51. Analysis of a Surgical Treatment for Persistent Urorectal Fistulas after Radical Cancer Surgery: A Comparison of Prostate Cancer and Rectal Cancer
- Author
-
Yoshinobu Komai, Norio Saito, Minoru Sakuraba, Yasuyuki Sakai, and Masaaki Ito
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Urinary Fistula ,Colorectal cancer ,Urology ,Rectus Abdominis ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Surgical Flaps ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Rectal Fistula ,Surgical treatment ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Prostatectomy ,Rectal Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Gracilis Muscle ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,business ,Cancer surgery - Abstract
Introduction: The study aimed to present our experience of surgical treatment for urorectal fistulas (URF) that develop after cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients with URF who were treated at our institution from 2005 through 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 7 patients had previous surgical treatment of prostate cancer (PC) and the other 7 had been treated for rectal cancer (RC). The fistula was resected through a perineal incision, and the urinary and fecal defects were separately closed with the hinge flap method followed by interposition of a muscle flap transfer. Results: The overall fistula closure rate was 79%. Although the closure rate of the URF was lower in patients with previous RC surgery compared to the PC patients (57 vs. 100%), it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: URF treatment using an interposition muscle flap offers a high success rate of fistula closure. However, complicated fistulas occurring after RC surgery involving the prostate or the seminal vesicle might be difficult to repair by this surgery alone.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF