Search

Purpose: To analyze the risk of enfortumab vedotin (EV), a targeted therapy for advanced bladder cancer, using real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2020 to Q1 2024. Adverse drug events (ADEs) related to EV were identified and categorized according to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) and specific events. Statistical methods, such as the proportional reporting ratio, reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean were used to detect safety signals., Results: Of the 7,449,181 FAERS case reports, 1,617 EV-related ADEs were identified, including 101 preferred terms and 22 SOCs. The key SOCs included skin and subcutaneous tissue, metabolic, and nutritional disorders. Rare ADEs, such as lichenoid keratosis (n = 4; ROR 26.89), small intestinal perforation (n = 3; ROR 24.51), pigmentation disorder (n = 9; ROR 18.16), and cholangitis (n = 8; ROR 17.48), showed significant disproportionality., Conclusion: While most findings aligned with the existing data, new signs such as lichenoid keratosis and small intestinal perforation were identified. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and emphasize the need for the clinical monitoring of EV-related ADEs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The treatment of cancer patients has dramatically changed over the past decades with the advent of monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and innovative T-cell therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have also revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Several ADCs have already been approved in hematology and clinical oncology, such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy of ADCs is limited by the emergence of resistance due to different mechanisms, such as antigen-related resistance, failure of internalization, impaired lysosomal function, and other mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the clinical data that contributed to the approval of T-DM1, T-DXd, SG, and EV. We also discuss the different mechanisms of resistance to ADCs, as well as the ways to overcome this resistance, such as bispecific ADCs and the combination of ADCs with immune-checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Further, adjuvant nivolumab is also indicated for patients at high risk of recurrence and is expected to improve prognosis. On the other hand, issues remain to be overcome, such as the unfit for cisplatin and variant histologies of urothelial carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Pembrolizumab, an anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibody, revolutionized the treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, the standard treatment for patients after disease progression with pembrolizumab had not been established until the recent approval of enfortumab vedotin. We analyzed the treatment of these patients in the real world, and the patient background and outcomes. Methods: We extracted data from 543 patients who experienced progressive disease after pembrolizumab initiation from a Japanese nation‐wide cohort of platinum‐refractory, metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Results: The median overall survival of the 543 patients was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval 3.0–4.1). Of these, only 20.6% (n = 112) received chemotherapy as a subsequent systemic treatment after progressive disease. The regimen of chemotherapy was very diverse. The median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval 9.2–14.7) for patients who received chemotherapy, compared to 2.4 months for those who did not receive chemotherapy (95% confidence interval 2.1–2.9; P < 0.0001). Patients who received subsequent chemotherapy were more likely to have better performance status, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio <3, hemoglobin >11 mg/dL, and history of a single chemotherapeutic regimen at pembrolizumab initiation. Conclusions: This report highlights the real‐world practice of the management after pembrolizumab treatment failure in the pre‐enfortumab vedotin era, characterized by infrequent use of subsequent anticancer therapy comprising various regimens, reflecting the lack of a standard treatment. Clinical introduction of enfortumab vedotin is expected to improve treatment outcomes in this setting. The present study will provide important baseline data for evaluating the influence of enfortumab vedotin on clinical practices and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 47-year-old female with poorly differentiated carcinoma of urothelial origin on pembrolizumab, presented to the hospital with fever, dysuria, pruritus, diffuse erythema, and skin desquamation 11 days after starting immunotherapy with enfortumab vedotin (EV). The desquamation covered about 25% of her body surface area and she subsequently developed a positive Nikolsky sign, bullae, and oral erosions. Labs were significant for elevated LFTs: 121 u/L (AST), 129 u/L (ALT), 147 u/L (ALP), CBC, and BMP were within normal limits.Histopathology demonstrated a vacuolar interface dermatitis consistent with an adverse drug reaction.EV was immediately stopped, and two doses of Etanercept 50 mg were administered subcutaneously followed by a three-day course of 200 mg IVIG, resulting in dramatic improvement of her rash. The patient required an ICU stay for worsening respiratory status and was discharged after five days of admission.According to a phase II trial, 48% of individuals receiving EV therapy developed treatment-related rashes. Post-marketing analysis data presented eight cases of serious skin reactions defined as either Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) after EV therapy. The majority of reports are from singular cases or case series. Further research is necessary to establish the real-world incidence of SJS/TEN in post market analysis from EV and management of the same.

• Enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is approved for advanced urothelial cancer as later-line therapy and earlier-line therapy, at a dose of 1.25 mg/kg on days 1,8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. • This postmarketing analysis used a nationwide EHR-derived dataset to examine EV monotherapy use, dose intensity and adherence across 280 U.S. cancer clinics. • We found that dosing frequency and dosage (2.4 treatments per cycle at 1.1 mg/kg) of EV monotherapy was lower in clinical practice than recommended in the product labelling. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer as later-line therapy (post-immunotherapy and -platinum-chemotherapy) and as earlier-line therapy (cisplatin-ineligible, at least 1 prior therapy). We examined real-world EV monotherapy use, dose intensity and adherence across 280 US cancer clinics. This postmarketing study used data from a nationwide (United States) deidentified patient-level electronic health record-derived database. Included were patients with advanced urothelial cancer initiating EV on or after December 19, 2019 (date of accelerated approval). We summarized characteristics of EV users using descriptive statistics and computed metrics of EV use, EV dose intensity, and EV treatment adherence. We identified 416 advanced urothelial cancer patients initiating EV monotherapy. More than half of patients (55.3%) received EV as later-line therapy (3L+), and nearly half (44.7%) received EV as earlier line therapy (1 or 2L). Dosing frequency (mean [SD] 2.4 [0.5] treatments per 28 day cycle) and dose (1.1 [0.2] mg/kg) were lower than label indication guidelines (1.25 mg/kg, Day 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle). Only 58.8% of patients received an average of >2 treatments per 28-day cycle. Among patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with EV monotherapy in contemporary practice, EV dosing frequency, and dosage was lower in clinical practice than recommended in the product labeling. Further research is required to understand clinical factors and outcomes associated with the differences observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing incidence of urothelial carcinoma, coupled with advancements in its therapeutic landscape, has resulted in improved survival rates for patients. This, in turn, has led to a growing population of patients requiring specialized oncological care, with Enfortumab vedotin (EV) emerging as a pivotal treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. While EV is associated with hyperglycemia, ketoacidosis is exceedingly rare. To the best of our knowledge, the link between EV and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has not yet been explored. A 56-year-old patient diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma underwent EV treatment as a third-line treatment after progression following treatment with cisplatin/gemcitabine and pembrolizumab. Notably, after receiving two doses of EV, the patient exhibited refractory insulin resistance, leading to ketoacidosis. Subsequently, HLH emerged, necessitating a treatment regimen involving dexamethasone and etoposide. Despite intensive efforts, the patient experienced septic shock, resulting in death. The present case report highlights refractory insulin resistance and ketoacidosis, followed by reactive HLH, in the context of EV therapy. The limited literature on these complications demonstrates the need for further research to improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. With growing evidence of the efficacy of EV and evolving survival rates in urothelial carcinoma, healthcare professionals must remain vigilant for potential adverse effects, ensuring early recognition and optimal patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody–drug conjugate directed against Nectin-4, significantly prolonged survival compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. The overall response rate in the phase 3 EV301 trial leading to approval was 40.6%. However, no data have been published yet regarding the effect of EV on brain metastases. Here, we present three patients from different centers with brain metastases receiving EV. A 58-year-old white male patient, who had been heavily pretreated for urothelial carcinoma with visceral metastases and a solitary clinically active brain metastasis, started on EV 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After three cycles, the first evaluation showed a partial remission by RECIST v1.1, with a near complete response on the brain metastasis and disappearance of neurological symptoms. The patient is currently still receiving EV. A second, 74-year-old male patient started on the same regimen, after previous progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and avelumab in maintenance. The patient achieved a complete response and received therapy for five months. Nevertheless, therapy was discontinued at the patient’s request. Shortly after, he developed new leptomeningeal metastases. Upon rechallenge with EV, there was a significant reduction in the diffuse meningeal infiltration. A third, 50-year-old white male patient also received EV after previous progression on cisplatin–gemcitabine and atezolizumab maintenance, followed by palliative whole-brain radiotherapy and two cycles of vinflunine. After three cycles of EV, there was a significant reduction in the brain metastases. The patient is currently still receiving EV. These are the first reports on the efficacy of EV in patients with urothelial carcinoma and active brain metastases.

The clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has significantly evolved with the emergence of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was granted approval by the FDA in 2021 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have received prior immunotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy. Little to no data exist for the use of EV in patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Here, we present the case of a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma on PD who failed multiple lines of treatment but demonstrated an impressive response to EV without significant toxicity. We discuss the possible impact of peritoneal dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of ADCs and the potential for safe administration based on known pharmacokinetic data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the backbone of first-line therapy while immunotherapy is now the standard of care in second-line setting after failure of first-line chemotherapy, as maintenance therapy in patients responding to first-line chemotherapy and in first-line in cisplatin-ineligible PD-L1 positive patients or in those not eligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy [[32], [68]]. The EMA granted approval for this drug as therapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma patients progressing to platinum-based chemotherapy or not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The new molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma in six subtypes with different prognosis and therapy response is paving the way for the tailored treatment of urothelial carcinoma patients. [Extracted from the article]

