Search

The Italian law does not currently offer the service of collecting and preserving a cord blood unit for autologous use within Italy if there are no indications that these cells can be used for familiar use; whilst it allows for the exportation of these units to be stored in banks outside Italy. The authorisation for exportation is issued by the Ministry of Health, after counselling with the Centre National Transplantation. The counselling provides a telephone number for the user of this service (usually future mothers) to contact experienced personnel (medic and non) and it was intended to help make decisions based on accurate and complete information, with the appropriate support, including psychological support. From 2005 to July 2008, 13,400 counsels were made. The number of contacts has increased greatly over the years and they have increased from 58 in the first year to 6858 during 2007. During 2008 (January-July period) there were on average 31 contacts per day, for a total of 3760. During the interviews information was gathered on: personal data of the future mother, education qualifications, date of birth, name of the structure where the the birth was to take place and the name of foreign bank where the collected sample was to be exported to. The future mothers were also asked for their reasons to want the collection and autologous preservation. The average age of women who requested counselling was 34 years with a range from 18 to 58 years. 70% of women were primipare and here the demand for autologous conservation came from a desire to ensure a “biological insurance” for their child. The same reason was reported by the multiparous women, but often in this case the autologous conservation was motivated both by a voluntary donation to the previous pregnancy (30%) and by a disease present in their first or another child (15%). At the beginning of the exportation request, a clear prevalence of women with academic qualifications (degree) was revealed, whilst further into the procedure the female graduates accounted for 53%, those with diploma of higher education averaged at 42% and lower education at 40%. Most women liked the interview for the additional information that was provided further to that received from the private bank, not least because the information was supported by scientific data. This has meant that a small but significant number of women decided not to continue with the exportation procedure (53 women), whilst 63 decided to donate. One of the reasons for exportation was linked to the limitations of the opening hours of the structures where the cord blood units can be stored. However 37% of women who have given birth in structures equipped for donation, said they definitely did not take this hypothesis into account. In all cases where the pregnancy came about after artificial insemination, the parents opted for exportation. Most pregnant women were informed of the possibility of exportation by their gynecologist or by the test laboratory, without being given any scientific information and there were a few cases where parents were also informed of the possibility of donation. It is necessary that in the future Italy enhances collection and donation and that the scientists and institutions make an effort to improve the quality of information along with the greater dissemination of the idea of donation, in contrast to the now growing tendency on the part of private companies to encourage a “biological insurance” where purely economic interests often come before any scientific aim or health protection.

The role of hospital staff in the organ procurement process is crucial. Nevertheless, there is little literature about their attitudes toward donation. The Donor Action Hospital Attitude Survey (HAS) comprises a series of questions to assess hospital staff's attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge on organ donation and transplantation. Further analysis of the data will help identify any weak areas in the staff viewpoint and information, highlight potential needs for more education on specific issues, and establish a baseline to monitor future improvements. We used the Donor Action HAS in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. The aim of this paper is to assess and better understand the personnel's viewpoint in the 12 main hospitals of the region. The survey was carried out among hospital staff involved in organ donation. 1576 responses were collected (52 % of distributed questionnaires), of which 1024 came from nurses, 475 from physicians, and 77 from other backgrounds. Questions were subdivided into categories, and for every point an overall mark (maximum 3/3) was calculated. Results: 1. Involvement in donation process during the past year: 1.24 /3, 2. Attitudes to organ donation (OD): 2.51 /3, 3. Skills / Self-confidence in donation practices: 1.36 /3, 4. Satisfaction with local transplant coordinator (TC) services: 2.31 /3. The attitude towards organ donation was positive, 1386 respondents support organ donation. A high percentage (93.6 % of respondents) is of the opinion that transplantation helps save other people's lives. Most uncertainty arises on the question whether donation helps families with grief. It is remarkable that only 53 % of those prepared to donate organs have informed the family of their wish. Many respondents do not feel comfortable performing key tasks close to donation. Major difficulties were observed in explaining to a family the concept of brain death (0.98 /3). Knowledge on the concept of brain-death was one of the most requested subjects for improvement. Emilia-Romagna is the region with one of the highest donation rates in Italy (29.9 pmp in 2000). Nevertheless, more profound knowledge of the local situation could help further improve donation.

