( P = 0.9). There was no statistical difference in rates of symptomatic intracranial or extracranial hemorrhagic complications., Conclusion and Relevance: Conversion from alteplase to tenecteplase can be safely and effectively achieved at a large community hospital health system with differing levels of stroke certification. There were also additional cost savings and practical advantages including workflow benefits.