101. Impact of health care reform on enrolment of immigrants in primary care in Ontario, Canada
- Author
-
Douglas G. Manuel, Edward Ng, Peter Tanuseputro, Ricardo Batista, Kevin Pottie, Amy E. Mark, and Simone Dahrouge
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Emigrants and Immigrants ,Health Services Accessibility ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,Retrospective Studies ,Ontario ,education.field_of_study ,030505 public health ,Capitation ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Public health ,Middle Aged ,Health equity ,Health Care Reform ,Cohort ,Female ,Health care reform ,0305 other medical science ,Family Practice ,business ,Demography ,Cohort study - Abstract
Objectives In 2003, Ontario introduced a patient enrolment system as part of health care reforms, aimed at enhancing primary health care services, but it is unclear whether immigrants have benefited from this health care reform. Therefore, we studied whether this reform changed the extent of immigrants' enrolment in primary care services in Ontario between 2003 and 2012. Methods This is a population-based retrospective cohort study, in which a closed cohort of 9231840 Ontario residents between 1985 and 2003 was created, using linked health administrative and immigration databases. Levels of enrolment for traditional and more comprehensive capitation-based practice between 2003 and 2012 were compared by immigrant status. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess the odds of enrolment on primary care practices. Results Overall enrolment in primary care practices increased gradually after 2004, until 2012, when two-thirds of the cohort (67%) were enrolled. The immigrants' enrolment level remained consistently lower than that of long-term residents over the study period. By 2012, enrolment of immigrants in capitation-based models was significantly lower (17.3% versus 25.4%). In particular, enrolment in Family Health Teams, considered the most comprehensive care model, was considerably lower in immigrants compared with long-term residents (5.6% versus 18.0%; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.41). Conclusions Immigrant enrolment rates in new comprehensive primary care models were consistently lower than among long-term residents. This has implication on equitable primary care access for immigrant populations.
- Published
- 2018