Escapes from conventional box traps, especially by previously captured animals, prompted development of an improved trap to catch woodchucks (Marmota monax). A comparison of trapping periods with improved and conventional traps showed a marked increase in the number of woodchucks captured with the improved trap, as well as an increase in the proportion of previously marked animals held. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 39(2):439-442 Although improvements in traps frequently are mentioned, data to support the contention rarely are presented. This paper describes some changes in design and presents data showing increased efficiency. A 1955-70 study of the woodchuck population on Letterkenny Army Depot, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, required the use of live traps to capture the animals. Early in the project, woodchucks were trapped with box traps similar to those described by Mosby (1955) and Taber and Cowan (1969:284). The trap had a wooden treadle to which was fastened a heavy gauge wire supporting the door which fell from the inside when the treadle was depressed. It became evident that these traps were not efficient in holding woodchucks. The tendency of woodchucks to escape was greater for those with previous trap experience than for those captured for the first time. Woodchucks escaped by one of two means: (1) reaching in past the treadle for the bait while balancing the door on their backs, and then backing out, or (2) turning around and lifting the door with a front foot. A slight nick or hole in the bottom edge of the door provided a toehold for woodchucks to lift the door. If the bottom edge of the door fitted tightly, a few minutes of chewing provided the necessary hold. Trump and Hendrickson (1943) stated that woodchucks pushed on such a door but did not pull on it. MATERIALS AND METHODS The trap (Fig. 1) length was increased to 36 inches to prevent woodchucks from stealing the bait without being captured. A transom catch was used as a latch to sto animals from lifting the door from inside. Driving three nails through the top of the trap near the back end and addition of a metal lining to the inside of the door thwarted animals' attempts to chew out of traps. In addition, the triggering mechanism was improved and simplified by using a wooden post rather than wire. The post makes the trap easier to construct, easier to set, harder to trip accidentally, and easier to repair. The following materials were used: 2 pcs., 36 x 1 x 8-inch pine, top and bottom; 2 pcs., 36 x 1 x 10-inch pine, sides; 1 pc., 18 x 1 x 7-inch pine, treadle; 1 pc., 10 x 1 x 7-inch pine, door; 1 pc., 6 x 2 x 2-inch pine, treadle post; 1 pc., 8.5 x 7-inch aluminum "valley tin" or heavy sheet aluminum, door lining; 1, 10 x 9-inch piece of 1 x 2-inch welded wire, back end; 1, reversible transom catch; 4, 2-inch-#7 flat-head wood screws; 30, 0.75-inch wire staples; 21, 8d box nails; and 24, 0.75-inch 16 gauge nails. SStudy supported by National Institutes of Health (Grant HE12295). J. Wildl. Manage. 39(2):1975 439 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.17 on Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:28:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 440 AN IMPROVED WOODCHUCK TRAP Ludwig and Davis