101. Challenging fat talk: An experimental investigation of reactions to body disparaging conversations
- Author
-
Cai Guo, Lea Simms, Megan Baumgardner, Suman Ambwani, and Emily Abromowitz
- Subjects
050103 clinical psychology ,Social Psychology ,Adolescent ,media_common.quotation_subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Impression formation ,050109 social psychology ,Young Adult ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Psychoeducation ,medicine ,Body Image ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Conversation ,Students ,General Psychology ,Applied Psychology ,media_common ,Language ,Disorder risk ,Social perception ,Communication ,05 social sciences ,medicine.disease ,Eating disorders ,Affect ,Mood ,Vignette ,Female ,Psychology ,Social psychology - Abstract
Although "fat talk" is associated with increased eating disorder risk, the predictors of fat talk engagement and viable alternatives to these pervasive conversations remain unclear. The current experiment examined responses to fat talk versus feminist-oriented challenging fat talk scenarios. Undergraduate women (N=283) completed baseline questionnaires assessing body dissatisfaction, fat talk engagement, and positive impression management. One week later, they were randomized to view one of the two scenarios, followed by assessment of mood, fat talk engagement, social acceptability, and social likeability. Results indicated that the challenging fat talk vignette (versus the fat talk vignette) yielded less negative affect and fat talk and was perceived as more socially attractive with a more likeable target character. Baseline body dissatisfaction, baseline fat talk tendencies, and momentary negative affect predicted post-exposure fat talk engagement. Current findings highlight possibilities for implementing feminist language and psychoeducation in fat talk prevention efforts.
- Published
- 2017