Search

An important aspect of binaural hearing is the proper detection of interaural sound level differences and interaural timing differences. Assessments of binaural hearing were made in patients with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL, n = 11) or congenital UCHL (n = 10) after unilateral application of a bone conduction device (BCD), and in patients with bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss after bilateral BCD application. Benefit (bilateral versus unilateral listening) was assessed by measuring directional hearing, compensation of the acoustic head shadow, binaural summation and binaural squelch. Measurements were performed after an acclimatization time of at least 10 weeks. Unilateral BCD application was beneficial, but there was less benefit in the patients with congenital UCHL as compared to patients with acquired UCHL. In adults with bilateral hearing loss, bilateral BCD application was clearly beneficial as compared to unilateral BCD application. Binaural summation was present, but binaural squelch could not be proven. To explain the poor results in the patients with congenital UCHL, two factors seemed to be important. First, a critical period in the development of binaural hearing might affect the binaural hearing abilities. Second, crossover stimulation, referring to additional stimulation of the cochlea contralateral to the BCD side, might deteriorate binaural hearing in patients with UCHL.

We studied the influence of static head roll on the perceived auditory zenith in head-centred and world-centred coordinates. Subjects sat either upright, or with their head left/right rolled sideways by about 35° relative to gravity, whilst judging whether a broadband sound was heard left or right from the head-centred or world-centred zenith. When upright, these reference frames coincide. Results show that subjects judged the zenith accurately within different planes, although response variability increased for the midsagittal plane. With the head rolled, head-centred auditory zenith shifted by the same amount and was located as accurately as for upright, indicating unaltered localisation cues by head-on-body roll. Interestingly, when judging world-centred zenith subjects made large systematic errors (10–15°) in the direction of head roll, and response variability increased, which resembles the visual Aubert effect. These results demonstrate a significant influence of the vestibular-collic system on auditory spatial awareness, which sheds new light on the mechanisms underlying multisensory integration and spatial updating in sound localisation behaviour.

To program a goal-directed orienting response toward a sound source embedded in an acoustic scene, the audiomotor system should detect and select the target against a background. Here, we focus on whether the system can segregate synchronous sounds in the midsagittal plane (elevation), a task requiring the auditory system to dissociate the pinna-induced spectral localization cues. Human listeners made rapid head-orienting responses toward either a single sound source (broadband buzzer or Gaussian noise) or toward two simultaneously presented sounds (buzzer and noise) at a wide variety of locations in the midsagittal plane. In the latter case, listeners had to orient to the buzzer (target) and ignore the noise (nontarget). In the single-sound condition, localization was accurate. However, in the double-sound condition, response endpoints depended on relative sound level and spatial disparity. The loudest sound dominated the responses, regardless of whether it was the target or the nontarget. When the sounds had about equal intensities and their spatial disparity was sufficiently small, endpoint distributions were well described by weighted averaging. However, when spatial disparities exceeded similar to 45 degrees, response endpoint distributions became bimodal. Similar response behavior has been reported for visuomotor experiments, for which averaging and bimodal endpoint distributions are thought to arise from neural interactions within retinotopically organized visuomotor maps. We show, however, that the auditory-evoked responses can be well explained by the idiosyncratic acoustics of the pinnae. Hence basic principles of target representation and selection for audition and vision appear to differ profoundly. ispartof: Journal of neuroscience vol:30 issue:1 pages:194-204 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Contains fulltext : 75710.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) In a previous study we quantified the effect of multisensory integration on the latency and accuracy of saccadic eye movements toward spatially aligned audiovisual (AV) stimuli within a rich AV-background (Corneil et al. in J Neurophysiol 88:438-454, 2002). In those experiments both stimulus modalities belonged to the same object, and subjects were instructed to foveate that source, irrespective of modality. Under natural conditions, however, subjects have no prior knowledge as to whether visual and auditory events originated from the same, or from different objects in space and time. In the present experiments we included these possibilities by introducing various spatial and temporal disparities between the visual and auditory events within the AV-background. Subjects had to orient fast and accurately to the visual target, thereby ignoring the auditory distractor. We show that this task belies a dichotomy, as it was quite difficult to produce fast responses (

Contains fulltext : 75164.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Orienting the eyes towards a peripheral sound source calls for a transformation of the head-centred sound coordinates into an oculocentric motor command, which requires an estimate of current eye position. Current models of saccadic control explain spatial accuracy by oculocentric transformations that rely on efference copies of relative eye-displacement signals, rather than on absolute eye position in the orbit. In principle, the gaze-control system could keep track of instantaneous eye position by vector addition of intervening eye-displacement commands. However, given that each motor update is endowed with some noise, the neural estimate of eye orientation is then expected to become noisier with increasing number of intervening saccades. As a consequence, the localization response will also be noisier. According to the alternative, in which target updates rely on feedback of the current eye position, such an increase in errors would be absent. In an attempt to dissociate these hypotheses, we studied the influence of the accumulation of oculomotor commands prior to a sound-localization response. Head-restrained subjects generated voluntary eye movements in darkness in random directions for a period between 0.2 and 15 s, after which they rapidly reoriented the eyes towards a brief sound burst. The results demonstrate that the audiomotor system programmes the orienting response on the basis of actual eye position, rather than on an accumulated estimate from intervening eye displacements.

Contains fulltext : 71484.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Such perisaccadic mislocalization is maximal in the direction of the saccade and varies systematically with the target-saccade onset delay. We have recently shown that under head-fixed conditions perisaccadic errors do not follow the quantitative predictions of current visuomotor models that explain these mislocalizations in terms of spatial updating. These models all assume sluggish eye-movement feedback and therefore predict that errors should vary systematically with the amplitude and kinematics of the intervening saccade. Instead, we reported that errors depend only weakly on the saccade amplitude. An alternative explanation for the data is that around the saccade the perceived target location undergoes a uniform transient shift in the saccade direction, but that the oculomotor feedback is, on average, accurate. This "visual shift" hypothesis predicts that errors will also remain insensitive to kinematic variability within much larger head-free gaze shifts. Here we test this prediction by presenting a brief visual probe near the onset of gaze saccades between 40 and 70 degrees amplitude. According to models with inaccurate gaze-motor feedback, the expected perisaccadic errors for such gaze shifts should be as large as 30 degrees and depend heavily on the kinematics of the gaze shift. In contrast, we found that the actual peak errors were similar to those reported for much smaller saccadic eye movements, i.e., on average about 10 degrees, and that neither gaze-shift amplitude nor kinematics plays a systematic role. Our data further corroborate the visual origin of perisaccadic mislocalization under open-loop conditions and strengthen the idea that efferent feedback signals in the gaze-control system are fast and accurate.

Localization of a brief visual target is inaccurate when presented around saccade onset. Perisaccadic mislocalization is maximal in the saccade direction and varies systematically with the target-saccade onset disparity. It has been hypothesized that this effect is either due to a sluggish representation of eye position, to low-pass filtering of the visual event, to saccade-induced compression of visual space, or to a combination of these effects. Despite their differences, these schemes all predict that the pattern of localization errors varies systematically with the saccade amplitude and kinematics. We tested these predictions for the double-step paradigm by analyzing the errors for saccades of widely varying amplitudes. Our data show that the measured error patterns are only mildly influenced by the primary-saccade amplitude over a large range of saccade properties. An alternative possibility, better accounting for the data, assumes that around saccade onset perceived target location undergoes a uniform shift in the saccade direction that varies with amplitude only for small saccades. The strength of this visual effect saturates at about 10 deg and also depends on target duration. Hence, we propose that perisaccadic mislocalization results from errors in visual-spatial perception rather than from sluggish oculomotor feedback.

