Search

The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández in the original article.The original version of this article was revised: The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Not available.

Abstract: Mutations commonly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), such as CEBPA, FLT3, IDH1/2, and NPM1, are rarely found in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and their prognostic significance in CMML has not been clearly identified. In 127 patients with CMML, we have retrospectively analyzed next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction data from bone marrow samples collected at the time of CMML diagnosis. Seven patients harbored CEBPA mutations, 8 FLT3 mutations, 12 IDH1 mutations, 26 IDH2 mutations, and 11 NPM1 mutations. Patients with CMML harboring CEBPA, FLT3, and/or NPM1 mutations (mutCFN) more frequently had the myeloproliferative subtype, a high prevalence of severe cytopenia, and elevated blast counts. Regardless of their CMML Prognostic Scoring System molecular classification, mutCFN patients with CMML had a poor prognosis, and the multivariate analysis identified mutCFN as an independent marker of overall survival. The genetic profile of these mutCFN patients with CMML closely resembled that of patients with AML, with higher-risk clinical characteristics. Our findings lead us to suggest including the assessment of these mutations in CMML prognostic models and treating these patients with AML-type therapies, including intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, whenever feasible. Furthermore, certain targeted therapies approved for use in AML should be considered., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

VEXAS syndrome is a haemato-inflammatory disease caused by somatic UBA1 mutations and characterized by cytoplasmic vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursor cells. Although there is currently no standard treatment algorithm for VEXAS, patients are generally treated with anti-inflammatory therapies focused on symptom management, with only partial effectiveness. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have shown promise in VEXAS patients with concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), while the efficacy of HMA in VEXAS patients without MDS is largely unknown. Furthermore, the usefulness of monitoring the variant allele frequency (VAF) of UBA1 or vacuolization in precursor cells over the course of treatment has not been extensively investigated. We have evaluated the efficacy of HMA in four VEXAS patients without MDS and performed longitudinal analyses of the VAF of UBA1 and vacuolization during treatment. HMA treatment led to overall clinical improvement, a dramatic reduction in the VAF of UBA1, normalization of haematological and inflammatory markers and a quantifiable decrease in vacuolization, leading us to speculate that unlike anti-inflammatory therapies, HMA may well act as a disease-modifying treatment. If these findings are confirmed in further studies, it could lead to the early use of HMA in the treatment of all VEXAS patients-with or without MDS., (© 2025 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Even though venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (VenAza) is considered a low-intensity regimen, its patients present a high incidence of cytopenia and infections during the first courses, making the initial management a challenging phase. Methods: This difficulty in our center led to the establishment of an At-Home (AH) program for ramp-up and follow-up patients during the VenAza combination induction phase focused on therapy administration, patient and caregiver education, and management of adverse events (AEs). A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R AML) were treated with VenAza from March 2019 to May 2022. We compared outcomes between patients managed with a hospital-based (inpatient) approach and those managed through the AH program. Results: Despite most patients experiencing grade 3-4 cytopenias (96.9%), the incidence of serious infections and other AEs was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference in febrile neutropenia (42.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.38). Overall, the AH cohort demonstrated a significantly lower hospital readmission rate after ramp-up (29.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the inpatient cohort's admission days were longer than in the AH cohort (13 vs. 8, p = 0.28). Conclusions: AH management was feasible and safe, leading to better resource use, enhanced patient comfort, and improved treatment compliance. The potential of AH programs for managing low-intensity chemotherapy regimens can reduce hospital admissions and subsequently improve patient and caregiver well-being.

Background/objectives: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML with FLT3 mutation ( FLT3 mut ) have a dismal prognosis. FLT3 mut offers a target for therapy in these patients. Gilteritinib (gilter) and quizartinib (quizar) have demonstrated efficacy as single agents in two phase 3 clinical trials., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of 50 patients with R/R FLT3 mut AML who received gilter or quizar as monotherapy in 27 Spanish centers before their commercial availability. Forty-four patients were treated with gilter and six with quizar., Results: The median age was 62.5 years, and 52% were women. Most patients presented with FLT3 -ITD mutations (80%); 46% had refractory disease and 54% had relapsed disease at treatment initiation. First-line treatment was chemotherapy in 80% of patients, with 40% of these also receiving midostaurin. Twenty-five patients (50%) had previously received FLT3 inhibitor, and twenty-eight (56%) had received more than one line treatment before starting gilter/quizar. The rates of complete remission (CR), CR without hematological recovery (CRi), and partial remission were 22%, 18%, and 16%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 4.74 months and 2.99 months, respectively. We observed a significant improvement in OS in patients who had received only one prior line of therapy compared to those who had received two or more therapies (10.77 months vs. 4.24 months, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified failure to achieve CR/CRi, receiving more than one prior line of therapy, age, and white blood cells count as independent prognostic factors for OS. The most common toxicities were febrile neutropenia, liver function abnormalities, and QT interval prolongation., Conclusions: Gilter/quizar monotherapy are effective and tolerable options for patients with R/R FLT3 mut AML in a real-world setting. Response and toxicity rates are similar to those reported in the phase 3 trials, despite the more heterogeneous nature of the study population.

The 2022 WHO revision and the ICC classification have recently modified the diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia. However, there is no consensus on whether CMML with NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut) should be diagnosed as AML. Nowadays, it is a subject of discussion because of its diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Therefore, we describe a case of a patient diagnosed with CMML NPM1mut and briefly review the literature to highlight the uncertainty about how to classify a CMML with NPM1 mutation. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive molecular study, which is crucial to optimize the individualized treatment of patients, enabling them to access targeted therapies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Two new diagnostic classifications of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were published in 2022 to update current knowledge on disease biology. In previous 2017-edition categories of AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, AML was not otherwise specified, but AML with mutated RUNX1 experienced profound changes. We performed whole exome sequencing on a cohort of 69 patients with cytogenetic intermediate-risk AML that belonged to these diagnostic categories to correlate their mutational pattern and copy-number alterations with their new diagnostic distribution. Our results show that 45% of patients changed their diagnostic category, being AML myelodysplasia-related the most enlarged, mainly due to a high frequency of myelodysplasia-related mutations (58% of patients). These showed a good correlation with multilineage dysplasia and/or myelodysplastic syndrome history, but at the same time, 21% of de novo patients without dysplasia also presented them. RUNX1 was the most frequently mutated gene, with a high co-occurrence rate with other myelodysplasia-related mutations. We found a high prevalence of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, frequently inducing a homozygous state in particular mutated genes. Mild differences in current classifications explain the diagnostic disparity in 10% of patients, claiming a forthcoming unified classification.

European LeukemiaNet refined their risk classification of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in 2022 (ELN 2022) according to the two new myeloid classifications published the same year. We have retrospectively assessed the prognostic value of the ELN 2022 in 120 AML patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), including 99 in first complete response (CR1) from 2011 to 2021 in our centre. Adverse risk patients (Adv) presented inferior outcome in terms of overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (OS [p = 0.003], LFS [p = 0.02]), confirmed in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] for OS = 2.00, p = 0.037). These results were also seen in patients allografted in CR1. Further analysis identified a subgroup named adverse-plus (AdvP), including complex karyotype, MECOM(EVI1) rearrangements and TP53 mutations, with worse outcomes than the rest of groups of patients, including the Adv (HR for OS: 3.14, p < 0.001, HR for LFS: 3.36, p < 0.001), with higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (p < 0.001). Notably, within this analysis, the outcome of Adv and intermediate patients were similar. These findings highlight the prognostic value of ELN 2022 in patients undergoing allo-HCT, which can be improved by the recognition of a poor genetic subset (AdvP) within the Adv risk group., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Non-acute myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with NPM1 mutations ( NPM1 mut-MNs) pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, primarily manifesting as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The classification and treatment approach for these conditions as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are debated. We describe eight cases of atypical NPM1 mut-MNs from our institution and review the literature. We include a rare case of concurrent prostate carcinoma and MN consistent with chronic eosinophilic leukemia, progressing to myeloid sarcoma of the skin. Of the remaining seven cases, five were CMML and two were MDS. NPM1 mutations occur in 3-5% of CMML and 1-6% of MDS, with an increased likelihood of rapid evolution to AML. Their influence on disease progression varies, and their prognostic significance in non-acute MNs is less established than in AML. Non-acute MNs with NPM1 mutations may display an aggressive clinical course, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive diagnosis integrating clinical and biological data. Tailoring patient management on an individualized basis, favoring intensive treatment aligned with AML protocols, is crucial, regardless of blast percentage. Research on the impact of NPM1 mutations in non-acute myeloid neoplasms is ongoing, requiring challenging prospective studies with substantial patient cohorts and extended follow-up periods for validation.

We evaluated the administration of ARI-0001 cells (chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19) in adult and pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory CD19 + malignancies. Patients received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by ARI-0001 cells at a dose of 0.4-5 × 10 6 ARI-0001 cells/kg, initially as a single dose and later split into 3 fractions (10%, 30%, and 60%) with full administration depending on the absence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). 58 patients were included, of which 47 received therapy: 38 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 8 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 1 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In patients with ALL, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 13.2% (26.7% before versus 4.3% after the amendment), grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2.6%, and the procedure-related mortality was 7.9% at day +100, with no procedure-related deaths after the amendment. The measurable residual disease-negative complete response rate was 71.1% at day +100. Progression-free survival was 47% (95% IC 27%-67%) at 1 year: 51.3% before versus 39.5% after the amendment. Overall survival was 68.6% (95% IC 49.2%-88%) at 1 year. In conclusion, the administration of ARI-0001 cells provided safety and efficacy results that are comparable with other academic or commercially available products. This trial was registered as ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03144583., (Copyright © 2020 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are deregulated in several tumors, although their role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is mostly unknown.We have examined the expression of the lncRNA HOX antisense intergenic RNA myeloid 1 (HOTAIRM1) in 241 AML patients. We have correlated HOTAIRM1 expression with a miRNA expression profile. We have also analyzed the prognostic value of HOTAIRM1 expression in 215 intermediate-risk AML (IR-AML) patients.The lowest expression level was observed in acute promyelocytic leukemia (P < 0.001) and the highest in t(6;9) AML (P = 0.005). In 215 IR-AML patients, high HOTAIRM1 expression was independently associated with shorter overall survival (OR:2.04;P = 0.001), shorter leukemia-free survival (OR:2.56; P < 0.001) and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (OR:1.67; P = 0.046). Moreover, HOTAIRM1 maintained its independent prognostic value within the favorable molecular subgroup (OR: 3.43; P = 0.009). Interestingly, HOTAIRM1 was overexpressed in NPM1-mutated AML (P < 0.001) and within this group retained its prognostic value (OR: 2.21; P = 0.01). Moreover, HOTAIRM1 expression was associated with a specific 33-microRNA signature that included miR-196b (P < 0.001). miR-196b is located in the HOX genomic region and has previously been reported to have an independent prognostic value in AML. miR-196b and HOTAIRM1 in combination as a prognostic factor can classify patients as high-, intermediate-, or low-risk (5-year OS: 24% vs 42% vs 70%; P = 0.004).Determination of HOTAIRM1 level at diagnosis provided relevant prognostic information in IR-AML and allowed refinement of risk stratification based on common molecular markers. The prognostic information provided by HOTAIRM1 was strengthened when combined with miR-196b expression. Furthermore, HOTAIRM1 correlated with a 33-miRNA signature.