Search

The immunocytes that regulate papillomavirus infection and lesion development in humans and animals remain largely undefined. We found that immunocompetent mice with varying H-2 haplotypes displayed asymptomatic skin infection that produced L1 when challenged with 6×1010 MusPV1 virions, the recently identified domestic mouse papillomavirus (also designated “MmuPV1”), but were uniformly resistant to MusPV1-induced papillomatosis. Broad immunosuppression with cyclosporin A resulted in variable induction of papillomas after experimental infection with a similar dose, from robust in Cr:ORL SENCAR to none in C57BL/6 mice, with lesional outgrowth correlating with early viral gene expression and partly with reported strain-specific susceptibility to chemical carcinogens, but not with H-2 haplotype. Challenge with 1×1012 virions in the absence of immunosuppression induced small transient papillomas in Cr:ORL SENCAR but not in C57BL/6 mice. Antibody-induced depletion of CD3+ T cells permitted efficient virus replication and papilloma formation in both strains, providing experimental proof for the crucial role of T cells in controlling papillomavirus infection and associated disease. In Cr:ORL SENCAR mice, immunodepletion of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was sufficient for efficient infection and papillomatosis, although deletion of one subset did not inhibit the recruitment of the other subset to the infected epithelium. Thus, the functional cooperation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is required to protect this strain. In contrast, C57BL/6 mice required depletion of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells for infection and papillomatosis, and separate CD4 knock-out and CD8 knock-out C57BL/6 were also resistant. Thus, in C57BL/6 mice, either CD4+ or CD8+ T cell-independent mechanisms exist that can protect this particular strain from MusPV1-associated disease. These findings may help to explain the diversity of pathological outcomes in immunocompetent humans after infection with a specific human papillomavirus genotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Through their functional diversification, distinct lineages of CD4+ T cells can act to either drive or constrain immune-mediated pathology. Transcription factors are critical in the generation of cellular diversity, and negative regulators antagonistic to alternate fates often act in conjunction with positive regulators to stabilize lineage commitment. Genetic polymorphisms within a single locus encoding the transcription factor BACH2 are associated with numerous autoimmune and allergic diseases including asthma, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease, vitiligo, multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes. Although these associations point to a shared mechanism underlying susceptibility to diverse immune-mediated diseases, a function for BACH2 in the maintenance of immune homeostasis has not been established. Here, by studying mice in which the Bach2 gene is disrupted, we define BACH2 as a broad regulator of immune activation that stabilizes immunoregulatory capacity while repressing the differentiation programs of multiple effector lineages in CD4+ T cells. BACH2 was required for efficient formation of regulatory (Treg) cells and consequently for suppression of lethal inflammation in a manner that was Treg-cell-dependent. Assessment of the genome-wide function of BACH2, however, revealed that it represses genes associated with effector cell differentiation. Consequently, its absence during Treg polarization resulted in inappropriate diversion to effector lineages. In addition, BACH2 constrained full effector differentiation within TH1, TH2 and TH17 cell lineages. These findings identify BACH2 as a key regulator of CD4+ T-cell differentiation that prevents inflammatory disease by controlling the balance between tolerance and immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Regulatory T cells are critically involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Recently, a novel subset of regulatory T cells has been described in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), However, the role of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells in the pathogenesis of SLE is not known. The authors therefore performed comparative analyses of proportions of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells in SLE patients with different organ manifestations. Methods Phenotypic analysis of peripheral blood CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells was performed by flow cytometry (FACS) in SLE patients with different organ manifestations and healthy controls (HC). CD4CD25Foxp3 as well as conventional regulatory T cells were analysed for the expression of the recently identified marker Helios and Icos and for their cytokine expression profile and correlated with clinical data, the daily cortisone dose and the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). Results The authors report that the proportions of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells are increased in patients with SLE as compared to HC. Expression of Helios and ICOS in CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells was similar to conventional Tregs, indicating that CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells are bona fide Tregs. Strikingly analysis of patients with different organ manifestations revealed increased proportions of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells in SLE patients with renal involvement, especially with active glomerulonephritis. Furthermore roportions of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells correlated with the extent of proteinuria. Ongoing experiments are performed in order to analyse the origin of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells. Therefore cells are stained for interleukin-4, interleukin-17 and IFN-γ and the transcription factor Foxp3, RORγt and GATA3. Conclusions In summary the authors found increased proportions of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells in patients with SLE who suffer from glomerulonephritis suggesting their involvement in kidney pathology. CD4CD25Foxp3 T cells might therefore be a useful tool to recognise and monitor patients with renal involvement. Kidney biopsies and a further characterisation of this cell population have been designed to unravel their role in the development of glomerulonephritis in SLE patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) contribute to shaping many aspects of T cell lineage functions in anti-infective surveillance; however, their role in fungus-specific immune responses remains poorly understood. Using a T cell-specific deletion of HDAC1, we uncover its critical role in limiting polarization toward Th17 by restricting expression of the cytokine receptors gp130 and transforming growth factor β receptor 2 (TGF-βRII) in a fungus-specific manner, thus limiting Stat3 and Smad2/3 signaling. Controlled release of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is vital to minimize apoptotic processes in renal tubular epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Consequently, animals harboring excess Th17-polarized HDCA1-deficient CD4 + T cells develop increased kidney pathology upon invasive Candida albicans infection. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of class I HDACs similarly increased IL-17A release by both mouse and human CD4 + T cells. Collectively, this work shows that HDAC1 controls T cell polarization, thus playing a critical role in the antifungal immune defense and infection outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Impaired immune response to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccination has been reported in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Repetitive vaccinations are recommended for this vulnerable group. Due to the high diversity within IEI patients, additional safety and immunogenicity data are needed to better understand these aspects especially in less common immunodeficiency syndromes. In this prospective open-label clinical trial, we assessed the humoral immune response and the T‑cell response in patients with IEI or severe MBL (mannose-binding lectin) deficiency (IEI/MBLdef) after three vaccinations. A total of 16 patients and 16 matched healthy controls (HC) with suboptimal humoral response defined by anti-SARS-CoV‑2 RBD (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 receptor binding domain) antibodies below 1500 BAU/ml (binding antibody units per ml) after the second COVID-19 vaccination were enrolled in this study and qualified for a third mRNA vaccine dose. After 4 weeks following vaccination, 100% of HC and 75% of IEI/MBLdef patients exhibited anti-SARS-CoV‑2 RBD antibodies > 1500 BAU/ml, although the difference was not statistically significant (75% vs. 100%; p = 0.109). Although post-vaccination IEI/MBLdef patients demonstrated significantly increased anti-SARS-CoV‑2 RBD antibodies and neutralizing antibodies compared to baseline, these responses were significantly lower in IEI/MBLdef patients compared to HCs. Notably, the third vaccination augmented the cellular immune response to both wild-type and omicron peptide stimulation. No serious adverse events were reported within the 4‑week follow-up period and, importantly, vaccination had little to no effect on the long-term disease activity and fatigue. This trial strongly supports the recommendation of repeated COVID-19 vaccinations for patients suffering from immunodeficiencies, especially when they exhibit an initially limited response to the vaccine., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Due to optimised treatment strategies and the availability of new therapies during the last decades, formerly devastating chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic sclerosis (SSc) have become less menacing. However, in many patients, even state-of-the-art treatment cannot induce remission. Moreover, the risk for flares strongly increases once anti-inflammatory therapy is tapered or withdrawn, suggesting that underlying pathological processes remain active even in the absence of overt inflammation. It has become evident that tissues have the ability to remember past encounters with pathogens, wounds and other irritants, and to react more strongly and/or persistently to the next occurrence. This priming of the tissue bears a paramount role in defence from microbes, but on the other hand drives inflammatory pathologies (the Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde aspect of tissue adaptation). Emerging evidence suggests that long-lived tissue-resident cells, such as fibroblasts, macrophages, long-lived plasma cells and tissue-resident memory T cells, determine inflammatory tissue priming in an interplay with infiltrating immune cells of lymphoid and myeloid origin, and with systemically acting factors such as cytokines, extracellular vesicles and antibodies. Here, we review the current state of science on inflammatory tissue priming, focusing on tissue-resident and tissue-occupying cells in arthritis and SSc, and reflect on the most promising treatment options targeting the maladapted tissue response during these diseases., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Background: Various SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns (VOCs) characterized by higher transmissibility and immune evasion have emerged. Despite reduced vaccine efficacy against VOCs, currently available vaccines provide protection. Population-based evidence on the humoral immune response after booster vaccination is crucial to guide future vaccination strategies and in preparation for imminent COVID-19 waves., Methods: This multicenter, population-based cohort study included 4697 individuals ≥18 years of age who received a booster vaccination. Antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies against wild-type (WT) virus and Omicron variants were assessed at baseline (day of booster vaccination) and after four weeks. Safety was evaluated daily within the first week using a participant-completed electronic diary. Antibody levels were compared across different vaccination strategies, taking into account individual host factors., Results: Our main model including 3838 participants revealed that individuals who received a booster with mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 vaccine had a significantly higher increase (95 %CI) in anti-RBD-antibody levels (37,707 BAU/mL [34,575-40,839] vs. 27,176 BAU/mL [26,265-28,087]), and of neutralization levels against WT (1,681 [1490-1872] vs. 1141 [1004-1278] and Omicron variant (422 [369-474] vs. 329 [284-374]). Neutralizing antibody titres highly correlated with anti-RBD antibodies, with neutralizing capacity 4.4 fold higher against WT compared to Omicron. No differences in safety were found between the two booster vaccines., Conclusion: Our study underlines the superiority of a booster vaccination with mRNA-1273, independent of the primary vaccination and therefore provides guidance on the vaccination strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and a substantial contributor to hospitalisation, increased morbidity, and mortality. In-vivo evidence of ongoing tissue remodelling in IIM-ILD is scarce. We aimed to evaluate fibroblast activation in lungs of IIM-patients and control individuals using ⁶⁸Ga-labelled inhibitor of Fibroblast-Activation-Protein (FAPi) based positronic emission tomography and computed tomography imaging (PET/CT)., Methods: In this prospective observational pilot study, consecutive patients with IIM and participants without rheumatic conditions or ILD serving as a control group were recruited at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and underwent FAPi PET/CT imaging. Standard-of-care procedures including clinical examination, assessment of severity of dyspnoea, high-resolution computed tomography (HR-CT), and pulmonary function testing (PFT) were performed on all patients with IIM at baseline and for patients with IIM-ILD at follow-up of 12 months. Baseline pulmonary FAPi-uptake was assessed by the maximum (SUVmax) and mean (SUVmean) standardized uptake values (SUV) over the whole lung (wl). SUV was corrected for blood pool background activity and target-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated. We compared pulmonary FAPi-uptake between patients with IIM-ILD and those without ILD, as well as controls, and correlated baseline FAP-uptake with standard diagnostic tools such as HR-CT and PFT. For predictive implications, we investigated whether patients with IIM and progressive ILD exhibited higher baseline FAPi-uptake compared to those with stable ILD. Metrics are reported as mean with standard deviation (±SD)., Findings: Between November 16, 2021 and October 10, 2022, a total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study. Three participants from the control group were excluded due to cardiopulmonary disease. In individuals with IIM-ILD (n = 14), wlTBR max and wlTBR mean were significantly increased as compared with both non-ILD-IIM patients (n = 5) and the control group (n = 16): wlTBR max : 2.06 ± 1.04 vs. 1.04 ± 0.22 (p = 0.019) and 1.08 ± 0.19 (p = 0.0012) and wlTBR mean : 0.45 ± 0.19 vs. 0.26 ± 0.06 (p = 0.025) and 0.27 ± 0.07 (p = 0.0024). Similar values were observed in wlTBR max or wlTBR mean between non-ILD IIM patients and the control group. Patients with progressive ILD displayed significantly enhanced wlTBR max and wlTBR mean values at baseline compared to patients with stable ILD: wlTBR max : 1.30 ± 0.31 vs. 2.63 ± 1.04 (p = 0.0084) and wlTBR mean : 0.32 ± 0.08 vs. 0.55 ± 0.19 (p = 0.021). Strong correlations were found between FAPi-uptake and disease extent on HR-CT (wlTBRmax: R = 0.42, p = 0.07; wlTBRmean: R = 0.56, p = 0.013) and severity of respiratory symptoms determined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification tool (wlTBRmax: R = 0.52, p = 0.022; wlTBRmean: R = 0.59, p = 0.0073). Further, pulmonary FAPi-uptake showed inverse correlation with forced vital capacity (FVC) (wlTBRmax: R = -0.56, p = 0.012; wlTBRmean: R = -0.64, p = 0.0033) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (wlTBRmax: R = -0.52, p = 0.028; wlTBRmean: R = -0.68, p = 0.0017)., Interpretation: Our study demonstrates higher fibroblast activation in patients with IIM-ILD compared to non-ILD patients and controls. Intensity of pulmonary FAPi accumulation was associated with progression of ILD. Considering that this study was carried out on a small population, FAPi PET/CT may serve as a useful non-invasive tool for risk stratification of lung disease in IIM., Funding: The Austrian Research Fund., Competing Interests: KK reports honoraria for lectures and presentations from UCB Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and AbbVie; support for attending meetings and/or travel: AbbVie, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb. ES reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. DM reports honoraria from AstraZeneca and travel support from Pfizer. MB received grants from GSK. HP received grants from Siemens, Boehringer-Ingelheim and AstraZeneca; reported honoraria for lectures and presentations from Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Roche, and participation on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Siemens and Boehringer-Ingelheim. DA received grants, speaker fees, or consultancy fees from Abbvie, Gilead, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. HR reports honoraria for lectures and presentations from Gilead, Merck and Pfizer; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen. TSN, OCK, IG, HPK, FP, WL, TTW, SB, MH, and PM declare no competing interests., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: The significance of muscle biopsy as a diagnostic tool in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) remains elusive. We aimed to determine the diagnostic weight that has been given to muscle biopsy in patients with suspected IIM, particularly in terms of clinical diagnosis and therapeutic decisions., Material and Methods: In this retrospective multicentric study, we analyzed muscle biopsy results of adult patients with suspected IIM referred to a tertiary center between January 1, 2007, and October 31, 2021. Information regarding referral department, suspected diagnosis, biopsy site, demographic, clinical, laboratory data, and imaging results were extracted. Statistical analyses included the level of agreement between suspected and histological diagnosis and calculation of diagnostic performance (positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity of muscle biopsy in relation to clinical diagnosis and/or treatment initiation). Performance was tested in different strata based on clinical pre-test probability., Results: Among 758 muscle biopsies, IIM was histologically compatible in 357/758 (47.1%) cases. Proportion of IIM was higher if there was a solid clinical pre-test probability (64.3% vs. 42.4% vs. 48% for high, medium and low pre-test probability). Sensitivity and specificity of muscle biopsy were highest (82%) when the diagnosis by the clinician was used as outcome scenario. Negative predictive value was only moderate (between 63% and 80%) and lowest if autoantibodies were positive (35%)., Conclusion: In patients with clinically suspected IIM, approximately 50% of biopsies revealed features indicative of IIM. Diagnostic performance of muscle biopsy was moderate to high depending on clinical pre-test probability., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest KK reports honoraria for lectures and presentations from UCB Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and AbbVie; support for attending meetings and/or travel: AbbVie, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb. DM reports support for meeting attendances from Pfizer and personal fees from AstraZeneca. DA received grants, speaker fees, or consultancy fees from Abbvie, Gilead, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. MB received grants from GSK. HR reports honoraria for lectures and presentations from Gilead, Merck and Pfizer; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen. NNL, MGT, EG, SH, RH, FZ, HC, ELP, PMH, HPK and LXH have no financial relationship to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Fundamental insight gained over the last decades led to the discovery of cytokines as pivotal drivers of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis/psoriasis arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, atopic dermatitis and spondylarthritis. A deeper understanding of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects of various cytokines has prompted new cytokine-targeting therapies, which revolutionised the treatment options in the last years for patients with inflammatory disorders. Disease-associated immune responses typically involve a complex interplay of multiple cytokines. Therefore, blockade of one single cytokine does not necessarily lead to a persistent remission in all patients with inflammatory disorders and fostered new therapeutic strategies targeting intracellular pathways shared by multiple cytokines. By inhibiting JAK-STAT signalling pathways common to families of cytokines, JAK-inhibitors (JAKinibs) have created a new paradigm for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Multiple agents have been approved for various disorders and more are being investigated for several new indications. Second-generation selective JAKinibs have been devised with the aim to achieve an increased selectivity and a possible reduced risk of side effects. In the current review, we will summarise the current body of evidence of pan versus selective JAKinibs and the most recent insights on new side effects and indications, including COVID-19., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JSS is main editor of the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Structural reorganisation of the synovium with expansion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) and influx of immune cells is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Activated FLS are increasingly recognised as a critical component driving synovial tissue remodelling by interacting with immune cells resulting in distinct synovial pathotypes of RA., Methods: Automated high-content fluorescence microscopy of co-cultured cytokine-activated FLS and autologous peripheral CD4 + T cells from patients with RA was established to quantify cell-cell interactions. Phenotypic profiling of cytokine-treated FLS and co-cultured T cells was done by flow cytometry and RNA-Seq, which were integrated with publicly available transcriptomic data from patients with different histological synovial pathotypes. Computational prediction and knock-down experiments were performed in FLS to identify adhesion molecules for cell-cell interaction., Results: Cytokine stimulation, especially with TNF-α, led to enhanced FLS-T cell interaction resulting in cell-cell contact-dependent activation, proliferation and differentiation of T cells. Signatures of cytokine-activated FLS were significantly enriched in RA synovial tissues defined as lymphoid-rich or leucocyte-rich pathotypes, with the most prominent effects for TNF-α. FLS cytokine signatures correlated with the number of infiltrating CD4 + T cells in synovial tissue of patients with RA. Ligand-receptor pair interaction analysis identified ICAM1 on FLS as an important mediator in TNF-mediated FLS-T cell interaction. Both, ICAM1 and its receptors were overexpressed in TNF-treated FLS and co-cultured T cells. Knock-down of ICAM1 in FLS resulted in reduced TNF-mediated FLS-T cell interaction., Conclusion: Our study highlights the role of cytokine-activated FLS in orchestrating inflammation-associated synovial pathotypes providing novel insights into disease mechanisms of RA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MB reports about personal fees from Eli-Lilly and received grants from Galapagos, DA received grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sandozand is an editorial board member of Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, JSS reports about grants, consulting and personal fees from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung and UCB and is editor-in-chief of Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. ES reports speaker fees from Eli-Lilly and supports for attendance of meetings from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim and Astra Zeneca. CP and is an editorial board member of Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. The authors CP and MJL are named inventors on a patent application (no. GB 2100821.4), submitted by Queen Mary University of London, that covers methods used to select treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To investigate the immunogenicity and safety of BNT162b2 booster vaccination with and without a tetravalent influenza vaccine., Methods: A prospective, open-label cohort study on immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 booster vaccination with or without a tetravalent influenza vaccine was performed. Eight hundred thirty-eight health care workers were included in the following study arms: BNT162b2 booster-only, influenza-vaccine-only or combination of both. Levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain, and haemagglutinin inhibition tested for four different influenza strains (A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B/Victoria, B/Yamagata) were measured at the time of vaccination and 4 weeks later., Results: After 4 weeks, median (interquartile range) levels of antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the viral spike (S) protein and relative change from baseline were high in individuals who received BNTb162b2 booster vaccination only (absolute: 16 600 [10 980-24 360] vs. 12 630 [8198-18 750] BAU/mL [p < 0.0001]; relative increase: 49% [23.6-95.3] vs. 40% [21.9-80.6] [p 0.048]; booster-only n = 521 vs. combination-arm n = 229 respectively). Results were confirmed after matching for sex, age, body mass index, baseline antibody levels and vaccine compound received for primary immunization (absolute: 13 930 [10 610-22 760] vs. 12 520 [8710-17 940]; [p 0.031]; relative increase: 55.7% [27.8-98.5] vs. 42.2% [22.9-74.5]; p 0.045). Adverse events were almost identical in the booster-only and the combination-arm, but numerically low in the influenza arm (525/536 [97.9%] vs. 235/240 [97.9%] vs. 26/33 [78.8 %])., Discussion: Although no safety concerns occurred, our study provides evidence on reduced immunogenicity of a BNT162b2 booster vaccination in combination with a tetravalent influenza vaccine. Further studies investigating new influenza variants as well as potential differences vaccine effectiveness are needed., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: An understanding vaccine-dependent effects on protective and sustained humoral immune response is crucial to planning future vaccination strategies against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: In this multicenter, population-based, cohort study including 4601 individuals after primary vaccination against COVID-19 ≥ 4 months earlier we compared factors associated with residual antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) across different vaccination strategies (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1)., Results: Our main model including 3787 individuals (2 × BNT162b2, n = 2271; 2 × mRNA-1273, n = 251; 2 × ChAdOx1, n = 1265), predicted significantly lower levels of anti-RBD antibodies after 6 months in individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 (392.7 binding antibody units per milliliter [BAU/mL]) compared with those vaccinated with BNT162b2 (1179.5 BAU/mL) or mRNA-1273 (2098.2 BAU/mL). Vaccine-dependent association of antibody levels was found for age with a significant predicted difference in BAU/ml per year for BNT162b2 (-21.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -24.7 to -18.3) and no significant association for mRNA-1273 (-4.0; 95% CI, -20.0 to 12.1) or ChAdOx1 (1.7; 95% CI, .2 to 3.1). The predicted decrease over time since full immunization was highest in mRNA-1273 (-23.4; 95% CI, -31.4 to -15.4) compared with BNT162b2 (-5.9; 95% CI, -7 to -4.8)., Conclusions: Our study revealed population-based evidence of vaccine-dependent effects of age and time since full immunization on humoral immune response. Findings underline the importance of individualized vaccine selection, especially in elderly individuals., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This nationwide Austrian consensus statement summarizes the recommendations on the management of latent tuberculosis by treatment with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. The essential questions with respect to screening and preventive treatment were discussed by experts from the disciplines of rheumatology, pneumology, infectious diseases, dermatology and gastroenterology, based on the available data, and then a joint consensus was formed by agreement. This involved a differentiated discussion on the various forms of treatment, and clear recommendations were formulated., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objectives: A third COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for immunosuppressed patients. However, data on immunogenicity and safety of a third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are sparse and therefore addressed within this clinical trial., Methods: 60 immunosuppressed patients and 48 healthy controls (HCs) received a third vaccination with an mRNA vaccine. The primary endpoint was defined as the presence of antibody levels against the receptor-binding domain (RBD)>1500 BAU/mL in patients with IMIDs versus HCs. Further endpoints included differences in neutralising antibodies and cellular immune responses after the third vaccination. Reactogenicity was recorded for 7 days, and safety was evaluated until week 4., Results: Rate of individuals with anti-RBD antibodies>1500 BAU/mL was not significantly different after the third vaccination between patients with IMIDs and HCs (91% vs 100% p=0.101). Anti-RBD and neutralising antibody levels were significantly lower in patients with IMIDs after the third vaccination than in HCs (p=0.002 and p=0.016, respectively). In contrast, fold increase in antibody levels between week 0 and 4 was higher in patients with IMIDs. Treatment with biological (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) or combination of bDMARDs and conventional synthetic DMARDs was associated with reduced antibody levels. Enhanced cellular immune response to wild type and Omicron peptide stimulation was observed after the third vaccination. No serious adverse event was attributed to the third vaccination., Conclusion: Our clinical trial data support the immunogenicity and safety of a third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IMIDs. However, effects of DMARD therapy on immunogenicity should be considered., Trial Registration Number: EudraCT No: 2021-002693-10., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DM reports support for meeting attendances