Search

Objective: Hypertension in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated disparities in the risk of preeclampsia based on race, educational attainment, census tract income level and household income. Yet, data on the association of insurance type, classification of hypertension in pregnancy and outcomes have not been well described. We sought to compare outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, by private versus public insurance.Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of subjects with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that delivered ≥23-week gestation at Oregon Health & Science University (October 2013-December 2017). The cohort began with the 2013 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Executive Summary on Hypertension in Pregnancy, which advised surveillance for severe features of disease in women with hypertension. Utilizing ICD-9 and ICD-10 discharge codes, followed by individual chart review, subjects were stratified into two groups by insurance status: Medicaid (public insurance), or individual or group health insurance (private insurance). As primary outcomes, we assessed severe features of preeclampsia, adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes (composite), and final hypertensive diagnosis: (i) chronic hypertension; (ii) gestational hypertension; (iii) preeclampsia without severe features and, (iv) preeclampsia with severe features. Differences in demographic and outcome data were analyzed by chi-square, t-test, and logistic regression.Results: Among 10 132 deliveries, 1335 (13.2%) were delivered with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Medicaid covered 54.1% (722) of these deliveries; 44.1% (589) were covered by private insurance, and 1.8% (24) had unknown insurance. There was a similar percentage of subjects with Medicaid or private insurance in each hypertensive group (p = .08). However, compared to subjects with private insurance, those with Medicaid had more severe blood pressure (BP) elevations (systolic BP ≥160 mmHg, p = .001) and more cases of eclampsia (p = .04), while neonates of subjects with Medicaid had more intensive care unit admissions (p = .02), and preterm births (p < .001). The association between Medicaid insurance and severe BP elevation, or adverse neonatal outcomes, persisted after multivariable adjustment.Conclusion: Medicaid was not associated with a particular hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, yet those with Medicaid experienced more severe BP elevations and higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes. More research is needed to understand potential risk factors and ways to improve outcomes for those with publicly funded insurance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the incidence and severity of preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations from 2005 to 2008 in California. The primary predictor was fetal hydrops and the primary outcome was preeclampsia. Selected adverse maternal and neonatal events were assessed as secondary outcomes. Potential confounders examined included fetal anomalies, polyhydramnios, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, chronic hypertension, and gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus.Results: We identified 337 pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops, 70.0% had a concomitant fetal anomaly and 39.8% had polyhydramnios. Compared to the general population, hydrops was associated with an increased risk for severe preeclampsia (5.26 versus 0.91%, p < .001) but not mild preeclampsia (2.86 versus 2.02%, p = .29). In multivariable analysis, fetal hydrops remained an independent risk factor for severe preeclampsia (as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 3.13, 1.91-5.14). Hydrops was also associated with increased rates of eclampsia, acute renal failure, pulmonary edema, postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, preterm birth, and neonatal death.Conclusions: We find that fetal hydrops is an independent risk factor for severe preeclampsia. In light of serious concerns for maternal and neonatal health, heightened surveillance for signs and symptoms of severe preeclampsia is warranted in all pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Situs inversus, a condition in which the major visceral organs are reversed from their normal positions in the body, can be detected by prenatal ultrasonography. Often benign, it may be associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by chronic respiratory disease. Yet, prenatal diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia has not been reported. We describe a pregnancy in which situs inversus was diagnosed by fetal ultrasound at 20 weeks gestation. Prenatal testing for primary ciliary dyskinesia led to the discovery that both parents were asymptomatic carriers of a pathogenic mutation in the CCDC103 gene, with an affected neonate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemolysis predisposes to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Yet, there are limited data on hemolysis in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy other than hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. To evaluate the prevalence and impact of hemolysis in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, we performed a retrospective cohort study at a single center (October 2013-May 2017), among women screened for hemolysis using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. We compared LDH levels by hypertensive disorder (chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and preeclampsia with severe features) and evaluated impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Data were analyzed by χ2 or t test, ANOVA, test of medians, and logistic regression. Among 8645 deliveries, 1188 (13.7%) had a hypertensive disorder. Of these, 812 (68.4%) had LDH measurement before delivery: chronic hypertension (n=152); gestational hypertension (n=209); preeclampsia (n=216); and preeclampsia with severe features (n=235). LDH ≥400 U/L (≥1.6× normal) was more common in preeclampsia with severe features compared with other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (9.8% versus 2.3%; P<0.001); adjusted odds ratio 4.52 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-9.2; P<0.001). LDH ≥400 U/L was associated with adverse maternal outcomes (41.7% versus 15.3%; P<0.001), adjusted odds ratio 3.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.7; P=0.006), and adverse neonatal outcomes (eg, preterm birth 59.4% versus 22.5%; P<0.001). We find that elevated LDH levels are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertension and preeclampsia, independent of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. Therefore, elevated LDH levels (≥1.6× normal or ≥400 U/L) may be considered a severe feature of preeclampsia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether adverse outcomes were more common in late preterm pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and growth restriction compared to those affected by preeclampsia alone.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 8927 singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia. Pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) neonates (birth weight <10th percentile) were compared to those appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery (CD) rate, CD for fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities, abruption, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), maternal transfusion, acute renal failure, and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Neonatal outcomes studied included respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), jaundice, hypoglycemia, seizure, asphyxia, neonatal death, and intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD).Results: Women with preeclampsia and SGA infants were more likely to experience abruption (5.3% versus 3.0%, p < 0.001), higher CD rate (66.5% versus 55.0%, p < 0.001), and higher likelihood of a CD for FHR abnormalities (21.7% versus 10.0%, p < 0.001). SGA infants were more likely to experience adverse neonatal outcomes including RDS (10.1% versus 4.9%, p < 0.001), jaundice (59.8% versus 39.2%, p < 0.001), hypoglycemia (8.9% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001), asphyxia (0.6% versus 0.2%, p = 0.015), and IUFD (1.5% versus 0.3%, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Preeclamptic women and their neonates were more likely to experience adverse perinatal outcomes when SGA pregnancies were compared to those with AGA neonates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]