Search

Background: Pain is a common and major problem among nursing home residents. The prevalence of pain in elderly nursing home people is 40-80%, showing that they are at great risk of experiencing pain. Since assessment of pain is an important step towards the treatment of pain, there is a need for manageable, valid and reliable tools to assess pain in elderly people with dementia., Methods: This systematic review identifies pain assessment scales for elderly people with severe dementia and evaluates the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments. Relevant publications in English, German, French or Dutch, from 1988 to 2005, were identified by means of an extensive search strategy in Medline, Psychinfo and CINAHL, supplemented by screening citations and references. Quality judgement criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales., Results: Twenty-nine publications reporting on behavioural pain assessment instruments were selected for this review. Twelve observational pain assessment scales (DOLOPLUS2; ECPA; ECS; Observational Pain Behavior Tool; CNPI; PACSLAC; PAINAD; PADE; RaPID; Abbey Pain Scale; NOPPAIN; Pain assessment scale for use with cognitively impaired adults) were identified. Findings indicate that most observational scales are under development and show moderate psychometric qualities., Conclusion: Based on the psychometric qualities and criteria regarding sensitivity and clinical utility, we conclude that PACSLAC and DOLOPLUS2 are the most appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability and clinical utility.

Many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care unit are painful for the preterm or term infant. Pain is therefore a central issue in neonatal intensive care nursing. As significant side effects are associated with analgesics, non-pharmacological methods of pain prevention and relief are being favoured over pharmacological therapy. This development is very important for the nursing profession since non-pharmacological interventions are determined and carried out without an order from a physician. This review of the current literature investigates the efficacy of non-pharmacological nursing interventions in the management of pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. Despite certain methodological problems with some of the studies included in this review, the trend favours non-pharmacological interventions. Modulation of arousal and excitability during and after a painful stimulus as well as an effect on physiological and behavioural parameters have been described following non-pharmacological interventions. The studies reviewed suggest that neonates show fewer signs of pain and stress after non-pharmacological interventions for prevention and relief of pain.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a condition that is associated with decreased quality of life. Apart from this impact on quality of life, UI is also a very costly problem. It is recognised that 'usual care' for patients suffering from UI is not optimal. Specialised nurses can play an important role in the care for community-dwelling incontinent patients, as they have the appropriate interpersonal and technical skills to provide patient-tailored care. This systematic review analyses the effect of treatment by nurses on clinical and economic outcomes. A total of 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were found, varying in terms of population, setting, outcome measurement and control/intervention. There is limited evidence that treatment by nurses results in a decrease in incontinence. No evidence was found for cost reduction. Recommendations are made for future studies.

The use of physical restraints in the elderly is a common practice in many countries. This paper summarizes the current knowledge on the use of restraints in home care, hospitals and nursing homes. Between 1999-2004 the reported prevalence numbers range from 41-64% in nursing homes and 33-68% in hospitals; numbers of restraint use in home care are unknown. Bed rails and belts have been reported as the most frequently used restraints in bed; chairs with a table and belts are the most frequently reported restraints in a chair. It is evident that physical restraints in most cases are used as safety measures; the main reason is the prevention of falls. In the hospital setting, the safe use of medical devices is also an important reason for restraint use. Predictors for the use of physical restraints are poor mobility, impaired cognitive status and high dependency of the elderly patient and the risk of falls in the nurses' opinion. Furthermore, there are indications that restraint use is related to organizational characteristics. Finally, many adverse effects of restraint use have been reported in the literature, like falls, pressure sores, depression, aggression, and death. Because of the adverse effects of restraints and the growing evidence that physical restraints are no adequate measure for the prevention of falls, measures for the reduction of physical restraints are discussed and recommendations are made for future research.

