Search

1. A total of 113 trigeminothalamic neurons and over 200 presumed interneurons of nucleus caudalis (0-5 mm below the obex) and subjacent reticular formation were studied in rhesus monkeys anesthetized with chloralose or nitrous oxide. Each cell was characterized in terms of its antidromic responses to stimulation of ventral posterior medial and/or posterior thalamic nuclei and to three types of stimuli applied to its receptive field: a) graded 5-s temperature shifts at a rate of 9 degrees C/s from 35 degrees C to final temperatures of 20-52 degrees C, generated by a contact thermode; b) graded intensities of electrical stimulation to determine the conduction velocities of converging primary afferent fiber populations; and c) mechanical stimulation ranging from light touch to pinch with serrated forceps. 2. This analysis yielded five classes of units distinguished by the range of responses to mechanical stimuli and by the convergence of different primary afferent fiber populations. These five classes were found among both trigeminothalamic neurons and neurons which could not be antidromically activated. Class 1 units exhibited rapidly adapting responses to hair movement or light touch and received only A-beta primary afferent input. Class 2 units responded to light touch and pressure with maintained discharges and received A-beta primary afferent input. Class 3 units responded maximally to pinch with serrated forceps but also were activated by light touch and pressure. They received A-beta, A-delta, and C fiber input. Class 4 units responded to firm pressure and maximally to pinch with serrated forceps. These units had A-delta and sometimes C fiber input. Class 5 units responded only to pinch with serrated forceps and had exclusive A-delta fiber input. Some cells in all five classes responded antidromically to stimulation of the thalamus. Antidromic action-potential latencies of classes 1,2, and 3 units were shorter than those of classes 4 and 5 units (P less than 0.001). Receptive-field sizes were usually small (1-2 cm2) for classes 1, 2, 4, and 5 units, and larger for class 3 units (one to three trigeminal divisions). The marginal layer of nucleus caudalis contained mostly classes 4 and 5 units, some class 3 units, but no classes 1 or 2 units. The superficial portion of the magnocellular layer contained mostly classes 1 and 2 units, while neurons at the base of this layer contained class 3 units and some classes 4 and 5 units. Cells in the sujacent reticular formation included all 5 classes but showed a tendency to have large receptive fields (greater than 1 trigeminal division). 3. Neurons responding to noxious thermal stimuli (44-52 degrees C) were classes 3 or 4 units. The response patterns of classes 3 and 4 units to noxious thermal stimuli were similar. No classes 1 or 2 units and only one class 5 unit responded to increases in skin temperature. Thermal thresholds ranged from 38 to 50 degrees C and most heat-responsive units responded monotonically to temperatures between 45 and 52 degrees C...

