101. Secondary prophylactic G-CSF (filgrastim) administration in chemotherapy of stage I and II Hodgkin's lymphoma with ABVD.
- Author
-
Rueda A, Sevilla I, Gumà J, Ribelles N, Miramón J, De Las Nieves MA, Márquez A, and Alba E
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols toxicity, Bleomycin administration & dosage, Bleomycin toxicity, Cohort Studies, Dacarbazine administration & dosage, Dacarbazine toxicity, Doxorubicin administration & dosage, Doxorubicin toxicity, Female, Filgrastim, Follow-Up Studies, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor toxicity, Hodgkin Disease complications, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Recombinant Proteins, Treatment Outcome, Vinblastine administration & dosage, Vinblastine toxicity, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor administration & dosage, Hodgkin Disease drug therapy
- Abstract
Unlabelled: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim, G-CSF) for maintenance of chemotherapy dose-intensity in patients with stage I or II Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Fifty-six patients with stage I or II Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with ABVD were eligible for secondary prophylactic G-CSF administration because of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1 x 10(9) /L) causing treatment delay or febrile neutropenia. Patients received 300 microg (total dose) of G-CSF (filgrastim) subcutaneously on days 3 to 7 and 17 to 21 of each cycle in order to prevent dose reduction or delay in subsequent cycles of treatment continuing the G-CSF until completion of chemotherapy. Results showed that 30 (54%) of the patients required the use of G-CSF, 26 (47%) during the first or second cycle. After G-CSF administration delay in chemotherapy did not occur in 25 patients, whereas delays in the fifth or sixth cycle occurred in four patients. Despite treatment with G-CSF, one patient had febrile neutropenia. Dose intensity greater than 90% of that planned was delivered to more the 85% of patients., In Conclusion: Secondary prophylactic G-CSF administration was necessary in more than half of patients with stage I or II Hodgkin's lymphoma during chemotherapy with ABVD. The use of G-CSF allowed maintenance of chemotherapy schedule and dose intensity in the majority of patients.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF