Search

McQuate, Grant T., Liquido, Nicanor J., Nakamichi, Kelly A. A. (2017): Annotated World Bibliography of Host Plants of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insecta Mundi 2017 (527): 1-339, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5353580, {"references": ["Agarwal, M. L., D. D. Sharma, and O. Rahman. 1987. Melon fruit-fly and its control. Indian Horticulture 32: 10-11.", "Agarwal, M. L., and S. S. Yazdani. 1991. A note on growth potential of melon fruit fly, Dacus (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae Coquillett in relation to certain host plants in North Bihar. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University (BAU) 3: 61-62.", "Agrawal, N., and Y. K. Mathur. 1991. The fruit fly problem associated with cultivated crops in India and its control. p. 140-151. In: S. Vijaysegaran and A. G. Ibrahim (eds.). Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on fruit flies in the tropics, Kuala Lumpur, 1988. Malaysian Agricultural Research Development Institute (MARDI) and Malaysian Plant Protection Society; Kuala Lumpur; Malaysia. 430 p.", "Akhtaruzzaman, M., M. Z. Alam, and M. A. Sardar. 1999. Suppressing fruit fly infestation by bagging cucumber at different days after anthesis. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology 9: 103-112.", "Akter, H., S. A. Khan, and M. S. Islam. 2010. Can Solanaceae vegetables serve as equivalent host to Cucurbitaeceae for the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) in Bangladesh? Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 6: 697-700.", "Ali, S. A. I., S. A. Mohamed, M. E. E. Mahmoud, S. A. I. Sabiel, S. Ali, and A. Ali. 2014a. Monitoring of Tephritidae of fruit trees and their level of infestation in South Kordofan State, Sudan. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 2: 687-693.", "Ali, S. A. I., S. A. Mohammed, and M. A. A. Fadel. 2014b. Monitoring some Tephritidae insects that affect fruit trees and their host range in Abugubeiha region, South Kordofan State, Sudan. Arab Journal of Plant Protection 32: 113-118.", "Allwood, A. J., A. Chinajariyawong, R. A. I. Drew, E. L. Hamacek, D. L. Hancock, C. Hengsawad, J. C. Jipanin, M. Jirasurat, C. K. Krong, S. Kritsaneepaiboon, C. T. S. Leong, and S. Vijaysegaran. 1999. Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southeast Asia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement 7: 1-92.", "Amin, M. R., T. Sarkar, and I.-J. Chun. 2011. Comparison of host plants infestation level and life history of fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett) on cucurbitaceous crops. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 52: 541-545.", "Arevalo-Galarza, L., and P. Follett. 2011. Response of Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) to metabolic stress disinfection and disinfection treatment. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 75-80.", "Armstrong, J. W. 1983. Infestation biology of three fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species on 'Brazilian,' 'Valery,' and 'William's' cultivars of banana in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 539-543.", "Armstrong, J. W., and D. L. Garcia. 1985. Methyl bromide quarantine fumigations for Hawaii-grown cucumbers infested with melon fly and oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 1308-1310.", "Armstrong, J. W., J. D. Hansen, B. K. S. Hu, and S. A. Brown. 1989. High-temperature, forced-air quarantine treatment for papayas infested with tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 82: 1667-1674.", "Armstrong, J. W., B. K. S. Hu, and S. A. Brown. 1995. Single temperature forced hot-air quarantine treatment to control fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in papaya. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 678-682.", "Armstrong, J. W., and R. I. Vargas. 1982. Resistance of pineapple variety '59-656' to field populations of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 75: 781-782.", "Australian Quarantine Service, Commonwealth Department of Primary Industry. 1987. Fruit flies. Plant Quarantine Leaflet no. 29. Australian Government Publishing Service; Canberra. 6 p.", "Ayyar, T. V. R. 1935. Fruit flies and their economic importance in S. India. The Madras Agricultural Journal 23: 127-137.", "Back, E. A., and C. E. Pemberton. 1914. Life history of the melon fly. Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 269-274.", "Back, E. A., and C. E. Pemberton. 1917. The melon fly in Hawaii, Bulletin No. 491, Washington Government Printing Office; Washington, D.C. 64 p.", "Back, E. A., and C. E. Pemberton. 1918. The melon fly, Bulletin No. 643, Washington Government Printing Office; Washington, D.C. 32 p.", "Badii, K. B., M. K. Billah, K. Afreh-Nuamah, and D. Obeng-Ofori. 2015. Species composition and host range of fruit-infesting flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in northern Ghana. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 35: 137-151.", "Bains, S. S., and P. S. Sidhu. 1984. Role of different food plants in the population build-up of the melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae in Punjab. Indian Journal of Ecology 11: 297-302.", "Banerji, R., S. K. Sahoo, S. K. Das, and S. Jha. 2005. Studies on incidence of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coq., in relation to weather parameters on bitter gourd in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Journal of Entomological Research 29: 179-182.", "Barma, P., S. Jha, and S. Banerjee. 2013. Prediction of population development of melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coq.) on pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.). African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 4740-4747.", "Bateman, M. A. 1989. A report on the tropical fruit flies of the South Pacific Region. South Pacific Commission; Suva, Fiji. 32 p.", "Batra, H. N. 1953. Biology and control of Dacus diversus Coquillett and Carpomyia vesuviana Costa and important notes on other fruit flies in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 23: 87-112.", "Batra, H. N. 1964. The population, behaviour, host specificity and development potential of fruit flies bred at constant temperature in winter. Indian Journal of Entomology 26: 195-206.", "Beller, S., and P. Bhenchitr. 1936. Preliminary list of insect pests and their host plants in Siam, p. 23, Technical Bulletin No. 1. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Bangkok, Thailand (Siam). 68 p.", "Bhagat, K. C., V. K. Koul, and R. K. Nehru. 1998. Seasonal variation of sex ratio in Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett. Journal of Advanced Zoology 19: 55-56.", "Bhatia, S. K., and Y. Mahto. 1968. Note on breeding of fruit flies Dacus ciliatus Loew and D. cucurbitae Coquillett in stem galls of Coccinia indica W. and A. Indian Journal of Entomology 30: 244-245.", "Bhatia, S. K., and Y. Mahto. 1970. Influence of temperature on the speed of development of melonfly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Trypetidae). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 40: 821-828.", "Bhowmik, P., D. Mandal, and M. L. Chatterjee. 2014. Studies on the infestation levels by melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett, on pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.) and bitter gourd (Momordica charantia Linn.) in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Journal of Entomological Research 38(3): 195-200.", "Binder, R. G., R. A. Flath, and T. R. Mon. 1989. Volatile components of bittermelon. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 37: 418-420.", "Birah, A., S. Singh, P. K. Singh, and S. D. Roy. 2015. Evaluation and efficacy of pest management modules for cucurbits against fruitfly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) in Andaman. Vegetos 28: 62-66.", "Blackman, L. G. 1909. Our melon pest. The Hawaiian Forester and Agriculturist 6: 281-286.", "Borah, R. K. 1996. Influence of sowing seasons and varieties on the infestation of fruitfly Baetrocera cucurbitae (Dacus cucurbitae) in cucumber in the hill zone of Assam. Indian Journal of Entomology 58: 382-383.", "Borah , R. K. 1997. Effect of insecticides on pest incidence in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in hill zone of Assam. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67: 332-333.", "Botha, J., A. Reeves, and D. Hardie. 2004. Melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) with reference to other fruit fly species of importance to the cucurbit industry: Exotic threat to Western Australia. Government of Western Australia Department of Agriculture Factsheet no. 5/2004; Perth. 2 p.", "CABI [Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International]. 2016. Bactrocera cucurbitae (melon fly). Datasheet. Invasive Species Compendium. CAB International; Wallingford, UK. (Available at ~ http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/17683 . Last accessed June 2016.)", "Cantelo, W. W., and E. P. Pholboon. 1965. A host list of the insects of Thailand. Department of Agriculture, Royal Thai Government and the United States Operations Mission to Thailand. Agency for International Development; Bangkok, Thailand. 149 p.", "Cantrell, B. K., B. Chadwick, and A. Cahill. 1999. National contingency plan for managing an incursion of melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in Australia. Horticultural Research and Development Corporation; Gordon NSW. 54 p.", "Capinera, J. L. 2001. Handbook of vegetable pests. Academic Press; New York. 729 p.", "Carey, J. R., and R. V. Dowell. 1989. Exotic fruit fly pests and California agriculture. California Agriculture 43: 38-40.", "Carey, J. R., E. J. Harris, and D. O. McInnis. 1985. Demography of a native strain of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae, from Hawaii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 38: 195-199.", "California Department of Food and Agriculture [CDFA]. 2001. Exotic fruit fly regulatory response manual, Section 5, Appendix A: Fruit fly host materials list, Melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae), p. 9-10. Available at: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/PE/EFFRRM/pdf/Section5_Appendix_A_Host_ Lists.pdf. Accessed June 2016.", "CERIS. 1993. FACTS-27. Fact sheet for fruit flies. Center for Environmental and Regulatory Information Systems (CERIS). National Agricultural Pest Information System (NAPIS). Purdue University; West Lafayette, IN. 8 p.", "Chaturvedia, P. L. 1947. The relative incidence of Dacus ciliatus Loew. and Dacus cucurbitae Coq. on cucurbit fruits at Kanpur. Indian Journal of Entomology 9: 109.", "Chaudhary, F. K., and G. M. Patel. 2007a. Biology of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett, on pumpkin. Indian Journal of Entomology 69: 168-171.", "Chaudhary, F. K., and G. M. Patel. 2007b. Adult activity of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett in pumpkin field. Insect Environment 13: 52-53.", "Chawla, S. S. 1966. Some critical observations on the biology of the melon fly Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Trypetidae). Research Bulletin of Punjab University (Science) 17: 105-109.", "Cheema, M. A. 1964. Study of resistance in muskmelon varieties against the infestation of Dacus cucurbitae Coq. Pakistan Journal of Science 16: 154-160.", "Chelliah, S. 1970. Host influence on the development of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett. Indian Journal of Entomology 32: 381-383.", "Chelliah, S., and C. N. Sambandam. 1971. Role of certain mechanical factors in Cucumis callosus (Rottl.) Cogn., in imparting resistance to Dacus cucurbitae C. Annamalai University Agricultural Research Annual (AUARA) 3: 48-53.", "Chelliah, S., and C. N. Sambandam. 1974a. Inheritance of resistance to the fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae C., in the interspecific cross between Cucumis callosus (Rottl.) Cogn., and Cucumis melo L. Annamalai University of Agricultural Research Annual (AUARA) 4: 169-171.", "Chelliah, S., and C. N. Sambandam. 1974b. Mechanism of resistance in Cucumis callosus (Rottl.) Cogn. to the fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coq. (Diptera: Tephritidae) - II. Antibiosis. Indian Journal of Entomology 36: 290-296.", "Chelliah, S., and C. N. Sambandam. 1974c. Evaluation of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) accessions and Cucumis callosus (Rottl) Cogn. for resistance to the fruit fly (Dacus cucurbitae C.). Indian Journal of Horticulture 31: 346-348.", "Chen, K. H. 1960. Studies on the melon fly control. Agricultural Research 9: 43-51.", "Chinajariyawong, A., A. R. Clarke, M. Jirasurat, S. Kritsaneepiboon, H. A. Lahey, S. Vijaysegaran, and G. H. Walter. 2000. Survey of opiine parasitoids of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand and Malaysia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 48: 71-101.", "Chinajariyawong, A., S. Kritsaneepaiboon, and R. A. I. Drew. 2003. Efficacy of protein bait sprays in controlling fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting angled luffa and bitter gourd in Thailand. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51: 7-15.", "Chong, M. 1952. Notes and exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 14: 361.", "Christenson, L. D., and R. H. Foote. 1960. Biology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 5: 171-192.", "Clancy, D. W., P. E. Marucci, and E. Dresner. 1952. Importation of natural enemies to control the oriental fruit fly in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 45: 85-90.", "Clarke, A. R., A. Allwood, A. Chinajariyawong, R. A. I. Drew, C. Hengsawad, M. Jirasurat, C. Kong Krong, S. Kritsaneepaiboon, and S. Vijaysegaran. 2001. Seasonal abundance and host use patterns of seven Bactrocera MacQuart species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 49: 207-220.", "Clausen, C. P., D. W. Clancy, and Q. C. Chock. 1965. Biological control of the oriental fruit fly (Dacus dorsalis Hendel) and other fruit flies in Hawaii. USDA Technical Bulletin 1322: 1-102.", "Commonwealth Institute of Entomology. 1978. Distribution maps of pests: Dacus cucurbitae Coq. (Dipt., Tephritidae) (melon fruit-fly). Map No. 64, Commonwealth Institute of Entomology; Queen's Gate, London.", "Copeland, R. S., Q. Luke, and R. A. Wharton. 2009. A natural history of the wild fruits of Kenya. CD-ROM supplement to the article: Insects reared from the wild fruits of Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History 98: 11-66.", "Coquillett, D. W. 1899. A new trypetid from Hawaii. Entomological News 10: 129-130.", "Couey, H. M., E. S. Linse, and A. N. Nakamura. 1984. Quarantine procedure for Hawaiian papayas using heat and cold treatments. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 984-988.", "Couey, M. H., and C. F. Hayes. 1986. Quarantine procedure for Hawaiian papaya using fruit selection and a two-stage hot-water immersion. Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 1307-1314.", "Cunningham, R. T., and L. F. Steiner. 1972. Field trial of cue-lure + naled on saturated fiberboard blocks for the control of the melon fly by the male-annihilation technique. Journal of Economic Entomology 65: 505-507.", "Cunningham, R. T., L. F. Steiner, K. Ohinata, and G. J. Farias. 1970. Mortality of male melon flies and male Mediterranean fruit flies treated with aerial sprays of lure and naled formulated with a monoglyceride or siliceous extender. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 106-110.", "De Meyer, M., H. Delatte, M. Mwatawala, S. Quilici, J.-F. Vayssieres, and M. Virgilio. 2015. A review of the current knowledge on Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Africa, with a list of species included in Zeugodacus. ZooKeys 540: 539-557.", "De Meyer, M., S. Mohamed, and I. M. White. 2014. Invasive fruit fly pests in Africa. A diagnostic tool and information reference for the four Asian species of fruit fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) that have become accidentally established as pests in Africa, including the Indian Ocean Islands. 6. Host Plants of the Introduced Asian Bactrocera spp. 6.1. Host plants of B. cucurbitae. Available at: http://www.africamuseum.be/fruitfly/AfroAsia.htm. Accessed June 2016.", "Defra [Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs]. 2008. UK Plant health interception and outbreak chart, UK Interceptions. The Food and Environment Research Agency; London, UK.", "Desai, S., B. L. Jakhar, and R. K. Patel. 2014. Bio-efficacy of different insecticides against melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) on sponge gourd. Pestology 38 (2): 49-53.", "Dhillon, M. K., R. Singh, J. S. Naresh, and H. C. Sharma. 2005a. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: a review of its biology and management. Journal of Insect Science 5: 1-16.", "Dhillon, M. K., R. Singh, J. S. Naresh, and N. K. Sharma. 2005b. Influence of physico-chemical traits of bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. on larval density and resistance to melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Journal of Applied Entomology 129: 393-399.", "Doharey, K. L. 1983. Bionomics of fruit flies (Dacus spp.) on some fruits. Indian Journal of Entomology 45: 406-413.", "Dong, Y.-J., C.-W. Song, Y.-Y. Chuang, K.-S. Chiang, W.-J. Wu, L.-L. Cheng, and C.