101. Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead?
- Author
-
Alwin Zweerink, Mathias Meine, Maarten J. Cramer, Cornelis P Allaart, Frits W. Prinzen, Kevin Vernooy, Wouter M. van Everdingen, Pieter A. Doevendans, Albert C. van Rossum, Uyên Châu Nguyên, Cardiology, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, ACS - Microcirculation, Fysiologie, RS: CARIM - R2.08 - Electro mechanics, Cardiologie, and MUMC+: MA Med Staf Spec Cardiologie (9)
- Subjects
Male ,Pacemaker, Artificial ,genetic structures ,Ventricular lead ,Haemodynamic response ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Hemodynamics ,cardiac resynchronization therapy ,heart failure ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,hemodynamics ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Electrocardiography ,0302 clinical medicine ,Heart Rate ,ELECTRICAL DELAY ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective Studies ,humans ,Ejection fraction ,Left bundle branch block ,SITE ,Stroke volume ,Equipment Design ,Electrodes, Implanted ,PLACEMENT ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,TRIAL ,ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Heart Ventricles ,Cardiac resynchronization therapy ,IMPROVEMENT ,03 medical and health sciences ,QRS complex ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,cardiovascular diseases ,Aged ,Bundle branch block ,business.industry ,MORTALITY ,medicine.disease ,PRESSURE-VOLUME LOOP ,Heart failure ,stroke volume ,SETTINGS ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead. Methods and Results: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8%; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure–volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (Δ%SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9% and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5%. Δ%SW was 89±64% and varied by 39±36% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large Δ%SW (all P P Conclusions: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF