101. Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods.
- Author
-
Tang, Gengyan, Cai, Hao, and Jia, Jingwen
- Subjects
SCHOLARLY publishing ,SCHOLARLY periodicals ,SCIENCE exhibitions ,RESEARCH personnel ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
The academic community requires not only responsible research but also responsible academic journals. An exploratory study of Chinese-language academic journals that used mixed methods found Chinese-language academic journals on the humanities and social sciences exhibiting a widespread status bias. Most of them summarily rejected submissions from junior researchers and students without paying due attention to the quality of the research itself. The main reasons for this problem are editorial department resources, the scientific research evaluation system, the editorial department culture, and the wider academic environment. This study recommends that Chinese-language academic journals join the Committee on Publication Ethics, other publishing ethics organizations, and the "Responsible Journals" program as soon as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF