Search

The formose reaction has been a leading hypothesis for the prebiotic synthesis of sugars such as ribose for many decades but tends to produce complex mixtures of sugars and often tars. Channeling the formose reaction towards the synthesis of biologically useful sugars such as ribose has been a holy grail of origins-of-life research. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a simple, prebiotically plausible phosphorylating agent, acetyl phosphate, could direct the formose reaction towards ribose through phosphorylation of intermediates in a manner resembling gluconeogenesis and the pentose phosphate pathway. We did indeed find that addition of acetyl phosphate to a developing formose reaction stabilized pentoses, including ribose, such that after 5 h of reaction about 10-fold more ribose remained compared with control runs. But mechanistic analyses using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry showed that, far from being directed towards ribose by phosphorylation, the formose reaction was halted by the precipitation of Ca 2+ ions as phosphate minerals such as apatite and hydroxyapatite. Adding orthophosphate had the same effect. Phosphorylated sugars were only detected below the limit of quantification when adding acetyl phosphate. Nonetheless, our findings are not strictly negative. The sensitivity of the formose reaction to geochemically reasonable conditions, combined with the apparent stability of ribose under these conditions, serves as a valuable constraint on possible pathways of sugar synthesis at the origin of life.

Background & Aims: We examined the efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist, in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at risk of disease progression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] ≥1.67xupper limit of normal [ULN]) who were receiving or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid., Methods: In this 52-week, phase II, dose-ranging, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to seladelpar 5 mg/day (n = 53) or 10 mg/day (n = 55) or assigned to 2 mg/day (n = 11; United Kingdom sites after interim analysis) for 12 weeks. Doses could then be uptitrated to 10 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was ALP change from baseline to Week 8., Results: Mean baseline ALP was 300, 345, and 295 U/L in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients had cirrhosis, 71% had pruritus. At Week 8, mean ± standard error ALP reductions from baseline were 26 ± 2.8%, 33 ± 2.6%, and 41 ± 1.8% in the 2 mg (n = 11), 5 mg (n = 49), and 10 mg (n = 52) cohorts (all p ≤0.005), respectively. Responses were maintained or improved at Week 52, after dose escalation in 91% and 80% of the 2 mg and 5 mg cohorts, respectively. At Week 52, composite response (ALP <1.67xULN, ≥15% ALP decrease, and normal total bilirubin) rates were 64%, 53%, and 67%, and ALP normalization rates were 9%, 13%, and 33% in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Pruritus visual analog scale score was decreased in the 5 mg and 10 mg cohorts. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and 4 patients discontinued due to adverse events., Conclusions: Seladelpar demonstrated robust, dose-dependent, clinically significant, and durable improvements in biochemical markers of cholestasis and inflammation in patients with PBC at risk of disease progression. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated and was not associated with any increase in pruritus., Gov Number: NCT02955602 CLINICALTRIALSREGISTER., Eu Number: 2016-002996-91 LAY SUMMARY: Current treatment options for patients living with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are not optimal due to inadequate effectiveness or undesirable side effects. Patients with PBC who took seladelpar, a new treatment being developed for PBC, at increasing doses (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) for 1 year had clinically significant, dose-dependent improvements in key liver tests. Treatment appeared safe and was not associated with any worsening in patient self-reported itch scores., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Christopher Bowlus has received grants from Arena Pharmaceuticals, Cara Therapeutics, Genfit, Genkyotex, and Novartis and grants and personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept. Michael Galambos has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Richard Aspinall owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Gideon M. Hirschfield has received personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, GlaxoSmithKline, HighTide, Intercept Pharma, Mirum, and Pliant. David E. Jones has received personal fees from Abbott and Falk and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Stuart C. Gordon has received personal fees and advisory board compensation from CymaBay Therapeutics and research support was paid to his institution by AbbVie, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, CymaBay Therapeutics, DURECT, Eiger, Genfit, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept, Merck, Pliant, Shire, and Viking. Stephen A. Harrison has received personal fees from AgonAB, Altimmune, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR, Canfite Biopharma, Echosens North America, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, GNS Healthcare, Histoindex Pte, Inipharm, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Medpace, Microba Pty, Nutrasource, Piper Sandler & Co, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes Medical Corporation, and Terns; grants from Cirius Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, and Pathai; personal fees and grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Enyo Pharma S.A., Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, High Tide, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metracrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; advisory board compensation from 89Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, High Tide, Histoindex Pte, Indalo Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sagimet Biosciences, Terns, and Theratechnologies; and owns stock in Akero Therapeutics, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex Pte, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., and Pathai. Andreas E. Kremer has received personal fees from AbbVie, Bayer, CymaBay Therapeutics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Escient, Falk, FMC, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Mirum, MSD, Myr, Newbridge, Novartis, and Zambon and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Marlyn J. Mayo has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Paul J. Thuluvath has received a grant from CymaBay Therapeutics. Cynthia Levy has received grants from Genkyotex, Gilead, High Tide, Intercept, Novartis, and Zydus and grants and personal fees from Cara Therapeutics, CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, and GlaxoSmithKline. Mark Swain has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics and Genfit and a grant and personal fees from Intercept. Yvonne Dörffel, Guy Neff, David Sheridan, Carmen Stanca, Christoph Berg, and Aparna Goel have nothing to disclose. Mitchell L. Shiffman has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics, High Tide, and Genfit and grants and personal fees from Intercept. John M. Vierling has received grants from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept; personal fees from Intercept and Novartis; and personal fees and grants from CymaBay Therapeutics. Pol Boudes is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds a patent broadly relevant to this work. Alexandra Steinberg is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Yun-Jung Choi is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Charles McWherter is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds patents broadly relevant to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common chronic liver disease that may advance to fibrosis and lead to mortality; however, no pharmacotherapy is currently available. We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of both the sodium-glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 with licogliflozin would lead to improvement in NASH. A total of 107 patients with phenotypic or histologic NASH were randomized (1:2:2) to receive oral administration of either placebo (n = 21), licogliflozin 30 mg (n = 43) or 150 mg (n = 43) once daily for 12 weeks. Licogliflozin 150 mg showed a significant 32% (80% confidence interval (CI): 21-43%; P = 0.002) placebo-adjusted reduction in serum alanine aminotransferase after 12 weeks of treatment, the primary endpoint of the study. However, the 30 mg dose of licogliflozin did not meet the primary endpoint (placebo-adjusted reduction 21% (80% CI: 7-32%; P = 0.061)). Diarrhea occurred in 77% (33 of 43), 49% (21 of 43) and 43% (9 of 21) of patients treated with licogliflozin 150 mg, 30 mg and placebo, respectively, which was mostly mild in severity. No other major safety concerns were identified. Treatment with 150 mg licogliflozin led to reductions in serum alanine aminotransferase in patients with NASH. Studies of longer duration and in combination with drugs that have different mechanisms of action are needed to validate these findings and to define a role of licogliflozin as a therapeutic option for NASH. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03205150., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background and Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is very common in both Asian and Western countries. Geographic variation leads to differences in epidemiological and demographic characters of NAFLD patients. Studies conducted upon different ethnic groups in the United States (US) show a higher prevalence of NAFLD in Hispanics and African-Americans. There is however, a paucity of studies involving Asians. It has been observed that Asian-Indian NAFLD patients have unique characteristics compared to their counterparts in the West. This study is the first attempt at comparing the characteristics of Asian-Indian and US NAFLD patients., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical, biochemical, and histological data was performed for 633 Asian-Indian NAFLD patients and 451 US NAFLD patients. Clinical parameters [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, etc.], biochemical tests (liver function tests, lipid profile, and fasting blood sugar), hepatic ultrasound and hepatic histology were compared between the two cohorts., Results: Eighty-two percent of US NAFLD patients were more than 40 years of age compared to 51.3% of Asian-Indian patients ( p <0.01). US (male 56.3%) and Asian-Indian (male 81.7%) ( p <0.01) patients differed from each other as regards gender prevalence. Rates of obesity were greater in the US patients compared to Asian-Indians (BMI 32.6 ± 5.3 kg/m 2 vs 26.2 ± 3.4 kg/m 2 ). There was a higher prevalence of both diabetes and hypertension (diabetes 42.1% vs 33%, and hypertension 56.8% vs 29.7%, p ≤0.01) in US patients. ALT levels were also significantly higher in US NAFLD patients compared to Asian-Indians (ALT 82.78 ± 71.30 vs 53.66 ± 37, p ≤0.01). A higher proportion of US patients were found to have the more advanced liver disease at the time of diagnosis compared to Asian-Indians (Stage 3 fibrosis 10.42% vs 0%, and Stage 4 fibrosis 2.66% vs 0%, p <0.01)., Conclusion: Asian-Indian and US NAFLD patients differ significantly on several parameters. Further studies need to be carried out to understand the mechanistic basis of these differences better., How to Cite This Article: Singh SP, Panigrahi MK, Patel A, et al . Comparison of Clinical, Biochemical, and Histopathologic Profiles between NAFLD in Asian-Indians and United States Adults. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2022;12(Suppl 1):S15-S18., Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None, (Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.)

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury, and is associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation and death. NASH affects more than 16 million people in the USA, and there is no approved therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study (ALPINE 2/3) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, we randomly assigned patients stratified by fibrosis stage in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, aldafermin 0·3 mg, 1·0 mg, or 3·0 mg once daily for 24 weeks at 30 study sites in the USA. Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH at week 24. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03912532, and has been completed., Findings: Between May 16, 2019, and Sept 4, 2020, 786 patients were screened, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and included in the intention-to-treat population: 43 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, 42 in the 1·0 mg group, 43 in the 3·0 mg group, and 43 in the placebo group. In total, 145 (85%) of patients completed treatment. At week 24, among patients with biopsies at both baseline and week 24, was seven (19%) of 36 patients in the placebo group, 11 (31%) of 36 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group (difference 90% CI 12% [-9 to 33]; p=0·11), five (15%) of 34 patients in the 1·0 mg group (difference -5% [-24 to 13]; p=0·80), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the 3·0 mg group (difference 10% [-9 to 30]; p=0·12) had an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, without meeting the prespecified significance for dose response (p=0·55). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea occurred in six (14%) of 43 patients in the placebo group, three (7%) of 43 patients in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, five (12%) of 41 patients in the 1·0 mg group, and ten (23%) of 43 patients in the 3·0 mg group. Incidences of serious adverse events and discontinuations owing to adverse events were similar between groups., Interpretation: Aldafermin was generally well tolerated but did not produce a significant dose response on fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, despite positive effects on a number of secondary endpoints. The findings of this trial may have implications for the design of future NASH trials., Funding: NGM Biopharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking, and 89 Bio; is a scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Alentis, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Forest Labs, Galectin, Gilead, Hepion, Hepagene, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, Terns, and Viking; and has stock options in Akero, Cirius, Chronwell, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM, and Northsea. MFA reports grant and research support from Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Magrigal, NGM, NovoNordisk, and Viking; is a consultant for Hanmi and Madrigal; and serves on an advisory committee for 89Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hanmi, NGM, Novo Nordisk, and Thera. CDG reports grant and research support from 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM; and is a consultant for 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM. NA reports serving on advisory boards for 89Bio, Gilead, Intercept, LG Chem, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; is a speaker for AbbVie, Alexion, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Perspectum, and Simply Speaking; and has received research support from 89Bio, Akero, Albireo, Allergan, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Fibronostics, Hanmi, Hepagene, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Metacrine, Northsea, Noom, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus. MRB reports grant and research support from the National Institutes of Health (5U01-DK061713-19, 1R01CA249765-01) as well as Carmot, Corcept, CymaBay, Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Pinnacle Clinical Research, Polarean Imaging, and Siemens Healthineers. MER reports consulting for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vBio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. MSS reports consulting for Pfizer and serves on an advisory committee for AMRA. MK reports research grants from Medtronic, SARO, Pfizer, Dexcom, Abbott, Regenacy, Metacrine, Lumos, Ascendis, Sagimet, MannKind, Aeterna-Zentaris, 89Bio, Gilead, Senseonics, KOWA, Allergan, NGM, Tolerion, and Lilly, and is on an advisory board for Quest Diagnostics. ZHY reports grant and research support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Conatus, Novartis, Allergan, Intercept, and Novo Nordisk, and is a consultant for Gilead. MB reports grant support from the National Institutes of Health. SJB reports serving on a scientific advisory board for Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi, and is a consultant for Altimmune, Amgen, Madrigal, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. BB reports research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Viking, AbbVie, Gynkotex, GlaxoSmithKline, Arena, Protagonist, Mirum, Eli Lilly, Ionis, and Poxel. PJR reports serving as speaker and adviser for Gilead Sciences and ViiV. PJT reports grant and research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara, Celgene, Cirius, Conatus, Cymabay, Dova, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Elobix, Enanta, Enyo, Exelixis, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Mallinckrodt, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sillajen, and Targ, and is a consultant for Mallinckrodt. MG, MK, CC, LM-K, WC, AMD, LL, and HDL report being employees and stockholders of NGM. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease associated with adverse clinical outcomes and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL)., Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven non-cirrhotic NASH with hepatic fat fraction of ≥10% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction were enrolled in a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of resmetirom. HRQL was assessed using Short Form-36 throughout 36 weeks of treatment., Results: One hundred twenty-five NASH patients were enrolled (50 ± 11 years old, 50% male, 94% white, body mass index 35 ± 6 kg/m 2 , 39% with diabetes mellitus). Of these, 84 patients received 80 mg of resmetirom daily, and 41 received placebo. At baseline, HRQL scores were not different from general population norms (Physical Component Summary [PCS] 47.9 ± 9.3 vs 50, Mental Component Summary 50.4 ± 10.0 vs 50; all P > .05). By treatment week 12, patients who received resmetirom experienced improvement of Bodily Pain and Short Form-6D utility scores (P < .05); no HRQL improvement was noted in placebo (all P > .05). Improvement in PCS continued up to week 36 of treatment with resmetirom, again with no improvement in placebo group (all P > .05). Adjusted for the baseline score and clinicodemographic confounders, meeting the endpoint of a decrease in proton density fat fraction of ≥30% by week 12 (met by 54 of 116 treatment completers; 47 of 54 on resmetirom) was independently associated with greater improvements in Physical Functioning and PCS scores at week 36 (P < .05). Patients with improvement in NASH and fibrosis on liver biopsy also showed improvement in components of HRQL., Conclusions: Patients with NASH treated who improved their hepatic fat fraction and/or Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score on serial liver biopsy experienced improvement of HRQL. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term sustainability of that improvement., Clinicaltrials: gov #NCT02912260., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Liver biopsy is still needed for fibrosis staging in many patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The aims of this study were to evaluate the individual diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement by vibration controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) Fibrosis Score (NFS) and to derive diagnostic strategies that could reduce the need for liver biopsies., Design: Individual patient data meta-analysis of studies evaluating LSM-VCTE against liver histology was conducted. FIB-4 and NFS were computed where possible. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were calculated. Biomarkers were assessed individually and in sequential combinations., Results: Data were included from 37 primary studies (n=5735; 45% women; median age: 54 years; median body mass index: 30 kg/m 2 ; 33% had type 2 diabetes; 30% had advanced fibrosis). AUROCs of individual LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS for advanced fibrosis were 0.85, 0.76 and 0.73. Sequential combination of FIB-4 cut-offs (<1.3; ≥2.67) followed by LSM-VCTE cut-offs (<8.0; ≥10.0 kPa) to rule-in or rule-out advanced fibrosis had sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of 66% (63-68) and 86% (84-87) with 33% needing a biopsy to establish a final diagnosis. FIB-4 cut-offs (<1.3; ≥3.48) followed by LSM cut-offs (<8.0; ≥20.0 kPa) to rule out advanced fibrosis or rule in cirrhosis had a sensitivity of 38% (37-39) and specificity of 90% (89-91) with 19% needing biopsy., Conclusion: Sequential combinations of markers with a lower cut-off to rule-out advanced fibrosis and a higher cut-off to rule-in cirrhosis can reduce the need for liver biopsies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AG reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Alexion, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Gilead, grants and personal fees from Intercept, personal fees from Ipsen, personal fees from Merz, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, personal fees from Sequana, grants and personal fees from Falk, personal fees from MSD, during the conduct of the study. ANAJ reports other from Perspectum, during the conduct of the study. CF reports other from Echosens, during the conduct of the study. JFC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Intercept, personal fees from Alnylam, during the conduct of the study. JB reports other from Pfizer, during the conduct of the study. JMS reports personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Echosens, personal fees from Genfit, personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Madrigal, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Falk Foundation, personal fees from MSD, grants from Gilead Sciences, during the conduct of the study. JW reports grants from Echosens, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Pavlides reports other from Perspectum, during the conduct of the study. MT reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Falk Foundation, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Intercept, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Albireo, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from BiomX, personal fees from Falk Pharma GmbH, personal fees from GENFIT, personal fees from Jannsen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Phenex, personal fees from Regulus and Shire, grants from AbbVie, grants from Falk, grants from Gilead, grants from Intercept, grants from Albireo, grants from CymaBay, grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, grants from Takeda, during the conduct of the study; in addition, MT has a patent norUDCA issued. PNN reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Poxel, grants from Pharmaxis, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Echosens, grants from Novo Nordisk, during the conduct of the study. QMA reports grants from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Allergan/Tobira, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants from Glympse Bio, grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Vertex, personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, personal fees from Acuitas Medical, personal fees from Blade, personal fees from BNN Cardio, personal fees from Cirius, personal fees from CymaBay, personal fees from EcoR1, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Galmed, personal fees from Genfit, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Grunthal, personal fees from HistoIndex, personal fees from Indalo, personal fees from Imperial Innovations, personal fees from Intercept Pharma Europe, personal fees from Inventiva, personal fees from IQVIA, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Kenes, personal fees from Madrigal, personal fees from MedImmune, personal fees from Metacrine, personal fees from NewGene, personal fees from NGMBio, personal fees from North Sea Therapeutics, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Poxel, personal fees from ProSciento, personal fees from Raptor Pharma, personal fees from Servier, personal fees from Viking Therapeutics, personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Clinical Care Options, personal fees from Falk, personal fees from Fishawack, personal fees from Integritas Communications, personal fees from MedScape, other from IMI2 LITMUS consortium, during the conduct of the study. SH reports grants and personal fees from Akero, grants and personal fees from Axcella, grants and personal fees from Cirius, grants and personal fees from CiVi Biopharma, grants and personal fees from CymaBay, grants and personal fees from Galectin, grants from Galmed, grants and personal fees from Genfit, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, grants and personal fees from Hepion Pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from Hightide Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Intercept, grants and personal fees from Madrigal, grants and personal fees from Metacrine, grants and personal fees from NGM Bio, grants and personal fees from North Sea Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Novo Nordisk, grants and personal fees from Poxel, grants and personal fees from Sagimet, grants and personal fees from Viking, personal fees from Altimmune, personal fees from Alentis, personal fees from Arrowhead, personal fees from Canfite, personal fees from Echosens, personal fees from Enyo, personal fees from Fibronostics, personal fees from Foresite Labs, personal fees from Fortress Biotech, personal fees from HistoIndex, personal fees from Kowa, personal fees from Prometic, personal fees from Ridgeline, personal fees from Terns, during the conduct of the study. SM reports personal fees from Echosens, during the conduct of the study. SN reports other from Perspectum, during the conduct of the study. SP reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Intercept, personal fees from Pfizer, during the conduct of the study. TK reports grants from Echosens, during the conduct of the study. TT reports other from Pfizer, during the conduct of the study. VdL reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Echosens, personal fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Myr-Pharma, personal fees from Supersonic Imagine, personal fees from Tillotts, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Wong reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from 3V-BIO, personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, grants and personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Intercept, personal fees from Echosens, personal fees from Hanmi Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Perspectum, personal fees from ProSciento, personal fees from Sagimet Biosciences, personal fees from TARGET PharmaSolutions, personal fees from Terns, personal fees from BMS, during the conduct of the study. WK reports personal fees from Samil, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Ildong, personal fees from LG Chemistry, personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from HK inno.N, personal fees from GreenCross, personal fees from Bukwang, personal fees from Standigm, personal fees from PharmaKing, personal fees from KOBIOLABS, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Zydus, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, grants from Gilead, grants from Ildong, grants from GreenCross, grants from Bukwang, grants from PharmaKing, grants from Roche, grants from Galmed, grants from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants from Springbank, grants from Altimmune, grants from MSD, grants from BMS, grants from Dicerna, grants from Enyo, grants from Hitachi-Aloka, other from KOBIOLABS, other from Lepidyne, during the conduct of the study. YY reports grants from Biocodes, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from Bilim Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Pharmactive Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Sanovel Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Galmed, personal fees from Zydus, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, during the conduct of the study. MP, ANAJ and SN are shareholders of Perspectum, Oxford, UK. CF is employed by Echosens, France. MT received speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); advisory board fees from Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, BiomX, Falk Pharma GmbH, GENFIT, Gilead, Intercept, Jannsen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Regulus and Shire; travel grants from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead, and Intercept; and research grants from Albireo, CymaBay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Takeda. He is also coinventor of patents on the medical use of norUDCA filed by the Medical University of Graz. SP was speaker and/or Advisor for AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept and Pfizer. PNN received grant and research support from Pharmaxis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens and Novo Nordisk and consulting fees from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Poxel on behalf of the University of Birmingham. VL reports consultancy for AbbVie, BMS, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Myr-Pharma, Pfizer, Supersonic Imagine and Tillotts. SM received honorarium fees from Echosens. JFC received consultancy, advisory board, and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca, NovoNordisk, Intercept and Alnylam. JMS reports consultancy for BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi; received research funding from Gilead Sciences and was on the speakers bureau for Falk Foundation MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH. WK has served as a speaker and consultant of Gilead, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Samil, Ildong, LG Chemistry, HK inno.N, GreenCross, Bukwang, Standigm, PharmaKing, KOBIOLABS, Eisai, Zydus, and Novonordisk, received grants from Gilead, Ildong, GreenCross, Bukwang, Pharmaking, Roche, Galmed, Novartis, Pfizer, Springbank, Altimmune, MSD, BMS, Dicerna, Enyo, and Hitachi-Aloka, and owns stocks in KOBIOLABS and Lepidyne. TK and JW received unrestricted research grants from Echosens, Paris France. TK participated in a clinical advisory board meeting. YY received research grant from Biocodex, Gilead Sciences, speaker fees for Gilead Sciences, Bilim Pharmaceuticals, Pharmactive Pharmaceutical, Sanovel Pharmaceuticals, and served as advisory board member for Galmed, Zydus, NovoNordisk. AG reports consultancy for AbbVie, Alexion, Bayer, BMS, CSL Behring, Gilead, Intercept, Ipsen, Merz, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Sequana; received research funding from Intercept, Falk, Novartis and was on the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Alexion, BMS, CSL Behring, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Merz, Novartis, Sequana. VWSW has served as a consultant or advisory board member for 3V-BIO, AbbVie, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Intercept, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum Diagnostics, Pfizer, ProSciento, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Terns; and a speaker for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, and Gilead Sciences. He has also received a research grant from Gilead Sciences for fatty liver research. QMA is coordinator of the IMI2 LITMUS consortium and he reports research grant funding from Abbvie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., Vertex; consultancy on behalf of Newcastle University for Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, Blade, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Imperial Innovations, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Kenes, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Servier, Viking Therapeutics; and speaker fees from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, MedScape. SAH has research grants from Akero, Axcella, Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, Viking. He has received consulting fees from Akero, Altimmune, Alentis, Arrowhead, Axcella, Canfite, Cirius, CiVi, Cymabay, Echosens, Enyo, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion, HIghtide, HistoIndex, Intercept, Kowa, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Prometic, Ridgeline, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background & Aims: Histologically assessed hepatocyte ballooning is a key feature discriminating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from steatosis (NAFL). Reliable identification underpins patient inclusion in clinical trials and serves as a key regulatory-approved surrogate endpoint for drug efficacy. High inter/intra-observer variation in ballooning measured using the NASH CRN semi-quantitative score has been reported yet no actionable solutions have been proposed., Methods: A focused evaluation of hepatocyte ballooning recognition was conducted. Digitized slides were evaluated by 9 internationally recognized expert liver pathologists on 2 separate occasions: each pathologist independently marked every ballooned hepatocyte and later provided an overall non-NASH NAFL/NASH assessment. Interobserver variation was assessed and a 'concordance atlas' of ballooned hepatocytes generated to train second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence imaging-based artificial intelligence (AI)., Results: The Fleiss kappa statistic for overall interobserver agreement for presence/absence of ballooning was 0.197 (95% CI 0.094-0.300), rising to 0.362 (0.258-0.465) with a ≥5-cell threshold. However, the intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency was higher (0.718 [0.511-0.900]), indicating 'moderate' agreement on ballooning burden. 133 ballooned cells were identified using a ≥5/9 majority to train AI ballooning detection (AI-pathologist pairwise concordance 19-42%, comparable to inter-pathologist pairwise concordance of between 8-75%). AI quantified change in ballooned cell burden in response to therapy in a separate slide set., Conclusions: The substantial divergence in hepatocyte ballooning identified amongst expert hepatopathologists suggests that ballooning is a spectrum, too subjective for its presence or complete absence to be unequivocally determined as a trial endpoint. A concordance atlas may be used to train AI assistive technologies to reproducibly quantify ballooned hepatocytes that standardize assessment of therapeutic efficacy. This atlas serves as a reference standard for ongoing work to refine how ballooning is classified by both pathologists and AI., Lay Summary: For the first time, we show that, even amongst expert hepatopathologists, there is poor agreement regarding the number of ballooned hepatocytes seen on the same digitized histology images. This has important implications as the presence of ballooning is needed to establish the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and its unequivocal absence is one of the key requirements to show 'NASH resolution' to support drug efficacy in clinical trials. Artificial intelligence-based approaches may provide a more reliable way to assess the range of injury recorded as "hepatocyte ballooning"., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest AJS is president of Sanyal Bio. He reports consultancy fees from Merck, Regeneron, Alnylam, Genentech, Amgen, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Inventiva, Madrigal, Malinckrodt, Salix, Genfit, Hemoshear, Histoindex, Siemens, Gilead, NGM, Terns, Rivus, Endiva, 89Bio, Akero, Blade, Novartis, Axcella, Intercept; grant funding from Intercept, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Eli Lilly, Viking, Madrigal, Akero, Hanmi; stock/stock options from Genfit, Tiziana, Indalo, Exhalenz, Hemoshear; royalties from Elsevier. AW reports fees from Clinnovate. BNT reports consultancy fees from Histoindex. CDG reports consultancy fees from HistoIndex, NGMBio, CymaBay and Madrigal. CDG has or has had consulting agreements with the following companies: HistoIndex, NGM, CymaBay, Madrigal and 89Bio. DGT reports consultancy for Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc, Allergan plc, Verily Life Sciences LLC, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, Alimentiv Inc, Clinnovate Health UK Ltd, ICON Clinical Research Ltd and grants from Histoindex Pte Ltd. DT is an employee of, and holds stock in, Histoindex. EC and RY are employees of Histoindex. EMB has been on Advisory Board for Pfizer Ltd. And served as a consultant for Arrowhead, CymaBay, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Perspectum Diagnostics and Histoindex. Paid slide evaluation for CymaBay, Medpace and Perspectum Diagnostics. MR reports consultancy fees from Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, NGM, Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vBio (Sagimet), 89Bio and Novartis, Immuron, Merck, Taiwan J. QMA is coordinator of the IMI2 LITMUS consortium, which is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme and EFPIA. This multi-stakeholder consortium includes industry partners. He reports research grant funding from Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., Vertex; consultancy on behalf of Newcastle University for 89Bio, Allergan/Tobira, Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BMS, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company, Galmed, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept, Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Medpace, Metacrine, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, PathAI, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Roche, Servier, Terns, The Medicines Company, Viking Therapeutics; and speaker fees from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, MedScape. SAH reports grants from Akero, Axcella, Cirius, CiVi, CymaBay, Enyo, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, Viking; consultancy fees from AgomAB, Akero, Alentis, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Axcella, Boston Pharma, B Riley, BVF Partners, Canfite, CiVi, Corcept, CymaBay, Echosens, Enyo, Fibronostics, Foresite, Fortress, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, GNS, Hepion, Hightide, HistoIndex, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Kowa, Madrigal, Metacrine, Microba, NGM, NorthSea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, Piper Sandler, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, Terns, Viking; and stock holdings or stock options in Akero, Chronwell, Cirius, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM, NorthSea, PathAI, Sonic Incytes. VR reports consultancy fees from Novo-Nordisk, Intercept, NGM, Theratechnologies, Galmed, Madrigal, Hanmi, Astra-Zeneca. VT reports research grants from Gilead sciences and consulting fees from Novo-Nordisk, Intercept, NGM, Theratechnologies, Galmed, Madrigal, Hanmi, Astra-Zeneca. The other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Aims: Surrogate endpoints that predict complications are necessary for assessment and approval of NASH therapies. We assessed associations between histologic and noninvasive tests (NITs) of fibrosis with liver-related complications in patients with NASH cirrhosis., Approach and Results: Patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH were enrolled in two placebo-controlled trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib. Liver fibrosis at baseline and week 48 (W48) was staged by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) and Ishak classifications and a machine learning (ML) approach, hepatic collagen and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression were quantified by morphometry, liver stiffness (LS) was measured by transient elastography, and serum NITs (enhanced liver fibrosis [ELF], NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS], and Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4]) were calculated. Cox regression determined associations between these parameters at baseline and their changes over time with adjudicated liver-related clinical events. Among 1,135 patients, 709 (62%) had Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and median ELF and LS were 10.66 and 21.1 kPa, respectively. During a median follow-up of 16.6 months, 71 (6.3%) had a liver-related event; associated baseline factors included Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and higher hepatic collagen, α-SMA expression, ML-based fibrosis parameters, LS, ELF, NFS, and FIB-4. Cirrhosis regression observed in 16% (176/1,135) between BL and W48 was associated with a lower risk of events versus nonregression (1.1% [2/176] vs. 7.2% [69/957]; HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04, 0.65 [p = 0.0104]). Conversely, after adjustment for baseline values, increases in hepatic collagen, α-SMA, ML-based fibrosis parameters, NFS, and LS were associated with an increased risk of events., Conclusions: In patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH, regression of fibrosis is associated with a reduction in liver-related complications. These data support the utility of histologic fibrosis regression and NITs as clinical trial endpoints for NASH cirrhosis., (© 2022 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Among the large population of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), identifying those with fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (Fibro-NASH) is a clinical priority, as these patients are at the highest risk of disease progression and will benefit most from pharmacologic treatment. MRI-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and MR elastography (MRE) can risk-stratify patients with NAFLD by assessing steatosis and fibrosis, respectively. We developed a highly specific MRI-based score to identify patients with Fibro-NASH., Methods: This analysis included derivation (n = 103) and validation (n = 244) cohorts of patients who underwent MRI, liver biopsy, transient elastography, and laboratory testing for NAFLD from 2016-2020 in 2 tertiary care centers. To identify Fibro-NASH, a formula was developed based on MRI-PDFF, MRE, and a third variable with highest balanced accuracy per logistic regression. The MRI-aspartate aminotransferase (MAST) score was created and compared to NAFLD fibrosis (NFS), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) scores., Results: The MAST score demonstrated high performance and discrimination in the validation cohort (AUC 0.93; 95% CI 0.88-0.97). In the validation cohorts, the 90% specificity cut-off of 0.242 corresponded to a sensitivity of 75.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50.0% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.5%, whereas the 90% sensitivity cut-off of 0.165 corresponded to a specificity of 72.2%, PPV of 29.4%, and NPV of 98.1%. Compared to NFS and FIB-4, MAST resulted in fewer patients having indeterminate scores and an overall higher AUC. Compared to FAST, MAST exhibited a higher AUC and overall better discrimination., Conclusion: The MAST score is an accurate, MRI-serum-based score that outperforms previous scores in non-invasively identifying patients at higher risk of Fibro-NASH., Lay Summary: Identifying patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis - who need treatment and are at risk of clinical liver-related outcomes - is a clinical priority. We developed a more accurate score using MRI-based technologies and a laboratory blood test (aspartate aminotransferase) that outperforms previous non-invasive scores for the identification of patients at higher risk of liver disease progression., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MN has been on the advisory board for 89BIO, Gilead, Intercept, Pfizer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Allergan, Blade, EchoSens, Fractyl, Terns, OWL, Siemens, Roche diagnostic and Abbott; MN has received research support from Allergan, BMS, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Conatus, Enanta, Madrigal, Novartis, Shire, Viking and Zydus; MN is a minor shareholder or has stocks in Anaetos and Viking. NA has been on the advisory board for Gilead and Allergan. NA is on the speaker bureau for Intercept and Gilead. SH: advisory boards/consultant for Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Altimmune Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Axcella Health, Corcept Therapeutics, Chronwell, Echosens North America, Enyo Pharma, Foresite Labs (MetreaBiosciences), Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Histoindex, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Terns, Theratechnologies, and Viking. Stock options/minor shareholder: Akero, Chronwell, Cirius, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea. Grant/Research support: Akero, Axcella, BMS, Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking, 89 Bio. NA: advisory board for Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Pfizer, and Zydus; grant/research support from 89Bio, Akero, Bristol Myers Squibb, Enanta, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Gilead, Intercept, Inventiva, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, Viking, and Zydus; speaker bureau for AbbVie, Alexion, Echosens, Gilead, and Intercept. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Gc) must overcome the limitation of metals such as zinc to colonize mucosal surfaces in its obligate human host. While the zinc-binding nutritional immunity proteins calprotectin (S100A8/A9) and psoriasin (S100A7) are abundant in human cervicovaginal lavage fluid, Gc possesses TonB-dependent transporters TdfH and TdfJ that bind and extract zinc from the human version of these proteins, respectively. Here we investigated the contribution of zinc acquisition to Gc infection of epithelial cells of the female genital tract. We found that TdfH and TdfJ were dispensable for survival of strain FA1090 Gc that was associated with Ect1 human immortalized epithelial cells, when zinc was limited by calprotectin and psoriasin. In contrast, suspension-grown bacteria declined in viability under the same conditions. Exposure to murine calprotectin, which Gc cannot use as a zinc source, similarly reduced survival of suspension-grown Gc, but not Ect1-associated Gc. We ruled out epithelial cells as a contributor to the enhanced growth of cell-associated Gc under zinc limitation. Instead, we found that attachment to glass was sufficient to enhance bacterial growth when zinc was sequestered. We compared the transcriptional profiles of WT Gc adherent to glass coverslips or in suspension, when zinc was sequestered with murine calprotectin or provided in excess, from which we identified open reading frames that were increased by zinc sequestration in adherent Gc. One of these, ZnuA, was necessary but not sufficient for survival of Gc under zinc-limiting conditions. These results show that adherence protects Gc from zinc-dependent growth restriction by host nutritional immunity proteins.

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. While liver biopsy is considered the reference standard for the histologic diagnosis of NASH and staging of fibrosis, its use in clinical practice is limited. Non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used to identify and stage liver fibrosis in patients with NASH, and several can assess liver-related outcomes. We report changes in various NITs in patients treated with obeticholic acid (OCA) or placebo in the phase III REGENERATE study., Methods: Patients with NASH and fibrosis stage F2 or F3 (n = 931) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo, OCA 10 mg, or OCA 25 mg once daily. Various NITs based on clinical chemistry and/or imaging were evaluated at baseline and throughout the study., Results: Rapid, sustained reductions from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, as well as in Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), FibroTest, FibroMeter, and FibroScan-AST scores were observed in OCA-treated vs. placebo-treated patients. Reduction in liver stiffness by vibration-controlled transient elastography was observed in the OCA 25 mg group vs. the placebo group at Month 18. NIT changes were associated with shifts in histologic fibrosis stage. The greatest improvements were observed in patients with ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement; however, improvements in ALT, AST, FIB-4, and FibroTest were also observed in OCA-treated patients whose histologic fibrosis remained stable., Conclusions: Based on the REGENERATE Month 18 interim analysis, rapid and sustained improvements in various NITs were observed with OCA treatment. Dynamic changes in selected NITs separated histologic responders from non-responders. These results suggest that NITs may be useful in assessing histologic response to OCA therapy. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT02548351 LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. To diagnose and assess liver fibrosis (scarring) in patients with NASH, non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used rather than liver biopsy, which is invasive, expensive, and can be risky. In the REGENERATE study, which is evaluating the effects of obeticholic acid vs. placebo in patients with NASH, various NITs were also evaluated. This analysis shows that improvements in levels of certain blood components, as well as favorable results of ultrasound imaging and proprietary tests of liver function, were associated with improvements in liver fibrosis after treatment with obeticholic acid, suggesting that NITs may be useful alternatives to liver biopsy in assessing NASH patients' response to therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MR was a consultant over the past 36 months for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vbio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. She currently has no active consulting contracts. J-FD reports advisory committee participation for AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegeniX, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly, Merck, Novartis; speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche. QMA reports support from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in relation to the present study; research funds as Coordinator of the EU IMI-2 LITMUS consortium, which is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme and EFPIA. This multi-stakeholder consortium includes industry partners, in addition, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd; royalties or licenses from Elsevier Ltd; consulting fees from 89Bio, Allergan/Tobira, Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BMS, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Medpace, Metacrine, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, PathAI, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Roche, Servier, Terns, The Medicines Company, Viking Therapeutics; honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Medscape; member of advisory board for Medpace (NorthSea Therapeutics). ZG has no conflicts to report. ZY reports consulting fees and research grants from Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS, Novo Nordisk, Viking, Terns, Siemens, Quest, AbbVie, Madrigal, Merck, and Novartis. SAH reports consulting/advisory, stock ownership/equity from Akero, Galectin, Genfit, Madrigal, Metacrine, Histoindex and NGM Bio; grants from Axcella, Cirius, CymaBay, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Second Genome; consulting/advisory for Alentis, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, CiVi, CLDF, Corcept, Echosens, , Gilead, HighTide, Medpace, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Prometric, Viking, Hepagene, Hepion, and Terns. RL reports research grants from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer -Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead, Inventiva, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Siemens; consulting fees from Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Ar Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CohBar, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Madrigal, Metacrine, Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89Bio, Viking Therapeutics; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; co-founder of Liponexus, Inc. AJS is President of Sanyal Biotechnology; he reports stock options in Sanyal Bio, Exhalenz, Akarna, GenFit, Hemoshear, Durect, Indalo, Tiziana, Rivus; paid consultant to 89Bio, Albireo, Amgen, Ardelyx, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bird Rock, Bristol-Myers, Conatus, Covance, Echosens-Sandhill, ENYO, Genentech, General Electric, Genfit, Gilead, Hemoshear, HistoIndex, Inventiva, Janssen, Lilly, Madrigal, Mallinckrodt, Merck, NGM Bio, Nimbus, NorthSea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owl, PathAI, Perspectum, Pfizer, Poxel, Prosciento, Regeneron, Rivus, Roche, Salix, Sanofi, Second Genome, Servier, Siemens, Takeda, Terns, Tiziana, Zydus; unpaid consultant to Immuron, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Galectin, Sequana, Fractyl; Durect, Indalo, Allergan, Chemomab, Affimune, Teva, BASF, AMRA, Perspectum, Biocellvia; advisory board member for Immuron; royalties from Elsevier and UptoDate; grant support from Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Salix, Novartis, Galectin, Bristol-Myers, Sequana; receipt of equipment from Echosens-Sandhill; ongoing research collaboration with Echosens-Sandhill, Owl, Second Genome, Siemens; his institution has received grant support from Conatus, Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol-Myers, Merck, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Fractyl, Madrigal, Inventiva, Covance; his institution has received fees from AstraZeneca. MB reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AT reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MN reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. RS reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. TG reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AV reports employment at Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. VR reports consulting fees from Galmed, Genfit, Madrigal, NGM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Theratechnologies, Terns; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an idiopathic and heterogenous cholestatic liver disease characterized by chronic inflammation and fibrosis of the biliary tree. Currently, no effective therapies are available for this condition, whose incidence is rising. At present, specificity and sensitivity of current serum markers used to diagnose PSC are limited and often unreliable. In this study, we characterize circulating extracellular vesicles and provide supporting data on their potential use as novel surrogate biomarkers for PSC. EVs are membrane surrounded structures, 100-1000 nm in size, released by cells under various conditions and which carry a variety of bioactive molecules, including small non-coding RNAs, lipids and proteins. In recent years, a large body of evidence has pointed to diagnostic implications of EVs and relative cargo in various human diseases. We isolated EVs from serum of well-characterized patients with PSC or control subjects by differential centrifugation and size-exclusion chromatography. A complete characterization identified elevated levels of circulating EVs in PSC patients compared to healthy control subjects (2000 vs. 500 Calcein-FITC + EVs/μL). Tissue and cell specificity of circulating EVs was assessed by identification of liver-specific markers and cholangiocyte marker CK-19. Further molecular characterization identified 282 proteins that were differentially regulated in PSC-derived compared to healthy control-EVs. Among those, IL-13Ra1 was the most significantly and differentially expressed protein in PSC-derived EVs and correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis. In addition to protein profiling, we performed a miRNA-sequencing analysis which identified 11 among established, liver-specific (e.g., miR-122 and miR-192) and novel miRNAs. One of the newly identified miRNAs, miR-4645-3p, was significantly up-regulated fourfold in PSC-derived EVs compared to circulating EVs isolated from healthy controls. This study provides supporting evidence of the potential role of circulating EVs and associated protein and miRNA cargo as surrogate noninvasive and reliable biomarker for PSC., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The prevalence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing, yet adequately validated tests for care paths are limited and non-invasive markers of disease progression are urgently needed. The aim of this work was to summarize the performance of Pro-C3, a biomarker of active fibrogenesis, in detecting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2), advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3), cirrhosis (F4) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with NAFLD. A sensitive search of five databases was performed in July 2021. Studies reporting Pro-C3 measurements and liver histology in adults with NAFLD without co-existing liver diseases were eligible. Meta-analysis was conducted by applying a bivariate random effects model to produce summary estimates of Pro-C3 accuracy. From 35 evaluated reports, eight studies met our inclusion criteria; 1568 patients were included in our meta-analysis of significant fibrosis and 2058 in that of advanced fibrosis. The area under the summary curve was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) in detecting significant fibrosis and 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.82) for advanced fibrosis. Our results support Pro-C3 as an important candidate biomarker for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. Further direct comparisons with currently recommended non-invasive tests will demonstrate whether Pro-C3 panels can outperform these tests, and improve care paths for patients with NAFLD.

Introduction: AXA1125 and AXA1957 are novel, orally administered endogenous metabolic modulator compositions, specifically designed to simultaneously support multiple metabolic and fibroinflammatory pathways associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study assessed safety, tolerability, and biologic activity of AXA1125 and AXA1957 in NAFLD., Methods: In this multicenter, 16-week, placebo-controlled, single-blind, randomized clinical study in subjects with NAFLD stratified by type 2 diabetes, AXA1125 24 g, AXA1957 13.5 g or 20.3 g, or placebo was administered twice daily. Key metabolism (MRI-proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF] and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and fibroinflammation markers (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], corrected T1 [cT1], keratin-18 [K-18] M65, and N-terminal type III collagen propeptide [Pro-C3]) were evaluated. Safety outcomes included adverse events and standard laboratory assessments., Results: Baseline characteristics of the 102 enrolled subjects, including 40 with type 2 diabetes, were consistent with presumed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. AXA1125 showed consistently greater biologic activity than AXA1957 or placebo. Week 16 changes from baseline with AXA1125 vs placebo: MRI-PDFF -22.9% vs -5.7%, HOMA-IR -4.4 vs +0.7, ALT -21.9% vs -7.2%, K-18 M65 -13.6% vs +20.1%, cT1 -69.6 vs +18.3 ms (P < 0.05), and Pro-C3 -13.6% vs -3.6%. Week 16 changes from baseline with AXA1957 20.3 g: MRI-PDFF -8.1%, HOMA-IR +8.4, ALT -20.7%, K-18 M65 6.6%, cT1 -34.7 ms, and Pro-C3 -15.6%. A greater proportion of subjects treated with AXA1125 achieved clinically relevant thresholds: ≥30% MRI-PDFF, ≥17-IU/L ALT, and ≥80-ms cT1 reductions at week 16. Study products were safe and well tolerated with stable lipid and weight profiles., Discussion: Both compositions showed multitargeted activity on relevant NAFLD pathways. AXA1125 demonstrated the greatest activity over 16 weeks, warranting continued clinical investigation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis subjects., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background and Aims: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the standard for estimating portal pressure but requires expertise for interpretation. We hypothesized that HVPG could be extrapolated from liver histology using a machine learning (ML) algorithm., Approach and Results: Patients with NASH with compensated cirrhosis from a phase 2b trial were included. HVPG and biopsies from baseline and weeks 48 and 96 were reviewed centrally, and biopsies evaluated with a convolutional neural network (PathAI, Boston, MA). Using trichrome-stained biopsies in the training set (n = 130), an ML model was developed to recognize fibrosis patterns associated with HVPG, and the resultant ML HVPG score was validated in a held-out test set (n = 88). Associations between the ML HVPG score with measured HVPG and liver-related events, and performance of the ML HVPG score for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg), were determined. The ML-HVPG score was more strongly correlated with HVPG than hepatic collagen by morphometry (ρ = 0.47 vs. ρ = 0.28; P < 0.001). The ML HVPG score differentiated patients with normal (0-5 mm Hg) and elevated (5.5-9.5 mm Hg) HVPG and CSPH (median: 1.51 vs. 1.93 vs. 2.60; all P < 0.05). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) (95% CI) of the ML-HVPG score for CSPH were 0.85 (0.80, 0.90) and 0.76 (0.68, 0.85) in the training and test sets, respectively. Discrimination of the ML-HVPG score for CSPH improved with the addition of a ML parameter for nodularity, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and bilirubin (AUROC in test set: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.92). Although baseline ML-HVPG score was not prognostic, changes were predictive of clinical events (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.26, 3.59) and associated with hemodynamic response and fibrosis improvement., Conclusions: An ML model based on trichrome-stained liver biopsy slides can predict CSPH in patients with NASH with cirrhosis., (© 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Find AGA's NASH Clinical Care Pathway App for iOS and Android mobile devices at nash.gastro.org. Scan this QR code to be taken directly to the website.Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming increasingly common, currently affecting approximately 37% of US adults. NAFLD is most often managed in primary care or endocrine clinics, where clinicians must determine which patients might benefit from secondary care to address hepatic manifestations, comorbid metabolic traits, and cardiovascular risks of the disease. Because NAFLD is largely asymptomatic, and because optimal timing of treatment depends on accurate staging of fibrosis risk, screening at the primary care level is critical, together with consistent, timely, evidence-based, widely accessible, and testable management processes. To achieve these goals, the American Gastroenterological Association assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a Clinical Care Pathway providing explicit guidance on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of NAFLD. This article describes the NAFLD Clinical Care Pathway they developed and provides a rationale supporting proposed steps to assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing NAFLD with clinically significant fibrosis (stage F2-F4) based on the best available evidence. This Pathway is intended to be applicable in any setting where care for patients with NAFLD is provided, including primary care, endocrine, obesity medicine, and gastroenterology practices., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a measurement of ultrasound attenuation used to assess liver steatosis non-invasively. However, the standard method has some limitations. This study assessed the performance of a new CAP method by ex vivo and in vivo assessments. The major difference with the new method is that it uses ultrasound data continuously acquired during the imaging phase of the FibroScan examination. Seven reference tissue-mimicking phantoms were used to test the performance. In vivo performance was assessed in two cohorts (in total 195 patients) of patients using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as a reference. The precision of CAP was improved by more than 50% on tissue-mimicking phantoms and 22%-41% in the in vivo cohort studies. The agreement between both methods was excellent, and the correlation between CAP and MRI-PDFF improved in both studies (0.71 to 0.74; 0.70 to 0.76). Using MRI-PDFF as a reference, the diagnostic performance of the new method was at least equal or superior (area under the receiver operating curve 0.889-0.900, 0.835-0.873). This study suggests that the new continuous CAP method can significantly improve the precision of CAP measurements ex vivo and in vivo., (Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can progress to cirrhosis and its complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Given that the majority of patients with NASH are asymptomatic, developing screening strategies to identify those individuals at risk for progressive NASH remains a highly unmet need. Furthermore, noninvasive tests that accurately predict disease progression as part of the natural history of NASH or regression in response to treatment are urgently needed to decrease the reliance on repeat liver biopsies. To date, there are no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for NASH that can resolve steatohepatitis and lead to fibrosis regression. The lack of FDA-approved therapy has led to apathy in diagnosis and referral for specialty care. However, several therapeutic agents are rapidly progressing through the different phases of clinical trials with several already in phase 3 programs. In this review, we provide a summary of recent developments in NASH diagnostics and therapeutics that are likely to shape the future management of this underdiagnosed and undertreated disease., (© 2021 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: AMP kinase (AMPK) is an energy sensor implicated in regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation, and insulin sensitivity. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of PXL770, a novel direct AMPK activator, in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)., Methods: STAMP-NAFLD, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a study, was done across 15 US clinical sites. Patients aged 18-75 years with liver fat content of at least 10% at baseline when assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), via an interactive web response system, to receive oral PXL770 250 mg once daily, 250 mg twice daily, or 500 mg once daily, or matched placebo. Patients were stratified according to type 2 diabetes status and study site. The primary endpoint was relative change in liver fat content from baseline compared with placebo at week 12, assessed by MRI-PDFF. The primary endpoint was analysed in an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification criteria as factors and baseline liver fat content as a covariate in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all as-randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Safety was analysed in the safety population, defined as all as-treated patients receiving at least one dose of the study treatment. The trial has been completed and the final results are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03763877., Findings: Between March 29, 2019, and March 13, 2020, 387 patients were screened, of whom 120 were included in the modified intention-to-treat and safety analyses (30 in the 250 mg once daily group, 30 in the 250 mg twice daily group, 29 in the 500 mg once daily group, and 31 in the placebo group). The mean relative change from baseline in liver fat content at week 12 was -1·1% in the placebo group, -1·0% in the 250 mg once daily group (mean difference versus placebo 0·1% [95% CI -15·4 to 15·7], p=0·99), -14·3% in the 250 mg twice daily group (-13·1% [-28·1 to 1·8], p=0·084), and -14·7% in the 500 mg once daily group (-13·5% [-28·5 to 1·4], p=0·076). At least one treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 23 (77%) of 30 patients in the 250 mg once daily group, 20 (67%) of 30 patients in the 250 mg twice daily group, 21 (72%) of 29 patients in the 500 mg once daily group, and 21 (68%) of 31 patients in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhoea (five [17%] of patients in the 250 mg once daily group, seven [23%] in the 250 mg twice daily group, six [21%] in the 500 mg once daily group, and none in the placebo group). No life-threatening events or treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: PXL770 treatment did not meet the primary outcome of liver fat improvement compared with placebo. Treatment was well tolerated. Given indications that metabolic features improved with PXL770 treatment, AMPK activation might be a promising pharmacological target for patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD, and could also be considered for further assessment in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis., Funding: Poxel., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KC reports grant and research support from Cirius, Echosens, Inventiva, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, and Zydus, and is a consulting adviser for Allergan, Altimmune, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Boehringer Ingelheim, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Fractyl, Hanmi, Genentech, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, Pfizer, Poxel, Prosciento, Madrigal, and Novo Nordisk. NA reports grant and research support from 89Bio, Akero, Axcella, BI, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Hanmi, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus; is a consulting adviser for 89Bio, Fibronostics, Gilead, Intercept, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; and reports educational fees from AbbVie, Alexion, CLDF, Gilead, Intercept, and Simply Speaking. SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Cirius, Civi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, and Viking; is a consulting adviser for 89 Bio, AgomAB, Akero, Alentis, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR, Canfite, Chronwell, Civi Biopharma, Corcept, Cymabay, Echosens, Enyo, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, GNS Healthcare, Hepion, Hightide, Histoindex, Indalo, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, Microba, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, PathAI, Piper Sandler & Co, Poxel, Prometic, Ridgeline, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes Medical, Terns, Theratechnologies, and Viking; and holds shares in Akero, Chronwell, Cirius, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, Histoindex, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, PathAI, and Sonic Incytes Medical. PF, DEM, SH-B, and SB are employees of and shareholders in Poxel. J-MG is a consulting adviser for Poxel. JD is a former employee of and shareholder in Poxel. VR reports grant and research support from Gilead and is a consulting adviser for Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Genfit, Poxel, Intercept, Novo-Nordisk, Terns, Alexion, Alnylam, Theratechnologies, NGMBio, Sagimet, Prosciento, Inventiva, Hanmi, Covance, and 89 Bio. SJM declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Increased de novo lipogenesis creates excess intrahepatic fat and lipotoxins, propagating liver damage in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. TVB-2640, a fatty acid synthase inhibitor, was designed to reduce excess liver fat and directly inhibit inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways. We assessed the safety and efficacy of TVB-2640 in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States., Methods: 3V2640-CLIN-005 (FASCINATE-1) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind study at 10 US sites. Adults with ≥8% liver fat, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, and evidence of liver fibrosis by magnetic resonance elastography ≥2.5 kPa or liver biopsy were eligible. Ninety-nine patients were randomized to receive placebo or 25 mg or 50 mg of TVB-2640 (orally, once-daily for 12 weeks). The primary end points of this study were safety and relative change in liver fat after treatment., Results: Liver fat increased in the placebo cohort by 4.5% relative to baseline; in contrast TVB-2640 reduced liver fat by 9.6% in the 25-mg cohort (n = 30; least squares mean: -15.5%; 95% confidence interval, -31.3 to -0.23; P = .053), and 28.1% in the 50-mg cohort (n = 28; least squares mean: -28.0%; 95% confidence interval, -44.5 to -11.6; P = .001). Eleven percent of patients in the placebo group achieved a ≥30% relative reduction of liver fat compared to 23% in the 25-mg group, and 61% in the 50-mg group (P < .001). Secondary analyses showed improvements of metabolic, pro-inflammatory and fibrotic markers. TVB-2640 was well tolerated; adverse events were mostly mild and balanced among the groups., Conclusions: TVB-2640 significantly reduced liver fat and improved biochemical, inflammatory, and fibrotic biomarkers after 12 weeks, in a dose-dependent manner in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03938246., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii produces and utilizes acinetobactin for iron assimilation. Although two isomeric structures of acinetobactin, one featuring an oxazoline (Oxa) and the other with an isoxazolidinone (Isox) at the core, have been identified, their differential roles as virulence factors for successful infection have yet to be established. This study provides direct evidence that Oxa supplies iron more efficiently than Isox, primarily owing to its specific recognition by the cognate outer membrane receptor, BauA. The other components in the acinetobactin uptake machinery appear not to discriminate these isomers. Interestingly, Oxa was found to form a stable iron complex that is resistant to release of the chelated iron upon competition by Isox, despite their comparable apparent affinities to Fe(III). In addition, both Oxa and Isox were found to be competent iron chelators successfully scavenging iron from host metal sequestering proteins responsible for nutritional immunity. These observations collectively led us to propose a new model for acinetobactin-based iron assimilation at infection sites. Namely, Oxa is the principal siderophore mediating the core Fe(III) supply chain for A. baumannii, whereas Isox plays a minor role in the iron delivery and, alternatively, functions as an auxiliary iron collector that channels the iron pool toward Oxa. The unique siderophore utilization mechanism proposed here represents an intriguing strategy for pathogen adaptation under the various nutritional stresses encountered at infection sites. IMPORTANCE Acinetobacter baumannii has acquired antibiotic resistance at an alarming rate, and it is becoming a serious threat to society, particularly due to the paucity of effective treatment options. Acinetobactin is a siderophore of Acinetobacter baumannii, responsible for active iron supply, and it serves as a key virulence factor to counter host nutritional immunity during infection. While two acinetobactin isomers were identified, their distinctive roles for successful infection of Acinetobacter baumannii remained unsettled. This study clearly identified the isomer containing an oxazoline core as the principal siderophore based on comparative analysis of the specificity of the acinetobactin uptake machinery, the stability of the corresponding iron complexes, and the iron scavenging activity against the host iron sequestering proteins. Our findings are anticipated to stimulate efforts to discover a potent antivirulence agent against Acinetobacter baumannii that exploits the acinetobactin-based iron assimilation mechanism.

Background: Management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an unmet clinical need. Lanifibranor is a pan-PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor) agonist that modulates key metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrogenic pathways in the pathogenesis of NASH., Methods: In this phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with noncirrhotic, highly active NASH were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 1200 mg or 800 mg of lanifibranor or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score (the activity part of the Steatosis, Activity, Fibrosis [SAF] scoring system that incorporates scores for ballooning and inflammation) without worsening of fibrosis; SAF-A scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more-severe disease activity. Secondary end points included resolution of NASH and regression of fibrosis., Results: A total of 247 patients underwent randomization, of whom 103 (42%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 188 (76%) had significant (moderate) or advanced fibrosis. The percentage of patients who had a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score without worsening of fibrosis was significantly higher among those who received the 1200-mg dose, but not among those who received the 800-mg dose, of lanifibranor than among those who received placebo (1200-mg dose vs. placebo, 55% vs. 33%, P = 0.007; 800-mg dose vs. placebo, 48% vs. 33%, P = 0.07). The results favored both the 1200-mg and 800-mg doses of lanifibranor over placebo for resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis (49% and 39%, respectively, vs. 22%), improvement in fibrosis stage of at least 1 without worsening of NASH (48% and 34%, respectively, vs. 29%), and resolution of NASH plus improvement in fibrosis stage of at least 1 (35% and 25%, respectively, vs. 9%). Liver enzyme levels decreased and the levels of the majority of lipid, inflammatory, and fibrosis biomarkers improved in the lanifibranor groups. The dropout rate for adverse events was less than 5% and was similar across the trial groups. Diarrhea, nausea, peripheral edema, anemia, and weight gain occurred more frequently with lanifibranor than with placebo., Conclusions: In this phase 2b trial involving patients with active NASH, the percentage of patients who had a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score without worsening of fibrosis was significantly higher with the 1200-mg dose of lanifibranor than with placebo. These findings support further assessment of lanifibranor in phase 3 trials. (Funded by Inventiva Pharma; NATIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03008070.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background and Aims: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), point shear wave elastography (pSWE), 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2DSWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been proposed as non-invasive tests for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study evaluated their diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)., Methods: PubMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of these index tests, against histology as the reference standard, in adult patients with NAFLD. Two authors independently screened and assessed methodological quality of studies and extracted data. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (sAUC) were calculated for fibrosis stages and NASH, using a random effects bivariate logit-normal model., Results: We included 82 studies (14,609 patients). Meta-analysis for diagnosing fibrosis stages was possible in 53 VCTE, 11 MRE, 12 pSWE and 4 2DSWE studies, and for diagnosing NASH in 4 MRE studies. sAUC for diagnosis of significant fibrosis were: 0.83 for VCTE, 0.91 for MRE, 0.86 for pSWE and 0.75 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis were: 0.85 for VCTE, 0.92 for MRE, 0.89 for pSWE and 0.72 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of cirrhosis were: 0.89 for VCTE, 0.90 for MRE, 0.90 for pSWE and 0.88 for 2DSWE. MRE had sAUC of 0.83 for diagnosis of NASH. Three (4%) studies reported intention-to-diagnose analyses and 15 (18%) studies reported diagnostic accuracy against pre-specified cut-offs., Conclusions: When elastography index tests are acquired successfully, they have acceptable diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The potential clinical impact of these index tests cannot be assessed fully as intention-to-diagnose analyses and validation of pre-specified thresholds are lacking., Lay Summary: Non-invasive tests that measure liver stiffness or use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been suggested as alternatives to liver biopsy for assessing the severity of liver scarring (fibrosis) and fatty inflammation (steatohepatitis) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this study, we summarise the results of previously published studies on how accurately these non-invasive tests can diagnose liver fibrosis and inflammation, using liver biopsy as the reference. We found that some techniques that measure liver stiffness had a good performance for the diagnosis of severe liver scarring., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest EAS, FEM, MHZ, YV, JAL, CKL, LAJY, NP, CHL, GPA and PMB have nothing to declare. ANAJ, SN and MP are shareholders of Perspectum Ltd. MRG reports grant funding from Gilead Sciences and Intercept; consultancy from Allergan, Gilead Science, Intercept, Medimmune, Shionogi, ProSciento, Kaleido, Siemens, Abbvie, Novo Nordisk, Genfit and Zydus. MJB and TAT are shareholders and employees of Pfizer. QMA is coordinator of the IMI2 LITMUS consortium and he reports research grant funding from Abbvie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., Vertex; consultancy on behalf of Newcastle University for Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, Blade, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Imperial Innovations, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Kenes, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Servier, Viking Therapeutics; and speaker fees from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, MedScape. SAH has research grants from Akero, Axcella, Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, Viking. He has received consulting fees from Akero, Altimmune, Alentis, Arrowhead, Axcella, Canfite, Cirius, CiVi, Cymabay, Echosens, Enyo, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion, HIghtide, HistoIndex, Intercept, Kowa, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Prometic, Ridgeline, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Backgrounds/aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a range of diseases from nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and has been linked to cardiovascular disease and sub-clinical cardiac remodeling. This paper presents a retrospective study of biopsy-proven NAFL and NASH to examine the differences in subclinical cardiac remodeling., Methods: Patients were recruited from an institutional repository of patients with liver-biopsy-confirmed NAFLD. Patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within 12 months of the liver biopsy were included. The parameters of the diastolic dysfunction were reviewed for the differences between NAFL and NASH as well as between the stages and grades of NASH., Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the study, 17 with NAFL and 16 with NASH. The NASH patients were more likely to have lower platelets, higher AST, higher ALT, and higher rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and hypertension than the NAFL patients. The E/e' ratio on transthoracic echocardiogram was significantly higher in NASH compared to NAFL, advanced-stage NASH compared to early stage, and high-grade NASH compared to low-grade. The E/e' ratio was also significantly higher in NASH than NAFL in patients without diabetes mellitus. The presence of diastolic dysfunction trended toward significance. The other markers of diastolic dysfunction were similar. Logistic regression revealed a statistical association with E/e' and NASH., Conclusions: NASH patients had evidence of a higher E/e' ratio than NAFL, and there was a trend towards a significant diastolic dysfunction. Patients with NASH compared to NAFL should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of cardiac dysfunction.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is frequently associated with diabetes and may cause progressive liver disease. Current treatment options are limited. Here we report on a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of two doses of HTD1801 (berberine ursodeoxycholate, an ionic salt of berberine and ursodeoxycholic acid), versus placebo that was conducted in 100 subjects with fatty liver disease and diabetes (NCT03656744). Treatment was for 18 weeks with a primary endpoint of reduction in liver fat content measured by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction. Key secondary endpoints included improvement in glycemic control, liver-associated enzymes and safety. The pre-specified primary endpoint was met. Thus, subjects receiving 1000 mg twice a day of berberine ursodeoxycholate had significantly greater reduction in liver fat content than in placebo recipients (mean absolute decrease -4.8% vs. -2.0% (p = 0.011). Compared to placebo, subjects receiving this dose also experienced significant improvement in glycemic control as well as reductions in liver-associated enzymes and significant weight loss. Diarrhea and abdominal discomfort were the most frequently reported adverse events. We conclude that berberine ursodeoxycholate has a broad spectrum of metabolic activity in patients with presumed NASH and diabetes. It is relatively well tolerated and merits further development as a treatment for NASH with diabetes., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection remains highly prevalent, and young women are disproportionately affected. Most CT-infected women are asymptomatic, and their infection often goes unrecognized and untreated. We hypothesized that testing for active CT infection with molecular diagnostics and obtaining a reported history of CT infection underestimate the prevalence of current and past CT infection, and incorporating serum CT antibody testing in addition to these other prevalence measures would generate more accurate estimates of the prevalence of CT infection in asymptomatic young women., Methods: We enrolled 362 asymptomatic women aged 16 to 29 years at 4 different clinical settings in Birmingham, AL, between August 2016 and January 2020 and determined the prevalence of CT infection based on having 1 or more of the following prevalence measures: an active urogenital CT infection based on molecular testing, reported prior CT infection, and/or being CT seropositive. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine predictors of the prevalence of CT infection after adjustment for participant characteristics., Results: The prevalence of CT infection was 67.7% (95% confidence interval, 62.6%-72.5%). Addition of CT antibody testing to the other individual prevalence measures more than doubled the CT infection prevalence. Non-Hispanic Black race, reported prior gonorrhea, and reported prior trichomoniasis predicted a higher prevalence of CT infection., Conclusions: More than half of women were unaware of ever having CT infection, suggesting many were at risk for CT-associated reproductive complications. These data reinforce the need to adhere to chlamydia screening guidelines and to increase screening coverage in those at risk., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: W.M.G. and B.V.D.P. report receiving research funding from Hologic, Inc, outside the range of the current work. The other authors report no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Large prospective studies to establish the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH), are lacking. We prospectively assessed the prevalence and severity of NAFLD/NASH in a cohort of asymptomatic middle-aged Americans attending a colonoscopy class at a gastroenterology clinic., Methods: Screening for NAFLD was performed using magnetic resonance (MR)-based LiverMultiScan® proton density fat fraction (LMS-PDFF). MR exams also included corrected T1 and elastography for liver stiffness measurement (LSM). FibroScan® was also used to measure LSM. Participants with predetermined abnormal imaging parameters were offered a liver biopsy. Biopsies were read in a blinded fashion with results based on the consensus by 2 expert pathologists. The prevalence of NAFLD was determined by PDFF ≥5% or by histological diagnosis of NAFLD (if biopsy data were available). The prevalence of NASH was defined by biopsy., Results: Of 835 participants, 664 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age was 56 ± 6.4 years, 50% were male, the mean BMI was 30.48 ± 5.46 kg/m 2 , and 52% were obese. The prevalence of NAFLD was 38% (95% CI 34-41%) and the prevalence of NASH was 14% (95% CI 12-17%). While no patient had cirrhosis on biopsy, significant fibrosis (F ≥2) was present in 5.9% (95% CI 4-8%) and bridging fibrosis in 1.6% (95% CI 1-3%). In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with the presence of NASH were race, obesity, and diabetes., Conclusion: Using state-of-the-art liver imaging modalities and reference biopsy, this study establishes an overall prevalence of NAFLD of 38% and NASH by biopsy of 14% in this cohort of asymptomatic middle-aged US adults., Lay Summary: There are no prospective studies to determine how common is nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In a large number of asymptomatic middle-aged Americans, we used a combination of state-of-the-art liver imaging methods and liver biopsy to prospectively determine the prevalence of NAFLD and NASH. NAFLD was diagnosed in 38%, NASH in 14%, and significant liver fibrosis in 6% of asymptomatic middle-aged Americans., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr. Harrison-SAH reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Second Genome, Tobira/Allergan, and Genentech; grants, personal fees, and stock/equity from Akero, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, and NorthSea Therapeutics; grants and personal fees from Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Conatus Pharmaceuticals, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, High Tide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; personal fees and stock/equity from HistoIndex; and personal fees from Altimmune, Blade Therapeutics, Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, Corcept Therapeutics, Echosens, Foresite Labs, Gelesis, Indalo Therapeutics, Innovate Pharma, IQVIA, Lipocine, Medpace, Perspectum, Poxel, Prometheus, Prometic, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Ridgeline Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Dr. Gawrieh consulting: TransMedics, research grant support: Cirius, Galmed, Viking and Zydus. Dr. Roberts has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lisanti receives royalties for the book MRI: The Basics, from Wolters Kluwer. Dr. Schwope has nothing to disclose. Dr. Cebe has nothing to disclose. Dr. Paradis consulting: Servier. Dr. Bedossa reports personal fees from Genfit, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Inventiva Pharma, Echosens, HistoIndex, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Cymabay, Pfizer, Cirius Therapeutics, Histoindex and Diafir outside the submitted work. Ms. Aldridge Whitehead has nothing to disclose A. Labourdette is a full-time employee of Echosens. Dr. Miette is a full-time employee of Echosens. Dr. Neubauer is a current shareholder and previous non-executive director and consultant for Perspectum. Outside the submitted work: Research grants from Cytokinetics and Boehringer Ingelheim, consultancy from Cytokinetics, shareholder, consultant and non-executive director, Caristo Diagnostics. Dr. Fournier is a full-time employee of Echosens. Dr. Paredes has nothing to disclose. Dr. Alkhouri serves on advisory boards for Allergan, Gilead, Intercept, Pfizer, and Zydus; he serves as a speaker for AbbVie, Alexion, Gilead, Intercept, and Simply Speaking; and has received research support from Akero, Albireo, Allergan, Axcella, BI, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Hanmi, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel and Zydus. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Manual histological assessment is currently the accepted standard for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression in NASH, but is limited by variability in interpretation and insensitivity to change. Thus, there is a critical need for improved tools to assess liver pathology in order to risk stratify NASH patients and monitor treatment response., Approach and Results: Here, we describe a machine learning (ML)-based approach to liver histology assessment, which accurately characterizes disease severity and heterogeneity, and sensitively quantifies treatment response in NASH. We use samples from three randomized controlled trials to build and then validate deep convolutional neural networks to measure key histological features in NASH, including steatosis, inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrosis. The ML-based predictions showed strong correlations with expert pathologists and were prognostic of progression to cirrhosis and liver-related clinical events. We developed a heterogeneity-sensitive metric of fibrosis response, the Deep Learning Treatment Assessment Liver Fibrosis score, which measured antifibrotic treatment effects that went undetected by manual pathological staging and was concordant with histological disease progression., Conclusions: Our ML method has shown reproducibility and sensitivity and was prognostic for disease progression, demonstrating the power of ML to advance our understanding of disease heterogeneity in NASH, risk stratify affected patients, and facilitate the development of therapies., (© 2021 PathAI. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: The benefits of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been validated, although improvements in efficacy and/or tolerability remain elusive. Herein, we aimed to assess the performance of a structurally optimized FXR agonist in patients with NASH., Methods: In this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated MET409 - a non-bile acid agonist with a unique chemical scaffold - in patients with NASH. Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mg (n = 20) or 50 mg (n = 19) of MET409, or placebo (n = 19)., Results: At Week 12, MET409 lowered liver fat content (LFC), with mean relative reductions of 55% (80 mg) and 38% (50 mg) vs. 6% in placebo (p <0.001). MET409 achieved ≥30% relative LFC reduction in 93% (80 mg) and 75% (50 mg) of patients vs. 11% in placebo (p <0.001) and normalized LFC (≤5%) in 29% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 0% in placebo (p <0.05). An increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was observed with MET409, confounding Week 12 changes from baseline (-25% for 80 mg, 28% for 50 mg). Nonetheless, MET409 achieved ≥30% relative ALT reduction in 50% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 17% in placebo. MET409 was associated with on-target high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases (mean changes of -23.4% for 80 mg and -20.3% for 50 mg vs. 2.6% in placebo) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases (mean changes of 23.7% for 80 mg and 6.8% for 50 mg vs. -1.5% in placebo). Pruritus (mild-moderate) occurred in 16% (50 mg) and 40% (80 mg) of MET409-treated patients., Conclusion: MET409 lowered LFC over 12 weeks in patients with NASH and delivered a differentiated pruritus and LDL-C profile at 50 mg, providing the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced through structural optimization., Lay Summary: Activation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a clinically validated approach for treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), although side effects such as itching or increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are frequently dose-limiting. MET409, an FXR agonist with a unique chemical structure, led to significant liver fat reduction and delivered a favorable side effect profile after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with NASH. These results provide the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest SAH and EJL are advisors of Metacrine, Inc. MRB serves as Principal Investigator on grants provided to his institution by Metacrine, Inc. K-JL, JS-L, JL, BW, NDS and HCC are employees of Metacrine, Inc. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is anti-fibrotic, improves metabolic status and has potential to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We assessed the safety and efficacy of efruxifermin, a long-acting Fc-FGF21 fusion protein, for the treatment of NASH. BALANCED was a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with NASH conducted at 27 centers in the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03976401 ). Eighty patients, stratified by hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and fibrosis stage, were randomized using a centrally administered minimization algorithm 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo (n = 21) or efruxifermin 28 mg (n = 19), efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or efruxifermin 70 mg (n = 20) via weekly subcutaneous injection for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint-absolute change from baseline in HFF measured as magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction at week 12-was met. For the full analysis set, the least squares mean absolute changes (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval) from baseline in HFF were -12.3% (-infinity (-inf), -10.3), -13.4% (-inf, -11.4) and -14.1% (-inf, -12.1) in the 28-, 50- and 70-mg groups, respectively, versus 0.3% (-inf, 1.6) in the placebo group, with statistically significant differences between efruxifermin groups and placebo (P < 0.0001 each). Overall, 70 of 79 patients who received the study drug (89%) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with the majority grade 1-2 (64 (81%)), five (6%) grade 3 and one grade 4. The most commonly reported drug-related TEAEs were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal (36 (46%)). Treatment with efruxifermin significantly reduced HFF in patients with F1-F3 stage NASH, with an acceptable safety profile., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background & Aims: The association between physical activity (PA) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) requires investigation. We studied whether PA, measured by accelerometer, is associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with NAFLD., Methods: We performed a longitudinal analysis using the 2003 to 2006 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data of adults (age, ≥20 y) and collecting mortality data through December 2015. NAFLD was defined based on the hepatic steatosis index or US fatty liver index scores, in the absence of other causes of chronic liver disease. PA was measured from participants who wore accelerometers 10 h/d for a minimum of 4 days over a 7-day period and were classified as total PA, moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and sedentary behavior., Results: Over an average follow-up period of 10.6 years, increasing the duration of total PA was associated with a reduced risk of death, from any cause, in an age- and sex-adjusted model (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.86 for highest quartile vs lowest quartile; P for trend = .001) and multivariable model (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75; P for trend < .001) among individuals with NAFLD. Increasing the duration of MVPA was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause in individuals with NAFLD. Furthermore, longer total PA was associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular disease-related death in individuals with NAFLD (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.98 for highest quartile vs lowest quartile; P for trend = .007). We did not find this association for cancer-related mortality in individuals with NAFLD. Increasing the duration of sedentary behavior did not affect all-cause or cause-specific mortality in individuals with NAFLD., Conclusions: Longer total PA and MVPA, measured by accelerometers over a 7-day period, are associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with NAFLD., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Liver histology changes are the current gold standard for evaluating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but are limited by their invasiveness and variability for sampling and interpretation. We evaluated noninvasive biomarkers as an indication of histologic changes in NASH., Methods: Associations between 12-month biomarker and NASH Clinical Research Network histologic score changes in 339 patients with NASH in the EMMINENCE trial was examined with multivariable models and partial canonical correlation. A meta-analysis of 17 NASH trials including 3717 patients examined associations between these same changes and histologic response within treatment groups, and treatment effects on biomarkers and on liver histology. Biopsy measures assessed were changes in ballooning, steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, NASH improvement without worsening of fibrosis, and fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH. All analytic methods suggest that a combination of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cytokeratin-18 (CK-18 [M30 or M65]), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) changes best predicts overall liver biopsy changes in response to interventions., Results: The weighted average of standardized mean changes (0.403 × AST, 0.314 × CK-18, 0.283 × HbA1c) facilitated comparisons of within-group responses and treatment effects among studies included in the meta-analysis. This composite in EMMINENCE discriminated between patients with and without NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis with area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.7880, and for fibrosis improvement without NASH worsening of 0.7553., Conclusion: A composite score based on changes in AST, HbA1c, and CK-18 could serve as a surrogate for liver histologic improvement and an effective objective, noninvasive tool for comparative assessment of treatment effects of novel interventions., Competing Interests: Beth A Davison, Gad Cotter, and Christopher Edwards report grants from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc. during the study's conduct. Rohit Loomba serves as a consultant or advisory board member for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bird Rock Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myer Squibb, Celgene, Cirius, CohBar, Conatus, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Gemphire, Gilead, Glympse bio, GNI, GRI Bio, Intercept, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Merck, Metacrine, Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prometheus, Sanofi, Siemens, and Viking Therapeutics. In addition, his institution has received grant support from Allergan, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Cirius, Eli Lilly and Company, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, GE, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Grail, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, NuSirt, Pfizer, pH Pharma, Prometheus, and Siemens. He is also co‐founder of Liponexus, Inc. Rohit Loomba also receives funding support from NIEHS (5P42ES010337), NCATS (5UL1TR001442), NIDDK (R01DK106419, P30DK120515), and DOD PRCRP (CA170674P2). Stephen A Harrison reports grants from Cirius Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees and other from Galectin, Genfit, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, grants and personal fees from 3VBio, Axcella, Cirius Therapeutics, Contravir, CymaBay, Galmed, Gilead, BMS, Hightide, Intercept, Immuron, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Second Genome, Tobira/Allergan, grants and other from NorthSea, grants from Conatus, personal fees and other from Akero, Altimmune, Blade Therapeutics, personal fees from CiVi Biopharma, Echosens, Gelesis, CLDF, Consynance, Corcept, HistoIndex, Indalo, Innovate, IQVIA, Lipocine, Medpace, Perspectum, Prometheus, Poxel, Prometic, Fortress Bio, Terns, Viking, outside the submitted work. Naim Alkhouri reports grants from Cirius Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; and grants from Albireo, Ackero, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Hanmi, Inventiva, Madrigal, MedImmune, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus; grants and personal fees from Allergan, Gilead, Intercept; AbbVie, Alexion and Eisai and personal fees from Exelixis and Salix outside the submitted work. Howard C Dittrich reports personal fees from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc., during the conduct of the study. In addition, there is a patent MSDC‐0602K method of use pending. Gary G Koch is the principal investigator of a biostatistical agreement between Momentum Research, Inc. and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and that agreement provided the structure for his activity for this article. He is also the principal investigator of many such biostatistical agreements with other biopharmaceutical sponsors, including AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly & Co., Forest Research Institute (Allergan), GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, and Sanofi, although his activities for those sponsors are not related to the content of this article. Information concerning all biostatistical agreements for which Gary Koch is the principal investigator is publicly available through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., (© 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); no approved therapies for NASH currently exist. Pegbelfermin (PGBF), a human fibroblast growth factor 21 analog, has metabolic effects that may provide benefit for patients with NASH., Design: The FALCON 1 and 2 studies are phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials to assess safety and efficacy of PGBF treatment in patients who have histologically-confirmed NASH with stage 3 liver fibrosis (FALCON 1; NCT03486899) or compensated cirrhosis (FALCON 2; NCT03486912). In both studies, randomized patients receive once weekly subcutaneous injections of PGBF (10, 20, or 40 mg) or placebo during a 48-week treatment period and are then followed for an additional 4 weeks., Endpoints: The primary efficacy endpoint for FALCON 1 is the proportion of patients who achieve ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis (by NASH CRN fibrosis score) without NASH worsening or NASH improvement (≥2 point decrease in NAFLD Activity Score) without fibrosis worsening at Week 24. For FALCON 2, the primary efficacy endpoint is ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis without NASH worsening at Week 48. Key safety endpoints for both studies include incidence and frequency of adverse events, bone mineral density and immunogenicity., Summary: Previous clinical trial data show that PGBF can reduce hepatic fat and improve metabolic factors and biomarkers of hepatic injury and fibrosis. The FALCON studies aim to evaluate PGBF treatment specifically in patients with NASH and advanced fibrosis, who are at greatest risk of poor clinical outcomes over time., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The role of liver biopsy in NASH has evolved along with the increased recognition of the significance of this disease, and the unmet medical need it presents. Drug development and clinical trials are rapidly growing, as are noninvasive tests for markers of steatosis, inflammation, injury, and fibrosis. Liver biopsy evaluation remains necessary for both drug development and clinical trials as the most specific means of diagnosis and patient identification for appropriate intervention. This White Paper, sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease NASH Task Force, is a focused review of liver biopsy evaluation in fatty liver disease in subjects with presumed NAFLD for practicing clinical hepatologists and pathologists. The goal is to provide succinct and specific means for reporting the histopathologic elements of NASH, distinguishing NASH from nonalcoholic fatty liver without steatohepatitis, and from alcohol-associated steatohepatitis when possible. The discussion includes the special situations of NASH in advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, and in the pediatric population. Finally, there is discussion of semiquantitative methods of evaluation of lesions of "disease activity" and fibrosis. Tables are presented for scoring and a suggested model for final reporting. Figures are presented to highlight the histopathologic elements of NASH., (© 2020 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aim: Fibrosis is an independent predictor of death in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We assessed the associations between histologic and noninvasive tests (NITs) for fibrosis with clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced NASH., Methods: Patients with advanced NASH (NASH Clinical Research Network stage F3 or F4) were enrolled in 4 multinational clinical trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib. Liver biopsy samples, NIT results, and PROs (Short Form-36, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-NASH, EuroQol-5D, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) were prospectively collected., Results: A total of 2154 patients with advanced NASH were included: 52.5% with F4 NASH, 40% male, 72% with type 2 diabetes, baseline liver stiffness of 24.1 ± 14.2 kPa in F4 disease and 14.6 ± 8.0 kPa in F3 disease, baseline mean Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score of 11.4 ± 1.2 in F4 disease and 10.3 ± 1.0 in F3 disease, and a median follow-up of 16 months. Of those with baseline F3 disease, 16.7% experienced disease progression to cirrhosis, whereas for those with F4 disease, 7.3% experienced clinical events (39% ascites, 24% hepatic encephalopathy); patients who progressed had higher baseline NIT scores (all P < .0001). Adjusted for baseline levels, increases in NIT scores were also associated with increased risk of disease progression in both the F3 and F4 groups (P < .01 for all NITs in F3 and for ELF, NAFLD Fibrosis Score, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and liver stiffness in F4). Higher NIT scores were found to be associated with impairment in PROs: ELF, ≥10.43; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score, ≥1.80; Fibrotest score, ≥0.54; liver stiffness, ≥23.4 kPa. During treatment, patients with decreases in NIT scores experienced improvement of their PRO scores, whereas those with increase in NIT scores had their PRO scores worsen (P < .05)., Conclusions: Baseline NIT scores and their changes over time are predictors of adverse clinical and PROs in patients with advanced NASH. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Numbers NCT01672866, NCT01672879, NCT03053050, and NCT03053063)., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common disease that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but treatment options are limited. The efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide in patients with NASH is not known., Methods: We conducted a 72-week, double-blind phase 2 trial involving patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and liver fibrosis of stage F1, F2, or F3. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 3:3:3:1:1:1 ratio, to receive once-daily subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg or corresponding placebo. The primary end point was resolution of NASH with no worsening of fibrosis. The confirmatory secondary end point was an improvement of at least one fibrosis stage with no worsening of NASH. The analyses of these end points were performed only in patients with stage F2 or F3 fibrosis; other analyses were performed in all the patients., Results: In total, 320 patients (of whom 230 had stage F2 or F3 fibrosis) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide at a dose of 0.1 mg (80 patients), 0.2 mg (78 patients), or 0.4 mg (82 patients) or to receive placebo (80 patients). The percentage of patients in whom NASH resolution was achieved with no worsening of fibrosis was 40% in the 0.1-mg group, 36% in the 0.2-mg group, 59% in the 0.4-mg group, and 17% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for semaglutide 0.4 mg vs. placebo). An improvement in fibrosis stage occurred in 43% of the patients in the 0.4-mg group and in 33% of the patients in the placebo group (P = 0.48). The mean percent weight loss was 13% in the 0.4-mg group and 1% in the placebo group. The incidence of nausea, constipation, and vomiting was higher in the 0.4-mg group than in the placebo group (nausea, 42% vs. 11%; constipation, 22% vs. 12%; and vomiting, 15% vs. 2%). Malignant neoplasms were reported in 3 patients who received semaglutide (1%) and in no patients who received placebo. Overall, neoplasms (benign, malignant, or unspecified) were reported in 15% of the patients in the semaglutide groups and in 8% in the placebo group; no pattern of occurrence in specific organs was observed., Conclusions: This phase 2 trial involving patients with NASH showed that treatment with semaglutide resulted in a significantly higher percentage of patients with NASH resolution than placebo. However, the trial did not show a significant between-group difference in the percentage of patients with an improvement in fibrosis stage. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02970942.)., (Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Despite the substantial gains in our understanding of NAFLD/NASH over the past 2 decades, there has been some dissatisfaction with the terminology "non-alcoholic" which overemphasizes "alcohol" and underemphasizes the root cause of this liver disease, namely, the predisposing metabolic risk factors. As a potential remedy, a name change from NAFLD to metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. Although MAFLD reflects the relevant risk factors for this liver disease, this term is still suboptimal, leaving a great deal of ambiguity. Here, we caution that changing the name without understanding its broad implications can have a negative impact on the field. In this context, changing the terminology without new understanding of the molecular basis of the disease entity, new insights in risk stratification or other important aspect of this liver disease, can create unnecessary confusion which could negatively impact the field. At a time when the field is facing substantial challenges around disease awareness as well as clarity of acceptable endpoints for drug development and biomarker discovery, changing the terminology from one suboptimal name to another suboptimal name without full assessment is expected to deepen these challenges. In the context of this debate about terminology, we recommend the creation of a true international consensus group to include all the relevant scientific liver societies (AASLD, EASL, ALEH, APASL), patient advocacy organizations, bio-pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies and policy makers. A consensus meeting must assess the impact and consequences of changing the terminology based on the available evidence and make recommendations that will move the field forward. By this approach, a true collaborative international and inclusive consensus can be adopted by all stakeholders dealing with this important global liver disease., (© 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Higher serum bile acid levels are associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and liver-related morbidity and mortality. Herein, we report secondary analyses of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19, on the circulating bile acid profile in prospective, phase II studies in patients with metabolic or cholestatic liver disease., Methods: One hundred and seventy-six patients with biopsy-confirmed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis and elevated liver fat content (≥8% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction) received 0.3 mg (n = 23), 1 mg (n = 49), 3 mg (n = 49), 6 mg (n = 28) aldafermin or placebo (n = 27) for 12 weeks. Sixty-two patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (>1.5× upper limit of normal) received 1 mg (n = 21), 3 mg (n = 21) aldafermin or placebo (n = 20) for 12 weeks. Serum samples were collected on day 1 and week 12 for determination of bile acid profile and neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (Pro-C3), a direct measure of fibrogenesis., Results: Treatment with aldafermin resulted in significant dose-dependent reductions in serum bile acids. In particular, bile acids with higher hydrophobicity indices, such as deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, and glycocholic acid, were markedly lowered by aldafermin in both NASH and PSC populations. Moreover, aldafermin predominantly suppressed the glycine-conjugated bile acids, rather than the taurine-conjugated bile acids. Changes in levels of bile acids correlated with changes in the novel fibrogenesis marker Pro-C3, which detects a neo-epitope of the type III collagen during its formation, in the pooled NASH and PSC populations., Conclusions: Aldafermin markedly reduced major hydrophobic bile acids that have greater detergent activity and cytotoxicity. Our data provide evidence that bile acids may contribute to sustaining a pro-fibrogenic microenvironment in the liver across metabolic and cholestatic liver diseases., Lay Summary: Aldafermin is an analogue of a gut hormone, which is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic liver disease. Herein, we show that aldafermin can potently and robustly suppress the toxic, hydrophobic bile acids irrespective of disease aetiology. The therapeutic strategy utilising aldafermin may be broadly applicable to other chronic gastrointestinal and liver disorders., Clinical Trials Registration: The study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT02443116 and NCT02704364., Competing Interests: A.J.S. reports serving as an unpaid consultant to Intercept, Zydus, Echosense, Immuron, Madrigal, Galectin, Blade, Pliant, Albireo, and AMRA; is a consultant to Gilead, Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Merck, Galmed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Siemens, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Glympse Bio, Genfit, Coherus, Surrozen, Poxel, 89 Bio, Perspectum, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, and Lipocine; owns stock options in Indalo, Durect, Tiziana, Exhalenz, and Northsea; and is president of Sanyal Bio. L.L., A.M.D., and H.D.L. are employees and stockholders of NGM Biopharmaceuticals. U.B. reports consulting for Novartis, Intercept; grant/research support from Norwegian, American, and South African PSC patient foundations and German DCCV; received lecture fees from Abbvie, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, Novartis, Roche, Shire, and Zambon; and received research support for investigator-initiated studies from Dr. Falk Pharma and Intercept. S.A.H. reports research support from Conatus, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Akero, Axcella, Metacrine, Sagimet, Enyo, NorthSea, Genentech, Hepion, Cymabay, and Hightide; and is a consulting adviser for the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, Cirius, Echosens, Akero, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Perspectum, Metacrine, Medpace, Sagimet, Blade, Viking, Poxel, Axcella, Terns, HistoIndex, Hightide, Hepion, Ridgeline Therapeutics, CiVi, and Prometic. G.M.H. reports consulting for Cymabay, Genfit, Falk, Intercept, GSK, Mirum, Roche, and Pliant. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Resmetirom (MGL-3196), a selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist, was evaluated in a 36-week paired liver biopsy study (NCT02912260) in adults with biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The primary endpoint was relative liver fat reduction as assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and secondary endpoints included histopathology. Subsequently, a 36-week active treatment open-label extension (OLE) study was conducted in 31 consenting patients (including 14 former placebo patients) with persistently mild to markedly elevated liver enzymes at the end of the main study. In patients treated with resmetirom (80 or 100 mg orally per day), MRI-PDFF reduction at OLE week 36 was -11.1% (1.5%) mean reduction (standard error [SE]; P  < 0.0001) and -52.3% (4.4%) mean relative reduction, P  < 0.0001. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-26.1% [4.5%], P  < 0.0001), apolipoprotein B (-23.8% [3.0%], P  < 0.0001), and triglycerides (-19.6% [5.4%], P  = 0.0012; -46.1 [14.5] mg/dL, P  = 0.0031) were reduced from baseline. Markers of fibrosis were reduced, including liver stiffness assessed by transient elastography (-2.1 [0.8] mean kilopascals [SE], P  = 0.015) and N-terminal type III collagen pro-peptide (PRO-C3) (-9.8 [2.3] ng/mL, P  = 0.0004 (baseline ≥ 10 ng/mL). In the main and OLE studies, PRO-C3/C3M (matrix metalloproteinase-degraded C3), a marker of net fibrosis formation, was reduced in resmetirom-treated patients (-0.76 [-1.27, -0.24], P  = 0.0044 and -0.68, P  < 0.0001, respectively). Resmetirom was well tolerated, with few, nonserious adverse events. Conclusion: The results of this 36-week OLE study support the efficacy and safety of resmetirom at daily doses of 80 mg and 100 mg, used in the ongoing phase 3 NASH study, MAESTRO-NASH (NCT03900429). The OLE study demonstrates a potential for noninvasive assessments to monitor the response to resmetirom from an individual patient with NASH., (© 2021 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background and Aims: The composition of the human gut microbiota is linked to health and disease, and knowledge of the impact of therapeutics on the microbiota is essential to decipher their biological roles and to gain new mechanistic insights. Here we report the effect of aldafermin, an analog of the gut hormone FGF19, versus placebo on the gut microbiota in a prospective, phase 2 study in patients with NASH., Approach and Results: A total of 176 patients with biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥ 4), fibrosis (F1-F3 by NASH Clinical Research Network criteria), and elevated liver fat content (≥ 8% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction) received 0.3 mg (n = 23), 1 mg (n = 49), 3 mg (n = 49), and 6 mg (n = 28) aldafermin or placebo (n = 27) for 12 weeks. Stool samples were collected on day 1 and week 12 and profiled using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing; 122 patients had paired stool microbiome profiles at both day 1 and week 12. Overall, the state of the gut microbial community was distinctly stable in patients treated with aldafermin, with all major phyla and genera unaltered during therapy. Patients treated with aldafermin showed a significant, dose-dependent enrichment in the rare genus Veillonella, a commensal microbe known to have lactate-degrading and performance-enhancing properties, which correlated with changes in serum bile acid profile., Conclusions: Veillonella may be a bile acid-sensitive bacteria whose enrichment is enabled by aldafermin-mediated suppression of bile acid synthesis and, in particular, decreases in toxic bile acids. This study provides an integrated analysis of gut microbiome, serum bile acid metabolome, imaging, and histological measurements in clinical trials testing aldafermin for NASH. Our results provide a better understanding of the intricacies of microbiome-host interactions (clinicaltrials.gov trial No. NCT02443116)., (© 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Aldafermin, an engineered analog of fibroblast growth factor 19, inhibits bile acid synthesis and regulates metabolic homeostasis. We report results from a 24-week, phase 2 study, with serial liver biopsies, of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)., Methods: We performed a double-blind study of 78 patients with NASH at 9 centers in the United States. Key inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven NASH with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score ≥4, stage 2 or 3 fibrosis by NASH Clinical Research Network classification, and absolute liver fat content ≥8%, measured by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2) to groups given subcutaneous placebo (n = 25) or aldafermin 1 mg (n = 53) daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in absolute liver fat content from baseline at week 24. Secondary outcomes included serum markers and histologic measures of fibrosis improvement and NASH resolution., Results: At week 24, the aldafermin group had a significant reduction in absolute liver fat content (reduction of 7.7%) compared with placebo (reduction of 2.7%; difference, reduction of 5.0%; 95% confidence interval, reduction of 8.0%-1.9%; P = .002). Aldafermin produced significantly greater decreases in levels of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, bile acids, alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, and neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (Pro-C3) than placebo. Fibrosis improvement (≥1 stage) with no worsening of NASH was achieved in 38% of patients receiving aldafermin vs 18% of patients receiving placebo (P = .10). NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis was observed in 24% of patients given aldafermin vs 9% of patients given placebo (P = .20). Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in no patients in the aldafermin group and 4% of patients in the placebo group., Conclusions: In a phase 2 trial of patients with NASH, aldafermin reduced liver fat and produced a trend toward fibrosis improvement. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02443116., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Liver biopsies are a critical component of pivotal studies in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), constituting inclusion criteria, risk stratification factors and endpoints. We evaluated the reliability of NASH Clinical Research Network scoring of liver biopsies in a NASH clinical trial., Methods: Digitized slides of 678 biopsies from 339 patients with paired biopsies randomized into the EMMINENCE study - examining a novel insulin sensitizer (MSDC-0602K) in NASH - were read independently by 3 hepatopathologists blinded to treatment code and scored using the NASH CRN histological scoring system. Various endpoints were computed from these scores., Results: Inter-reader linearly weighted kappas were 0.609, 0.484, 0.328, and 0.517 for steatosis, fibrosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning, respectively. Inter-reader unweighted kappas were 0.400 for the diagnosis of NASH, 0.396 for NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis, and 0.366 for fibrosis improvement without worsening NASH. In the current study, 46.3% of the patients included in the study based on 1 hepatopathologist's qualifying reading were deemed not to meet the study's histologic inclusion criteria by at least 1 of the 3 hepatopathologists. The MSDC-0602K treatment effect was lowest for those histologic features with lower inter-reader reliability. Simulations show that the lack of reliability of endpoints and inclusion criteria can drastically reduce study power - from >90% in a well-powered study to as low as 40%., Conclusions: The reliability of hepatopathologists' liver biopsy evaluation using currently accepted criteria is suboptimal. This lack of reliability may affect NASH pivotal studies by introducing patients who do not meet NASH study entry criteria, misclassifying fibrosis subgroups, and attenuating apparent treatment effects., Lay Summary: Since liver biopsy analysis plays such an important role in clinical studies of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, it is important to understand the reliability of hepato-pathologist readings. We examined both inter- and intra-reader variability in a large data set of paired liver biopsies from a clinical trial. We found very poor inter-reader and modest intra-reader variability. This result has important implications for entry criteria, fibrosis stratification, and the ability to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Beth Davison, Gad Cotter, and Christopher Edwards report grants from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc. during the study's conduct. Stephen Harrison reports grants from Cirius Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees and other from Galectin, Genfit, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, grants and personal fees from 3VBio, Axcella, Cirius Therapeutics, Contravir, CymaBay, Galmed, Gilead, BMS, Hightide, Intercept, Immuron, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Second Genome, Tobira/Allergan, grants and other from NorthSea, grants from Conatus, personal fees and other from Akero, Altimmune, Blade Therapeutics, personal fees from CiVi Biopharma, Echosens, Gelesis, CLDF, Consynance, Corcept, HistoIndex, Indalo, Innovate, IQVIA, Lipocine, Medpace, Perspectum, Prometheus, Poxel, Prometic, Fortress Bio, Terns, Viking, outside the submitted work. Naim Alkhouri reports grants from Cirius Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; and grants from Albireo, Ackero, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Hanmi, Inventiva, Madrigal, MedImmune, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus; grants and personal fees from Allergan, Gilead, Intercept; AbbVie, Alexion and Eisai and personal fees from Exelixis and Salix outside the submitted work. Arun Sanyal reports grants from Echosens-Sandhill, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sequana, Tiziana; grants and other from Genfit, Mallinckrodt, Pfizer; non-financial support and other from Immuron; other from Sanyal Bio, Exhalenz, Conatus, Akarna, Elsevier, Intercept, Salix, UptoDate, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Novartis, Nimbus, Galectin, Merck, Hemoshear, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Fractyl, Durect, Indalo, Allergan, Chemomab, Affimmune, Teva, Ardelyx, Terns, ENYO, Birdrock, Albireo, Sanofi, Jannsen, Takeda, Zydus, BASF, Amra, Perspectum, OWL, Poxel, Servier, Second Genome, General Electric, and 89 Bio outside the submitted work. Jerry Colca and Howard Dittrich report personal fees from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc, during the conduct of the study. In addition, they have a patent MSDC-0602K method of use pending. Julie Iwashita reports personal fees from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc. during the conduct of the study. Gary Koch is the principal investigator of a biostatistical agreement between Momentum Research, Inc. and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and that agreement provided the structure for his activity for this article. He is also the principal investigator of many such biostatistical agreements with other biopharmaceutical sponsors, including AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly & Co., Forest Research Institute (Allergan), GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, and Sanofi, although his activities for those sponsors are not related to the content of this article. Information concerning all biostatistical agreements for which Gary Koch is the principal investigator is publicly available through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-invasive tests that can identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) at higher risk of disease progression are lacking. We report the development and validation of a blood-based diagnostic test to non-invasively rule in and rule out at-risk NASH (defined as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD] activity score [NAS] ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2)., Methods: In this prospective derivation and global validation study, blood samples, clinical data, and liver biopsy results from three independent cohorts with suspected NAFLD were used to develop and validate a non-invasive blood-based diagnostic test, called NIS4. Derivation was done in the discovery cohort, which comprised 239 prospectively recruited patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH (NAFLD NAS ≥3; fibrosis stage 0-3) from the international GOLDEN-505 phase 2b clinical trial. A complete matrix based on 23 variables selected for univariate association with the presence of at-risk NASH and avoiding high multi-collinearity was used to derive the model in a bootstrap-based process that minimised the Akaike information criterion. The overall diagnostic performance of NIS4 was externally validated in two independent cohorts: RESOLVE-IT diag and Angers. The RESOLVE-IT diag cohort comprised the first 475 patients screened for potential inclusion into the RESOLVE-IT phase 3 clinical trial. Angers was a retrospective cohort of 227 prospectively recruited patients with suspected NAFLD and clinical risk factors for NASH or fibrosis stage 2 or more according to abnormal elastography results or abnormal liver biochemistry. Both external validation cohorts were independently analysed and were combined into a pooled validation cohort (n=702) to assess clinical performance of NIS4 and other non-invasive tests., Findings: The derived NIS4 algorithm comprised four independent NASH-associated biomarkers (miR-34a-5p, alpha-2 macroglobulin, YKL-40, and glycated haemoglobin; area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC] 0·80, 95% CI 0·73-0·85), and did not require adjustment for age, sex, body-mass index (BMI), or aminotransferase concentrations. Clinical cutoffs were established within the discovery cohort to optimise both rule out and rule in clinical performance while minimising indeterminate results. NIS4 was validated in the RESOLVE-IT diag cohort (AUROC 0·83, 95% CI 0·79-0·86) and the Angers cohort (0·76, 0·69-0·82). In the pooled validation cohort, patients with a NIS4 value less than 0·36 were classified as not having at-risk NASH (ruled out) with 81·5% (95% CI 76·9-85·3) sensitivity, 63·0% (57·8-68·0) specificity, and a negative predictive value of 77·9% (72·5-82·4), whereas those with a NIS4 value of more than 0·63 were classified as having at-risk NASH (ruled in) with 87·1% (83·1-90·3) specificity, 50·7% (45·3-56·1) sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 79·2% (73·1-84·2). The diagnostic performance of NIS4 within the external validation cohorts was not influenced by age, sex, BMI, or aminotransferase concentrations., Interpretation: NIS4 is a novel blood-based diagnostic that provides an effective way to non-invasively rule in or rule out at-risk NASH in patients with metabolic risk factors and suspected disease. Use of NIS4 in clinical trials or in the clinic has the potential to greatly reduce unnecessary liver biopsies in patients with lower risk of disease progression., Funding: Genfit., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease. There is a clear need to develop pharmacological treatment for patients with NASH as well as biomarkers that can diagnose the disease. We describe a trial of semaglutide treatment for NASH, identify key patient characteristics and compare the relationship of patient characteristics and non-invasive biomarkers/scores. NCT02970942 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-national Phase 2 trial of daily subcutaneous semaglutide (0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, 0.4 mg) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH, F1-F3 fibrosis, NAFLD Activity Score ≥ 4, and body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m 2 . Exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate correlations between baseline parameters and biomarkers in NASH. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 320 randomised patients was 55 (11) years, mean BMI was 36 (6) kg/m 2 , and 199 (62%) had type 2 diabetes. Of the total patients, 28% had F1 fibrosis, 23% had F2 fibrosis and 49% had F3 fibrosis. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.69) for accuracy in classifying fibrosis stage, F2-3 versus F1, was observed for Fib-4 and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF). No substantial correlation between BMI or other clinical or biochemical parameters and fibrosis stage was observed. In this large Phase 2 trial of semaglutide treatment for NASH, the clinical profile of enrolled patients was typical for patients with NASH. Of the investigated biomarkers/scores, ELF and Fib-4 showed the most apparent correlation in classifying fibrosis stage, but had only moderate predictive value., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Knowledge of the contemporary epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among military personnel can inform potential Department of Defense (DoD) screening policy and infection and disease control strategies., Materials and Methods: HBV infection status at accession and following deployment was determined by evaluating reposed serum from 10,000 service members recently deployed to combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in the period from 2007 to 2010. A cost model was developed from the perspective of the Department of Defense for a program to integrate HBV infection screening of applicants for military service into the existing screening program of screening new accessions for vaccine-preventable infections., Results: The prevalence of chronic HBV infection at accession was 2.3/1,000 (95% CI: 1.4, 3.2); most cases (16/21, 76%) identified after deployment were present at accession. There were 110 military service-related HBV infections identified. Screening accessions who are identified as HBV susceptible with HBV surface antigen followed by HBV surface antigen neutralization for confirmation offered no cost advantage over not screening and resulted in a net annual increase in cost of $5.78 million. However, screening would exclude as many as 514 HBV cases each year from accession., Conclusions: Screening for HBV infection at service entry would potentially reduce chronic HBV infection in the force, decrease the threat of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection in the battlefield blood supply, and lead to earlier diagnosis and linkage to care; however, applicant screening is not cost saving. Service-related incident infections indicate a durable threat, the need for improved laboratory-based surveillance tools, and mandate review of immunization policy and practice., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States.)