No deterioration in patient-reported outcome scores for health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and symptoms was observed with enfortumab vedotin therapy among patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. The EV-201 trial (NCT03219333) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and durable response rate and a tolerable safety profile with enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC) treated with prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy (cohort 1). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were included in EV-201 as exploratory endpoints. To evaluate PRO data for cohort 1 of EV-201 to better understand the relationship between EV therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Enrolled patients with LA/mUC who received EV were invited to electronically complete two HRQoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L) at baseline and day 1 of each cycle until treatment discontinuation. Patient demographics, completion and compliance rates, and PRO scores were analysed using descriptive statistics. Selected EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were analysed post hoc using a repeated-measures mixed model. Among treated patients (n = 125), 95% completed both baseline questionnaires. Compliance rates were ≥86% throughout the study. Descriptive analyses showed that global health status, physical functioning, and symptom scores remained stable over time, with average scores similar at each cycle. Lower pain and fatigue scores were observed in responders at cycles following an objective response. Pain was lower at cycle 3 than at baseline in patients with bone metastases. Mean EQ-5D-3L utility score (0.80 at baseline; range from 0.77 at cycle 2 to 0.91 at cycle 10) and visual analogue scale scores (66.9 at baseline; range from 65.5 at cycle 2 to 78.4 at cycle 10) remained similar over time. Variability and the small sample size limited definitive conclusions. PRO scores remained stable throughout EV treatment, further supporting the overall value of EV in the treatment of patients with LA/mUC. The potential benefit of EV therapy on overall HRQoL and symptoms such as pain and fatigue is currently being explored. In this study of adult patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract that progressed after previous medications, quality of life, ability to function, and symptoms did not worsen on treatment with enfortumab vedotin, which is an antibody + drug combination. Some improvements in pain and fatigue were reported by patients, but further research needs to be conducted. These data complement the efficacy and safety data from the EV-201 trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Research in recent years has led to the approval of new treatments that offer improved survival for patients. Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody drug conjugate that binds Nectin-4, a protein expressed on bladder cancer cells, and delivers the tubulin toxin, monomethyl auristatin E, into the cell causing cell death. Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv has changed the standard of care treatment in urothelial carcinoma with a high response and disease-control rate, acceptable toxicity profile and improved overall survival for patients who previously had limited options after failure of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. We review the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of enfortumab vedotin. Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv has shown promising efficacy and safety in pretreated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. It is currently being evaluated in clinical trials in earlier lines of treatment and in combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The treatment landscape of advanced bladder cancer continues to evolve with novel therapeutics approved in recent years and many in the pipeline. Here we review the role of the novel agents enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan in treatment of advanced disease. Summary Patients with advanced bladder cancer often first receive platinum-based therapy, while immune checkpoint inhibitors offer a maintenance option following cytotoxic chemotherapy or a second-line option. Despite various first- and second-line options, patients with significant comorbidities and treatment-related adverse events will experience disease progression requiring alternative treatment. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are novel antibody-drug conjugates approved in patients with advanced bladder cancer following platinum-based and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Following platinum-based therapy and immunotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer, enfortumab vedotin, targeting Nectin-4, improves overall survival while sacituzumab govitecan, targeting Trop-2, is associated with a 27% response rate. With these new approaches to disease management, however, it remains critical to understand safety, efficacy, and operational considerations to optimize outcomes. Conclusion When selecting an antibody-drug conjugate to treat patients with bladder cancer, it is important to note the adverse event profile of each agent to optimize outcomes and safety for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mainstay of medical treatment has been tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for renal cell cancer (RCC), cytotoxic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer (UC), and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. These therapeutic modalities still play important roles in these malignancies. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 are being rapidly introduced for the treatment of metastatic urological cancers, just as they have been for other malignancies. Currently, the paradigm of medical treatment for patients with metastatic urological cancer is dramatically changing. Accordingly, we need to organize and summarize the new therapeutic tools, which include immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This review provides an overview of agents and regimens that have just launched or will be launched in the near future in Japan. Based on the promising anti-tumor efficacy and manageable safety profiles being demonstrated in clinical trials, these new agents and therapies are expected to be rapidly introduced in Japanese clinical practice. Additionally, the newly designed ADC, enfortumab vedotin, which comprises a fully human monoclonal antibody conjugated to an anti-cancerous agent via a protease-cleavable linker, has just been launched in Japan. In order to provide the optimal treatment for our patients, we need to completely understand these new therapeutic tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Nectin-4 is a tumor-associated antigen that is highly expressed on various cancer cells, and it has been further proposed to have roles in tumor development and propagation ranging from cellular proliferation to motility and invasion. Nectin-4 blockade reduces tumor proliferation and induces apoptosis in several malignancies. Nectin-4 has been used as a potential target in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development. Enfortumab vedotin, an ADC against Nectin-4, has demonstrated efficacy against solid tumor malignancies. Enfortumab vedotin has received US Food and Drug Administration approval for treating urothelial cancer. Furthermore, the efficacy of ADCs against Nectin-4 against solid tumors other than urothelial cancer has been demonstrated in preclinical studies, and clinical trials examining the effects of enfortumab vedotin are ongoing. Recently, Nectin-4 was reported to be highly expressed in several skin cancers, including malignant melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and extramammary Paget's disease, and involved in tumor progression and survival in retrospective studies. Nectin-4-targeted therapies and ADCs against Nectin-4 could therefore be novel therapeutic options for skin cancers. This review highlights current knowledge on Nectin-4 in malignant tumors, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin in clinical trials, and the prospects of Nectin-4-targeted agents against skin cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) refractory to prior therapy. In the Urothelial Cancer Network to Investigate Therapeutic Experiences (UNITE) study, the authors looked at the experience with EV in patient subsets of interest for which activity had not been well defined in clinical trials.Methods: UNITE was a retrospective study of patients with aUC treated with recently approved agents. This initial analysis focused on patients treated with EV. Patient data were abstracted from chart reviews by investigators at each site. The observed response rate (ORR) was investigator-assessed for patients with at least 1 post-baseline