Alessandro Nanni Costa, J. M. Simon i Castellvi, Antonio G. Spagnolo, Nunziata Comoretto, Jean Laffitte, Hakan Gabel, Francis L. Delmonico, Ferdinand Muehlbacher, Walter Schaupp, Alexandra K. Glazier, Valter D. Garcia, Mario Abbud-Filho, Jose O. Medina-Pestana, Mariangela Gritta Grainer, Pier Paolo Donadio, Anna Guermani, Riccardo Bosco, Francesco Giordano, Blanca Martinez Lopez de Arroyabe, Marco Brunetti, Marti Manyalich, Gloria Paez, Ricardo Valero, Rafael Matesanz, Elisabeth Coll, Beatriz Dominguez-Gil, Beatriz Mahillo, Eduardo Martin Escobar, Gregorio Garrido, and Felix Cantarovich

The increasing demand for organs for transplantation entails a consensual need for enhancement of organ procurement activity. As organ donors reside mainly in hospital intensive care units (ICUs), the Donor Action programme is aimed at identifying critical areas in ICUs, in order to improve the first step of organ donation. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the problem of identification of potential donors by means of a chart revision of patients who died in 14 ICUs in the Emilia-Romagna region between 1 July 1998 and 31 December 2000. All deaths and patients with severe brain insult (score on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 3/15) were assessed by the local transplant coordinators together with a professional at the Transplant Reference Centre. Brain death diagnoses and potential donor referrals were therefore assessed in the study period, which was subdivided into five semesters. Of the 3,056 deaths reported in 30 months, 1,248 were due to severe brain damage (GCS score = 3). Brain death diagnosis (BD) was performed in 509 patients (40.8%). Although we applied the same parameters over the whole length of the study, we observed a significant increase in BDs (from 87 in the first semester to 125 in the last, 30.5% to 53.0% of the patients with GCS 3 ( P=0.003, chi(2) for trend=16.072), in spite of a slight decrease in the total number of deaths and in the total number of patients with GCS score = 3 (from 649 to 587, and from 44% to 41%, respectively). Study population characteristics could have contrasted with rather than facilitated our results: age and gender did not change significantly, whilst cause of death showed a significant reduction in trauma and an increase in cerebrovascular incidents over the whole length of the study. We can conclude that the more careful assessment of patients dying in ICUs, by the Donor Action programme, significantly contributed to the improvement of BDs observed in the study period. Therefore, Donor Action seems to be an efficient quality control programme to improve identification of potential donors, the first stage of organ procurement.

Background & Aims: The appropriate allocation of grafts from HBcAb positive donors in liver transplantation is crucial, yet a consensus is still lacking. Methods: We evaluated this issue within Liver Match, a prospective observational Italian study. Data from 1437 consecutive, first transplants performed in 2007-2009 using grafts from deceased heart beating donors were analyzed (median follow-up: 1040 days). Of these, 219 (15.2%) were HBcAb positive. Sixty-six HBcAb positive grafts were allocated to HBsAg positive and 153 to HBsAg negative recipients. Results: 329 graft losses occurred (22.9%): 66 (30.1%) among 219 recipients of HBcAb positive grafts, and 263 (21.6%) among 1218 recipients of HBcAb negative grafts. Graft survival was lower in recipients of HBcAb positive compared to HBcAb negative donors, with unadjusted 3-year graft survival of 0.69 (s.e. 0.032) and 0.77 (0.013), respectively (log-rank, p = 0.0047). After stratifying for recipient HBsAg status, this difference was only observed among HBsAg negative recipients (log rank, p = 0.0007), 3-year graft survival being excellent (0.88, s.e. 0.020) among HBsAg positive recipients, regardless of the HBcAb donor status (log rank, p = 0.4478). Graft loss due to de novo HBV hepatitis occurred only in one patient. At Cox regression, hazard ratios for graft loss were: MELD (1.30 per 10 units, p = 0.0002), donor HBcAb positivity (1.56, p = 0.0015), recipient HBsAg positivity (0.43, p

The shortage of available organs, has increasingly prompted the use of elderly donors, with a consequent growth of possible risk factors. In this context the risk of donor-recipient transmission of infectious or neoplastic pathologies may be considered as a major issue; in each case for each organ potentially available, acceptable quality must be provided and unacceptable risks must be avoided. METHODS: We are presenting here the process of risk management followed by the Italian centers. In 2001, the Italian National Transplant Centre created a national commission of experts, with the mission of defining guidelines for the evaluation process of the potential organ donor. As a supplement to these measures, the Italian National Transplant Centre has supported transplant network health workers through ad hoc developed information tools and an expert task force (second opinion) for evaluation of doubtful cases. RESULTS: Starting from the date of guidelines application and second opinion start up, 9519 potential cadaveric donors were reported in Italy. Of these, 1611 presented a neoplastic or infectious risk. Over this period, 4861 donors were used for transplantation, equal to 48.5% of reported donors. Among the 1611 donors, who had been diagnosed at risk, 674 were neoplastic-disease affected donors and 937 infection-disease affected donors. CONCLUSIONS: At the European level, several new activities have been recently implemented to increase organ safety. In Italy, new guidelines and actions to ensure organ safety have been implemented. The evaluation of the impact of these actions will be performed in the near future.