Background: Neonates who require treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are subjected to many invasive painful procedures., Aims: Assessment of pain in preterm and term neonates with or without ventilation on continuous positive airway pressure using the Bernese Pain-Scale for Neonates (BPSN). The validity and the reliability of the BPSN was established., Study Design and Subjects: Pain assessments (n=288) were performed by 6 health care workers in different situations of term and preterm neonates. Each neonate (n=12) was observed in four given situations (after feeding, while a foot was being warmed, while a routine capillary blood sample was taken and 15 min after the blood sample was taken). Pain assessments were made by two nurses at the bedside using the BPSN, the Visual-Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). At the same time, a video sequence was made which was shown later to four different nurses to assess pain using the BPSN, the PIPP, and the VAS., Results: The construct validity of the BPSN was very good (F=41.3, p<0.0001). Moreover, concurrent and convergent validity of the BPSN compared to VAS and PIPP was r=0.86, and r=0.91, p<0.0001, respectively. Finally, the study demonstrated high coefficients for interrater (r=0.86-0.97) and intrarater reliability (r=0.98-0.99)., Conclusion: The BPSN was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain in term and preterm neonates with and without ventilation.

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of physical restraint use in cognitively impaired nursing home residents, the manner in which restraints are used, reasons for using them, and relationships between residents' characteristics and use of physical restraints., Methods: A point prevalence study was conducted on the use of physical restraints among all residents cared for in two Dutch nursing homes and one nursing home unit (n = 265). Data about the nursing home residents and the use of restraints were collected by means of a questionnaire, which was filled in by the nurses. The response rate was 98%. The mean age of residents was 81 years (sd = 8.6), 74% of whom were female., Results: One or more restraints were used with 49% of the residents. The most frequently used physical restraints were bed rails, a waist belt, and a chair with a table. In almost all situations (90%), residents were continuously restrained and restraints were used for longer than 3 months. The most common reason (90%) for use of restraints was to prevent falls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that use of restraints was highly associated with poor mobility, care dependency and risk of falling in the opinion of nursing staff., Conclusions: The results of this study are comparable with those of other studies. However, since recent studies have reported that physical restraints are inadequate to prevent falls, recommendations are made to re-evaluate critically the use of restraints and to conduct future research into a responsible and safe way of decreasing the use of physical restraints.

Background: Although important progress has been made during the past decade, research on pain in people with intellectual disabilities is still scarce. Pain assessment in people with intellectual disabilities is a frequent and difficult problem, especially for nurses working with people with intellectual disabilities on a daily basis. Gathering more information about pain in people with intellectual disabilities is of major importance and relevance for nursing, and adds to the developing body of knowledge., Objective: To investigate the nature and relative importance of non-verbal indicators used by nurses to assess pain in people with a severe or profound intellectual disability., Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 158 indicators of pain was used. A total of 135 nurses from nine institutions specializing in the care of people with intellectual disability were asked to rate each indicator on a scale of 1-10 to show which non-verbal expressions they considered important in diagnosing pain., Results: A total of 109 nurses responded. All 158 indicators were mentioned as being important to indicate pain. All except four had a range of 9. Seven (moaning during manipulation, crying during manipulation, painful facial expression during manipulation, swelling, screaming during manipulation, not using (affected) body part, and moving the body in a specific way of behaving) were reported as 'very important' by more than 50% of nurses. The lowest score (median 5.5; minimum 1, maximum 10) was given to the indicator 'waving arm movements'. The pain of people with severe intellectual disability appeared to be assessed differently from that of people with profound intellectual disability. Indicators belonging to the 'physiological' category scored relatively higher in the group of nurses specializing in profound disability. In contrast, indicators belonging to the 'social-emotional' category were scored relatively higher by nurses specializing in severe disability., Conclusion: Nurses used a wide range of indicators to assess pain in people with intellectual disability. Functional abilities and level of disability seem to influence the indicators used.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of children's pain at home following (adeno)tonsillectomies. The subjects were parents of 161 children (86 boys, 75 girls) undergoing myringotomies, adenoidectomies and (adeno)tonsillectomies. The mean age of the children was 5.5 years (SD=2.4; range 1-14). Parents were asked to assess the child's average pain on the day of operation and 7 days after the operation, using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Parents from (adeno)tonsillectomy patients were also interviewed by phone on day 7.The mean VAS pain intensity scores by period (day of operation until 7th day after operation) differed between the myringotomy (3.2), adenoidectomy (10.6), and (adeno)tonsillectomy (22.1) group (F(2,133)=31.65; p<0.001). The VAS ratings were highest for the tonsillectomy group (p<0.001). There was a trend that pain intensity scores for adenoidectomies were significantly higher than scores for myringotomies (p=0.07). In the interviews, 81% of the parents stated that their child suffered pain at home. However, this was not necessarily a reason to administer an analgesic. Furthermore, parents reported pain-related problems like problems regarding eating, fluid intake, vomiting and sleep disturbance. Finally, 67% of the children at home recalled severe pain experience in the hospital. It was concluded that especially following (adeno)tonsillectomies children suffer clinically significant pain at home and that the management of pain and related problems needs to be clearly improved., (Copyright 2002 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims of the Study: The present study investigates the relationship between Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) and employee well-being, using three different concepts of efforts (i.e. psychological demands, physical demands and emotional demands)., Background: The ERI model had been used as a theoretical framework, indicating that work stress is related to high efforts (i.e. job demands) and low occupational rewards (e.g. money, esteem and security/career opportunities). The ERI model also predicts that, in overcommitted workers, effects of ERI on employee well-being are stronger compared with their less committed counterparts., Methods: A cross-sectional survey among 167 ancillary health care workers of two nursing homes was conducted. Multiple univariate logistic regression analyses were used to test the relationship between ERI and employee well-being., Results: Results of the logistic regression analyses showed that employees with both high (psychological, physical and emotional) efforts and low rewards had higher risks of psychosomatic health complaints, physical health symptoms and job dissatisfaction (odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 5.09 to 18.55). Moreover, employees who reported both high efforts and high rewards had elevated risks of physical symptoms and exhaustion (ORs ranged from 6.17 to 9.39). No support was found for the hypothesis on the moderating effect of overcommitment., Conclusion: Results show some support for the ERI model; ancillary health care workers with high effort/low reward imbalance had elevated risks of poor employee well-being. In addition, results show that the combination of high efforts and high rewards is important for employee well-being. Finally, some practical implications are discussed to combat work stress in health care work.

Aim of the Study: The purpose of this study is to explore the needs of stroke patients' relatives during the hospitalization period., Background: In the Netherlands, the consequences of a stroke, and the needs of stroke patients and their relatives are becoming increasingly important. In hospital, however, nursing care is still focused on the patients. A previous qualitative study on the needs of relatives of stroke patients identified four categories of needs. This present study aims to test the results of the previous study in a larger setting and to identify the factors that influence the needs of the relatives., Design/methods: This study uses a cross-sectional design. A questionnaire was designed for the purpose of data collection. This questionnaire was completed by 106 relatives of stroke patients admitted to the neurology wards of 19 Dutch hospitals (response rate 64%). The data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate analyses., Results/findings: The findings of the study indicate that the needs of the relatives of stroke patients are best divided into three categories. These are the need for information, counselling (a combination of communication and support) and accessibility. In all cases, the most important need of the relatives of stroke patients is that their questions are answered honestly. The findings show a discrepancy between the importance of the needs and the degree to which these needs are met. Multivariate data analyses show that female relatives requested most information, whereas highly educated relatives needed less counselling. Satisfaction about the care provided is positively influenced by the period of hospitalization and negatively influenced by prior experiences of hospitalization.

This study explores the experiences and needs of relatives of hospitalized stroke patients. In semi-structured interviews, 17 relatives of stroke patients were asked about their experiences during the hospitalization period. The interviews were analysed by thematic content analysis. The findings indicate that the experiences of the relatives change during the hospitalization period, and that they are influenced by four factors: the individual character of the relatives, the position of the patient, the people in the relatives' social environment and the hospital situation. Four categories of needs were also found: the need for information, communication, support and accessibility.

Various clinical protocols are used to manage early postoperative tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy (T&A) pain in children. Although believed to be effective, these protocols are not evidenced-based. Therefore, a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled (2 x 2) factorial design was used (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 pain protocols used interchangeably to manage early postoperative T&A pain and (2) to investigate whether nurses' systematic pain assessments improve pain management. In the first protocol children receive a loading dose (30 to 50 mg/kg) of paracetamol (acetaminophen) Formularium der Nederlandse Apothekers (Formulary of the Dutch Royal Society for the Advancement of Pharmacy) intraoperatively, followed by regular doses (70 to 100 mg/kg/24 hours) of paracetamol. In the second protocol children receive the first protocol, plus intramuscular fentanyl citrate (1 microgram/kg) intraoperatively. Subjects were 83 healthy children between the ages of 3 and 12 years, admitted for T&A as an outpatient procedure. The child's pain was measured using observation scales (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability Scale), a visual analogue scale, and self-report measures (Faces Pain Scale and Oucher). Neither pain protocol sufficiently relieved early postoperative T&A pain, and systemic pain assessments did not improve the effectiveness of analgesics. Further research evaluating the effectiveness of pain management protocols is needed.

This article critically reviews the measures developed for assessing pain in the human neonate. Information was gathered with a computerized literature search of published articles and abstracts, a manual review of relevant conference proceedings, recently published journals, unpublished reports and manuscripts, and personal files. This identified 16 measures that were critically examined for their psychometric properties (reliability and validity) and clinical use. Special emphasis was placed on the feasibility of using neonatal pain assessment measures for clinical practice to address the research-practice gap. Although considerable progress has been made in the field of neonatal pain assessment, few measures have adequately established psychometric properties and clinical utility. Furthermore, most measures have been developed for research and not for the clinical setting. Issues regarding sensitivity, specificity, and the ability to detect clinically important changes have not been addressed. A sufficient number of infant pain measures have now been developed to assess acute pain. There is a paucity of measures to assess chronic pain in infants, and measures for infants who are low birth weight, critically ill, or ventilated. Future research should be aimed at strengthening the properties of existing measures, and at the development of measures for those infants with chronic pain or special needs.

The literature often suggests and assumes that children are under-medicated postoperatively. A review of the literature leads to the conclusion that only a few studies answer the question of whether children's pain is relieved insufficiently. The lack of consensus on expected pain intensity after surgery and caution about prescribing analgesics could explain why analgesics are often prescribed on a pro re nata (prn) basis. Prescription on a prn basis, in fact, means that the nurse makes the decision whether or not an analgesic should be administered. Some studies suggest, however, that nurses under-medicate children and that postoperative pain is relieved insufficiently. In some situations, nurses under-estimate the child's pain, while in others, nurses' attitudes, beliefs and knowledge regarding pain relief strategies play an important role. On the basis of this review of the literature standard prescription of pain medication instead of prn is recommended. Furthermore, research on the incidence and prevalence of pain in children and on the effectiveness of analgesic administration postoperatively is warranted.

The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the literature on the factors influencing decision-making in the nursing care of children in pain. To that effect published and unpublished references were reviewed. The most frequently cited factors influencing the assessment and management of pain in children are summarized and discussed. Finally recommendations are made where further research is warranted.

This article describes a study examining the influence of expertise on nurses' pain assessments and decisions regarding pharmacological interventions in children. In an experimental design, novices (n = 271), intermediates (n = 222), and experts (n = 202) in pediatric nursing, various cases were presented. Each case consisted of a combination of a vignette and a video. Subjects were asked (1) to assess the child's pain intensity, (2) to specify their confidence in the assessment, and (3) to state whether or not they would administer a non-narcotic analgesic. The results indicated that expertise did not influence assessments of pain intensity. However, expertise did have a distinct impact on both the subjects' confidence in their decisions, and the decision to administer analgesics. Experienced nurses were most confident and were most inclined to administer analgesics. The findings of this study are placed in the context of a general theory on the development of expertise, which assumes that experts' decision-making is based on cognitive structures that describe features of prototypical or even actual patients, so called "illness scripts". From this theory it can be deduced that mainly practical experience is responsible for the (lack of) differences in decision-making between novices, intermediates and experts.

This article describes the development and psychometric evaluation of self-report measurement instruments in (nursing) research. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into, and understanding of the use of such instruments. To be more specific, this paper deals with: (1) What is a self-report measurement instrument?; (2) How to develop such an instrument?; (3) What is its psychometric quality in terms of validity and reliability?; (4) How to analyze an instrument statistically?; (5) Which are the pros en cons of a self-report measurement instrument in general?; and (6) Where do we find examples of good measurement instruments? These six questions will be answered with the help of several practical research examples. The article concludes with a few suggestions for literature concerning existing measurement instruments and their psychometric qualities.

Research is lacking on factors influencing nurses' decision-making directed at the diagnosis of pain in children and its related interventions. This paper reports on two studies, namely a qualitative study and its replication, in which we explored factors influencing nurses' pain assessments and interventions in children. Those factors found to influence nurses' decisions were: medical diagnosis, child's expressions, age, and parents, and the nurses' knowledge, experience, attitude and workload. Some of these factors seem to have more influence than others. For example, the presence of a medical diagnosis seems to legitimate being in pain. Furthermore, it is suggested that mainly vocal expressions, especially crying, influence nurses' decisions to administer analgesics. Finally, nurses' negative views on non-narcotic analgesics were striking. In this paper, the results of both studies and their relationship to information reported in the literature are further elaborated and discussed, and hypotheses on strength and direction of influence of factors on pain assessment and intervention are generated.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to quantify the correlation between irradiated small bowel volume and late occurring small bowel complications., Methods: Small bowel volumes in the high-dose region were measured using orthogonal barium films for 203 patients treated for rectal carcinoma with pelvic postoperative radiotherapy to 50 Gy in an EORTC multicentric study., Results: The 5-year estimate of late pelvic small bowel obstruction requiring surgery was 11%. No correlation between the irradiated small bowel volume and obstruction was detected. The actuarial 5-year estimate of chronic diarrhea varied from 31% in patients with irradiated small bowel volumes below 77 cm3 to 42% in patients with volumes over 328 cm3. This correlation was significant in the univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.025). The type of rectal surgery significantly influenced the incidence of chronic diarrhea and malabsorption, the actuarial 5-year estimate being 49% and 26% after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection, respectively (p = 0.04)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that there is a volume-effect in radiation-induced diarrhea at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. No volume-effect for small bowel obstruction was detected at this dose-level in pelvic postoperative radiotherapy. A review of the literature data on small bowel obstruction indicates that the volume effect at this dose level can only be demonstrated in patients who were treated with extended field radiotherapy (estimated small bowel volume 800 cm3) after intra-abdominal surgery.

In clinical practice professional nurses appear to make different judgments regarding particular nursing situations. The purpose of this literature review is to gain insight into the way nurses make decisions related to nursing diagnoses and interventions. Literature on decision making can be divided into literature that focuses on how decisions are made, ie, information-processing model, and information that focuses on how decisions ought to be made, ie, mathematical models. Most of the literature about decision making in nursing in particular appears to focus on the former, specifically on the stages and strategies in the decision-making process and on factors influencing this process. These factors include the problem task (cues), the decision maker (his or her knowledge, experience, personal variability), and discipline. However, to date, most of the research that has been done with regard to these factors has been restricted to the performance between novice and expert. We conclude that further validation of nursing diagnoses is necessary to ensure accuracy in decision making in nursing.

This article reports on a qualitative study, that explored factors influencing nurses' pain assessment and interventions with children. Although many factors appear to influence decision-making processes, nurses seem to attach more weight to some factors than to others. For example, medical diagnosis and the intensity with which the child expresses its pain are used as determining factors for the decision to administer analgesics. In this article the results of the study, their relationship to information reported in the literature as well as their implications for practice and research are further elaborated and discussed.

In clinical practice professional nurses appear to make different judgments regarding particular nursing situations. Assuming that it is desirable that nurses, confronted with the same situation, make the same decisions, it is important to gain insight into the way decisions are made. The purpose of this literature review is to summarize what is already known about decision-making in nursing. It appears that most of the texts on decision-making in nursing are based on a general model on decision-making: the information-processing model. Factors influencing decision-making processes are discussed. Finally, an overview is given of research on decision-making in nursing.