scan or clear evidence of clinical progression. ORRs were compared across subsets of interest for patients treated with EV monotherapy.Results: The initial UNITE analysis included 304 patients from 16 institutions; 260 of these patients were treated with EV monotherapy and included in the analyses. In the monotherapy cohort, the ORR was 52%, and it was >40% in all reported subsets of interest, including patients with comorbidities previously excluded from clinical trials (baseline renal impairment, diabetes, and neuropathy) and patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 and 14.4 months, respectively. Patients with a pure urothelial histology had a higher ORR than patients with a variant histology component (58% vs 42%; P = .06).Conclusions: In a large retrospective cohort, responses to EV monotherapy were consistent with data previously reported in clinical trials and were also observed in various patient subsets, including patients with variant histology, patients with FGFR3 alterations, and patients previously excluded from clinical trials with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min and significant comorbidities.Lay Summary: Enfortumab vedotin, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2019, is an important new drug for the treatment of patients with advanced bladder cancer. This study looks at the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin as it has been used at multiple centers since approval, and focuses on important patient populations previously excluded from clinical trials. These populations include patients with decreased kidney function, diabetes, and important mutations. Enfortumab vedotin is effective for treating these patients. Previously reported clinical trial data have been replicated in this real-world setting, and support the use of this drug in broader patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As distinct cancer biomarkers have been discovered in recent years, a need to reclassify tumors by more than their histology has been proposed, and therapies are now tailored to treat cancers based on specific molecular aberrations and immunologic markers. In fact, multiple histology‐agnostic therapies are currently adopted in clinical practice for treating patients regardless of their tumor site of origin. In parallel with this new model for drug development, in the past few years, several novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved to treat solid tumors, benefiting from engineering improvements in the conjugation process and the introduction of novel linkers and payloads. With the recognition that numerous surface targets are expressed across various cancer histologies, alongside the remarkable activity of modern ADCs, this drug class has been increasingly evaluated as suitable for a histology‐agnostic expansion of indication. For illustration, the anti‐HER2 ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan has demonstrated compelling activity in HER2‐overexpressing breast, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer. Examples of additional novel and potentially histology‐agnostic ADC targets include trophoblast cell‐surface antigen 2 (Trop‐2) and nectin‐4, among others. In the current review article, the authors summarize the current approvals of ADCs by the US Food and Drug Administration focusing on solid tumors and discuss the challenges and opportunities posed by the multihistological expansion of ADCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin is a first-in-class Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy and a programmed death receptor-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitor, or patients with la/mUC who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and have previously received one or more prior lines of therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is the only drug to have demonstrated survival benefit versus chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial in patients with la/mUC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1/L1 inhibitor. The development of dermatologic events following the administration of enfortumab vedotin is anticipated given the expression of Nectin-4 in epidermal keratinocytes and skin appendages (eg, sweat glands and hair follicles). There is the potential for rare but severe and possibly fatal cutaneous adverse reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrosis, as described in the boxed warning of the US prescribing information for enfortumab vedotin. This manuscript describes the presumed pathophysiology and manifestations of dermatologic reactions related to enfortumab vedotin, and presents recommendations for prevention and treatment, to provide oncologists and other healthcare providers with an awareness of these potential adverse events to best anticipate and manage them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alexa Thibodeau, Nambi Nallasamy Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USACorrespondence: Nambi NallasamyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USATel +1 734 763 5506Fax +1 734 936 2340Email nnallasa@med.umich.eduAbstract: Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody–drug conjugate that was recently granted accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Early clinical trials identified blurry vision, increased lacrimation and other events associated with dry eye as potential side effects. We report a case of bilateral anterior subcapsular cataract development following initiation of enfortumab vedotin. Enfortumab vedotin is not previously known to cause cataract development or progression and, thus, our patient’s presentation may reflect the first report of an undocumented adverse effect of this novel agent.Keywords: anterior subcapsular cataract, enfortumab vedotin, urothelial carcinoma

The clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has significantly evolved with the emergence of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was granted approval by the FDA in 2021 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have received prior immunotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy. Little to no data exist for the use of EV in patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Here, we present the case of a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma on PD who failed multiple lines of treatment but demonstrated an impressive response to EV without significant toxicity. We discuss the possible impact of peritoneal dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of ADCs and the potential for safe administration based on known pharmacokinetic data.

The mainstay of medical treatment has been tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for renal cell cancer (RCC), cytotoxic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer (UC), and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. These therapeutic modalities still play important roles in these malignancies. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 are being rapidly introduced for the treatment of metastatic urological cancers, just as they have been for other malignancies. Currently, the paradigm of medical treatment for patients with metastatic urological cancer is dramatically changing. Accordingly, we need to organize and summarize the new therapeutic tools, which include immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This review provides an overview of agents and regimens that have just launched or will be launched in the near future in Japan. Based on the promising anti-tumor efficacy and manageable safety profiles being demonstrated in clinical trials, these new agents and therapies are expected to be rapidly introduced in Japanese clinical practice. Additionally, the newly designed ADC, enfortumab vedotin, which comprises a fully human monoclonal antibody conjugated to an anti-cancerous agent via a protease-cleavable linker, has just been launched in Japan. In order to provide the optimal treatment for our patients, we need to completely understand these new therapeutic tools.

This retrospective study demonstrates poor outcomes of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients following discontinuation of Enfortumab Vedotin (EV). Only 51% received therapy after discontinuation of EV. Benchmarks for the interpretation of activity of new agents following EV were identified. The duration of EV was identified as a potential prognostic factor following discontinuation of EV. Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved to treat metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) following platinum and PD1/L1 inhibitors. Since the outcomes and patterns of therapy of patients following discontinuation of EV are unknown, we conducted a retrospective study to assess this issue. Methods: Data were retrospectively obtained from patients with mUC following discontinuation of EV after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and PD1/L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated in those who received therapy post-EV. Statistical analyses were performed to describe the overall survival (OS) and compare patient characteristics and outcomes of those who did or did not receive treatment post-EV. Results: Data were available for 63 patients from 6 institutions: 46 (73%) were male and median age was 68 years (range 43-83). The median OS was 32 weeks. Thir ty-t wo patients (51%) received therapy after EV. The OS of those who did vs. did not receive post-EV therapy was significantly different (median 43.1 vs. 16.9 weeks, P = .015). Longer duration of prior EV therapy was associated with receipt of post-EV therapy (P = .0437) as well as OS in both the treated (P = .045) and untreated groups (P = .012). Objective response was observed in 3 of 32 patients (9.4%) who received therapy post-EV. Conclusion: Outcomes of patients with mUC following discontinuation of EV are dismal and only 51% received therapy after discontinuation of EV. This study identifies benchmarks for the interpretation of activity of new agents following EV and raises the hypothesis for duration of EV as a potential prognostic factor following discontinuation of EV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates have recently been introduced as a treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The EV-301 study demonstrated that enfortumab vedotin (EV) improved overall survival compared with conventional chemotherapy. To assess the cost-effectiveness of EV for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) from a payer perspective in middle- and high-income countries. Methods: A decision analysis model was developed to assess the efficacy and economic viability of EV as a subsequent-line treatment following disease progression in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma already treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Clinical and utility values were obtained from the published literature and available databases. Cost data were obtained from payer perspectives in the United States, United Kingdom, and China. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were used to measure health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) used to evaluate cost-effectiveness in comparison to willingness-to-pay in the United States, United Kingdom, and China. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Results: Compared with chemotherapy, EV increased the benefit by 0.16-0.17 QALYs, resulting in ICERs of $2,168,746.71, $2,164,494.38, and $1,775,576.56 per QALY in the United States, United Kingdom, and China, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the largest effect on outcome was the utility value for progression-free survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the probability of EV being cost-effective was 0%. Conclusions: EV provides an additional health benefit over chemotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma but is not cost-effective from a payer perspective in the United States, United Kingdom, or China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rohit K Jain, William Paul Skelton IV, Jingsong Zhang Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USACorrespondence: Jingsong ZhangDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USAEmail Jingsong.zhang@moffitt.orgAbstract: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody–drug conjugate with humanized anti-Nectin-4 antibody linked with a microtubule-disrupting agent called monomethyl auristatin E. Nectin-4 is a cellular adhesion protein that is overexpressed in urothelial cancer. EV was approved in December 2019 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we reviewed the clinical efficacy and safety data that led to the accelerated approval of EV for treating patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Emerging clinical data on EV-based combinational therapeutic trials for metastatic urothelial cancer were also reviewed.Keywords: enfortumab vedotin, urothelial cancer, antibody-drug conjugate

Background: For patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), prognosis is poor and effective treatment options are limited. Erdafitinib is an oral fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with la/mUC harboring FGFR alterations whose disease progressed following at least 1 prior line of therapy, including a PD-1 or PD-L(1) inhibitor, based on the phase 3, randomized THOR trial (NCT03390504, Cohort 1). Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib vs enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV) in the absence of head-to-head comparison via an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Methods: An anchored MAIC was conducted according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance, with physician's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel/paclitaxel and vinflunine) as the common comparator. Individual patient data from THOR were adjusted to match published key eligibility criteria and average baseline characteristics of EV-301, such as Bellmunt risk score, liver or visceral metastases, primary site, among others. Erdafitinib was then indirectly compared with EV using the relative treatment effects for the reweighted THOR population and those published for EV-301. Results: After matching, the effective sample size for THOR was 126 patients. The MAIC-recalculated hazard ratio (95% credible interval) for erdafitinib vs EV was 0.92 (0.54, 1.57) for overall survival and 0.93 (0.55, 1.56) for progression-free survival, yielding Bayesian probabilities of erdafitinib being better than EV of 62.1% and 60.5%, respectively. For response outcomes, the MAIC-recalculated risk ratio was 1.49 (0.56, 3.90) for confirmed objective response rate and 2.89 (0.27, 30.33) for confirmed complete response with probabilities of 72.6% and 81.3% for erdafitinib being better than EV, respectively. For safety, MAIC-yielded risk ratios of 1.09 (0.99, 1.21) for any treatment-related adverse events, 0.86 (0.57, 1.28) for grade 3+ TRAEs, and 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) for any treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusion: The MAIC indicates comparable efficacy of erdafitinib vs EV for overall survival and progression-free survival, with erdafitinib showing a higher probability of achieving deep responses. While erdafitinib is associated with slightly more adverse events compared with EV, these events seem to be less severe., Competing Interests: S.V. is an employee of Janssen and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. A.Y. is an employee of Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. S.B. is an employee of Janssen and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. K.S. is an employee of Janssen and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. S.T. is an employee of Janssen and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. Z.Y. is an employee of Cytel, which was contracted for this work by Janssen Pharmaceutica NV. C.D. was an employee of Cytel at the time of writing, which was contracted for this work by Janssen Pharmaceutica NV.

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN)., Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year., Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Yu, Zhou, Cao, Ji and Zheng.)

