Search

To evaluate the effects on lung function of asthma, time since diagnosis of asthma, and age at diagnosis of asthma, we examined school children in a cohort of 2,277 fourth- and seventh-graders at least twice during a 4-yr follow-up period. Sex-specific models for each lung function were fitted through mixed-effects models that used regression splines and captured age-dependent trends in the effect of asthma on lung function. In males, a history of asthma was associated with large and statistically significant deficits in maximum midexpiratory flow (MMEF) (-4.89%) and forced expiratory flow at 75% of expired FVC (FEF(75)) (-6.62%), whereas in females these deficits were smaller (-1.93% and -2.45%, respectively) and were not statistically significant. However, larger deficits were seen in both males and females with longer time since diagnosis. In males with more than 6 yr since diagnosis, there were significant deficits in FEV(1) (-3.91%), MMEF (-7.39%), FEF(75) (-8.12%), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (-4.65%) as compared with children with less than 3 yr since diagnosis. There were fewer females with more than 6 yr since diagnosis, but deficits were similar to those of males for FEV(1) (-2.52%), MMEF (-9.26%), and FEF(75) (-14.28%). Large deficits in flow rates in both large and small airways were observed in males and females for whom asthma was reported to have been diagnosed before age 3 yr. There was little evidence that lung growth in children with asthma "catches up" at older ages. Therefore, because a constant percent deficit in lung function implies an increasingly large absolute deficit in older children with larger lungs, these results are consistent with prior evidence that lung function deficits in children with asthma persist into adulthood. We also suggest that in children, commonly observed differences between sexes in the impact of asthma on lung function may reflect differences in the duration and age of onset of asthma in males and females.

Average growth of lung function over a 4-yr period, in three cohorts of southern California children who were in the fourth, seventh, or tenth grade in 1993, was modeled as a function of average exposure to ambient air pollutants. In the fourth-grade cohort, significant deficits in growth of lung function (FEV(1), FVC, maximal midexpiratory flow [MMEF], and FEF(75)) were associated with exposure to particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 micrometer (PM(10)), PM(2.5), PM(10)-PM(2.5), NO(2), and inorganic acid vapor (p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed with ozone. The estimated growth rate for children in the most polluted of the communities as compared with the least polluted was predicted to result in a cumulative reduction of 3.4% in FEV(1) and 5.0% in MMEF over the 4-yr study period. The estimated deficits were generally larger for children spending more time outdoors. In the seventh- and tenth-grade cohorts, the estimated pollutant effects were also negative for most lung function measures, but sample sizes were lower in these groups and none achieved statistical significance. The results suggest that significant negative effects on lung function growth in children occur at current ambient concentrations of particles, NO(2), and inorganic acid vapor.

To study the possible chronic respiratory effects of air pollutants, we designed and initiated a 10-yr prospective study of Southern California public schoolchildren living in 12 communities with different levels and profiles of air pollution. The design of the study, exposure assessment methods, and survey methods and results related to respiratory symptoms and conditions are described in the accompanying paper. Pulmonary function tests were completed on 3,293 subjects. We evaluated cross-sectionally the effects of air pollution exposures based on data collected in 1986-1990 by existing monitoring stations and data collected by our study team in 1994. Expected relationships were seen between demographic, physical, and other environmental factors and pulmonary function values. When the data were stratified by sex, an association was seen between pollution levels and lower pulmonary function in female subjects, with the associations being stronger for the 1994 exposure data than the 1986-1990 data. After adjustment, PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 were each significantly associated with lower FVC, FEV1, and maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF); acid vapor with lower FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and MMEF; and O3 with lower PEFR and MMEF. Effects were generally larger in those girls spending more time outdoors. Stepwise regression of adjusted pulmonary function values for girls in the 12 communities showed that NO2 was most strongly associated with lower FVC (r = -0.74, p < 0.01), PM2.5 with FEV1 (r = -0.72, p < 0.01), O3 with PEFR (r = -0.75, p < 0.005), and PM2.5 with MMEF (r = -0.80, p < 0.005). There was a statistically significant association between ozone exposure and decreased FVC and FEV1 in girls with asthma. For boys, significant associations were seen between peak O3 exposures and lower FVC and FEV1, but only in those spending more time outdoors. These findings underline the importance of follow-up of this cohort.

Assessing personal exposure to ozone has only been feasible recently with the introduction of passive ozone samplers. These devices are easy to use, but changes in air velocity across their collection surfaces can affect performance. The Harvard active ozone sampler (AS) was developed in response to problems with the passive methods. This active sampler has been tested extensively as a microenvironmental sampler. To test for personal sampling, 40 children attending summer day-camp in Riverside, California wore the active ozone sampler for approximately 2.6 h on July 19 and 21, 1994, when ozone concentrations were about 100 ppb and 140 ppb, respectively. The children spent 94-100% of the sampling period outside, staying within a well-defined area while participating in normal camp activities. Ambient ozone concentrations across this area were monitored by two UV photometric ozone monitors. The active sampler was worn in a small backpack that was also equipped with a passive ozone sampler. Device precision, reported as the percent difference between duplicate pairs of samplers, was +/- 3.7% and +/- 4.2% for the active and passive samplers, respectively. The active sampler measured, on average, 94.5 +/- 8.2% of the ambient ozone while the passive samplers measured, on average, 124.5 +/- 18.8%. The samplers were worn successfully for the entire sampling period by all participating children.

To study possible chronic respiratory effects of air pollutants, we initiated a 10-yr prospective cohort study of Southern California children, with a study design focused on four pollutants: ozone, particulate matter, acids, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Twelve demographically similar communities were selected on the basis of historic monitoring information to represent extremes of exposure to one or more pollutants. In each community, about 150 public school students in grade 4, 75 in grade 7, and 75 in grade 10 were enrolled through their classrooms. Informed consent and written responses to surveys about students' lifetime residential histories, historic and current health status, residential characteristics, and physical activity were obtained with the help of the parents. In the first testing season, 3,676 students returned questionnaires. We confirmed associations previously reported between respiratory morbidity prevalence and the presence of personal, demographic, and residential risk factors. Rates of respiratory illness were higher for males, those living in houses with pets, pests, mildew, and water damage, those whose parents had asthma, and those living in houses with smokers. Wheeze prevalence was positively associated with levels of both acid (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.83) and NO2 (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.19) in boys. We conclude, based on this cross-sectional assessment of questionnaire responses, that current levels of ambient air pollution in Southern California may be associated with effects on schoolchildren's respiratory morbidity as assessed by questionnaire.

Southern California children (10 to 12 years old) participated in a two-season study to assess the potential acute respiratory effects of ambient ozone (O3). Asthmatic (n = 49), wheezy (n = 53), and healthy (n = 93) children completed a four-day (Friday through Monday) study protocol, once in spring and again in summer, that included the use of daily activity and symptom diaries, heart rate recording devices, personal O3 samplers, and maximal effort spirometry several times per day. Data from regional monitoring stations were used to establish ambient hourly O3 concentrations. Analyses revealed that the children spent more time outdoors and were more physically active in the spring. Girls spent less time outdoors and were less physically active than boys. Personal O3 samplers correlated poorly with, and generally gave lower readings than, outdoor ambient monitors. Higher personal O3 exposures were associated generally with increased inhaler use, more outdoor time, and more physical activity. Children with asthma spent more time outdoors and were more active in the spring on high-O3 days (measured by personal sampler), and had the most trouble breathing, the most wheezing, and the most inhaler use on these days. Activity pattern data suggested that children with asthma protected themselves by being less physically active outdoors during the summer on high-O3 days. Wheezy children had the most trouble breathing during the summer on low-O3 days (measured by personal sampler). Observed relationships between O3 and pulmonary function were erratic and difficult to reconcile with existing knowledge about the acute respiratory effects of air pollution. We conclude that although asthmatic and wheezy children behave differently from their healthy peers with regard to symptoms and patterns of activity when challenged by ambient ozone, the nature of these changes remains inconsistent and ill-defined.

In respiratory health surveys involving multiple spirometers, spirometer differences may introduce important biases. We investigated temperature measurement variability as a cause of spirometer differences. Digital thermometers recorded internal (cylinder) and external (outer casing) temperatures of six similar rolling-seal spirometers during field use and in laboratory tests at controlled room temperatures. Internal and external thermometers substantially agreed in recording spirometer temperature changes, which lagged room temperature changes. Offsets of individual thermometers from overall mean readings were roughly the same in field testing of 3908 students in > 60 schools over 5 months and in subsequent laboratory tests. Thermometers differed by as much as 1.3 degrees C, causing differences as large as 0.8% in vital capacity measurements. We conclude that (1) interior and exterior temperatures of typical rolling-seal spirometers do not differ greatly, although both may differ from surrounding air temperature; and (2) variations between individual digital thermometers may be large enough to bias spirometric data appreciably in large-scale surveys. Variations should be controlled by selection of similar-reading thermometers and/or correction to a uniform standard.

To help assess acute health effects of summer air pollution in the eastern United States, we simulated ambient "acid summer haze" as closely as was practical in a laboratory chamber. We exposed young volunteers who were thought to be sensitive to this pollutant mixture on the basis of previous epidemiologic evidence. Specifically, we exposed 41 subjects aged 9-12 y to mixed ozone (0.10 ppm), sulfur dioxide (0.10 ppm), and 0.6-microm sulfuric acid aerosol (100 +/- 40 microg/m3, mean +/- standard deviation) for 4 h, during which there was intermittent exercise. Fifteen subjects were healthy, and 26 had allergy or mild asthma. The entire group responded nonsignificantly (p > .05) to pollution exposure (relative to clean air), as determined by spirometry, symptoms, and overall discomfort level during exercise. Subjects with allergy/asthma showed a positive association (p = .01) between symptoms and acid dose; in healthy subjects, that association was negative (p = .08). In these chamber-exposure studies, we noted less of an effect than was reported in previous epidemiologic studies of children exposed to ambient "acid summer haze."

