Search

Professor Donald Coffey and his laboratory pioneered studies showing the relationships between nuclear shape and cellular function. In doing so, he and his students established the field of nuclear morphometry in prostate cancer. By using perioperative tissues via biopsies and surgical sampling, Dr. Coffey's team discovered that nuclear shape and other pathologic features correlated with clinical outcome measures. Cancer cells also exist outside of solid tumor masses as they can be shed from both primary and metastatic lesions into the circulatory system. The pool of these circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is heterogeneous. While some of these CTCs are passively shed into the circulation, others are active metastasizers with invasive potential. Advances in nanotechnology now make it possible to study morphologic features such as nuclear shape of CTCs in the bloodstream via liquid biopsy. Compared to traditional tissue sampling, liquid biopsy allows for minimally invasive, repetitive, and systemic disease sampling, which overcomes disease misrepresentation issues due to tumor temporospatial heterogeneity. Our team developed a novel liquid biopsy approach, the NanoVelcro assay, which allows us to identify morphologic heterogeneity in the CTC compartment. By applying classical methods of nuclear morphometry, we identified very small nuclear CTCs (vsnCTCs) in prostate cancer patients. Our initial studies showed that vsnCTCs strongly correlated with unfavorable clinical behaviors including the disposition to visceral metastases. These approaches may continue to yield additional insights into dynamic clinical behaviors, which creates an opportunity for more comprehensive and accurate cancer profiling. Ultimately, these advancements will allow physicians to employ more accurate and personalized treatments, helping the field reach the goal of true precision medicine.

Background: Although visceral metastases (VMs) are widely recognized to portend worse prognoses compared with bone and lymph metastases in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), little is known about what predicts VMs and the extent to which men with VMs do worse., Objective: To determine whether men with VMs at initial mCRPC diagnosis have worse overall survival (OS) and identify predictors of VMs., Design, Setting, and Participants: We analyzed 494 men diagnosed with castration-resistant prostate cancer post-1999 and no known metastases from five Veterans Affairs hospitals of the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database who later developed metastases. Radiology scans within 30 d of initial metastasis diagnosis were reviewed to collect information on bone, visceral, and lymph node metastases. We analyzed the 236 men who had a computed tomography scan performed., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Predictors of VMs and OS were evaluated using logistic regression and Cox models, respectively., Results and Limitations: Of the 236 mCRPC patients, 38 (16%) had VMs. Regarding VMs, 19 patients (50%), 8 patients (21%), and 16 patients (42%) had metastases in the liver, lungs, and other locations, respectively. VMs were a predictor of OS on crude analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.72; p=0.001) and after risk adjustment (HR: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.24-2.72; p=0.002). Age, year, treatment center, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and time from CRPC to metastases were significant in predicting OS (all p<0.05). None of the variables tested were associated with having VMs (all p > 0.09). Prospective studies and larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings., Conclusions: Demographic, tumor, and PSA kinetic characteristics were not predictive of having VMs, but VMs predicted worse OS., Patient Summary: Because patients with VMs have worse overall survival, further research is needed to develop better biomarkers and thus diagnose those with VMs at earlier stages in their disease course., (Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer seems to be modulated by factors such as the number and site of metastases. Our objective is to evaluate survival outcomes according to the number and site of metastases in our series of metastatic patients over the last 15 years., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2014. We analyzed overall survival and progression-free survival, depending on the number and location of metastases on patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Other potential prognostic factors were also evaluated: age, clinical stage, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason, PSA nadir, time till PSA nadir and first-line or second-line treatment after progression., Results: We analyzed a series of 162 patients. The mean age was 72.7yr (SD: 8.5). The estimated median overall survival was 3.9 yr (95% CI 2.6-5.2). The overall survival in patients with only lymph node metastases was 7 yr (95% CI 4.1-9.7), 3.9 (95%CI 2.3-5.5) in patients with only bone metastases, 2.5 yr (95% CI 2-2.3) in lymph nodes and bone metastases, and 2.2 yr (95% CI 1.4-3) in patients with visceral metastases (P<.001). In multivariate analysis, the location of metastasesis significantly associated with overall survival and progression-free survival. The number of metastases showed no association with survival., Conclusions: The site of metastases has a clear impact on both overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients with only lymph node involvement had a better prognosis. The number of metastases showed no significant impact on survival in our series., (Copyright © 2016 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Fulvestrant is a new oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that is licensed for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing following antioestrogen treatment and may also be effective in those progressing after non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The use of fulvestrant in a Compassionate Use Programme (CUP) in a ‘real-life’ setting has permitted its activity and tolerability profile in patients with different disease characteristics to be observed. Here, we present five case reports of fulvestrant use in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine therapy. Clinical experience from the CUP supports the published clinical trial data and suggests that fulvestrant is a valuable new treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, including those with visceral metastases and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Docetaxel is the current first-line treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), following failure to respond to maximal androgen blockade (MAB). Patients who fail to respond to docetaxel may receive cabazitaxel or abiraterone; however, there are no recommendations on which of these two agents should be used first. Here, we present a case of a male patient suffering from CRPC with liver and lymph node metastases, in which abiraterone achieved a partial response, according to RECIST criteria. In the literature, visceral involvement in patients with advanced prostate cancer is an infrequent occurrence; it affects 18-22% of patients. In the pivotal study concerning docetaxel-resistant patients, abiraterone was compared with a placebo and the forest plot for survival demonstrated that patients with visceral involvement have significantly benefited from abiraterone. In the TROPIC trial comparing cabazitaxel with mitoxantrone, the proportion of patients with visceral disease was ∼25% in both arms and there was no difference in overall survival in this subgroup of patients. In our case, we observed a significant activity of abiraterone in lymph node and liver metastases. If confirmed in large studies, this observation may raise concerns over whether to treat patients suffering from CRPC and visceral metasis with chemotherapy or hormone therapy.