Background/aim: This study retrospectively evaluated whether enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is effective as a late-line treatment according to prior treatment type in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC)., Patients and Methods: We assessed consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in the Kyushu study population with lower and upper urinary tract cancer treated with EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy failure between December 2021 and March 2024. In particular, patients receiving avelumab maintenance or pembrolizumab therapy before EV for advanced UC were analyzed and compared according to the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of the 80 enrolled patients, 31 and 49 received avelumab and pembrolizumab before EV therapy, respectively. The avelumab and pembrolizumab groups had comparable objective response rates (48.4% vs. 44.9%, p=0.820) and disease control rates (77.4% vs. 67.3%, p=0.448). These two groups showed no significant difference in PFS from the initiation of EV (median: 6.4 months vs. 4.2 months, p=0.184); meanwhile, the avelumab group had better OS from the initiation of EV than the pembrolizumab group (median: 16.0 months vs. 10.2 months, p=0.019). Moreover, the median OS after first-line chemotherapy initiation was longer in the avelumab group than in the pembrolizumab group (40.3 months vs. 24.7 months, p=0.054). On multivariate analysis, avelumab maintenance therapy before EV reduced the mortality risk by 47% (95% confidence interval=0.27-1.03; p=0.059)., Conclusion: EV monotherapy after avelumab maintenance therapy provides favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced UC., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of enfortumab vedotin (EV) for elderly advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients and patients with a poor performance status (PS) are unclear., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of EV in elderly patients and patients with a poor PS between December 2021 and August 2023., Results: Sixty-two patients (≥75 years old, n=22; PS≥2, n=10) were enrolled. Patients with PS≥2 had significantly lower albumin levels than those with PS<2 (p=0.023). The objective response and disease control rates did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years old (p=0.598 and p=0.769, respectively) or between those with PS<2 and PS≥2 (p>0.99 and p=0.178, respectively). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different in patients <75 years and ≥75 years (p=0984, 0.368). A significant difference in PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.086) was observed between the PS<2 and PS≥2 groups. The rates of any-grade and severe (grade ≥3) adverse events did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years (p=0.471, p=0.136) or between PS<2 and PS≥2 groups (p>0.99, 0.99). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels significantly increased, but alanine aminotransferase levels did not, following EV treatment (p<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the albumin level was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=0.159; p<0.001)., Conclusion: EV demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in elderly and younger patients with advanced UC. In patients with a poor PS, although the safety was similar, survival was significantly worse in terms of PFS, while the AST levels were significantly elevated., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an established pharmacotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC); however, its adverse events (AEs) cannot be overlooked. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of biweekly EV administration., Methods: Patients with mUC who received EV at our institution were included in the study. Eligible patients were classified into two groups as follows: those who received EV on a standard schedule (standard group) and those who received EV on a biweekly schedule (biweekly group); the treatment outcomes and AEs between the two groups were compared., Results: Nine and 19 patients were in the standard group and biweekly groups, respectively. The progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall response rate were not significantly different between the two groups. AEs following EV administration, such as decreased appetite (P < .01), pruritus (P < .01), rash maculopapular (P < .01), anemia (P = .04), and liver dysfunction (P = .04), were significantly more frequent in the standard group. Grade 3 or higher AEs, such as pruritus (P = .03) and rash maculopapular (P < .01), were significantly more frequent in the standard group. Furthermore, significantly more patients in the standard group had to be given a reduced dose due to adverse events (P = .02)., Conclusions: Biweekly administration of EV may be safer without compromising therapeutic efficacy than the standard schedule., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Background/aim: The clinical outcomes associated with cutaneous toxicity and changes in the renal function of patients receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV) for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical outcomes and EV-related cutaneous toxicity, and the influence on the renal function in 58 patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to July 2023., Results: There were no differences in the overall response and disease control rates between patients with any grade of EV-related cutaneous toxicity and without (p=0.605 and p>0.99, respectively) nor of grade ≥3 (p>0.99 and p=0.173, respectively). Progression-free survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (5.4 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.557) nor of grade ≥3 (2.7 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.053). Overall survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (11.8 vs. 8.9 months, p=0.389), nor of grade ≥3 (4.6 vs. 11.4 months, p=0.168). The incidence of EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade was significantly higher in patients with any grade of ICI-related cutaneous toxicity (88.9% vs. 36.7%, p=0.008). There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine levels after EV treatment (p=0.211). Divided into two groups according to their renal function, using a serum creatinine cut-off of 2 mg/dl, there were no significant changes after EV treatment in either group (p=0.187 and p=0.938)., Conclusion: EV-related cutaneous toxicity did not affect clinical outcomes, although it occurred in patients who experienced immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cutaneous toxicity. EV did not affect renal function., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was approved for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progressed after anticancer therapy on September 2021 in Japan. The association between the occurrence of EV-related side effects and clinical outcome remains to be elucidated., Methods: We identified 97 mUC patients treated with EV therapy at our five institutions from the date of approval to March 2023. The median follow-up period was 7.0 months. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of EV., Results: The median age of the patients was 71 years old, 39% had PS of 1 or more, and 56.7% had primary tumor in upper urinary tract. Overall response rate (ORR) to EV therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 43.3%, 7.52 months, and 12.78 months, respectively. Any grade of treatment-related skin disorder, dysgeusia, peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal disorder, and hyperglycemia occurred in 61 (62.9%), 36 (37.1%), 34 (35.1%), 29 (29.9%), and 18 (18.6%) patients, respectively. The patients with EV-associated peripheral neuropathy had significantly higher ORR (58.8% vs. 34.9%, P = .032) and longer median PFS (8.05 vs. 6.31 months, P = .017) and OS (not reached vs. 11.57 months, P = .008, respectively) than those without. The occurrence of peripheral neuropathy after EV treatment and the presence of peritoneal dissemination were factors independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.46, P = .008 and hazard raito = 3.83, P = .004, respectively) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.30, P = .005 and hazard raito = 4.53, P = .002, respectively)., Conclusions: The occurrence of EV-related peripheral neuropathy might be associated with the efficacy of EV therapy in mUC patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4 for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Common adverse events include rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia. However, there are no reports on the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in clinical settings., Case Presentation: A 72-year-old male patient experienced prolonged and severe thrombocytopenia 18 weeks after the start of enfortumab vedotin therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, requiring daily platelet transfusions. Bone marrow examination and chromosomal analysis confirmed the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Treatment with eltrombopag proved to be effective., Conclusion: This is the first report of the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in a clinical setting. Although rare, myelodysplastic syndrome can occur during enfortumab vedotin therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). IJU Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor. Although cytotoxic drugs have been widely used in advanced ESCC, several antibody agents have recently been reported to be effective., Areas Covered: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that improve immunosuppression by binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1), leading to an antitumor effect. Randomized phase III trials have found these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to be effective as second-line treatment. ATTRACTION-3, which compared nivolumab monotherapy with taxane monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced ESCC, reported prolonged overall survival in the nivolumab group. KEYNOTE-181 found that overall survival was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive ESCC who received second-line treatment with pembrolizumab than in those who received chemotherapy. Sym004 and amivantamab are antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of other tumors in recent phase I studies. Furthermore, clinical trials on antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin and DS-7300 for solid tumors are currently ongoing., Expert Opinion: The standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC contain ICIs. Therefore, drugs with different mechanisms of action that can overcome resistance to ICIs are needed as second-line or later-line treatments to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was FDA approved in December 2019 for platinum- and checkpoint-refractory urothelial cancer based on an exceptional 44% response rate, and is currently approved for use after platinum and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Enfortumab is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4, which is widely expressed in urothelial cancer. Despite this ample target, clinical benefit is not achieved by all patients, and mechanisms of treatment resistance are undescribed. Herein we summarize what is known to date regarding coorelative findings and subgroup analysis and EV response, including novel biopsy data in patients with tumor progression post EV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing, cost, and clinical implications of enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV) in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed (inception to August 2020) was conducted using the terms enfortumab, vedotin, Padcev, and Nectin. Data were also obtained from package inserts, meeting abstracts, and ongoing studies from ClinicalTrials.gov.Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant published articles, package inserts, and meeting abstracts evaluating EV for the treatment of UC were analyzed.Data Synthesis: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver potent cytotoxic agents using highly selective monoclonal antibodies. Targeting the near-universal expression of Nectin-4 on UC cells is a viable therapeutic strategy. In a pivotal phase II trial, EV demonstrated an overall response rate of 44%, and a median duration of response of 7.6 months. Estimated overall survival was 11.7 months with a median estimated progression-free survival of 5.6 months. Results were similar among difficult-to-treat patients, including those with liver metastases. Unique toxicity concerns with EV require careful consideration and monitoring.Relevance To Patient Care and Clinical Practice: EV, a first-in-class anti-Nectin-4 ADC, provides impressive response rates with manageable toxicities, making it a promising treatment option for patients with multiply relapsed or refractory UC.Conclusion: The US Food and Drug Administration-approved EV demonstrates antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with UC but harbors important adverse effects and financial concerns. Additional studies are required to identify the optimal sequencing, patient population, and place in therapy for EV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin is a Nectin-4 directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in metastatic urothelial carcinoma following progression on a platinum-containing chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade. On-target dermatologic toxicity may occur from Nectin-4 expression in the skin. We highlight a case of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis following enfortumab infusions that was ultimately fatal. The second case describes an erythema multiforme-like rash with interface dermatitis related to enfortumab. Dermatologic findings, immunohistochemistry studies, and immune profiling are detailed. These cases demonstrate the potentially catastrophic outcomes in some patients treated with enfortumab. Patients must be monitored for cutaneous toxicities with early involvement of dermatology and dermatopathology.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) need additional treatment options beyond PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapies. Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed at Nectin-4 that received accelerated approval for treatment of adults with locally advanced or mUC previously treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and platinumcontaining chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant, locally advanced, or metastatic settings. OBJECTIVES: This article provides practical considerations and recommendations regarding common and potentially treatment-limiting adverse events that may arise with EV therapy. METHODS: The clinical data that supported the approval of EV are reviewed, and supporting safety and management considerations are provided based on the authors' experience. FINDINGS: EV therapy can be optimized through patient and caregiver education, proactive patient monitoring, early identification of adverse events, and timely intervention to alleviate symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin is a Nectin-4 directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in metastatic urothelial carcinoma following progression on a platinum-containing chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade. On-target dermatologic toxicity may occur from Nectin-4 expression in the skin. We highlight a case of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis following enfortumab infusions that was ultimately fatal. The second case describes an erythema multiforme-like rash with interface dermatitis related to enfortumab. Dermatologic findings, immunohistochemistry studies, and immune profiling are detailed. These cases demonstrate the potentially catastrophic outcomes in some patients treated with enfortumab. Patients must be monitored for cutaneous toxicities with early involvement of dermatology and dermatopathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urothelial cancer is a lethal malignancy characterized by a wide diffusion in Western countries due to a larger exposure to known risk factors, such as aromatic amines, tobacco smoke and benzene [...]

Introduction: Few studies have reported on administering enfortumab vedotin to patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis., Case Presentation: Case 1: An 85-year-old man underwent hemodialysis for progressive renal failure 4 months after right laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Case 2: A 73-year-old man underwent hemodialysis after two laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomies for recurrent urothelial carcinoma. In both cases, enfortumab vedotin was administered due to postoperative recurrence and progression despite platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. Partial response and disease progression were observed in cases 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events included a mild skin rash in both patients and neutropenia in Case 1, both of which resolved with symptomatic treatment., Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, were confirmed., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). IJU Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Urological Association.)

Antibody-drug conjugates and bicycle toxin conjugates represent a tremendous advance in drug delivery technology and have shown great promise in the treatment of urothelial cancer. Previously approved systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy, are often impractical due to comorbidities, and outcomes for patients with advanced disease remain poor, even when receiving systemic therapy. In this setting, antibody-drug and bicycle toxin conjugates have emerged as novel treatments, dramatically altering the therapeutic landscape. These drugs harness unique designs consisting of antibody or bicycle peptide, linker, and cytotoxic payload with more targeted delivery than conventional chemotherapy, thus eliminating malignant cells while reducing systemic toxicities. Potential targets investigated in urothelial cancer include Nectin-4, TROP2, HER2, and EphA2. Initial clinical trials demonstrated efficacy in treatment of refractory advanced urothelial cancer, as well as improvement in quality of life. These initial studies led to FDA approval of two antibody-drug conjugates, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan. Moreover, antibody-drug and bicycle toxin conjugates are being studied in ongoing clinical trials in frontline treatment of advanced disease as well as for localized cancer. These studies highlight the potential for additional future therapies with novel targets, novel antibodies, cytotoxic and immunomodulatory payloads, and unique structural designs enhancing efficacy and safety. There is increasing evidence that combinations with other cancer therapies, especially immunotherapy, improve treatment outcomes. The combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab was recently approved for first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Despite the great promise of these novel drugs, robust predictive biomarkers are needed to determine the patients who would maximally benefit. This review surveys the rationale and current state of the evidence for these new drugs and describes future directions actively being explored., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Nectin cell adhesion molecule 4 (nectin-4) is a transmembrane protein overexpressed on a variety of cancers and plays an important role in oncogenic and metastatic processes. The nectin-4-targeted antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin has been approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, but the efficacy in other types of cancer remains to be explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of nectin-4-targeted PET imaging with 68 Ga-N188 as a noninvasive method to quantify membranous nectin-4 expression in multiple tumor types-an approach that may provide insight for patient stratification and treatment selection. Methods: Sixty-two patients with 16 types of cancer underwent head-to-head 68 Ga-N188 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging for initial staging or detection of recurrence and metastases. Correlation between lesion SUV max and nectin-4 expression determined by immunohistochemistry staining was analyzed in 36 of 62 patients. Results: The SUV max of 68 Ga-N188 had a positive correlation with membranous nectin-4 expression in the various tumor types tested ( r = 0.458; P = 0.005), whereas no association was observed between the SUV max and cytoplasmic nectin-4 expression. The detection rates for patient-based analysis of 68 Ga-N188 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT examinations were comparable (95.00% [57/60] vs. 93.33% [56/60]). In patients with pancreatic cancer, 68 Ga-N188 exhibited a potential advantage for detecting residual or locally recurrent tumors; this advantage may assist in clinical decision-making. Conclusion: The correlation between nectin-4-targeted 68 Ga-N188 PET imaging and membranous nectin-4 expression indicates the potential of 68 Ga-N188 as an effective tool for selecting patients who may benefit from enfortumab vedotin treatment. The PET imaging results provided evidence to explore nectin-4-targeted therapy in a variety of tumors. 68 Ga-N188 may improve the restaging of pancreatic cancer but requires further evaluation in a powered, prospective setting., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against Nectin-4 that is used to treat urothelial carcinoma. Nectin-4 is inherently expressed in the skin and adnexal structures. Since therapeutic options for cutaneous adnexal carcinomas are limited, we sought to evaluate Nectin-4 expression in adnexal carcinomas and benign adnexal neoplasms to identify tumors that are potentially targetable with EV., Methods: Eight sebaceous carcinomas (seven periocular and one lymph node metastasis), eight digital papillary adenocarcinomas, seven squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas, eight poromas, eight trichilemmomas, and seven sebaceous adenomas were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for anti-Nectin-4 antibody. H-scores for Nectin-4 expression were calculated., Results: Benign adnexal neoplasms had a significantly lower mean (±SD) Nectin-4 H-score (142.6 ± 39.1) than did the adnexal carcinomas (198 ± 90.8; p = 0.006). Nectin-4 was expressed in 91% (21/23) of adnexal carcinomas. Sebaceous carcinomas frequently exhibited high expression of Nectin-4 (88% [7/8]), with a mean (±SD) H-score (258.1 ± 58.4) significantly higher than those for digital papillary adenocarcinomas (197.5 ± 52.5; p = 0.035) and squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas (131.4 ± 114.1; p = 0.031). Sebaceous carcinomas also had significantly higher H-scores than did sebaceous adenomas (186.4 ± 25.0; p = 0.013)., Conclusions: Increased Nectin-4 expression in a subset of cutaneous adnexal carcinomas, particularly sebaceous carcinomas, reveals that EV is a potential therapeutic option for these tumors., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)