Contains fulltext : 35134.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) This study compares the performance of a newly developed gaze (eye-in-space) measurement technique based on double magnetic induction (DMI) by a custom-made gold-plated copper ring on the eye with the classical scleral search coil (SSC) technique to record two-dimensional (2D) head-unrestrained gaze shifts. We tested both systems simultaneously during head-free saccades toward light-emitting diodes (LEDs) within the entire oculomotor range (+/-35 deg). The absence of irritating lead wires in the case of the DMI method leads to a higher guarantee of success (no coil breakage) and to less irritation on the subject's eye, which results in a longer and more comfortable measurement time. Correlations between DMI and SSC signals for horizontal and vertical eye position, velocity, and acceleration were close to 1.0. The difference between the SSC signal and the DMI signal remains within a few degrees. In our current setup the resolution was about 0.3 deg for the DMI method versus 0.2 deg for the SSC technique. The DMI method is an especially good alternative in the case of patient and laboratory animal gaze control studies where breakage of the SSC lead wires is particularly cumbersome.

Contains fulltext : 36473.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) This paper reports on the acute effects of a monaural plug on directional hearing in the horizontal (azimuth) and vertical (elevation) planes of human listeners. Sound localization behavior was tested with rapid head-orienting responses toward brief high-pass filtered (>3 kHz; HP) and broadband (0.5-20 kHz; BB) noises, with sound levels between 30 and 60 dB, A-weighted (dBA). To deny listeners any consistent azimuth-related head-shadow cues, stimuli were randomly interleaved. A plug immediately degraded azimuth performance, as evidenced by a sound level-dependent shift ("bias") of responses contralateral to the plug, and a level-dependent change in the slope of the stimulus-response relation ("gain"). Although the azimuth bias and gain were highly correlated, they could not be predicted from the plug's acoustic attenuation. Interestingly, listeners performed best for low-intensity stimuli at their normal-hearing side. These data demonstrate that listeners rely on monaural spectral cues for sound-source azimuth localization as soon as the binaural difference cues break down. Also the elevation response components were affected by the plug: elevation gain depended on both stimulus azimuth and on sound level and, as for azimuth, localization was best for low-intensity stimuli at the hearing side. Our results show that the neural computation of elevation incorporates a binaural weighting process that relies on the perceived, rather than the actual, sound-source azimuth. It is our conjecture that sound localization ensues from a weighting of all acoustic cues for both azimuth and elevation, in which the weights may be partially determined, and rapidly updated, by the reliability of the particular cue.

So far, the double-magnetic induction (DMI) method has been successfully applied to record eye movements from head-restrained humans, monkeys and cats. An advantage of the DMI method, compared to the more widely used scleral search coil technique, is the absence of vulnerable lead wires on the eye. A disadvantage, however, is that the relationship between the eye-in-head orientation and the secondary induction signal is highly non-linear and non-monotonic. This limits the effective measuring range to maximum eye orientations of about +/-30 degrees . Here, we analyze and test two extensions required to record the full eye-head orienting range, well exceeding 90 degrees from straight-ahead in all directions. (1) The use of mutually perpendicular magnetic fields allows for the disambiguation of the non-monotonic signal from the ring. (2) The application of an artificial neural network for offline calibration of the signals. The theoretical predictions are tested for horizontal rotations with a gimbal system. Our results show that the method is a promising alternative to the search coil technique.

Visual stimuli are initially represented in a retinotopic reference frame. To maintain spatial accuracy of gaze (i.e., eye in space) despite intervening eye and head movements, the visual input could be combined with dynamic feedback about ongoing gaze shifts. Alternatively, target coordinates could be updated in advance by using the preprogrammed gaze-motor command (“predictive remapping”). So far, previous experiments have not dissociated these possibilities. Here we study whether the visuomotor system accounts for saccadic eye–head movements that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with fast dynamic changes of the retinal input and with highly variable changes in relative eye and head movements that cannot be preprogrammed by the gaze control system. We performed visual–visual double-step experiments in which a brief (50-ms) stimulus was presented during a saccadic eye–head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that gaze shifts remain accurate under these dynamic conditions, even for stimuli presented near saccade onset, and that eyes and head are driven in oculocentric and craniocentric coordinates, respectively. These results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. We propose that the visuomotor system adequately processes dynamic changes in visual input that result from self-initiated gaze shifts, to construct a stable representation of visual targets in an absolute, supraretinal (e.g., world) reference frame. Predictive remapping may subserve transsaccadic integration, thus enabling perception of a stable visual scene despite eye movements, whereas dynamic feedback ensures accurate actions (e.g., eye–head orienting) to a selected goal.

Saccades to combined audiovisual stimuli often have reduced saccadic reaction times (SRTs) compared with those to unimodal stimuli. Neurons in the intermediate/deep layers of the superior colliculus (dSC) are capable of integrating converging sensory inputs to influence the time to saccade initiation. To identify how neural processing in the dSC contributes to reducing SRTs to audiovisual stimuli, we recorded activity from dSC neurons while monkeys generated saccades to visual or audiovisual stimuli. To evoke crossmodal interactions of varying strength, we used auditory and visual stimuli of different intensities, presented either in spatial alignment or to opposite hemifields. Spatially aligned audiovisual stimuli evoked the shortest SRTs. In the case of low-intensity stimuli, the response to the auditory component of the aligned audiovisual target increased the activity preceding the response to the visual component, accelerating the onset of the visual response and facilitating the generation of shorter-latency saccades. In the case of high-intensity stimuli, the auditory and visual responses occurred much closer together in time and so there was little opportunity for the auditory stimulus to influence previsual activity. Instead, the reduction in SRT for high-intensity, aligned audiovisual stimuli was correlated with increased premotor activity (activity after visual burst but preceding saccade-aligned burst). These data provide a link between changes in neural activity related to stimulus modality with changes in behavior. They further demonstrate how crossmodal interactions are not limited to the initial sensory activity but can also influence premotor activity in the SC.

Contains fulltext : 57201.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Human sound localization relies on implicit head-centered acoustic cues. However, to create a stable and accurate representation of sounds despite intervening head movements, the acoustic input should be continuously combined with feedback signals about changes in head orientation. Alternatively, the auditory target coordinates could be updated in advance by using either the preprogrammed gaze-motor command or the sensory target coordinates to which the intervening gaze shift is made ("predictive remapping"). So far, previous experiments cannot dissociate these alternatives. Here, we study whether the auditory system compensates for ongoing saccadic eye and head movements in two dimensions that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with dynamic changes of the acoustic cues as well as with rapid changes in relative eye and head orientation that cannot be preprogrammed by the audiomotor system. We performed visual-auditory double-step experiments in two dimensions in which a brief sound burst was presented while subjects made a saccadic eye-head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that localization responses under these dynamic conditions remain accurate. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the intervening eye and head movements are fully accounted for. Moreover, elevation response components were more accurate for longer-duration sounds (50 msec) than for extremely brief sounds (3 msec), for all localization conditions. Taken together, these results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. Rather, we conclude that the human auditory system adequately processes dynamically varying acoustic cues that result from self-initiated rapid head movements to construct a stable representation of the target in world coordinates. This signal is subsequently used to program accurate eye and head localization responses.

Contains fulltext : 59358.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) The localization of sounds in the vertical plane (elevation) deteriorates for short-duration wideband sounds at moderate to high intensities. The effect is described by a systematic decrease of the elevation gain (slope of stimulus-response relation) at short sound durations. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain this finding. Either the sound localization system integrates over a time window that is too short to accurately extract the spectral localization cues (neural integration hypothesis), or the effect results from cochlear saturation at high intensities (adaptation hypothesis). While the neural integration model predicts that elevation gain is independent of sound level, the adaptation hypothesis holds that low elevation gains for short-duration sounds are only obtained at high intensities. Here, these predictions are tested over a larger range of stimulus parameters than has been done so far. Subjects responded with rapid head movements to noise bursts in the two-dimensional frontal space. Stimulus durations ranged from 3 to 100 ms; sound levels from 26 to 73 dB SPL. Results show that the elevation gain decreases for short noise bursts at all sound levels, a finding that supports the integration model. On the other hand, the short-duration gain also decreases at high sound levels, which is in line with the adaptation hypothesis. The finding that elevation gain was a nonmonotonic function of sound level for all sound durations, however, is predicted by neither model. It is concluded that both mechanisms underlie the elevation gain effect and a conceptual model is proposed to reconcile these findings.

Contains fulltext : 58761.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Monaurally deaf people lack the binaural acoustic difference cues in sound level and timing that are needed to encode sound location in the horizontal plane (azimuth). It has been proposed that these people therefore rely on spectral pinna cues of their normal ear to localize sounds. However, the acoustic head-shadow effect (HSE) might also serve as an azimuth cue, despite its ambiguity when absolute sound levels are unknown. Here, we assess the contribution of either cue in the monaural deaf to two-dimensional (2D) sound localization. In a localization test with randomly interleaved sound levels, we show that all monaurally deaf listeners relied heavily on the HSE, whereas binaural control listeners ignore this cue. However, some monaural listeners responded partly to actual sound-source azimuth, regardless of sound level. We show that these listeners extracted azimuth information from their pinna cues. The better monaural listeners were able to localize azimuth on the basis of spectral cues, the better their ability to also localize sound-source elevation. In a subsequent localization experiment with one fixed sound level, monaural listeners rapidly adopted a strategy on the basis of the HSE. We conclude that monaural spectral cues are not sufficient for adequate 2D sound localization under unfamiliar acoustic conditions. Thus, monaural listeners strongly rely on the ambiguous HSE, which may help them to cope with familiar acoustic environments.

Contains fulltext : 57793.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) The midbrain inferior colliculus (IC) is implicated in coding sound location, but evidence from behaving primates is scarce. Here we report single-unit responses to broadband sounds that were systematically varied within the two-dimensional (2D) frontal hemifield, as well as in sound level, while monkeys fixated a central visual target. Results show that IC neurons are broadly tuned to both sound-source azimuth and level in a way that can be approximated by multiplicative, planar modulation of the firing rate of the cell. In addition, a fraction of neurons also responded to elevation. This tuning, however, was more varied: some neurons were sensitive to a specific elevation; others responded to elevation in a monotonic way. Multiple-linear regression parameters varied from cell to cell, but the only topography encountered was a dorsoventral tonotopy. In a second experiment, we presented sounds from straight ahead while monkeys fixated visual targets at different positions. We found that auditory responses in a fraction of IC cells were weakly, but systematically, modulated by 2D eye position. This modulation was absent in the spontaneous firing rates, again suggesting a multiplicative interaction of acoustic and eye-position inputs. Tuning parameters to sound frequency, location, intensity, and eye position were uncorrelated. On the basis of simulations with a simple neural network model, we suggest that the population of IC cells could encode the head-centered 2D sound location and enable a direct transformation of this signal into the eye-centered topographic motor map of the superior colliculus. Both signals are required to generate rapid eye-head orienting movements toward sounds. 12 p.

Illusions are effective tools for the study of the neural mechanisms underlying perception because neural responses can be correlated to the physical properties of stimuli and the subject’s perceptions. The Franssen illusion (FI) is an auditory spatial illusion evoked by presenting a transient, abrupt tone and a slowly rising, sustained tone of the same frequency simultaneously on opposite sides of the subject. Perception of the FI consists of hearing a single sound, the sustained tone, on the side that the transient was presented. Both subcortical and cortical mechanisms for the FI have been proposed, but, to date, there is no direct evidence for either. The data show that humans and rhesus monkeys perceive the FI similarly. Recordings were taken from single units of the inferior colliculus in the monkey while they indicated the perceived location of sound sources with their gaze. The results show that the transient component of the Franssen stimulus, with a shorter first spike latency and higher discharge rate than the sustained tone, encodes the perception of sound location. Furthermore, the persistent erroneous perception of the sustained stimulus location is due to continued excitation of the same neurons, first activated by the transient, by the sustained stimulus without location information. These results demonstrate for the first time, on a trial-by-trial basis, a correlation between perception of an auditory spatial illusion and a subcortical physiological substrate.

Item does not contain fulltext This paper describes the application of a small hearing aid that precisely fits into a subject's ear canal (complete-in-canal, or CIC). The bandwidth of the device is about 7 kHz. The system allows for selective manipulation of the different acoustic cues used for sound localization. The potential of the system is illustrated by robustly interchanging the input of the left and right ear, and consequently changing the sign of the binaural difference cues (both interaural phase and intensity) that are used for horizontal sound localization. As a result, left-right perception is reversed, while high-frequency pinna cues are sufficiently preserved to maintain up-down localization. As the hearing condition is well-defined, the auditory system could in principle remap these cues into a new representation of sound azimuth by relating the modified cues to veridical sound locations. The hearing aids were applied in four human subjects. Swapped binaural hearing was tested in two of the subjects. Swapped localization experiments for an extended period indicated stable performance of both subjects. Interestingly, an adaptive response to the reversed interaural cues was not observed. The current system may prove useful for psychophysical studies that concern the independent processing of sound localization cues, as well as in long-term developmental and plasticity studies with animals.

The geometrical arrangement of the extra-ocular muscles enables rotations of the eyes in three dimensions (3D). Helmholtz [29] has noted that the oculomotor system should therefore account for the noncommutative properties of 3D rotations. This principle entails that, in a series of rotations, the final orientation of the eye depends on the order in which they are generated. As a consequence, this property could jeopardize the stability of the perceived visual world and greatly complicate visuomotor control. However, for head-fixed saccadic eye movements the problem is elegantly circumvented by Listing’s law, which imposes precise geometric constraints on the ocular rotation axis. Recent findings have shown that somewhat different constraints, described by Donders’ law, apply to conditions where both the eye and head are free to move [11], [79], [71]. A current controversy is whether these constraints are due to a neural control strategy [42], [51], [57], [75], [71], [72], or whether they result mainly from passive mechanical properties of the motor plants in combination with commutative neural controllers [60], [61], [66]. In this chapter, a review is given of the 3D kinematic principles of rotations that underlie the control of saccadic gaze shifts. It is argued that the experimental evidence strongly supports the notion that both Donders’ and Listing’s law have a major neural component.

This paper reports on single-unit activity of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) in the intermediate and deep layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC), evoked by bimodal sensory stimulation. Monkeys were trained to generate saccadic eye movements towards visual stimuli, in either a unimodal visual saccade task, or in a bimodal visual-auditory task. In the latter task, the monkeys were required to make an accurate saccade towards a visual target, while ignoring an auditory stimulus. The presentation of an auditory stimulus in temporal and spatial proximity of the visual target influenced neither the accuracy nor the kinematic properties of the evoked saccades. However, it had a significant effect on the activity of 90% (45/50) of the SRBNs. The motor-related burst increased significantly in some neurons, but was suppressed in others. In visual-movement cells, comparable bimodal interactions were observed in both the visually evoked burst and the movement-related burst. The large differences observed in the movement-related activity of SRBNs for identical saccades under different sensory conditions do not support the hypothesis that such cells encode dynamic motor error. The only behavioral parameter that was affected by the presentation of the auditory stimulus was saccade latency. Auditory stimulation caused saccade latency changes in the majority of the experiments. Meanwhile, the timing of peak collicular motor activity and saccade onset remained tightly coupled for all stimulus configurations. In addition, saccade latency varied as function of the distance between the stimuli in 36% of the recordings. Interestingly, the occurrence of a spatial latency effect covaried significantly with a similar spatial influence on the SRBNs firing rate. These cells were always most active in the bimodal task when both stimuli were in spatial register, but activity decreased with increasing stimulus separation.

The direction-dependent acoustic filtering of the external ear plays an important role in sound localization. It is believed to be essential for the detection of sound elevation, whereas sound azimuth follows from binaural difference cues in intensity and phase. Sound elevation is believed to be coded by prominent and characteristic features in the sound power spectrum at the sensory level, like peaks and valleys. However, it is still not known what the relative importance is of each of these features and how sound elevation can be calculated from them. This paper presents a localization model that enables extraction of the features that can be expected to be relevant in elevation detection. A feature was characterized as a spectral derivative of a certain order and scale, where a simple two-layer network was used to determine its importance in computing sound elevation.

