Search

Moxifloxacin has an important role in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). Unfortunately, coadministration with the cornerstone TB drug rifampicin results in suboptimal plasma exposure. We aimed to gain insight into the moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics and the interaction with rifampicin. Moreover, we provided a mechanistic framework to understand moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics. We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model in Simcyp version 19, with available and newly generated in vitro and in vivo data, to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters of moxifloxacin alone and when administered with rifampicin. By combining these strategies, we illustrate that the role of P-glycoprotein in moxifloxacin transport is limited and implicate MRP2 as transporter of moxifloxacin-glucuronide followed by rapid hydrolysis in the gut. Simulations of multiple dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) with and without rifampicin (600 mg once daily) were in accordance with clinically observed data (predicted/observed [P/O] ratio of 0.87 and 0.80, respectively). Importantly, increasing the moxifloxacin dose to 600 mg restored the plasma exposure both in actual patients with TB as well as in our simulations. Furthermore, we extrapolated the single dose model to pediatric populations (P/O AUC ratios, 1.04-1.52) and the multiple dose model to children with TB (P/O AUC ratio, 1.51). In conclusion, our combined approach resulted in new insights into moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics and accurate simulations of moxifloxacin exposure with and without rifampicin. Finally, various knowledge gaps were identified, which may be considered as avenues for further physiologically based pharmacokinetic refinement.

Dolutegravir 50 mg is registered for use in children weighing 20-40 kg. This approval is based on data from an African paediatric cohort, and no pharmacokinetic data was available from children outside of Africa. This study provides further evidence of the effective use of dolutegravir 50 mg in children weighing 20 to 40 kg by showing that concentration data gathered in clinical practice shows adequate concentration levels in Dutch children without a safety signal.

Objectives: We report a case of incomplete HIV-1 suppression on a dolutegravir, lamivudine, and abacavir single-tablet regimen with the emergence of the H51Y and G118R integrase resistance mutations. Methods: Integrase sequencing was performed retrospectively by Sanger and next-generation sequencing. Rates of emergence and decline of resistance mutations were calculated using next-generation sequencing data. Dolutegravir plasma concentrations were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The effects of H51Y and G118R on infectivity, fitness, and susceptibility to dolutegravir were quantified using cell-based assays. Results: During periods of non-adherence to treatment, mutations were retrospectively documented only by next-generation sequencing. Misdiagnosis by Sanger sequencing was caused by the rapid decline of mutant strains within the retroviral population. This observation was also true for a M184V lamivudine-resistant reverse transcriptase mutation found in association with integrase mutations on single HIV genomes. Resistance rebound upon treatment re-initiation was swift (>8000 copies per day). Next-generation sequencing indicated cumulative adherence to treatment. Compared to WT HIV-1, relative infectivity was 73%, 38%, and 43%; relative fitness was 100%, 35%, and 10% for H51Y, G118R, and H51Y+G118R viruses, respectively. H51Y did not change the susceptibility to dolutegravir, but G188R and H51Y+G118R conferred 7- and 28-fold resistance, respectively. Conclusion: This case illustrates how poorly-fit drug-resistant viruses wax and wane alongside erratic treatment adherence and are easily misdiagnosed by Sanger sequencing. We recommend next-generation sequencing to improve the clinical management of incomplete virological suppression with dolutegravir.

Pemetrexed is a cytotoxic drug for first-line treatment of lung cancer. It is often combined with other anticancer drugs such as cisplatin or carboplatin. In clinical practice, hyperhydration regimens are applied to overcome cisplatin-related nephrotoxicity. As pemetrexed is almost completely eliminated from the body by the kidneys, hyperhydration can result in augmented clearance. Furthermore, administration of large quantities of fluid may increase the volume of distribution of pemetrexed. Pharmacokinetics and, thus, efficacy and toxicity may be influenced by hyperhydration. This has not yet been properly studied. We performed a population pharmacokinetic analysis to assess hyperhydration as a covariate for pemetrexed clearance and for volume of distribution A relevant change was defined as >25% increase in clearance or volume of distribution. In our extensive dataset of 133 individuals, we found that hyperhydration did not significantly or relevantly explain variability in pemetrexed clearance (unchanged, P =.196) or volume of distribution (+7% change, P =.002), despite a power of >99% to detect a relevant change. Therefore, dose adjustments of pemetrexed are not required during hyperhydration with cisplatin.

Once-daily two 600 mg tablets (1200 mg q.d.) raltegravir offers an easier treatment option compared to the twice-daily regimen of one 400 mg tablet. No pharmacokinetic, efficacy, or safety data of the 1200 mg q.d. regimen have been reported in pregnant women to date as it is challenging to collect these clinical data. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetic profile of raltegravir 1200 mg q.d. in pregnant women and to discuss the expected pharmacodynamic properties of raltegravir 1200 mg q.d. during pregnancy based on previously reported concentration-effect relationships. Data from 11 pharmacokinetic studies were pooled (n = 221). A two-compartment model with first-order elimination and absorption through three sequential transit compartments best described the data. We assessed that the bio-availability of the 600 mg tablets was 21% higher as the 400 mg tablets, and the bio-availability in pregnant women was 49% lower. Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to predict the pharmacokinetic profile of 1200 mg q.d. in pregnant and nonpregnant women. The primary criteria for efficacy were that the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the concentration before next dose administration (C-trough) geometric mean ratio (GMR) of simulated pregnant/nonpregnant women had to be greater than 0.75. The simulated raltegravir C-trough GMR (90% CI) was 0.51 (0.41-0.63), hence not meeting the primary target for efficacy. Clinical data from two pregnant women using 1200 mg q.d. raltegravir showed a similar C-trough ratio pregnant/nonpregnant. Our pharmacokinetic results support the current recommendation of not using the raltegravir 1200 mg q.d. regimen during pregnancy until more data on the exposure-response relationship becomes available.