101. Value of repeat cranial computed axial tomography scanning in patients with minimal head injury
- Author
-
Alicia M. Mohr, Ziad C. Sifri, Carl J. Hauser, Adena T Homnick, David H. Livingston, Robert F. Lavery, and Anne C. Mosenthal
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Critical Care ,Traumatic brain injury ,Neurological examination ,Risk Assessment ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Neurosurgical Procedures ,Head trauma ,Cohort Studies ,Injury Severity Score ,Trauma Centers ,medicine ,Confidence Intervals ,Craniocerebral Trauma ,Humans ,Glasgow Coma Scale ,Aged ,Probability ,Retrospective Studies ,Neurologic Examination ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Head injury ,Trauma center ,Age Factors ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Female ,Radiology ,Triage ,business ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background Patients with minimal head injury (MHI) and a cranial computed axial tomography (CAT) scan positive for the presence of intracranial injury routinely undergo a repeat CAT scan within 24 hours after injury. The value of this repeat cranial CAT scan is unclear in those patients who are neurologically normal or improving. Methods A retrospective analysis of all adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma center with MHI and a positive cranial CAT scan during a 32-month period was performed. The need for neurosurgical intervention after repeat CAT scan in patients with a persistently normal or improved neurological examination was recorded. Results One hundred fifty-one patients had a persistently normal or improved neurological examination, but none of these patients required neurosurgical intervention after the repeat cranial CAT scan. Conclusions A persistently normal or improving neurological examination in a patient with MHI appears to exclude the need for neurosurgical intervention and thus a repeat cranial CAT scan.
- Published
- 2003