Search

BackgroundAge-stratified analyses of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are limited. The purpose of current study was to compare in-hospital outcomes in elderly AF patients (age > 80 years) to a relatively younger cohort (age £ 80 years) after LAAO.MethodsData were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2018. LAAO device implantations were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes of 37.90 and 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, inpatient mortality, and resource utilization with LAAO.ResultsA total of 36,065 LAAO recipients were included in the final analysis, of which 34.6% (n=12,475) were performed on elderly AF patients. Elderly AF patients had a higher prevalence of major complications (6.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.01) and mortality (0.4% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01) after LAAO device implantation in the crude analysis. After multivariate adjustment of potential confounders, age > 80 years was associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.439, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.391-8.239) but not major complications (aOR 1.084, 95% CI 0.971-1.211), prolonged length of stay (aOR 0.943, 95% CI 0.88-1.101), or increased hospitalization costs (aOR 0.909, 95% CI 0.865-0.955).ConclusionOver 1 in 3 LAAO device implantations occurred in elderly AF patients. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, advanced age was associated with inpatient mortality, but not with other LAAO procedural-related outcomes including major complications, prolonged length of stay, or increased hospitalization costs.

Objective: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), oral anticoagulants are contraindicated, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative treatment. However, the efficacy of thromboembolic prevention using LAAO in these patients has rarely been reported in Asian populations. To our knowledge, this is the first long-term LAAO study in patients with AF undergoing dialysis in Asia. Methods: In this study, 310 patients (179 men) with a mean age of 71.3 ± 9.6 years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.8 were consecutively enrolled at multiple centers in Taiwan. The outcomes of 29 patients with AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis who underwent LAAO were compared to those without ESRD. The primary composite outcomes were stroke, systemic embolization, or death. Results: No difference in mean CHADS-VASc score was noted between patients with versus without ESRD (4.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.453). After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 16 months, the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 5.12 [1.4–18.6]; p = 0.013) than in those without ESRD after LAAO therapy. Mortality was also higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 6.6 [1.1–39.7]; p = 0.038). The stroke rate was numerically higher in patients with versus without ESRD, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 3.2 [0.6–17.7]; p = 0.183). Additionally, ESRD was associated with device-related thrombosis (odds ratio, 6.15; p = 0.047). Conclusion: Long-term outcomes of LAAO therapy may be less favorable in patients with AF undergoing dialysis, possibly because of the poor condition of patients with ESRD.

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in elderly patients. It highlights the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in AF patients, with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the role of DOACs in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is still unclear. The article also explores the safety and effectiveness of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative for stroke prevention in AF patients. The study suggests that DOACs may be associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to VKAs in elderly patients with AF and CKD. Additionally, the article discusses the potential benefits of performing LAAO without the use of contrast medium, which could reduce the risk of acute kidney injury in CKD patients. Overall, the findings suggest that LAAO may be a promising treatment option for elderly AF and CKD patients. [Extracted from the article]

Device-assisted left atrial appendage exclusion plays a crucial role in the prevention of fatal ischemic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation treatment. Various devices with different safety profiles and device-related complications are available in daily practice to perform this procedure. In this review, the anatomy, physiology, and functions of the left atrial appendage were detailed, and all available devices used for epicardial and endocardial exclusion of the left atrial appendage and their clinical outcomes were discussed. Future research should aim to further investigate the long-term effects of left atrial appendage exclusion on body homeostasis, blood coagulation, and cardiac function.

Introduction: Existing randomised controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in atrial fibrillation (AF) were of relatively small sample size or included patients who could receive oral anticoagulant treatment after device implantation. We compared the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed AF who received percutaneous LAAO or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment, in a large population from a global federated health network (TriNetX). Methods: Patients with AF treated with percutaneous LAAO were matched with those treated with DOAC between December 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) at 5 years. Results: We included 200 patients with AF, who received either LAAO or DOAC. The risk of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, and ICH at 5 years was not significantly different between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] for all-cause mortality: 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97–2.38, RR for ischaemic stroke: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.51–2.36, and RR for ICH: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.44–2.30). Conclusion: Patients newly diagnosed with AF, eligible for DOAC, showed similar 5-year risk of death, ischaemic stroke, and ICH when comparing those who underwent percutaneous LAAO to those receiving DOAC. Future randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings and advise changes in guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an established alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Antithrombotic therapy is used in the post-procedural period to prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT). The risk of DRT is considered highest in the first 45–90 days after device implantation, based on animal studies of the device healing process. Clinically applied antithrombotic regimens vary greatly across studies, continents, and centers. This article gives an overview of the evidence behind current antithrombotic regimens, ongoing randomized trials, and future post-procedural management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The absence of the left atrial appendage is an exceedingly rare structural variant that could have important implications for anticoagulation regimens in patients with atrial fibrillation. Case summary We report the case of a 63-year-old Puerto Rican female with a history of hypertension, cerebral artery aneurysms, and type 2 diabetes mellitus who suffered multiple haemorrhagic strokes. The patient had never received anticoagulation therapy. During the indicated stroke work-up, the patient was found to have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Given the patients high risk for thromboembolism and contraindications to anticoagulation therapy, the patient was referred for left atrial appendage occlusion. Pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography failed to identify the left atrial appendage. Evaluation by way of cardiac computed tomography confirmed absence of the left atrial appendage. Left atrial appendage occlusion could not be carried out. The patient had been deemed being at high risk of bleeding, was not anticoagulated, and was instead closely followed. The patient has not had thrombo-embolic events nor has she experienced a haemorrhagic stroke recurrence at follow-up appointments. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first such case report that reports left atrial appendage absence in the setting of multiple haemorrhagic strokes. Given the rarity of the condition and lack of available guidelines, the most viable way to currently manage this patient population is on a case-to-case basis. However, we propose that absence of the left atrial appendage could confer a decreased risk of thrombo-embolic phenomena in patients with atrial fibrillation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation in patients with AF. Therapies include use of percutaneous LAA closure devices, or surgical LAA occlusion (LAAO). Despite these options, complete closure of the LAA is not always achieved, and residual communication between the LAA and atrium may result in increased thrombus formation. Although studies have analysed the use of percutaneous measures such as coils, plugs, or second occluder device deployment in LAA with peri-device leak (PDL), use of percutaneous occlude devices in surgically occluded LAA is far less studied. Case summary We present a case of a 79-year-old female patient who underwent LAAO device deployment within a surgically occluded LAA with PDL. She underwent 27 mm LAAO device (WATCHMANTM) deployment and all the P.A.S.S. (Position, Anchor, Size, and Seal) criteria were satisfied. Only 1.4 mm PDL was present. She was continued on apixaban and aspirin post-operatively. Post-operative transoesophageal echocardiogram at 6 weeks demonstrated trivial PDL measuring 1.49 mm. Patient was continued on aspirin and clopidogrel, with discontinuation of apixaban. Discussion Percutaneous LAAO device deployment in previously surgically ligated LAA with incomplete exclusion is a potential therapeutic option for patients with AF and a high bleeding risk seeking a minimally invasive strategy, in an attempt to de-escalate anticoagulation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) combined with other cardiac procedures have not been previously examined. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining LAAO with other cardiac procedures vs isolated LAAO. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample database to compare patients undergoing LAAO combined with another cardiac procedure vs isolated LAAO. Outcomes included risk-adjusted major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), in-hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay (LOS), and total costs. The total cohort included 88,910 weighted encounters, of which 1,225 (1.4%) involved concomitant cardiac procedures. After risk adjustment, patients in the concomitant procedure group had similar odds of MACEs (adjusted OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.94-2.74); in-hospital mortality; and complications including stroke, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and vascular injury. They also had similar LOS (1 day vs 1 day; P = 0.32) and higher costs ($44,723 vs $32,364; P < 0.01) compared with isolated LAAO but shorter LOS (1 day vs 2 days; P < 0.01) and lower costs ($51,552 vs $63,170; P = 0.04) compared with LAAO with sequential procedures. In subgroup analyses, concomitant atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ablation had higher adjusted odds of heart block (P < 0.01), and concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement had higher adjusted odds of stroke (P = 0.02) and vascular injury (P < 0.01). In this retrospective observational study, combining LAAO with another cardiac intervention appeared to be associated with similar MACEs and LOS. However, certain complications appeared to be more frequent, and the cost was higher with combined procedures. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Residual leaks are not infrequent after left atrial appendage occlusion. However, there is still uncertainty regarding their prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of residual leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion. Methods A literature search was conducted until 19 February 2023. Residual leaks comprised peri-device leaks (PDLs) on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or computed tomography (CT), as well as left atrial appendage patency on CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the clinical impact of residual leaks. Results Overall 48 eligible studies (44 non-randomized/observational and 4 randomized studies) including 61 666 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion were analysed. Peri-device leak by TEE was present in 26.1% of patients. Computed tomography-based left atrial appendage patency and PDL were present in 54.9% and 57.3% of patients, respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography-based PDL (i.e. any reported PDL regardless of its size) was significantly associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52–2.74], all-cause mortality (pOR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08–1.24), and major bleeding (pOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03–1.22), compared with no reported PDL. A positive graded association between PDL size and risk of thromboembolism was noted across TEE cut-offs. For any PDL of >0, >1, >3, and >5 mm, the pORs for thromboembolism were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.35–2.47), 2.13 (95% CI: 1.04–4.35), 4.14 (95% CI: 2.07–8.27), and 4.44 (95% CI: 2.09–9.43), respectively, compared with either no PDL or PDL smaller than each cut-off. Neither left atrial appendage patency, nor PDL by CT was associated with thromboembolism (pOR 1.45 and 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84–2.50 and 0.52–2.07, respectively). Conclusions Peri-device leak detected by TEE was associated with adverse events, primarily thromboembolism. Residual leaks detected by CT were more frequent but lacked prognostic significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy; however, anticoagulant therapy after surgical procedures has limited use due to associated uncertainties. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the short-term use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin after LAAO. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 11, 2022. Our study compared DOAC therapy and warfarin in patients after LAAO. A meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager software (version 5.4). The meta-analysis included 13 cohort studies with a total of 32,607 patients. Our findings indicated that the incidence of stroke/TIA/SE, peri-device leaks>5 mm, device-related thrombosis , and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between the two groups after LAAO (P > 0.05). The DOAC group had a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.74–0.94, P = 0.003), any bleeding (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.23–0.51, P < 0.001), stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.34–0.95, P = 0.03), and any major adverse event (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI:0.82–0.97, P = 0.010) than the warfarin group. The subgroup analysis revealed that the rate of stroke/TIA/SE was similar in the two groups in terms of the different regions, follow-up time, study type, anticoagulant strategy, and bleeding risk. The incidence of major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly lower than that in the warfarin group in North America, as well as at follow-up period ≤6 months, retrospective cohort, HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3. In addition, the risk of major bleeding was higher with the combination of OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) than with OAC alone. Finally, in the North American region, retrospective cohort, and HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3, the incidence of any serious adverse event in the DOAC group was still significantly lower than that in the warfarin group. Compared to warfarin, DOAC reduced the risk of major bleeding and any serious adverse event in patients after LAAO. This advantage was particularly notable in North America and high-risk populations for bleeding. In addition, the incidence of device-related thrombosis, peri-device leaks, stroke/TIA/SE and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups. The risk of major bleeding was lower in patients taking OAC alone compared with those taking OAC plus SAPT, without increasing the risk of thrombosis. • There is currently no unified standard for anticoagulation after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) surgery. • In 13 studies revealed that the incidence of stroke/TIA/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality were similar between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared to warfarin. However, the incidence of bleeding and any major adverse event were higher among those who received warfarin. • The risk of major bleeding was lower among patients who received OAC alone compared to those who received OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy, without an increased risk of thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ICE versus TEE guidance during LAAO on procedural characteristics and acute outcomes, as well the presence of peri‐device leaks and residual septal defects during follow‐up. Methods: All studies comparing ICE‐guided versus TEE‐guided LAAO were identified. The primary outcomes were procedural efficacy and occurrence of procedure‐related complications. Secondary outcomes included lab efficiency (defined as a reduction in in‐room time), procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and presence of peri‐device leaks and residual interatrial septal defects (IASD) during follow‐up. Results: Twelve studies (n = 5637) were included. There were no differences in procedural success (98.3% vs. 97.8%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42–1.27, p =.27; I2 = 0%) or adverse events (4.5% vs. 4.4%; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.56–1.16, p =.25; I2 = 0%) between the ICE‐guided and TEE‐guided groups. ICE guidance reduced in in‐room time (mean‐weighted 28.6‐min reduction in in‐room time) without differences in procedural time or fluoroscopy time. There were no differences in peri‐device leak (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68–1.27, p = 0.64); however, an increased prevalence of residual IASD was observed with ICE‐guided versus TEE‐guided LAAO (46.3% vs. 34.2%; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05–4.75, p = 0.04). Conclusion: ICE guidance is associated with similar procedural efficacy and safety, but could result in improved lab efficiency (as established by a significant reduction in in‐room time). No differences in the rate of periprocedural leaks were found. A higher prevalence of residual interatrial septal defects was observed with ICE guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) presents a growing health concern, often requiring stroke prevention measures, primarily through oral anticoagulation (OAC). Surgical interventions such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) offer alternatives when OAC is contraindicated. In recent years, percutaneous procedures have gained traction as minimally invasive options, demanding precise anatomical insights. Fusion imaging (FI), which combines transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy, has emerged as a potential game-changer in transcatheter interventions. Aim: This study introduces FI to LAAO procedures in Poland, assessing its role in guiding interventions, highlighting advantages, and exploring its potential to reshape cardiovascular interventions. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving LAAO procedures from March 2015 to December 2018, all utilizing FI. Patient indications, procedural specifics, and safety metrics were collected and analyzed. Follow-ups were conducted at 3 and 6 months. Results: A cohort of 83 patients (mean age: 72.1 ±8.4 years) underwent successful LAAO procedures. FI provided precise device placement and anatomical assessment. Mean procedure time was 54.9 ±34.3 min, contrast medium usage averaged 33.7 ±22.7 ml, and creatinine levels remained stable. Patients were discharged in about 4.2 ±3.4 days. Adverse effects were rare, including minimal bleeding and cardiac tamponade. Follow-ups demonstrated favorable outcomes with low adverse event rates. Conclusions: This study marks the inaugural application of FI in Polish LAAO procedures. FI, offering enhanced visualization and reduced procedure times, holds promise in improving patient safety and treatment efficacy. We recommend its consideration as a standard visualization technique for LAAO procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), oral anticoagulants are contraindicated, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative treatment. However, the efficacy of thromboembolic prevention using LAAO in these patients has rarely been reported in Asian populations. To our knowledge, this is the first long-term LAAO study in patients with AF undergoing dialysis in Asia. In this study, 310 patients (179 men) with a mean age of 71.3 ± 9.6 years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.8 were consecutively enrolled at multiple centers in Taiwan. The outcomes of 29 patients with AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis who underwent LAAO were compared to those without ESRD. The primary composite outcomes were stroke, systemic embolization, or death. No difference in mean CHADS-VASc score was noted between patients with versus without ESRD (4.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.453). After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 16 months, the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 5.12 [1.4–18.6]; p = 0.013) than in those without ESRD after LAAO therapy. Mortality was also higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 6.6 [1.1–39.7]; p = 0.038). The stroke rate was numerically higher in patients with versus without ESRD, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 3.2 [0.6–17.7]; p = 0.183). Additionally, ESRD was associated with device-related thrombosis (odds ratio, 6.15; p = 0.047). Long-term outcomes of LAAO therapy may be less favorable in patients with AF undergoing dialysis, possibly because of the poor condition of patients with ESRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage occlusion affects systemic coagulation parameters, leading to additional patient-related benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in coagulation factor changes 6 months after epicardial left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with different LAA morphometries. This is the first study to analyze these relationships in detail. A prospective study of 22 consecutive patients was performed. Plasminogen, fibrinogen, tPA concentration, PAI-1, TAFI and computed tomography angiograms were performed. Patients were divided into subgroups based on left atrial appendage body and orifice diameter enlargement. The results of blood tests at baseline and six-month follow-up were compared. In a population with normal LAA body size and normal orifice diameter size, a significant decrease in analyzed clotting factors was observed between baseline and follow-up for all parameters except plasminogen. A significant decrease between baseline and follow-up was observed with enlarged LAA body size in all parameters except TAFI, in which it was insignificant and plasminogen, in which a significant increase was observed. Occlusion of the left atrial appendage is beneficial for systemic coagulation. Patients with a small LAA may benefit more from LAA closure in terms of stabilizing their coagulation factors associated with potential thromboembolic events in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a valuable therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high bleeding risk. However, complex LAA anatomies sometimes preclude the adoption of commercially available LAAO devices. The design of a custom-made LAAO device is a promising strategy in these cases. However, few examples of custom-made devices in case of giant LAAs have been reported. Case summary An 85-year-old man with permanent AF with CHA2DS2-VASc 4 and recurrent active gastrointestinal major bleedings was referred for transcatheter LAAO at Parma University Hospital after multidisciplinary team evaluation. Pre-procedural coronary computed tomography angiography revealed a giant windsock LAA, with a maximum ostium diameter of 44 mm, a landing zone diameter of 34 mm, and maximal length of 49 mm. Patient's management was particularly challenging given that available LAAO devices were too small to completely exclude the LAA. In accordance with the manufacturer, a custom-made LAmbre™ Closure System (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China), which specifically fitted with patient's LAA anatomy, was designed and successfully deployed under transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopic guidance. Periprocedural TEE confirmed the appropriate position of the device and the absence of peri-device leaks. No adverse ischaemic and haemorrhagic events were reported at 3-months follow-up. Discussion We present a case of a successful transcatheter LAAO procedure by deploying a custom-made LAmbre device 38/46 mm to mechanically exclude a giant windsock LAA. This case illustrates the effectiveness of a custom-made device strategy, which potentially enables the closure of all complex LAA anatomies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have a five-fold increase in stroke events, and ∼90% of the thrombi develop in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a safe and feasible alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in selected patients with non-valvular AF and contraindications to OAC. Atrial fibrillation is closely associated with mitral disease, and there is a growing interest in combined procedures. More than half of patients undergoing a mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) suffer of AF and many have high or unacceptable bleeding risk. Case summary We present a case of an 80-year-old woman suffering from paroxysmal AF, right carotid siphon aneurysm, and primary mitral regurgitation, with a high bleeding risk, who underwent a combined intervention of M-TEER and LAAO. Discussion The combination of these two procedures is a logical step once the access to the left atrium is obtained with a transseptal puncture (TSP) and a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is in place to guide both procedures. The turning point in LAAO procedure is a correct TSP allowing coaxial alignment of the sheath with the LAA neck. Steerable delivery sheaths are promising dedicated tools, particularly in challenging anatomy or during combined procedures requiring different TSP positions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative approach to anticoagulants. Nonetheless, data regarding the outcomes of LAAC procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia remain lacking. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of the composite endpoint comprising ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, and cardiac cause of death among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and thrombocytopenia who were either undergoing LAAC or receiving oral anticoagulants. The secondary endpoint was the determination of total mortality. Data from a prospective, single-center registry of patients undergoing LAAC procedures were analyzed. A subset of 50 consecutive patients with thrombocytopenia were selected. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a thrombocyte count below 150,000. Subsequently, from patients hospitalized with AF receiving oral anticoagulants, 50 patients were further chosen based on propensity score matching, ensuring comparability with the study group. The primary endpoint occurred in 2% of patients in the LAAC group and 10% of patients in the non-LAAC group (p = 0.097). Additionally, a significant difference was noted in the occurrence of the secondary endpoint, which was observed in 0% of patients in the LAAC group and 10% of patients in the non-LAAC group (p = 0.025). In patients with thrombocytopenia the LAAC procedure improves prognosis compared with continued anticoagulant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has shown non-inferiority compared to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke. The objective of this study was to assess whether LAAC reduces the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and/or chronic anaemia associated with OAC, as well as the consumption of healthcare resources. Prospective, single-center study from 2016 to 2022, LAAC was performed. Clinical, analytical and healthcare resource consumption data were collected (endoscopies, blood transfusions, hospital admissions) prior and 6 months after LAAC. 43 patients were included, with an average age of 77.6 years. LAAC indication was upper, low and obscure GIB in 7 (16%), 8 (19%) and 28 patients (65%) respectively. GIB source was intestinal angiodysplasias in 27 patients (63%), occult origin in 12 (28%), and others (antral vascular ectasia, portal hypertension gastropathy, etc.) in 4 patients (9%). The mean number of packed red blood cells per patient before LAAC was (mean ± SD) 7.29 ± 5 vs 0.42 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001); endoscopic procedures were 4.34 ± 2.85 vs 0.27 ± 0.76 (p < 0.001); and hospitalizations 2.67 ± 2.14 vs 0.03 ± 0.17 (p < 0.001), with a hospital stay of 21.5 ± 17.3 vs 0.09 ± 0.5 days (p < 0.001) at 6 months post-intervention. Haemoglobin value increased from 8.1 ± 1.2g/dl to 12.4 ± 2.2g/dl (p < 0.001) at 6 months. No thromboembolic events were registered during a median follow-up of 16.6 months (range 6–65). LAAC could be a safe and effective alternative to OAC in patients with non-valvular AF presenting significant, recurrent or potentially unresolvable GIB. This intervention also leads to important savings in the consumption of healthcare resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past two decades, percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has proven to be a viable alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), in particular in those patients who are at increased risk for stroke and bleeding complications. This systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of anatomical features, patient selection, procedural planning and execution, complications, medical treatment following the procedure, and contemporary outcome data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing dialysis is high, however, the high risk of bleeding often hampers with a correct anticoagulation in ESKD patients with AF, despite high thromboembolic risk. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is a anticoagulation (OAT) for thromboembolism prevention in AF populations with high hemorrhagic risk. Methods and Results The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAA occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients undergoing the procedure (LAA occlusion cohort, n  = 106), in comparison with two other ESKD cohorts, one taking warfarin (Warfarin cohort, n  = 114) and the other without anticoagulation therapy (No-OAT cohort, n  = 148). After a median follow-up of 4 years, a Cox regression model, adjusted for possible confounding factors, showed that the hazard ratios (HRs) of thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were 0.19 (95%CI 0.04–0.96; p  = 0.045) and 0.16 (95%CI 0.04–0.66; p  = 0.011) as compared with Warfarin and No-OAT cohorts, respectively. The HR of bleeding in the LAA occlusion cohort was 0.37 (95%CI 0.16–0.83; p  = 0.017) compared to Warfarin cohort, while there were no significant differences between the LAA occlusion and the No-OAT cohort (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.23–1.12; p  = 0.094). Adjusted Cox regression models showed lower mortality in patients undergoing LAA occlusion as compared with both the Warfarin cohort (HR 0.60; 95%CI 0.38–0.94; p  = 0.027) and no-OAT cohort (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.34–0.78; p  = 0.002). Thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were lower than expected according to the CHA2DS2VASc score (1.7 [95%CI 0.3–3.0] vs 6.7 events per 100 person/years, p  < 0.001). Conclusion In ESKD patients with AF, LAA occlusion is safe and effective and is associated with reduced mortality compared with OAT or no therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulation therapy plays a crucial role in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), considering the high morbidity and mortality of AF‐related ischemic strokes. With the plausible hypothesis that left atrial appendage is the main source of thrombus in AF patients, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been regarded as a potential substitute to oral anticoagulation in order to meet the unmet needs for stroke prevention, particularly in patients with high bleeding risk. Notable advancements in safety, efficacy, and device innovation have been made in recent years, albeit concerns still remain regarding the insufficient efficacy data, device‐related complications, and the need for procedural optimization. We aim to review current knowledge about LAAC and provide potential future directions for the remaining key issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and previous stroke have a significantly higher risk of stroke recurrence. This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of the LAmbre left atrial appendage occlusion device in NVAF patients with a history of stroke. Methods: We examined 103 consecutive NVAF patients in 11 Chinese medical centers who had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and underwent placement of the LAmbre device. Follow‐up was conducted 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The primary endpoints were the incidence of new ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, or cardiac death. Secondary endpoints were serious perioperative or device‐related complications and cerebral, gastrointestinal, or other bleeding events requiring transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells. Results: Mean patient age was 67.63 ± 7.14 years; mean CHA2DS2‐VASc score was 4.72 ± 1.18 and mean HAS‐BLED score was 1.90 ± 1.00. LAmbre device placement was successful in 101 patients (98.05%). Mean follow‐up was 12.2 months. Five patients (4.95%) developed a new pericardial effusion after the procedure; none required treatment. Eighty‐six patients (85.15%) exhibited no peri‐device leak (PDL). However, 13 (12.8%) had a small (0–3 mm) PDL and two (2.3%) had a moderate PDL (3–5 mm). One recurrent stroke occurred during follow‐up (1.1%). No other complications occurred. Conclusions: This multicenter study shows the safety and efficacy of LAmbre left atrial appendage occlusion for NVAF patients with a history of stroke or TIA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The impact of psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) on outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device implantation is unclear. We aimed to analyze the association of psychosocial risk factors with outcomes in patients undergoing LAAO. Methods: Data were extracted from the Nationwide readmissions database for the calendar years 2016-2019. LAAO device implantations were identified using ICD-10-CM code 02L73DK. The outcomes of interest included procedural complications, inpatient mortality, resource utilization, and 30-day readmissions. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the absence or presence of PSRFs. Results: Our cohort included a total of 54,900 patients, of which, 19,984 (36.4%) had ≥ 1 PSRF as compared to 34,916 (63.6%) with no PSRFs. The prevalence of major complications (3.3% vs 2.8%, p=0.03) was significantly higher in patients with ≥ 1 PSRF as compared to no PSRFs. Furthermore, patients with ≥ 1 PSRF had a significantly higher 30-day readmission rate (6.9% vs 6.2%, p=0.02). In the multivariable model, the presence of ≥ 1 PSRF was associated with significantly higher odds of overall complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR):1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.21; p=0.02]. Additionally, the presence of ≥ 1 PSRF was associated with higher odds of prolonged hospital stay for more than one day (aOR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.21-1.40; p<0.01). Conclusion: The high prevalence of PSRFs may be associated with poorer outcomes in patients with AF patients undergoing LAAO device implantations. These data merit further study to help in the selection process of patients for LAAO for improved outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be a viable option for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a contraindication for oral anticoagulation. No evidence evaluating the safety of this procedure in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) exists. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CIED function is affected by LAAO and to explore LAAO procedural characteristics and complications in patients with a CIED. Methods: This single-center cohort study included consecutive patients scheduled for percutaneous LAAO. Patients with a CIED prior to LAAO were selected and compared to the patients without CIED, concerning procedural characteristics and peri-procedural complications. In the group of patients with CIEDs, essential pacemaker integrity parameters were compared before and after the procedure to detect possible micro and macro lead displacements. Results: Thirty-one patients with CIED were scheduled for LAAO (age 73.7 ± 5.4 years, 65% males, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, and HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.0). The 245 patients without CIED were younger, and HAS-BLED-score was slightly lower (69.4 ± 8.2 years, p < 0.001; 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.022). Patients without CIED more frequently underwent LAAO combined with catheter ablation (p = 0.002). All other procedural characteristics were comparable between both groups. No visible lead displacement was observed on chest X-ray after LAAO. Additionally, no differences in impedance, threshold, or intracardiac sensing in various CIED lead locations were found prior versus post LAAO. Conclusion: This study supports the feasibility and safety of LAAO in patients with a CIED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one the most prevalent arrhythmias globally and is associated with a significantly higher risk of morbidity and mortality, including an up to five-fold increase in risk of stroke. While oral anticoagulation therapy remains the standard approach for stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a viable alternative for patients who are intolerant to long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, selecting appropriate candidates for LAAO requires a comprehensive evaluation that considers various clinical factors, although this presents a challenge in clinical practice. This review aims to provide an overview of the current recommendations for patient selection in LAAO procedures and the key factors that need to be considered both before and after the procedure, as well as the ongoing advancements in this field that may facilitate the selection of patients for LAAO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims This study was performed to compare the usability, efficiency, and safety of a modified angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture (TSP) technique vs. the conventional approach in facilitating access into the left atrium during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Methods and results The ADVANCE-LAAO trial (Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted vs. Conventional Transseptal Puncture for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (NCT05125159). Patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO were prospectively enrolled from four centres and randomly assigned to an angioplasty guidewire-assisted TSP group (n = 131) or to a conventional Brockenbrough needle TSP group (n = 132). The