Just prior to and during a saccadic eye movement a large population of neurons in the midbrain superior colliculus (SC) is recruited, representing a desired vectorial eye displacement in a topographically organized motor map. The SC transmits its output to horizontal and vertical burst cells in the brainstem, which generate the appropriate high-velocity commands for the oculomotor plant. Substantial experimental evidence suggests that saccade generation is under continuous feedback control. An important problem for models of the saccadic system is, how the spatial representation of the SC output is transformed into the temporal code of brainstem cell populations. This problem is even more intriguing, when the possibility is considered of a dynamic feedback loop which includes the SC. Recent experimental findings support such a possibility. In this paper we describe the properties of a two-dimensional neural network model for the monkey SC, which incorporates a number of realistic features known from neurophysiology and, in addition, is inside the dynamic feedback loop for saccade generation. We show that, in order to generate goal-directed saccades, both the feedforward and feedback synaptic connections of the SC neurons should be organized topographically. Several interesting emerging properties of the model are discussed.

Purpose: Speech understanding in noise and horizontal sound localization is poor in most cochlear implant (CI) users with a hearing aid (bimodal stimulation). This study investigated the effect of static and less-extreme adaptive frequency compression in hearing aids on spatial hearing. By means of frequency compression, we aimed to restore high-frequency audibility, and thus improve sound localization and spatial speech recognition. Method: Sound-detection thresholds, sound localization, and spatial speech recognition were measured in eight bimodal CI users, with and without frequency compression. We tested two compression algorithms: a static algorithm, which compressed frequencies beyond the compression knee point (160 or 480 Hz), and an adaptive algorithm, which aimed to compress only consonants leaving vowels unaffected (adaptive knee-point frequencies from 736 to 2946 Hz). Results: Compression yielded a strong audibility benefit (high-frequency thresholds improved by 40 and 24 dB for static and adaptive compression, respectively), no meaningful improvement in localization performance (errors remained > 30 deg), and spatial speech recognition across all participants. Localization biases without compression (toward the hearing-aid and implant side for low- and high-frequency sounds, respectively) disappeared or reversed with compression. The audibility benefits provided to each bimodal user partially explained any individual improvements in localization performance; shifts in bias; and, for six out of eight participants, benefits in spatial speech recognition. Conclusions: We speculate that limiting factors such as a persistent hearing asymmetry and mismatch in spectral overlap prevent compression in bimodal users from improving sound localization. Therefore, the benefit in spatial release from masking by compression is likely due to a shift of attention to the ear with the better signal-to-noise ratio facilitated by compression, rather than an improved spatial selectivity. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16869485

Sound localization in the horizontal plane (azimuth) relies mainly on binaural difference cues in sound level and arrival time. Blocking one ear will perturb these cues, and may strongly affect azimuth performance of the listener. However, single-sided deaf listeners, as well as acutely single-sided plugged normal-hearing subjects, often use a combination of (ambiguous) monaural head-shadow cues, impoverished binaural level-difference cues, and (veridical, but limited) pinna- and head-related spectral cues to estimate source azimuth. To what extent listeners can adjust the relative contributions of these different cues is unknown, as the mechanisms underlying adaptive processes to acute monauralization are still unclear. By providing visual feedback during a brief training session with a high-pass (HP) filtered sound at a fixed sound level, we investigated the ability of listeners to adapt to their erroneous sound-localization percepts. We show that acutely plugged listeners rapidly adjusted the relative contributions of perceived sound level, and the spectral and distorted binaural cues, to improve their localization performance in azimuth also for different sound levels and locations than those experienced during training. Interestingly, our results also show that this acute cue-reweighting led to poorer localization performance in elevation, which was in line with the acoustic–spatial information provided during training. We conclude that the human auditory system rapidly readjusts the weighting of all relevant localization cues, to adequately respond to the demands of the current acoustic environment, even if the adjustments may hamper veridical localization performance in the real world.