The article discusses the topic of pluralism and diversity in universities, especially in confessional universities. Three types of pluralism are mentioned: plurality of worldviews, plurality of cultures, and structural plurality. The importance of maintaining pluralism in society through proper articulation between spaces, worldviews, and cultures is highlighted. Two approaches to liberalism are contrasted: rationalist, which seeks to free itself from local influences, and pluralist, which defends the freedom of individuals' ways of life. It is argued that pluralism is achieved by respecting local customs and strengthening intermediate associations. The text addresses the topic of university autonomy and its importance in the face of rationalism that seeks to impose a single vision of pluralism and diversity. It is emphasized that autonomy is fundamental for the functioning of universities, as any external influence diminishes academic freedom. It is mentioned that Catholic confessional universities must also have autonomy from the State and ecclesiastical authorities. It is emphasized that universities must seek truth in a free and disinterested manner, respecting human dignity. The text defends the autonomy of universities and the importance of respecting human dignity. It is mentioned that Catholic confessional universities have managed to maintain their identity and academic excellence while seeking truth. The importance of the disinterested pursuit of truth in Catholic universities is highlighted, and secular and Christian ethics are mentioned as a positive addition to their work. The diversity of viewpoints in universities is also discussed and how this contributes to acquiring knowledge and promoting intellectual honesty. The importance of being able to discuss and confront ideas in a space of dialogue without being subject to external mandates is emphasized. The article discusses state interference in the autonomy and academic freedom of universities, highlighting the danger of limiting diversity of opinions and critical thinking. It is argued that instead of imposing regulations and oversight, the State should strengthen peer evaluation and support the existence of quality assurance processes within institutions. The actions of the Higher Education Superintendent in Chile, which has imposed policies and regulations that do not respect the autonomy and freedom of universities, are criticized. Additionally, the attempt to deny public funds to universities that refuse to practice abortion is mentioned, which was reversed by the Constitutional Court. [Extracted from the article]