101. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination
- Author
-
Feld, Jan, Salamanca, N, Hamermesh, DS, Macro, International & Labour Economics, Externe publicaties SBE, RS: GSBE DUHR, and Research Centre for Educ and Labour Mark
- Subjects
Absolventen ,Economics ,education ,jel:B40 ,I24 ,Geschlecht ,Bildungsertrag ,jel:J71 ,Staatsangehörigkeit ,Lohndifferenzierung ,economics of education, favoritism, discrimination, field experiment, wage differentials ,economics of education ,B40 ,favoritism ,jel:I24 ,field experiment ,ddc:330 ,Arbeitsmarktdiskriminierung ,wage differentials ,J71 ,discrimination - Abstract
The discrimination literature treats outcomes as relative. But does a differential arise because agents discriminate against others – exophobia – or because they favour their own kind – endophilia? Using a field experiment that assigned graders randomly to students’ examinations that did/did not contain names, we find favouritism but no discrimination by nationality nor by gender. We are able to identify these preferences under a wide range of behavioural scenarios regarding the graders. That endophilia dominates exophobia alters how we should measure discriminatory wage differentials and should inform the formulation of anti-discrimination policy. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Economic Journal following peer review. The version of record Feld. J, Salamanca, N., & Hamermesh, D. S. (2016). Endophilia or Exophobia: beyond discrimination. The Economic Journal, 126(594), 1503-1527 is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12289
- Published
- 2013