We analyzed the activity of 51 trigeminothalamic neurons in the medullary dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) of monkeys during the performance of behavioral tasks requiring the monkeys to discriminate innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli applied to the face and to detect the onset of visual stimuli. Static properties of trigeminothalamic neurons in behaving monkeys were similar to those in anesthetized monkeys. Responses to passively presented mechanical and thermal stimuli, receptive-field properties, and conduction velocities did not differ in the awake and anesthetized states. For most wide dynamic range and nociceptive-specific trigeminothalamic neurons, there was a negative correlation between the magnitude of thermally evoked activity and behavioral latencies to discriminate 47 and 49 degrees C stimuli. Thus, both groups of neurons provide information that could be used by the monkey to discriminate noxious thermal stimuli. The magnitude of thermal responses of trigeminothalamic neurons was modulated by the behavioral significance of the stimulus. Behaviorally relevant thermal stimuli presented during the thermal discrimination task produced a greater neuronal response than equivalent irrelevant thermal stimuli presented between behavioral trials or presented while the monkey performed the visual detection task. Neurons whose activity is modulated by behavioral state are likely to be involved in discrimination of thermal stimuli, since the activity of these neurons correlates with the behavioral response to the stimuli and information from the modulated neurons is sent to the thalamus. Some trigeminothalamic neurons that exhibited somatosensory responses also responded to behaviorally relevant stimuli and events associated with trial initiation and receipt of reward in the behavioral tasks. Similar events outside a behavioral task evoked no neuronal responses. These task-related responses were similar to those described previously for medullary dorsal horn neurons not identified as to projection sites (14).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. The magnitude of the sensations produced by small increases in thermal stimuli superimposed on noxious levels of heat stimulation was studied by the use of a simple reaction-time task. Noxious thermal stimuli were presented on the face of three monkeys, the forearm volar surface of three monkeys, and the face of four human subjects. The subject, either monkey or human, initiated a trial by pressing an illuminated button. Subsequently, a contact thermode increased in temperature from a base line of 38 degree C to temperatures of 44, 45, 46, or 47 degrees C (T1). After a variable time period lasting between 4 and 10 s, the thermode temperature increased an additional 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, or 0.8 degrees C (T2). The subject was required to release the button as soon as the T2 stimulus was detected. Detection latency, expressed as its reciprocal, detection speed, was defined as the time interval between the onset of T2 and the release of the button. 2. The monkeys' detection speed to stimuli presented on the upper lip was dependent on the intensity of both T1 and T2. Increases in the intensity of T2 between 0.1 and 0.8 degrees C produced faster detection speeds. In general, as the intensity of T1 increased, the detection speed increased to identical T2 stimuli. The monkeys' T2-detection threshold was also dependent on the intensity of T1. 3. The psychophysical functions obtained from stimulation of the monkey's face were compared with those obtained from the volar surface of the monkey's forearm. Whereas the T2 thresholds obtained from stimulation of the monkey's forearm and face were similar, the psychophysical functions obtained from stimulation of the face were significantly steeper than those obtained from stimulation of the forearm. 4. The humans' detection speed of T2 stimuli presented on the face was monotonically related to the intensity of T2 and was dependent on the level of T1. The psychophysical functions obtained from the human's face were equivalent to those obtained from the monkey's faces. 5. A cross-modality matching procedure was used to examine the perceived intensity of pain sensation produced by T2 stimuli in human subjects. The magnitude estimates of these stimuli were dependent on the level of T1, as well as the intensity of T2. Detection speed, plotted as a function of the estimated magnitude of pain, independent of T1 and T2 temperature, was best fit by a logarithmic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. We examined the activity of thermally sensitive trigeminothalamic neurons and nonprojection neurons in the medullary dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) in three monkeys performing thermal and visual detection tasks. 2. An examination of neuronal stimulus-response functions, obtained during thermal-detection tasks in which noxious heat stimuli were applied to the face, indicated that wide-dynamic-range neurons (WDR, responsive to innocuous mechanical stimuli with greater responses to noxious mechanical stimuli) could be subclassified based on the slope values of linear regression lines. WDR1 neurons exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to noxious heat stimulation than WDR2 neurons or nociceptive-specific neurons (NS, responsive only to noxious stimuli). 3. In one behavioral task, the monkeys detected 1.0 degrees C increases in noxious heat from preceding noxious heat stimuli ranging from 44 to 48 degrees C. WDR1, WDR2, and NS neurons increased their discharge frequency as a function of the intensity of the first noxious heat temperature (T1) as well as the final temperature (T2). The responses of WDR1 neurons were greater than those produced by WDR2 or NS neurons across all the temperatures examined. The order of stimulus presentation affected the responses of WDR1 neurons to 1.0 degrees C increases in the noxious heat range but not those of WDR2 or NS neurons. 4. In a second behavioral task, the monkeys detected small increases in noxious heat (0.2-0.8 degrees C) from a first temperature of 46 degrees C. Although the responses of all three classes of neurons were monotonically related to stimulus intensity, WDR1 neurons exhibited greater sensitivity to small temperature increases than either WDR2 or NS neurons. 5. Subpopulations of all three classes of neurons exhibited responses that were independent of thermal stimulus parameters or sensory modality and that only occurred during the behavioral task. These task-related responses were time-locked to specific behavioral events associated with trial initiation and trial continuation. 6. These data provide evidence that a subpopulation of WDR neurons is the dorsal horn cell type most sensitive to small increases in noxious heat in the 45-49 degrees C temperature range and provides the most information about stimulus intensity. The findings support the view that nociceptive neurons have the capacity to precisely encode stimulus features in the noxious range and that WDR neurons are likely to participate in the monkeys' ability to perceive the intensity of such stimuli.

1. We examined the relationship between the activity of medullary dorsal horn nociceptive neurons and the monkeys' ability to detect noxious heat stimuli. In two different detection tasks, the temperature of a contact thermode positioned on the monkey's face increased from 38 degrees C to temperatures between 44 and 48 degrees C (T1). After a variable time period, the thermode temperature increased an additional 0.2-1.5 degrees C (T2), and the monkeys' detection speed from the onset of T2 was determined. We previously have established that detection speed is a measure of the perceived intensity of noxious thermal stimuli. Nociceptive neurons were classified as wide-dynamic-range (WDR, responsive to innocuous mechanical stimuli with greater responses to noxious mechanical stimuli) and nociceptive-specific (NS, responsive only to noxious stimuli). WDR neurons were subclassified as WDR1 and WDR2 based on the higher slope values of the stimulus-response functions of WDR1 neurons. The monkeys were trained to detect small increases in noxious heat, and their detection speeds were correlated with the responses of WDR1, WDR2, and NS neurons. 2. Detection speeds to T2 temperatures of 1.0 degrees C from preceding T1 temperatures of 45 and 46 degrees C were faster during a preceding ascending series of stimuli than during a descending series. Similarly, the peak discharge frequencies of WDR1 neurons in response to the same stimuli were greater during the ascending series of T2 temperatures. In contrast, the responses of WDR2 and NS neurons showed no significant differences during the ascending and descending series of stimuli. 3. Detection speeds following 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 degrees C T2 stimuli were higher when the preceding T1 temperature was 46 degrees C as compared with detection speeds to the identical stimuli when the preceding T1 temperature was 45 degrees C. WDR1 neurons also exhibited a significant increase in peak discharge frequency to these same T2 stimuli when the preceding T1 temperature was 46 degrees C. In contrast, the neuronal activity of WDR2 and NS neurons did not differ on 45 and 46 degrees C T1 trials. 4. The relationship between detection speed and neuronal peak discharge frequency was examined in response to different pairs of T1 and T2 stimuli when T1 was either 45 or 46 degrees C. There was a significant correlation between detection speed and neuronal discharge for WDR1 and WDR2 neurons. No correlation was observed for NS neurons. 5. The magnitude of neuronal activity on correctly detected and nondetected trials was compared when T1 was 46 degrees C and T2 was 0.2 degree C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)