primary endpoint was the one-time success rate of TSP. We also analysed the TSP procedure time, failure rate of the assigned TSP type, radiation dose, contrast dose, and procedural complications in both groups. All patients in the guidewire-assisted group underwent successful TSP, whereas five in the standard conventional group switched to the guidewire-assisted approach. The guidewire-assisted puncture improved the one-time success rate (92.4 vs. 77.3%, P = 0.001), shortened the TSP procedure time (109.2 ± 48.2 vs. 120.5 ± 57.6 s, P = 0.023), and tended to have a higher rate of good coaxial orientation of the sheath with the left atrial appendage during the LAAO procedure (66.4 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.059). No TSP-related complications occurred in the guidewire-assisted TSP group, whereas two complications occurred in the conventional TSP group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of the assigned TSP type, the total procedure time, the total radiation dose, the rate of successful LAAO implantation, or the procedural complication rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion This study confirmed that angioplasty guidewire-assisted puncture can effectively improve the success rate of TSP during LAAO procedures. This novel technique has high potential for application in interventional therapies requiring TSP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is a major risk factor for stroke, with an incidence rate of 4–5% per year. The use of DOACs is recommended for specific patient populations however the risk of bleeding commonly precludes their use. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a relatively novel procedure recommended for such patients. We set out to analyse the initial success and safety of this procedure in a single site. Results: Twenty patients were included in the study with an average age of 81 years. Seventy percent (n = 14) were male. Ninety percent (n = 18) had a history of major bleeding, an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation. The mean CHADS2VaSc and HASBLED scores were 4.75 and 3.7, respectively. The technical success rate was 95% comparable with existing data. The procedural success rate in our study was 80%. The most frequent complication was cardiac tamponade, occurring in 10% of cases. Conclusion: We report lower technical success and procedural success rates in an older population cohort than historically studied, 90% of whom had an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation, with higher CHADS2VaSc and HASBLED scores than commonly studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) performed percutaneously has emerged as a widely accepted method for stroke prevention, offering a viable alternative to anticoagulation. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. However, in certain cases, the use of a single LAAO device may not adequately achieve optimal closure due to variations in the anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA). Case summary In this manuscript, we highlight the successful closure of a bilobed LAA with a large ostium utilizing two WATCHMAN™ FLX devices and using the double sheath technique. The aim was to achieve optimal closure and address the unique anatomical characteristics of the patient's LAA. Discussion The utilization of two LAAO devices in bilobed appendage anatomy, where a single device may not be sufficient, is possible, although it poses a challenge because of the lack of technical expertise and limited published evidence. Transoesophageal imaging can serve as a valuable tool for assessing the precise anatomy of the LAA and guide the selection and placement of the occlusion devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)–guided left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly common. Patients with previous atrial septal defect closure constitute a significant challenge for transseptal access. Case summary A 49-year-old man with persistent atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and reduced left ventricular function was considered for LAAO after a life-threatening intrathoracic bleeding while on oral anticoagulation. Percutaneous atrial septal defect closure was performed 15 years before with a 34 mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography demonstrated the atrial septal occluder device with a small native interatrial septum at the inferior margin. The left atrial appendage landing zone measured 17 × 22 mm. The LAAO was performed under local analgesia. A steerable sheath was used to guide the transseptal puncture, and the ICE probe was traced along a guidewire across the atrial septum. A 12-F Amulet delivery sheath was advanced through the same transseptal hole. Under ICE and fluoroscopy guidance, a 25 mm Amplatzer Amulet was deployed. Follow-up imaging showed a well-positioned device with a small peridevice leak at the disc. Discussion This case report illustrates the feasibility of LAAO performed with ICE guidance from the left atrium in a patient with a large Amplatzer Septal Occluder with a small native interatrial septum. It demonstrates that prior atrial septal defect closure should not be considered as a contraindication for LAAO but warrants careful preprocedural planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of thromboembolism, who cannot tolerate long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). Questions persist regarding effectiveness and safety of this treatment and the optimal post-interventional antithrombotic regimen after LAAO. Methods: We retrospectively gathered data from 428 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO in 6 Italian high-volume centres, aimed at describing the real-world utilization, safety, and effectiveness of LAAO procedures, also assessing the clinical outcomes associated with different antithrombotic strategies. Results: Among the entire population, 20 (4.7 %) patients experienced a combination of pericardial effusion and periprocedural major bleeding: 8 (1.9 %) pericardial effusion, 1 (0.3 %) fatal bleeding, and 3 (0.7 %) non-fatal procedural major bleeding. Patients were discharged with different antithrombotic regimens: dual (DAPT) (27 %) or single (SAPT) (26 %) antiplatelet therapy, OAC (27 %), other antithrombotic regimens (14 %). Very few patients were not prescribed with antithrombotic drugs (6 %). At a medium 523 ± 58 days follow-up, 14 patients (3.3 %) experienced all-cause death, 6 patients (1.4 %) cardiovascular death, 3 patients (0.7 %) major bleeding, 10 patients (2.6 %) clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and 3 patients (0.7 %) ischemic stroke. At survival analysis, with DAPT as the reference group, OAC therapy was associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that LAAO is a safe procedure. Different individualized post-discharge antithrombotic regimens are now adopted, likely driven by the perceived thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk. The incidence of both ischemic and bleeding events tends to be low.

Thrombotic complications of atrial fibrillation continue to pose a significant challenge in clinical practice today. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising alternative to oral anticoagulation for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. However, despite the potential benefits, there is still the possibility of life-threatening complications such as device dislocation. In this case study, we present a patient who experienced severe hemodynamic disturbances due to the embolization of LAAO device into the left ventricular outflow tract, resulting in a torn mitral valve and secondary massive mitral regurgitation, just 3 hours after the procedure. As a result, emergent surgical intervention was required to remove the device and repair the mitral valve. We also conducted a review of previous studies on the retrieval of dislodged left atrial appendage occluders through surgical procedures. It is crucial to maintain vigilance, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and respond promptly to ensure the safety and efficacy of LAAO procedures.

Abstract Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been rapidly evolving since FDA’s approval in 2015 and has become more of a same-day-discharge procedure. Cancer patient with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) population can benefit from the procedure but the in-hospital outcomes and readmission data were rarely studied. Objectives We investigated the utilization, in-hospital and readmission outcomes in cancer patients with AF who underwent LAAO. Methods Data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample and National Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2019. Patients with primary diagnosis of AF admitted for LAAO (ICD-10 code 02L73DK) were grouped by cancer as a secondary diagnosis. We assessed in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges, and complications. Thirty-day readmission rates were compared. Results LAAO was performed in 60,380 patients with AF and 3% were cancer patients. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality and total hospital charges; however, cancer patients tended to have longer hospital stay (1.59 ± 0.11 vs. 1.32 ± 0.02, p = 0.013). Among complications, cancer patients had higher rates in open or percutaneous pericardial drainage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–4.76) and major bleeding events (aOR 7.07; 95% CI 1.82–27.38). There was no statistical significance of 30-day readmission rates between patients with and without cancer (10.0% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.34). The most common readmission reason in cancer patients was gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions LAAO is a promising procedure in cancer patients complicated by AF with contraindication to anticoagulation. Readmission rate is comparable between patients with and without cancer.

Abstract Background The increasing global prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has led to a growing demand for stroke prevention strategies, resulting in higher healthcare costs. High-quality economic evaluations of stroke prevention strategies can play a crucial role in maximising efficient allocation of resources. In this systematic review, we assessed the methodological quality of such economic evaluations. Methods We searched electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Econ Lit to identify model-based economic evaluations comparing the left atrial appendage closure procedure (LAAC) and oral anticoagulants published in English since 2000. Data on study characteristics, model-based details, and analyses were collected. The methodological quality was evaluated using the modified Economic Evaluations Bias (ECOBIAS) checklist. For each of the 22 biases listed in this checklist, studies were categorised into one of four groups: low risk, partial risk, high risk due to inadequate reporting, or high risk. To gauge the overall quality of each study, we computed a composite score by assigning + 2, 0, − 1 and − 2 to each risk category, respectively. Results In our analysis of 12 studies, majority adopted a healthcare provider or payer perspective and employed Markov Models with the number of health states varying from 6 to 16. Cost-effectiveness results varied across studies. LAAC displayed a probability exceeding 50% of being the cost-effective option in six out of nine evaluations compared to warfarin, six out of eight evaluations when compared to dabigatran, in three out of five evaluations against apixaban, and in two out of three studies compared to rivaroxaban. The methodological quality scores for individual studies ranged from 10 to − 12 out of a possible 24. Most high-risk ratings were due to inadequate reporting, which was prevalent across various biases, including those related to data identification, baseline data, treatment effects, and data incorporation. Cost measurement omission bias and inefficient comparator bias were also common. Conclusions While most studies concluded LAAC to be the cost-effective strategy for stroke prevention in AF, shortcomings in methodological quality raise concerns about reliability and validity of results. Future evaluations, free of these shortcomings, can yield stronger policy evidence.

Pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation using the Farapulse system, followed by left atrial appendage occlusion, have been achieved as single combined procedure to treat long‐standing persistent atrial fibrillation in a patient at high hemorrhagic risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, and is associated with a significant risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising alternative for patients with contraindications or intolerance to anticoagulant therapy. This review summarises the current evidence, indications, and technical advancements in surgical and percutaneous LAAO. Preprocedural planning relies on various imaging techniques, each with unique advantages and limitations. The existing randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses demonstrate favourable results for both percutaneous and surgical LAAO. Postprocedural management emphasises personalised anticoagulation strategies and comprehensive imaging surveillance to ensure device stability and detect complications. Future focus should be put on antithrombotic regimens, investigating predictors of device-related complications, and simplifying procedural aspects to enhance patient outcomes. In summary, LAAO is presented as a valuable therapeutic option for preventing AF-related thromboembolic events, with ongoing research aimed at refining techniques and improving patient care.

BackgroundLeft atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for mitigating ischemic stroke risk in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but safety data in patients with significant kidney disease are limited.ObjectiveTo determine the association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes after LAAO in AF patients.MethodsData were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2018. Watchman implantations were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes of 37.90 and 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, inpatient mortality, and resource utilization with LAAO.ResultsA total of 36,065 Watchman recipients were included in the final analysis. CKD (9.8%, n = 3545) and ESRD (3%, n = 1155) were associated with a higher prevalence of major complications and mortality in crude analysis compared to no CKD. After multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, CKD was associated with length of stay (LOS) >1 day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.355; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.234-1.488), median cost >$24,663 (aOR 1.267; 95% CI 1.176-1.365), and acute kidney injury (aOR 4.134; 95% CI 3.536-4.833), while ESRD was associated with in-patient mortality (aOR 7.156; 95% CI 3.294-15.544).ConclusionThe prevalence of CKD and ESRD was approximately 13% in AF patients undergoing Watchman LAAO implantations. CKD was independently associated with prolonged LOS, higher hospitalization costs, and acute kidney injury, while ESRD was independently associated with in-patient mortality.

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the origin of most heart thrombi which can lead to stroke or other cerebrovascular event in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to prove safety and low complication rate of surgical LAA amputation using cut and sew technique with control of its effectiveness. Methods 303 patients who have undergone selective LAA amputation were enrolled in the study in a period from 10/17 to 08/20. The LAA amputation was performed concomitant to routine cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest with or without previous history of AF. The operative and clinical data were evaluated. Extent of LAA amputation was examined intraoperatively by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Six months in follow up, the patients were controlled regarding clinical status and episodes of strokes. Results Average age of study population was 69.9 ± 19.2 and 81.9% of patients were male. In only three patients was residual stump after LAA amputation larger than 1 cm with average stump size 0.28 ± 0.34 cm. 3 patients (1%) developed postoperative bleeding. Postoperatively 77 (25.4%) patients developed postoperative AF (POAF), of which 29 (9.6%) still had AF at discharge. On 6 months follow up only 5 patients had NYHA class III and 1 NYHA class IV. Seven patients reported with leg oedema and no patient experienced any cerebrovascular event in early postoperative follow up. Conclusion LAA amputation can be performed safely and completely leaving minimal to no LAA residual stump.

Despite the unprecedented advances in the left atrial appendage occlusion field, device-related thrombus (DRT) remains an unresolved issue with the therapy. This paper aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of the literature on the incidence, clinical impact, predictors and management of DRT and propose a novel classification of DRT and hypoattenuated thickening. [Display omitted] • Device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage occlusion is rare but is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and is challenging to manage. • Independent predictors of DRT include nonmodifiable clinical characteristics (eg, permanent AF) and modifiable procedural factors (eg, deep implantation). • This report proposes a novel mechanistic classification of DRT and HAT that can be used to guide future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scarce data exist on the evolution of device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). This study sought to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT in LAAC recipients. Data were obtained from an international multicenter registry including 237 patients diagnosed with DRT after LAAC. Of these, 214 patients with a subsequent imaging examination after the initial diagnosis of DRT were included. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was defined as either persisting or recurrent DRT. DRT resolved in 153 (71.5%) cases and persisted in 61 (28.5%) cases. Larger DRT size (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.009) and female (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.12-5.26; P = 0.02) were independently associated with persistent DRT. After DRT resolution, 82 (53.6%) of 153 patients had repeated device imaging, with 14 (17.1%) cases diagnosed with recurrent DRT. Overall, 75 (35.0%) patients had unfavorable evolution of DRT, and the sole predictor was average thrombus size at initial diagnosis (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003), with an optimal cutoff size of 7 mm (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.39-4.52; P = 0.002). Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a higher rate of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT (26.7% vs 15.1%; HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.15-3.94; P = 0.02). About one-third of DRT events had an unfavorable evolution (either persisting or recurring), with a larger initial thrombus size (particularly >7 mm) portending an increased risk. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an approved alternative for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for patients with an "appropriate rationale" to avoid long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). Many patients undergoing LAAO are at high risk of bleeding. This study sought to investigate whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a safe alternative to OAC (direct oral anticoagulation [DOAC] or warfarin) with aspirin after LAAO. Using National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO registry data, patients undergoing Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific) implantation (August 5, 2020-September 30, 2021) were included in 1:1 propensity-matched analyses comparing discharge medication regimens (DAPT, DOAC/aspirin, or warfarin/aspirin). A composite endpoint (death, stroke, major bleeding, and systemic embolism), its components, and device-related thrombus between discharge and 45 days were evaluated. In 49,968 patients implanted with the Watchman FLX during the study period, the mean age was 77 years, and 40% were women. Postimplant DOAC/aspirin was prescribed in 24,497 patients, warfarin/aspirin in 3,913, and DAPT in 4,155. DAPT patients had more comorbid conditions than patients receiving OAC/aspirin. After propensity score matching, the 45-day composite endpoint rates were similar among the groups (DAPT = 3.44% vs DOAC/aspirin: 4.06%; P = 0.13 and DAPT = 3.23% vs warfarin/aspirin: 3.08%; P = 0.75). Death, stroke, and device-related thrombus were also similar; major bleeding was slightly increased in DOAC/aspirin patients (DAPT = 2.48% vs DOAC/aspirin = 3.25%; P = 0.04 and DAPT = 2.25% vs warfarin/aspirin = 2.22%; P = 0.93). In a large registry, DAPT had a similar safety profile compared with current Food and Drug Administration–approved postimplant drug regimens of OAC with aspirin following LAAO with the Watchman FLX. Shared decision making for nonpharmacologic stroke prevention should include a discussion of postprocedure medical therapy options. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the role of the CT‐derived angle between the intra‐atrial septum (IAS) and the left atrial appendage (LAA) on procedural complexity and clinical outcomes in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. Background: Given the broad variations in anatomy, LAAO remains one of the most challenging interventional procedures in structural heart disease. In recent years, preprocedural cardiac tomography (CT) has evolved as a valuable tool; however, prediction of procedural complexity remains cumbersome. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients that underwent LAAO at our center in whom pre‐procedural cardiac CT‐scans were available. Among other baseline parameters, we measured the angle between the LAA ostium and the preferred transseptal puncture site at the IAS. We compared patients with an angle above and below the median regarding procedural characteristics and procedural outcome. Results: The median angle between the LAA and the IAS was 127.3° (IQR: 120.9–141.3). LAAO took longer in patients with a measured angle below the median (55.0 ± 22.7 min vs. 41.3 ± 17.5 min; p =.04), resulting in longer radiation times (13.0 ± 5.3 min vs. 9.8 ± 5.7 min; p =.04) and more contrast use (61.1 ± 47.5 mL vs. 33.6 ± 24.7 mL; p =.05). Moreover, the necessity for a sheath exchange was significantly higher (30.4% vs. 4.2%, p =.02) and device repositioning or device resizing trended to be more frequent (26.1% vs. 8.3%; p =.1 and 21.7% vs. 8.3%; p =.2). There were no differences in procedural outcome, device‐position and peri‐device leak (PDL). Conclusions: The angle between the transseptal puncture site and the LAA ostium may serve as a predictor for more demanding LAAO interventions. In our study a steeper angle led to a prolonged procedure resulting in higher doses of contrast and radiation, but was not associated with a worse procedural outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]