-C. Chen. 2011. Degree of fruit ripeness affecting infestation of papaya by two species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Research 60: 253-262.", "Drew, R. A. I. 1982. Dacus (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae Coquillett. p. 52-55. In: Drew, R. A. I., G. H. S. Hooper, and M. A. Bateman (eds.). Economic fruit flies of the South Pacific Region, 2nd ed. Queensland Department of Primary Industries; Brisbane, Queensland. 139 p.", "Drew, R. A. I. 1989. The tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanian Regions. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 26: 1-521.", "Drew, R. A. I., G. H. S. Hooper, and M. A. Bateman. 1978. Economic fruit flies of the South Pacific Region, Australian Department of Health; Canberra. 137 p.", "Duradundi, S., J. Jayappa, D. Siddartha, and S. Madarakhandi. 2015. Screening of ridge gourd genotypes against the fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Journal of Experimental Zoology India 18(2): 681-684.", "Duyck, P. F., S. Quilici, F. Fabre, and P. Ryckewaert. 2004. Comparison and optimization of the efficacy of different food attractants for both sexes of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera:Tephritidae). p. 351-354. In: Barnes, B. N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on fruit flies of economic significance (May 6-10, 2002, Stellenbosch, South Africa). Isteg Scientific Publications; Irene, South Africa. 510 p.", "Ebeling, W., T. Nishida, and H. A. Bess. 1953. Field experiments on the control of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae. Hilgardia 21: 563-592.", "Ecoport. 2008. Bactrocera cucurbitae. NARI (National Agricultural Research Institute); Papua New Guinea. (Available at ~ http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=entityAssociationDisplay&entityId=188 98&entityRole=PE&coRole=HO . Last accessed December 2013.)", "Ehrhorn, E. M. 1910. Report of superintendent of entomology. Hawaii Forestry and Agriculture 7: 336-338.", "Etienne, J. 1967. Lutte contre les mouches des fruits. Institut Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales Reunion (IRAT) Rapport Annuel 1967 p. 117-124.", "Etienne, J. 1972. Les principales Trypetides nuisibles de L'ile de la Reunion. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de La France 8: 485-491.", "European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization [EPPO]. 2015. PQR - EPPO plant quarantine data retrieval system. Version 5.3.5. Available at: http://www.eppo.int. Current version can be downloaded at http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm.", "Fadlelmula, A. A., and E. B. M. Ali. 2014. Fruit fly species, their distribution, host range and seasonal abundance in Blue Nile State, Sudan. Persian Gulf Crop Protection 3: 17-24.", "Fang, M. N. 1989. Studies on using different bagging materials for control of melon fly on bitter gourd and sponge gourd. Bulletin of TaiChung District of Agricultural Improvement Station 25: 3-12.", "Fernando, M., and S. B. Udurawana. 1941. The relative resistance of some strains of bitter gourd to the cucurbit fruitfly (Dacus cucurbitae Coq.). Tropical Agriculture 96: 347-352.", "Finney, G. L. 1951. Notes and exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 14: 203-227.", "Fletcher, B. S. 1987. The biology of Dacine fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 32: 115-144.", "Follett, P., J. Armstrong, and F. T. Zee. 2009. Host status of blueberry to invasive tephritid fruit flies in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 102: 1859-1863.", "Follett, P., and F. Zee. 2011. Host status of Vaccinium reticulatum (Ericaceae) to invasive tephritid fruit flies in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 57

The genus Nekemias (Vitaceae) was first recognized by Rafinesque in 1838. It has been treated as a synonym of Ampelopsis Michx. Recent phylogenetic studies suggest that Ampelopsis as traditionally delimited is paraphyletic. To maintain the monophyly of each of the genera of Vitaceae, we herein segregate the Ampelopsis sect. Leeaceifoliae lineage from Ampelopsis and recognize these taxa in Nekemias Raf., which has a disjunct distribution in eastern to southeastern Asia and eastern North America. Nomenclatural changes are made for nine species and one variety: Nekemias arborea (L.) J. Wen & Boggan, Nekemias cantoniensis (Hook. & Arn.) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias celebica (Suess.) J. Wen & Boggan, Nekemias chaffanjonii (H. Lév. & Van.) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias gongshanensis (C.L. Li) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias grossedentata (Hand.-Mazz.) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias hypoglauca (Hance) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias megalophylla (Diels & Gilg) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, Nekemias megalophylla var. jiangxiensis (W.T. Wang) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie, and Nekemias rubifolia (Wall.) J. Wen & Z.L. Nie. A taxonomic key is provided for the genus to facilitate identification.