We studied 269 school children from three Southern California communities of contrasting air quality in two successive school years, to investigate short-term effects of ambient ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), or particulate matter (PM) on respiratory health. We measured lung function and symptoms twice daily for one week each in fall, winter and spring; and concurrently assessed time-activity patterns and personal exposures. Average daily personal exposures correlated with pollutant concentrations at central sites (r = 0.61 for O3, 0.63 for NO2, 0.48 for PM). Questionnaire-reported outdoor activity increased slightly in communities/seasons with higher pollution. Lung function differences between communities were explainable by age differences. Morning forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased significantly with increase in PM or NO2 measured over the preceding 24 hours. Morning-to-afternoon change of forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) became significantly more negative with increase in PM, NO2, or O3 on the same day. Predicted FVC or FEV1 loss on highest- vs lowest-pollution days was < 2%. Daily symptoms showed no association with current or prior 24-hour pollution, but increased with decreasing temperature. Parents' questionnaire responses suggested excess asthma and allergy in children from one polluted community while children in the other polluted community reported more symptoms, relative to the cleaner community. We conclude that Los Angeles area children may experience slight lung function changes in association with day-to-day air quality changes, reasonably similar to responses seen by others in less polluted areas. Although short-term pollution effects appear small, they should be assessed in longitudinal lung function studies when possible, to allow maximally accurate measurement of longer-term function changes.

Ozone is one of the most toxic common air pollutants (judging from short-term animal and human exposure studies at realistic concentrations) and one of the most difficult and expensive pollutants to control. Because of ozone's high chemical reactivity, its concentrations may vary greatly over short distances, and fixed-site air quality monitors may not accurately estimate exposures of human populations. Epidemiologic research on ozone's long-term health effects has been inconclusive, partly because of the lack of reliable personal exposure information. The objective of this project was to develop a practical personal ozone exposure monitoring technique, and to document its precision and accuracy in actual use by representatives of freely ranging, ozone-exposed populations. The project site, Los Angeles, is the nation's metropolitan area with the highest level of ozone pollution and, thus, probably the most important locale for personal exposure assessment. Our overall strategy was (1) to select the most promising laboratory technique for ozone detection from published literature and private communications; (2) to design and test personal monitors using this technique; and (3) when feasible, to evaluate concurrently alternative methodologies developed by others. As indicated below, parts 1 and 2 of our strategy yielded a limited success with respect to short-term active sampling, i.e., measuring personal ozone exposure levels during one to two hours with a monitor incorporating a battery-powered air pump of the type used in industrial hygiene investigations. The same approach was not successful in passive sampling, i.e., measuring exposure levels during multihour or multiday periods with a light-weight, diffusion-controlled "badge" sampler having no moving parts. Passive badge samplers could be calibrated reasonably well in laboratory exposures to ozone in otherwise pure air, but they greatly overestimated ozone levels in outdoor ambient air. Part 3 of our strategy yielded more promising information on an alternative passive badge design. After testing and rejecting two other possibilities, we chose a binary organic reagents, 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone acetone azine with 2-phenylphenol, as the most promising chemical detector of ozone. Filter papers impregnated with the binary reagent develop a characteristic intense pink color when exposed to ozone. The inventors, J.E. Lambert and associates of Kansas State University, had intended only to develop a rough qualitative ozone monitor (Lambert et al. 1989). However, our initial laboratory testing (in exposure chambers containing ozone in otherwise very clean air, away from humans), revealed fairly accurate quantitative response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

We combined field and laboratory experimentation to evaluate the effects of nitrogen dioxide in a panel of Los Angeles area residents with chronic respiratory illness, 15 men and 11 women aged 47 to 69. All had heavy smoking history, chronic symptoms, and low FEV1; some also had low FVC. During the fall-winter high-NO2 season, they monitored themselves for 2-wk periods using spirometers in the home, passive NO2 sampling badges, and diaries to record time and activity patterns and clinical status. In the middle of each self-monitoring week they were exposed in a chamber, once to clean air and once to 0.3 ppm NO2. Chamber exposures were double blind, lasted 4 h, and included four 7-min exercise sessions with average ventilation rates near 25 L/min. Symptom reports and hourly forced expiratory function tests showed no statistically significant differences between clean air and NO2 chamber exposures, although peak flow showed a approximately 3% loss with NO2 relative to clean air during the first 2 h of exposure only (p = 0.056). No significant overall differences were found between field self-measurements and measurements of lung function in the chamber or between field measurements in clean air and NO2 exposure weeks. Field data showed that group average lung function and symptom levels were worse in the morning than later in the day (p < 0.005) but otherwise were stable over 2 wk. Even though most subjects smoked and stayed indoors 80 to 90% of the time, personal NO2 exposures correlated significantly with outdoor NO2 concentrations as reported by local monitoring stations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Respirable carbon or fly ash particles are suspected to increase the respiratory toxicity of coexisting acidic air pollutants, by concentrating acid on their surfaces and so delivering it efficiently to the lower respiratory tract. To investigate this issue, we exposed 15 healthy and 15 asthmatic volunteers in a controlled-environment chamber (21 degrees C, 50 percent relative humidity) to four test atmospheres: (i) clean air; (ii) 0.5-microns H2SO4 aerosol at approximately 100 micrograms/m3, generated from water solution; (iii) 0.5-microns carbon aerosol at approximately 250 micrograms/m3, generated from highly pure carbon black with specific surface area comparable to ambient pollution particles; and (iv) carbon as in (iii) plus approximately 100 micrograms/m3 of ultrafine H2SO4 aerosol generated from fuming sulfuric acid. Electron microscopy showed that nearly all acid in (iv) became attached to carbon particle surfaces, and that most particles remained in the sub-micron size range. Exposures were performed double-blind, 1 week apart. They lasted 1 hr each, with alternate 10-min periods of heavy exercise (ventilation approximately 50 L/min) and rest. Subjects gargled citrus juice before exposure to suppress airway ammonia. Lung function and symptoms were measured pre-exposure, after initial exercise, and at end-exposure. Bronchial reactivity to methacholine was measured after exposure. Statistical analyses tested for effects of H2SO4 or carbon, separate or interactive, on health measures. Group data showed no more than small equivocal effects of any exposure on any health measure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thirty-two asthmatic volunteers 8 to 16 yr of age, recruited through local schools and private physicians, were exposed in a chamber to clean air (control condition) and to sulfuric acid aerosol at a "low" concentration (46 +/- 11 micrograms/m3; mean +/- SD) and at a "high" concentration (127 +/- 21 micrograms/m3). Acid aerosols had mass median aerodynamic diameters near 0.5 microns with geometric standard deviations near 1.9. Temperature was 21 degrees C, and relative humidity was near 50%. Subjects were exposed with unencumbered oronasal breathing for 30 min at rest plus 10 min at moderate exercise (ventilation rate approximately 20 L/min/m2 of body surface). A subgroup (21 subjects) were exposed similarly to clean air and to "high" acid (134 +/- 20 micrograms/m3) with 100% oral breathing. Increased symptoms and bronchoconstriction were found after exercise under all exposure conditions. For the group, symptom and lung function responses were not statistically different during control and during acid exposures with unencumbered breathing or with oral breathing. By contrast, other investigators have reported statistically significant lung function disturbances in groups of young asthmatics exposed similarly with oral breathing. A minority of our subjects showed possibly meaningful excess bronchoconstriction with "high" acid exposure relative to control with both routes of breathing. This could be the result of chance, or it could suggest the existence of an acid-sensitive subpopulation of young asthmatics.

This study was undertaken to determine if the ventilatory capacity of children is affected by hourly concentrations of ozone inhaled during their daily activity. Over a 3-wk period (June-July 1987) children who were attending a summer camp in the San Bernardino mountains of California performed spirometry up to three times per day during their stay at the camp. A total of 43 children were tested a total of 461 times. Ozone, oxides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, temperature, and relative humidity were measured continuously. Daily average measurements of total suspended particulate and the PM10 particulate fraction (less than or equal to 10 microns) were also made. Hourly ozone concentrations at the time of testing varied between 20 and 245 ppb. Regressions of each individual's FEV1 and FVC supported the view that high ozone levels reduced these lung function parameters. The average regression coefficient for FEV1 on ozone was -0.39 ml/ppb (SEM = 0.12) and for FVC -0.44 ml/ppb (SEM = 0.15), both of which were significantly different from zero. Statistical allowance for temperature and humidity increased the magnitude of these slopes. Nitrogen dioxide never exceeded 40 ppb during the time of testing and averaged 13 ppb. Sulfur dioxide's highest measurement was 8 ppb and often was at the limit of detection. Neither NO2 nor SO2 was considered in the statistical modeling. Data were divided based on whether each subject had been exposed to levels of ozone in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) during the several hours previous to being tested. Exposures exceeding the NAAQS indicated a significant negative relationship between ozone and FEV1, FVC, and PEFR. Data for nonexceedance periods did not indicate this negative relationship for any of the three lung function parameters, but it could not be determined if this was due to an absence of an ozone effect or to a combination of the increased variability and decreased size of this data subset. These data indicate that lung function changes on a daily basis relate in a negative fashion to ambient ozone levels. The magnitude of the changes are small and are reversed as ambient ozone decreases.

Twenty-one volunteers with moderate to severe asthma were exposed to sulfur dioxide (SO2) at concentrations of 0 (control), 0.3, and 0.6 ppm in each of three medication states: (1) low (much of their usual asthma medication withheld), (2) normal (each subject on his own usual medication schedule), and (3) high (usual medication supplemented by inhaled metaproterenol before exposure). Theophylline, the medication usually taken by subjects, was often supplemented by beta-adrenergics. Exposures were for 10 min and were accompanied by continuous heavy exercise (ventilation approximately 50 l/min). Lung function and symptoms were measured before and after exposure. With normal medication, symptomatic bronchoconstriction occurred with exercise and was exacerbated by 0.6 ppm SO2, as reported for mildly unmedicated asthmatics studied previously. Both baseline and post-exposure lung function were noticeably worse in the low-medication state. High medication improved baseline lung function and prevented most bronchoconstrictive effects of SO2/exercise. High medication also increased heart rate and apparently induced tremor or nervousness in some individuals.

Twenty-one mildly asthmatic volunteers were exposed to 0, 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 ppm nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in purified background air in an environmental control chamber. Exposures were separated by 1-wk periods and occurred in random order. Each lasted 1 hr and included three 10-min bouts of moderately heavy exercise (mean ventilation rate 41 L/min). Exposure temperature was near 22 degrees C and relative humidity near 50%. Specific airway resistance and maximal forced expiratory performance were measured preexposure, after the initial exercise, and near the end of exposure. Bronchial reactivity was assessed immediately following exposure, by normocapnic hyperventilation with subfreezing air. Symptoms were recorded on questionnaires before, during, and for 1-wk after each exposure. Exercise induced significant bronchoconstriction regardless of NO2 level. No statistically significant untoward response to NO2 was observed at any exposure concentration. This negative finding agrees with our previous results, but contrasts with findings elsewhere of respiratory dysfunction after exposure to 0.3 ppm. The discrepancy is presently unexplained, but it may relate to different severity of asthma in different subject groups.

Twenty-two volunteers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were exposed to nitrogen dioxide at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 ppm in a controlled environment chamber. Exposure lasted 1 hr and included two 15-min exercise periods, during which the mean ventilation rate was roughly 16 L/min. Pulmonary mechanical function was evaluated pre-exposure, after initial exercise, and at the end of exposure. Blood oxygenation was measured by ear oximetry pre-exposure and during the second exposure period. Symptoms were recorded during exposures and for 1-wk periods afterward. No statistically significant changes in symptom reporting could be attributed to nitrogen dioxide exposure at any concentration, compared to the 0.0 ppm control condition. Measures of pulmonary mechanics showed either no significant changes, or small and equivocal changes. Arterial oxygen saturation showed marginal improvement with exercise, regardless of nitrogen dioxide concentration.

This study was intended to help explain individual differences in susceptibility to irritant effects of ozone (O3), by determining whether prior ambient O3 exposures and/or recent acute respiratory illness modified response to laboratory O3 exposures. Response was measured in terms of lung function changes and irritant symptoms. Initially, 59 adult volunteer Los Angeles area residents underwent screening exposures in spring, before the season of frequent high ambient O3 levels. Unusually responsive and nonresponsive individuals (N = 12 and 13 respectively) underwent followup exposures in autumn (late in the high-O3 season) and in winter (low-O3 season). All exposures were to 0.18 ppm O3 for 2 hr with intermittent heavy exercise at 31 degrees C and 35% relative humidity. Nonresponders tended to remain nonresponsive throughout. In fall, responders had lost much of their reactivity, as if they had "adapted" to summer ambient O3 exposures. They did not regain reactivity by winter. Clinical laboratory findings suggestive of acute respiratory illness did not appear to correlate with O3 response. Eight responders and 9 nonresponders underwent another followup exposure in spring, about 1 yr after screening. By that time most responders had regained their reactivity; individual function changes were significantly correlated with changes 1 yr earlier. These results suggest that response to O3 is a persistent individual characteristic, but can be modified by repeated ambient exposures.

To help assess respiratory health risks from sulfur dioxide (SO2) air pollution, we studied 24 normal, 21 atopic, 16 minimal/mild asthmatic, and 24 moderate/severe, medication-dependent asthmatic subjects classified according to history, lung function, allergy skin tests, serum IgE level, and airway reactivity to methacholine. All were exposed in a chamber (21 degrees C, 50% humidity) to 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 ppm SO2 in random order at 1-wk intervals; then exposures were repeated to test consistency of response. The 1-h exposures included three 10-min exercise periods (ventilation approximately 40 L/min). Physiologic response was measured early (approximately 15 min) and late (approximately 55 min) in exposure. Symptoms were evaluated during exposure and for 1 wk afterward. Normal and most atopic subjects showed little response at these SO2 levels. A few atopic subjects and many asthmatics developed bronchoconstriction and respiratory symptoms, but most were able to maintain their exercise. Effects were not markedly different between early and late measurements, nor between the first and second round of studies; however, late and second-round responses appeared slightly more favorable. No statistically significant effect of SO2 on symptoms was found 1 day or 1 wk after exposure. Minimal/mild asthmatics showed, on the average, slight responses at 0.0 ppm (attributable to exercise) and increasing responses at increasing SO2 concentrations. Moderate/severe asthmatics reacted more at 0.0 ppm, but their increments in response with increasing SO2 concentration were roughly similar to those of minimal/mild asthmatics. Thus, responses to SO2 per se were not strongly dependent on clinical severity of asthma, nor on SO2 exposure history during previous weeks.

Twenty-one healthy and 21 asthmatic volunteers were exposed to respirable sulfuric acid aerosol (mass median particle diameter approximately 0.9 micron, geometric standard deviation 2.5) in a chamber at 21 degrees and 50% relative humidity. Measured sulfuric acid concentrations averaged 0, 380, 1060, and 1520 micrograms/m3 (in the occupational range, higher than concentrations observed in ambient air pollution). Exposures to different concentrations occurred in randomized order 1 week apart. They lasted 1 hr and included three 10-min periods of heavy exercise. Healthy volunteers showed no statistically significant changes in pulmonary function, airway reactivity to inhaled methacholine, or overall reporting of irritant symptoms which could be attributed to acid exposure. They did show a slight statistically significant (P less than .01) increase in cough with increasing acid concentration. At the two highest acid concentrations, asthmatics showed significant increases in irritant symptoms and decrements in pulmonary function, without significant changes in airway reactivity. Their function decrements appeared to increase with time during exposure. Previous studies in fog (10 degrees, median particle diameter approximately 10 micron) with similar concentrations of sulfuric acid showed more symptoms but less pulmonary function change, perhaps reflecting different sites of particle deposition in airways and/or different degrees of neutralization by airway ammonia. This and earlier evidence predicts little, if any, acute irritant response in short-term (1 hr or less) exposures to sulfuric acid at concentrations found in ambient air pollution.

Asthmatic volunteers aged 8 to 16 (N = 34) were exposed on separate occasions to clean air (control), to 0.30 ppm nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in otherwise clean air, and to polluted Los Angeles area ambient air on summer mornings when NO2 pollution was expected. Exposures lasted 3 hr, with alternating 10-min periods of exercise and rest. In ambient pollution exposures, 3-hr average NO2 concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 0.26 ppm, with a mean of 0.09 ppm. Ambient exposures did not significantly affect lung function, symptoms, or bronchial reactivity to cold air, relative to the control condition. Responses to 0.3 ppm NO2 exposures were equivocal. Asthma symptoms were more severe during 1-week periods before 0.3 ppm exposures, and lung function was decreased immediately before 0.3 ppm exposures, compared to other conditions. Lung function declined slightly during the first hour at 0.3 ppm, but improved over the remaining 2 hr. Compared to other conditions, symptoms were not increased during 0.3 ppm exposures, but were increased during 1-week periods afterward. These observations may reflect untoward effects of 0.3 ppm NO2, or may reflect chance increases in asthma severity prior to 0.3 ppm exposures.

Twenty-two asthmatic young adult volunteers, predetermined to be reactive to sulfur dioxide (SO2) with exercise at normal room temperature, were studied to document short-term effects of SO2 exposure under hot conditions, both humid and dry. For comparison, similar exposures were conducted at mild temperatures. All subjects were exposed in an environmental control chamber to all possible combinations of 2 atmospheric conditions (purified air and 0.6 ppm SO2), 2 temperatures (near 21 and 38 degrees C), and 2 levels of relative humidity (near 20 and 80%). Exposures involved 5 min of heavy exercise (target ventilation rate, 50 L/min) plus brief warm-up and cool-down periods. Body plethysmographic measurements and symptom questionnaire interviews were administered before and at the end of each exposure. Response was expressed in terms of change in airway size or change in intensity of symptoms during exposure. Atmospheric condition showed the most marked and significant overall effect on physiologic responses; temperature and humidity effects were also significant. High temperature and high humidity tended to mitigate the bronchoconstriction produced by 0.6 ppm SO2 exposure: group mean specific airway resistance approximately tripled at 21 degrees C and low humidity, but increased by less than 40% at 38 degrees C and high humidity. Temperature and humidity affected symptoms less consistently than physiologic responses, but in general, symptom responses paralleled physiologic responses.

The ability of disposable half-face masks containing activated carbon to protect against inhaled ozone (O2) (nominal experimental exposure concentration, 0.5 ppm) was tested using a specially designed mechanical device simulating the breathing of a moderately exercising human, and then tested further by 18 volunteers exposed to O2 in a controlled-environment chamber for 2 h with intermittent mild exercise. As a control experiment, masks containing no activated carbon were tested similarly. On the mechanical device, carbon-impregnated masks removed 96 to 98% of ambient O3, whereas masks with no carbon removed 32 to 37%. Volunteers experienced typical respiratory irritation and temporary loss of forced expiratory function during O3 exposures when they wore the masks without carbon. These untoward effects were substantially reduced when masks containing carbon were worn. Volunteers tolerated the half-masks reasonably well, although some complained of discomfort. Disposable masks may be of significant benefit in protecting sensitive people from O2 exposures that they cannot readily avoid by other means.

Twenty asthmatic volunteers, most with mild disease, underwent dose-response studies with sulfur dioxide (SO2) under three pretreatment conditions: (1) drug (metaproterenol sulfate in aerosolized saline solution), (2) placebo (aerosolized saline only), and (3) no pretreatment. Sulfur dioxide exposure concentrations were 0.0, 0.3, and 0.6 ppm. Experimental conditions were presented in random order at 1-wk intervals. Exposures lasted 10 min with heavy continuous exercise. Lung function was measured at baseline, after pretreatment (immediately pre-exposure), immediately post-exposure, and during a 2-hr follow-up. Subjects could elect to take bronchodilators during follow-up. Symptoms were monitored before, during, and for 1 wk after exposure. With no pretreatment, subjects exhibited typical exercise-induced bronchospasm at 0.0 ppm, slightly increased responses at 0.3 ppm, and more marked increases at 0.6 ppm. Seven subjects took bronchodilator after 0.6-ppm exposures, compared to 2 at lower concentrations. Within 30 min post-exposure, most subjects' symptoms and lung function had returned to near pre-exposure levels. A similar sequence was observed when subjects received placebo. Drug pretreatment improved lung function relative to baseline, prevented bronchoconstrictive responses at 0.0 and 0.3 ppm, and greatly mitigated responses at 0.6 ppm. Thus, typical bronchodilator usage by asthmatics is likely to reduce their response to ambient SO2 pollution.

Twenty-four healthy, well-conditioned young adult male volunteers, free of asthma or clinical respiratory allergies, were exposed to purified air containing ozone (O3) at 0.16, 0.14, 0.12, 0.10, 0.08, and 0.00 part per million (ppm). Exposures were separated by 2-week intervals, occurred in random order, and lasted 2 hours each. Temperature was 32 +/- 1 degree C and relative humidity was 38 +/- 3%, simulating Los Angeles area smog conditions. Subjects exercised 15 minutes of each half hour, attaining ventilation rates averaging 68 L/min (approximately 35 L/min per m2 body surface area). Lung function was measured pre-exposure and after 1 hr and 2 hr of exposure. Airway responsiveness to a cold-air challenge was measured immediately following the 2-hr exposure. Symptoms were recorded before, during, and for one-week periods following exposures. For the group as a whole, no meaningful untoward effects were found except for a mild typical respiratory irritant response after 2 hr exposure to 0.16 ppm O3. Two individual subjects showed possible responses at 0.14 ppm, and one of them also at 0.12 ppm. In comparison to some previous investigations, this study showed generally less response to O3. The comparative lack of response may relate to the favorable clinical status of the subjects, the pattern of exercise during exposure, or some other factor not yet identified.

Asthmatic volunteers (N = 14) aged 18 to 33 yr with documented sensitivity to sulfur dioxide (SO2) were exposed in a chamber to 0.6 ppm SO2 for 6-hr periods on 2 successive days. Similar exposures to purified air, 1 wk later or earlier, served as controls. Subjects exercised heavily (target ventilation rate 50 L/min) for 5 min near the beginning of exposure (early exercise) and for an additional 5 min beginning after 5-hr of exposure (late exercise). At all other times, they rested. Body plethysmographic measurements and symptom questionnaires were administered pre-exposure, after each exercise period, and hourly during rest. Bronchoconstriction and lower respiratory symptoms were observed during or immediately following exercise--to a slight extent with clean air, and to a more marked extent with SO2. Bronchoconstriction and symptoms were modestly less severe on the second day of SO2 exposure than on the first day, but there were no meaningful differences in response between early and late exercise periods on either day.

To investigate short-term health effects of community air pollution directly, we developed a mobile laboratory allowing "blind" exposures of volunteers to polluted ambient air and to purified air at similar temperature and humidity. Subjects (30 asthmatic, 34 normal) from the surrounding area were studied at Duarte, California, a Los Angeles suburb subject to frequent photochemical oxidant pollution. Each was exposed to a close approximation of outdoor ambient air for 2 h with intermittent light exercise. Lung function and symptoms were evaluated pre- and post-exposure. A control (purified air) study took place several weeks later. Mean ambient air exposure concentrations were near 0.22 ppm for ozone and 200 micrograms/m3 for total suspended particulate. Ambient air exposures were associated with small significant losses in forced expiratory performance and total lung capacity. The responses of asthmatic and normal subjects were generally not significantly different, possibly because many normal subjects had a history of allergy and appeared atypically reactive to respiratory insults. In the normal subjects, a small significant increase in reported symptoms was seen with ambient air exposures compared with the control. In the asthmatics, the increase was not significant. Over-all, only slight effects attributable to exposure were found, even though a severely polluted area and a presumed high-risk population were chosen for study.

We exposed groups of healthy and asthmatic volunteers to sulfuric acid aerosols with volume median droplet diameters of approximately 20, 10, and 1 microns, at nominal concentrations of 2,000 micrograms/m3, and exposed them similarly to aerosols of purified water as a control. Exposures lasted 1 h each, and included three 10-min periods of exercise (ventilation rate typically 40 to 45 L/min). Exposures occurred in randomized order 7 days apart. Temperature was 10 degrees C, relative humidity was approximately 100% in 20- and 10-microns (fog) exposures, and approximately 75 to 80% in 1-micron aerosol exposures. Healthy subjects showed no statistically significant changes in lung function or in bronchial reactivity to methacholine attributable to acid exposures. They showed significant increases in lower and upper respiratory irritant symptoms when exposed to 20- or 10-microns acid fog, but not when exposed to 1-micron acid aerosol. Asthmatics showed significant excess decreases in forced expiratory performance, increases in airway resistance, and increases in irritant symptoms during acid exposures, relative to control conditions. Lung function changes in asthmatics tended to increase with time during exposure; they did not vary significantly with acid droplet size. Symptoms in asthmatics were slightly worse with 10- or 20-microns fog as compared with 1-micron aerosol. In a few instances, symptoms and lung function decrements necessitated stopping exercise or terminating the exposure early. Thus, asthma is a risk factor for unfavorable physiologic response to sulfuric acid at occupational exposure concentrations. Large droplet size (i.e., fog) tends to exacerbate short-term symptomatic response, but we have not been able to demonstrate a consistent effect of droplet size on physiologic response.

Healthy volunteers 12 to 15 yr of age (46 boys, 13 girls) were exposed to purified air and to smoggy Los Angeles ambient air on different occasions. The studies were performed in random order approximately 2 wk apart. They included 1 h of continuous bicycle exercise (mean ventilation, 32 L/min) plus brief warm-up and cool-down periods. Symptoms and forced expiratory performance were recorded preexposure in purified air, immediately postexposure, and after 1 h recovery in purified air. Mean exposure temperature was 32 degrees C, and mean relative humidity was 45%. In ambient exposure, pollutant concentrations averaged 0.144 ppm for ozone and 153 micrograms/m3 for total suspended particulates. Group mean FEV1 decreased during ambient exposure (p less than 0.01) and only partially recovered during the following 1 h. Unlike adults studied previously, this subject group reported no significant increase in respiratory symptoms accompanying changes in FEV1. Adolescents may be less aware of early respiratory irritation by oxidants and thus more at risk from ambient exposures than are adults.

Our laboratory has undertaken the study of possible acute adverse health effects of sulfate aerosols through controlled exposures of volunteer human subjects. Both healthy and asthmatic adult men were exposed for 2-hour periods (with intermittent exercise) to ammonium sulfate, ammonium bisulfate, and sulfuric acid of particle size distributions and concentrations intended to simulate "worst case" exposures during Los Angeles smog episodes. Lung function tests were performed by the subjects on entering and before exiting from a carefully controlled environmental chamber. Subject symptoms were evluated in a standardized manner. Aerosol concentrations and size distributions were determined by an on-line computer/aerometric monitoring system; gravimetric and chemical analyses were performed on impactor and total filter samples after test exposures. We found little or no evidence of adverse health effects from 2-hour multiple-day exposures to any of the compounds at "worst case" ambient concentrations.

Healthy and asthmatic volunteer subjects (N = 25 and N = 23, respectively) were exposed twice each to purified air (control) and to 4 ppm nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in a controlled-environment chamber. Exposures lasted 75 min, and included 15 min each of light exercise (ventilation rate near 25 L/min) and heavy exercise (near 50 L/min). Compared to control, NO2 exposure produced no statistically significant untoward effects on airway resistance, symptoms, heart rate, skin conductance, or self-reported emotional state in normal or asthmatic subjects. Exercise was associated with significantly (P less than .001) increased airway resistance in both subject groups, although the increase in normals was small. In both groups, systolic blood pressure showed small but significant (P less than .01) decreases with NO2 exposure, compared to control. This effect, if real, may relate to formation of a vasodilating nitrite or nitrate from inhaled NO2. The lack of respiratory response contrasts with previous findings elsewhere; at present, this inconsistency is unexplained.