Search

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga] Ga-Pentixafor in malignant melanoma patients., Methods: In this prospective study, patients with histology-proven melanoma were included and underwent [ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) and [ 68 Ga] Ga-Pentixafor PET/computed tomography (CT) within a week. Suspicious lesions were interpreted as benign vs. malignant, and the corresponding semi-quantitative PET/CT parameters were recorded and compared., Results: Twelve consecutive melanoma patients (mean age: 60 ± 6) were included. Two patients were referred for initial staging, two for detecting recurrence and eight for evaluating the extent of metastases. Overall, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT showed 236 tumoral lesions, including two primary tumors, two recurrent lesions, 29 locoregional metastases and 203 distant metastases. In [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT, 101 tumoral lesions were detected, including two primary tumors, one recurrence, 16 locoregional metastases and 82 distant metastases. Notably, a documented brain metastasis was only visualized on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT images. Compared with [ 18 F]FDG, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT provided a 42% detection rate. Regarding semi-quantitative measures, the intensity of uptake and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly lower on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT [average maximum standard uptake value (SUV max ) of 2.72 ± 1.33 vs. 11.41 ± 14.79; P value <0.001 and 1.17 ± 0.53 vs. 5.32 ± 7.34; P value <0.001, respectively]., Conclusion: When comparing [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT, not only did [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT detect fewer lesions, but the intensity of uptake and the TBRs were also lower on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. Thus, our results may indicate a limited potential of this novel tracer in cutaneous melanoma patients compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Given the lower TBRs, applying this radiotracer in radioligand therapies is also questionable., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: Patients with pathology-proven NSCLC were prospectively included. Patients underwent [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT within 1 week. All suspicious lesions were interpreted as benign or malignant, and the corresponding PET/CT semi-quantitative parameters were recorded. A two-sided P -value <0.05 was considered significant., Results: Twelve consecutive NSCLC patients (mean age: 60 ± 7) were included. All patients underwent both [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT scans with a median interval of 2 days. Overall, 73 abnormal lesions were detected, from which 58 (79%) were concordant between [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. All primary tumors were clearly detectable in both scans visually. Also, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT demonstrated rather comparable results with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scan in detecting metastatic lesions. However, malignant lesions demonstrated significantly higher SUVmax and SUVmean in [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT ( P -values <0.05). Regarding the advantages, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor depicted two brain metastases that were missed by [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Also, a highly suspicious lesion for recurrence on [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scan was correctly classified as benign by subsequent [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT., Conclusion: [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT was concordant with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary NSCLC tumors and could visualize the majority of metastatic lesions. Moreover, this modality was found to be potentially helpful in excluding tumoural lesions when the [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT was equivocal, as well as in detecting brain metastasis where [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT suffers from poor sensitivity. However, the count statistics were significantly lower., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Partial volume effect, due to the poor spatial resolution of single photon emission tomography (SPET), significantly restricts the absolute quantification of the regional brain uptake and limits the accuracy of the absolute measurement of blood flow. In this study the importance of compensation for the collimator-detector response (CDR) in the technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer ((99m)Tc-ECD) brain SPET was assessed, by incorporating system response in the ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm. By placing a point source of (99m)Tc at different distances from the face of the collimator, CDR were found and modeled using Gaussian functions. A fillable slice of the brain phantom was designed and filled by (99m)Tc. Projections acquired from the phantom and also 4 patients who underwent the (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET were used in this study. To reconstruct the images, 3D OSEM algorithm was used. System blurring functions were modeled, during the reconstruction in both projection and backprojection steps. Our results were compared with the conventional resolution recovery using Metz filter in filtered backprojection (FBP). Visual inspection of the images was performed by six nuclear medicine specialists. Quantitative analysis was also studied by calculating the contrast and the count density of the reconstructed images. For the phantom images, background counts and noise were decreased by 3D OSEM compared to the FBP-Metz method. Quantitatively, the ratio of the counts of the occupied hot region to that of the cold region of the reconstructed by FBP-Metz images was 1.14. This value was decreased from 1.12 to 0.86 for 3D OSEM of 2 and 30 iterations respectively. The reference value was 0.85 for the planar image. For clinical images, hot to cold regions (grey to white matter), the count ratio was increased from 1.44 in FBP-Metz to 3.2 and 4 in 3D OSEM with 10 and 20 iterations respectively. Based on the interpretability of images, the best scores (3.79±0.51) by the physicians were given to the images reconstructed by 3D OSEM and 10 iterations. This value was 0.63±0.77 for FBP-Metz images. In conclusion, by incorporating the distance dependent CDR during 3D OSEM, it was possible to reconstruct the brain images with much higher resolution and contrast as compared to the conventional resolution recovery method, which used FBP-Metz. It was however important to make a trade-off between noise and resolution by determining an optimum iterations number.