Tetrastigma calcicola Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. Table 1, Figs 1���2 urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77155114-1 Diagnosis Tetrastigma calcicola sp. nov. is most closely aligned to T. pachyphyllum (Hemsl.) Chun, but differs in having a 4-lobed disc adnate to the lower part of the ovary, and small berries with a smooth surface (Table 1). Etymology The specific epithet refers to the habitat of this species, which is only found on limestone mountains. Type materials Holotype THAILAND: Chiang Rai, Tham Luang Khun Nam Nang Non Forest Park, 21 Mar. 2011, M. Norsaengsri & N. Tathana 7810, ♀ fl. (holo-: QBG!). Paratype THAILAND: Chiang Rai, Tham Luang Khun, Nam Nang Non Forest Park, 10 Jul. 2012, M. Norsaengsri & N. Tathana 9736, ♀ fr. (QBG). Description Slender climber. Stems terete, young branches terete, verrucose; mature stems corky; tendrils simple; stipules 2, deltate, c. 0.2 �� 0.2 cm long, scale-like with age. Leaves compound, 3-foliolate or pedately 5-foliolate; petiole 0.8���5.0 cm long, glabrous, base slightly pulvinate; leaflets coriaceous; terminal leaflet petiolule 0.2���2.0 cm long, glabrous, terminal leaflet blade elliptic, obovate to oblanceolate, 2.0���8.0 �� 1.0��� 3.5 cm, base cuneate, margins serrate with minute protruding vein tip, apex acute to acuminate, petiolules of lateral leaflet complex 0.1���1.0 cm long, glabrous, lateral leaflet petiolules, sessile to 0.6 cm long, glabrous, lateral leaflet blade elliptic, obovate to oblanceolate, 1.0���5.5 �� 0.5���2.8 cm, base cuneate or asymmetrical, margins and apex as for terminal leaflet; veins conspicuous on lower sides, midrib protruding on both surfaces, glabrous, 1 main basal vein, 4���7 pairs of lateral veins. Inflorescences axillary on young stem, 1���2 per node, compound umbel, male plant not seen; female plant 1.0��� 2.5 cm in diameter, compact, globose; peduncles 0.3���1.0 cm, rarely puberulous. Female flowers��� bud ovoid, 1.0��� 1.5 mm long; pedicels 0.5���1.0 mm long, papillose; calyx disciform, margins entire, papillose; petals ovate, 1.5���1.8 �� 0.8 mm, apex slightly corniculate, outer surface densely papillose, margins entire; disc 4-lobed adnate to lower part of ovary; staminode clavate, c. 1.2 mm long; ovary conical, c. 0.8 �� 0.8 mm; style sessile; stigma cruciform, 4-lobed, lobes obtuse, ciliate. Berries globose to ellipsoid, 0.8���1.0 �� 0.7���0.8 cm, surface smooth, yellow or white when ripe, 1���3-seeded. Seeds ellipsoid, 0.7���0.8 �� 0.4���0.5 cm, testa transversely rugulose on both sides, adaxial surface with a Y shaped furrow, abaxial surface with an oblong chalaza, endosperm ��� ��� shaped in cross-section. Distribution Known only from Thailand (Fig. 2). Ecology and phenology In open area on limestone mountain, dry evergreen forest, altitude 1,300 ���1,450 m; flowering: February��� March; fruiting: July���October. Additional specimens examined THAILAND. Chiang Rai:Doi Tung, 22 Oct. 1995, R. Pooma 1186, ♀ fr. (BKF, CMUB); ibid., 18 Feb. 2005, J.F. Maxwell 05-147, ♀ fl. (CMUB). Conservation status We suggest to treat this species as Data Deficient (DD) according to IUCN (2012), as this species is only known from a few herbarium specimens and only two localities have been recorded: Doi Tung and Tham Luang Khun Nam Nang Non Forest Park in Chiang Rai Province. Although the species seems to occur only in limestone mountains at high elevation, the number of populations and their sizes are not known so far. Tetrastigma jaichagunii C.L.Li ex Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. Table 2, Figs 2���3 urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77155116-1 Diagnosis This species is similar to T. harmandii Planch., but differs from it by having more densely verrucose young branches, broader leaflets, 4-lobed thick discs, bigger globose berries