101. Prophylactic Clipping After Colorectal Endoscopic Resection Prevents Bleeding of Large, Proximal Polyps: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
- Author
-
Douglas K. Rex, Mineo Iwatate, Andrea Anderloni, Prateek Sharma, Giulio Antonelli, Heiko Pohl, Mónica Enguita-Germán, Loredana Correale, Eduardo Albéniz, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Marco Antonio Álvarez, Cesare Hassan, Silvia Carrara, Marco Spadaccini, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, and Matteo Badalamenti
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,education ,Colonoscopy ,Colonic Polyps ,Postoperative Hemorrhage ,Proctoscopy ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Prevalence ,Medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Clipping (audio) ,Hepatology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Odds ratio ,Confidence interval ,Polypectomy ,nervous system diseases ,Surgery ,surgical procedures, operative ,030104 developmental biology ,Rectal Diseases ,Treatment Outcome ,Relative risk ,cardiovascular system ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Complication ,Colorectal Neoplasms - Abstract
The benefits of prophylactic clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy are unclear. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the efficacy of clipping in preventing bleeding after polypectomy, overall and according to polyp size and location.We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for randomized trials that compared the effects of clipping vs not clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Multilevel random-effects metaregression analysis was used to combine data on bleeding after polypectomy and estimate associations between rates of bleeding and polyp characteristics.We analyzed data from 9 trials, comprising 71897 colorectal lesions (22.5% 20 mm or larger; 49.2% with proximal location). Clipping, compared with no clipping, did not significantly reduce the overall risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (2.2% with clipping vs 3.3% with no clipping; RR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.08; P = .072). Clipping significantly reduced risk of bleeding after removal of polyps that were 20 mm or larger (4.3% had bleeding after clipping vs 7.6% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78; P = .020) or that were in a proximal location (3.0% had bleeding after clipping vs 6.2% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P.001). In multilevel metaregression analysis that adjusted for polyp size and location, prophylactic clipping was significantly associated with reduced risk of bleeding after removal of large proximal polyps (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; P = .021) but not small proximal lesions (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.48-1.62; P = .581).In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found that routine use of prophylactic clipping does not reduce risk of postpolypectomy bleeding overall. However, clipping appeared to reduce bleeding after removal of large (more than 20 mm) proximal lesions.
- Published
- 2019