from Pfizer. AK reports about contracts and personal fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Merck Sharp and Dohme. PM reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis and research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB. JSS reports about grants, consulting and personal fees from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung and UCB. AH reports fees from MDGH. HH received grants from Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis. DA received grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sandoz. MB reports about personal fees from Eli-Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: A 3 rd COVID-19 vaccination is currently recommended for patients under immunosuppression. However, a fast decline of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein has been observed. Currently it remains unclear whether immunosuppressive therapy affects kinetics of humoral and cellular immune responses., Methods: 50 patients under immunosuppression and 42 healthy controls (HCs) received a 3 rd dose of an mRNA-based vaccine and were monitored over a 12-weeks period. Humoral immune response was assessed 4 and 12 weeks after 3 rd dose. Antibodies were quantified using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike immunoassay against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were quantified by IFN-γ ELISpot assays. Adverse events, including SARS-CoV-2 infections, were monitored over a 12-week period., Results: At week 12, reduced anti-RBD antibody levels were observed in IMID patients as compared to HCs (median antibody level 5345 BAU/ml [1781-10,208] versus 9650 BAU/ml [6633-16,050], p < 0.001). Reduction in relative antibody levels was significantly higher in IMID patients as compared to HCs at week 12 (p < 0.001). Lowest anti-RBD antibody levels were detected in IMID patients who received biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or a combination therapy with conventional synthetic and biological DMARDs. Number of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells against wildtype and Omicron variants remained stable over 12 weeks in IMID patients. No serious adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Due to a fast decline in anti-RBD antibodies in IMID patients an early 4 th vaccination should be considered in this vulnerable group of patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest DM reports support for meeting attendances from Pfizer and consultation fees from AstraZeneca; JS reports about grants, consulting and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Samsung, Sanofi, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz Roche, Samsung and UCB and grants from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche; HR received speaker fees from Gilead, Merck Sharp and Pfizer and travel support from Janssen; HH received grants from Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis; DA received grants, speaker fees, or consultancy fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Galapagos, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi; RK reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Takeda Pharma, MEDahead and Janssen Cilag and speaker fees from Otsuka; ES received travel support from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Boehringer-Ingelheim and speaker fees from Lilly; MB reports about personal fees from Eli-Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This publication provides a thorough analysis of the most relevant topics concerning the management of latent tuberculosis when using biologic and targeted synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by a multidisciplinary, select committee of Austrian physicians. The committee includes members of the Austrian Societies for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Pulmonology, Infectiology, Dermatology and Gastroenterology. Consensus was reached on issues regarding screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis and includes separate recommendations for each biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Impaired response to COVID-19 vaccination is of particular concern in immunosuppressed patients. To determine the best vaccination strategy for this vulnerable group we performed a single center, 1:1 randomized blinded clinical trial. Patients who failed to seroconvert upon two mRNA vaccinations (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) are randomized to receive either a third dose of the same mRNA or the vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Primary endpoint is the difference in SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody seroconversion rate between vector and mRNA vaccinated patients four weeks after the third dose. Secondary outcomes include cellular immune responses. Seroconversion rates at week four are significantly higher in the mRNA (homologous vaccination, 15/24, 63%) as compared to the vector vaccine group (heterologous vaccination, 4/22, 18%). SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses are reduced but could be increased after a third dose of either vector or mRNA vaccine. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, patient age and vaccine type are associated with seroconversion. No serious adverse event is attributed to COVID-19 booster vaccination. Efficacy and safety data underline the importance of a booster vaccination and support the use of a homologous mRNA booster vaccination in immunosuppressed patients.Trial registration: EudraCT No.: 2021-002693-10., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Epidemiological and experimental data implicate cutaneous human papillomavirus infection as co-factor in the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs), particularly in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients (OTRs). Herein, we established and characterized a skin cancer model, in which Mus musculus papillomavirus 1 (MmuPV1) infection caused cSCCs in cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated mice, even in the absence of UV light. Development of cSCCs and their precursors were observed in 70% of MmuPV1-infected, CsA-treated mice on back as well as on tail skin. Immunosuppression by systemic CsA, but not UV-B irradiation, was a prerequisite, as immunocompetent or UV-B-irradiated mice did not develop skin malignancies after infection. In the virus-driven cSCCs the MmuPV1-E6/E7 oncogenes were abundantly expressed, and transcriptional activity and productive infection demonstrated. MmuPV1 infection induced the expression of phosphorylated H2AX, but not degradation of proapoptotic BAK in the cSCCs. Transfer of primary cells, established from a MmuPV1-induced cSCC from back skin, into athymic nude mice gave rise to secondary cSCCs, which lacked viral DNA, demonstrating that maintenance of the malignant phenotype was virus independent. This papillomavirus-induced skin cancer model opens future investigations into viral involvement, pathogenesis, and cancer surveillance, aiming at understanding and controlling the high incidence of skin cancer in OTRs., (© 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: The vaccines against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) approved in the European Union represent a decisive step in the fight against the pandemic. The application of these available vaccines to patients with pre-existing immunological conditions leads to a multitude of questions regarding efficacy, side effects and the necessary patient information., Results: This review article provides insight into mechanisms of action of the currently available severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and summarises the current state of science as well as expert recommendations regarding tolerability of the vaccines. In addition, the potential to develop protective immune responses is determined. A special focus is given on patients under immunosuppression or in treatment with immunomodulatory drugs. Special groups of the population such as children, pregnant women and the elderly are also considered., Conclusion: Despite the need for a patient-specific risk-benefit assessment, the consensus among experts is that patients with immunological diseases in particular benefit from the induced immune protection after COVID-19 vaccination and do not have an increased risk of side effects., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestP.M. Brunner is an employee of the Medical University of Vienna and has received personal fees from LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Celgene, UCB Pharma, Biotest, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Amgen and Arena Pharmaceuticals. He also works as an investigator on behalf of Novartis and has received grants for his institute. T. Eiwegger serves as principal investigator for DBV’s company-sponsored studies and as a secondary investigator (sub-investigator) for Regeneron. He also receives grants from Innovation Fund Denmark and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) outside the submitted work. He is co-investigator or scientific lead in three investigator-initiated oral immunotherapy studies supported by the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program‘SickKids’. In addition, serves as Associate Editor for Allergy. He/his laboratory has received unconditional in-kind support from Macro Array Diagnostics and ALK. He also serves as an Advisory Board Member for ALK. W. Reinisch has acted in an advisory capacity for: Abbvie, Algernon, Amgen, AM Pharma, AMT, AOP Orphan, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Avaxia, Roland Berger GmBH, Bioclinica, Biogen IDEC, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cellerix, Chemocentryx, Celgene, Centocor, Celltrion, Covance, Danone Austria, DSM, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ernest & Young, Falk Pharma GmbH, Ferring, Galapagos, Gatehouse Bio Inc., Genentech, Gilead, Grünenthal, ICON, Index Pharma, Inova, Intrinsic Imaging, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Lipid Therapeutics, LivaNova, Mallinckrodt, Medahead, MedImmune, Millenium, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Nash Pharmaceuticals, Nestle, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ocera, OMass, Otsuka, Parexel, PDL, Periconsulting, Pharmacosmos, Philip Morris Institute, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Prometheus, Protagonist, Provention, Quell Therapeutics, Robarts Clinical Trial, Sandoz, Schering-Plough, Second Genome, Seres Therapeutics, Setpointmedical, Sigmoid, Sublimity, Takeda, Therakos, Theravance, Tigenix, UCB, Vifor, Zealand, Zyngenia and 4SC. E. Untersmayr, E. Förster-Waldl, M. Bonelli,K. Boztug, K. Eller, L. Göschl, K. Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, W. Hötzenecker, G. Jordakieva, A.R. Moschen, B. Pfaller, W. Pickl, U. Wiedermann, L. Klimek, K.-C. Bergmann, R. Brehler, W. Pfützner, N. Novak, H. Merk, U. Rabe, W. Schlenter, J. Ring, W. Wehrmann, N. Mülleneisen, H. Wrede, T. Fuchs and E. Jensen-Jarolim declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Autoimmune diseases, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) are characterized by the breakdown of immunological tolerance. Defects of regulatory T cells have been described among the various mechanisms, that are important for the development of autoimmune diseases, due to their critical role as regulators of peripheral immune tolerance and homeostasis. Initially T suppressor cells have been described as one population of peripheral T cells. Based on new technological advances a new understanding of the heterogeneity of different Treg cell populations in the lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissue has evolved over the last years. While initially Foxp3 has been defined as the main master regulator of Treg cells, we have learned that Treg cells from various tissue can be identified by a specific transcriptomic and epigenetic signature. Epigenetic mechanisms allow Treg cell stability, but we have also learned that certain Treg subsets are plastic and can under specific circumstances even enhance autoimmunity and inflammatory processes. Quantitative and functional defects of Treg cells have been observed in a variety of autoimmune diseases. Due to our understanding of the nature of this cell population, Treg cells have been a target of new Treg based therapies, such as low-dose IL-2. In addition, ongoing clinical trials aim to test safety and efficacy of transferred, in vitro expanded Treg cells in patients with autoimmune diseases and transplant patients., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) represents a chronic T cell-mediated inflammatory autoimmune disease. Studies have shown that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of RA. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) represent one important group of epigenetic regulators. However, the role of individual HDAC members for the pathogenesis of arthritis is still unknown. In this study we demonstrate that mice with a T cell-specific deletion of HDAC1 (HDAC1-cKO) are resistant to the development of Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), whereas the antibody response to collagen type II was undisturbed, indicating an unaltered T cell-mediated B cell activation. The inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IL-6 were significantly decreased in sera of HDAC1-cKO mice. IL-6 treated HDAC1-deficient CD4 + T cells showed an impaired upregulation of CCR6. Selective inhibition of class I HDACs with the HDAC inhibitor MS-275 under Th17-skewing conditions inhibited the upregulation of chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) in mouse and human CD4 + T cells. Accordingly, analysis of human RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data and histological analysis of synovial tissue samples from human RA patients revealed the existence of CD4 + CCR6 + cells with enhanced HDAC1 expression. Our data indicate a key role for HDAC1 for the pathogenesis of CIA and suggest that HDAC1 and other class I HDACs might be promising targets of selective HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) for the treatment of RA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None. This research has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Joint Undertaking under grant agreement n°115142 (BTCure), and grant agreement n(o)777357 (RTCure) resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union's Framework Programmes and EFPIA companies' in kind contribution. The work has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project F26193 (to WE) and the FWF special research program SFB F70 (subproject F7003 to MB, F7004 to NB and F7005 to WE)., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogenous autoimmune disease, which can affect different organs. Increased proportions of CD4⁺CD25-Foxp3⁺ T cells have been described in SLE patients. The exact role of this cell population in SLE patients still remains unclear. We therefore analyzed this T cell subset in a large cohort of SLE patients with different organ manifestations., Methods: Phenotypic analyses, proportions and absolute cell numbers of CD4⁺CD25-Foxp3⁺ T cells were determined by flow cytometry (FACS) in healthy controls (HC) (n = 36) and SLE patients (n = 61) with different organ manifestations. CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells were correlated with clinical data, the immunosuppressive therapy and different disease activity indices. In patients with active glomerulonephritis, CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells were analyzed in urine sediment samples. Time course analyses of CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells were performed in patients with active disease activity before and after treatment with cyclophosphamide and prednisone., Results: CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells were significantly increased in active SLE patients and the majority expressed Helios. Detailed analysis of this patient cohort revealed increased proportions of CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells in SLE patients with renal involvement. CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells were also detected in urine sediment samples of patients with active glomerulonephritis and correlated with the extent of proteinuria., Conclusion: CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells resemble regulatory rather than activated T cells. Comparative analysis of CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells in SLE patients revealed a significant association of this newly described cell population with active nephritis. Therefore CD4⁺CD25⁻Foxp3⁺ T cells might serve as an important tool to recognize and monitor SLE patients with renal involvement.

CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) that specialize in the suppression of immune responses might be critically involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Recent studies have described increased proportions of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells that lacked expression of CD25 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients but the suppressive capacity of these cells has not been analyzed so far. We therefore performed combined phenotypic and functional analyses of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells in patients with autoimmune diseases and healthy controls (HC). Phenotypic analysis revealed increased proportions of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells in SLE patients as compared with patients with systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, (RA), or HC. In addition, increased proportions of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells correlated with the clinical disease activity and the daily cortisone dose. According to phenotypic analysis, CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells resembled regulatory T cells rather than activated T cells. For functional analysis, a surrogate surface marker combination to substitute for intracellular Foxp3 was defined: CD4(+)CD25(-)CD127(-) T cells from SLE patients were isolated by FACS sorting and analyzed for their suppressive capacity in vitro. CD4(+)CD25(-)CD127(-) T cells, that contained up to 53% Foxp3(+) T cells, were found to suppress T cell proliferation but not IFN-gamma production in vitro. In summary, CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells phenotypically and to a certain extent also functionally resemble conventional Treg. Despite increased proportions, however, their selective functional defects might contribute to the failure of Treg to control autoimmune dysregulation in SLE patients.