and oblongoid seeds (Table 2). Some specimens were misidentified as T. hookeri Planch., an Indian species, but T. hookeri has narrow leaves and an inconspicuous disc in female flowers. Etymology We think that Prof. C.L. Li selected the specific epithet ���Jaichagunii��� in honour of Mr Manit Jaichagun, from the CITES Scientific Authority in Thailand. Type materials Holotype THAILAND. Trang, Khao Chong, 12 Mar. 1974, K. Larsen & S. S. Larsen 33238, ♀ fl. (holo-: AAU!, iso-: BKF!, L!, P!). Paratypes THAILAND. Phetchaburi, Kaeng Krachan National Park, 3 Aug. 1995, K. Larsen, S. S. Larsen, C. Tange, R. Moran & P. Puudjaa 45370, ♀ fr. (AAU); Satun, Ta Le Bun, 26 Nov. 1985, J. F. Maxwell 85- 1060, ♀ fr. (L). Description Large climber. Stems flattened with age, young branches terete, verrucose; mature stems corky; tendrils simple; stipules 2, deltate, c. 0.4 �� 0.3 cm, reduced to scale-like with age. Leaves compound, 3-foliolate or pedately 5(���7)-foliolate; petioles 4.0���19.0 cm long, verrucose, base pulvinate; leaflets papyraceous to subcoriaceous; terminal leaflet petiolule, 1���5.0 cm long, glabrous, terminal leaflet blade lanceolate, elliptic, to oblanceolate, 11.5���33.0 �� 3.5���12.0 cm, base obtuse to cuneate, margins coarsely serrate with c. 0.5 protruding vein tip, apex acuminate to caudate, petiolules of lateral leaflet complex 1.0��� 3.5 cm long, glabrous, lateral leaflet petiolules, sessile��� 2.5 cm long, glabrous, lateral leaflet blade lanceolate, elliptic to broadly elliptic, oblong, 8.5���30 �� 2.5���11.5 cm, base obtuse to cuneate or asymmetrical, margins and apex as terminal leaflet; veins conspicuous on lower sides, midrib protruding on both surfaces, glabrous, 1 main basal vein, 6���13 pairs of lateral veins. Inflorescences axillary on young stem, single, compound umbel; 2���3 cm in diameter, compact, umbelliform; peduncles 0.5���1.0 cm, puberulent, male plant not seen. Male flowers not seen. Female flowers��� bud ovoid, 2.0���3.0 mm long; pedicels 2.0���3.0 mm long, papillose; calyx disciform to cupuliform, margins undulate, ciliate; petals ovate to oblong, 2.2���3.0 �� 1.5���1.8 mm, apex hooded, outer surface densely papillose, margins entire; disc thick, 4-angled, adnate to ovary; staminode clavate���trullate, 0.5���1.0 mm long; ovary conical, 1.0���1.2 �� 1.0��� 1.5 mm; style cylindrical, c. 0.5 mm long; stigma peltate, round or slightly 4-lobed, ciliate. Berries globose, 1.8���3.0 �� 1.5���2.5 cm, surface smooth, green when young, yellow when ripe, 1���4-seeded. Seeds oblongoid, 1.2���1.4 �� 1.0��� 1.2 cm, testa transversely rugose on both sides, adaxial surface with an oblong furrow, abaxial surface with a linear chalaza, apex bilobed, apical notch 1.0���3.0 mm, endosperm ��� ��� shaped in cross-section. Distribution Known only from Thailand (Fig. 2). Ecology and Phenology Along streams or in forest margins in evergreen forest; altitude 0���1,500 m; flowering: January���April; fruiting: June���January. Additional specimens examined THAILAND. NORTHERN: Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai, along the road, 40 km to Pai, 17 Sep. 1995, K. Larsen, S.S. Larsen, C. Tange & D. Sookchaloem 46583, ♀ fl. (AAU); Chiang Dao, 26 Dec. 1940, H.B.G. Garrett 1214, ♀ fr. (TCD, L, P); Doi Chiang Dao, 13 Jul. 1950, H.B.G. Garrett 1336 (P, L, K); ibid., 18 Dec. 1951, H.B.G. Garrett 1374 (P, L, K); ibid., 22 Jan. 1989, J.F. Maxwell 89-0081, ♀ fr. (L); Hang Dong, Mae Khanin, 7 Mar. 1999, S. Watthana & W. Pongamornkul Wat. 240, ♀ fl. (QBG); Mae Tang, 19 Nov. 1990, J.F. Maxwell 90-1259, ♀ fr. (CMU); Mae Tang, Pa Pae, 17 Sep. 1995, BGO. Staff. 4507 (QBG); SOUTH-WESTERN: Kanchanaburi: Between Kriti and Mueang Cha, 9 Jul. 1973, R. Geesink & C. Phengklai 6220, ♀ fr. (AAU, BKF, E, L, P); Thung Yai Naresuan, 11 Aug. 1992, J.F. Maxwell 93-869, ♀ fr. (CMUB); Thong Pha Phum, Thung Yai Naresuan, 10 Jun. 2002, M. Van De Bult 565, ♀ fr. (BKF, CMUB); Phetchaburi: Kaeng Krachan National Park, 26 Aug. 1995, J.A.N. Parnell, J. Pendry & T. Boonthavikoon 95-450, ♀ fr. (K); ibid., 25 Jun. 2000, M.F. Newman, T. Boonthavikoon, C. Hemrat & D.J. Middleton 1040, ♀ fr. (AAU, BKF, L, P); ibid., 9 Aug. 2002, D.J. Middleton, S. Suddee, S.J. Davies & C. Hemrat 888, ♀ fr. (BKF, CMUB); Prachuap Khiri Khan: Kaeng Krachan National Park, Pa La-u Waterfalls, 14 Aug. 2002, D.J. Middleton, S. Suddee, S.J. Davies & C. Hemrat 1060, ♀ fr. (BKF, CMUB); PENINSULAR: Ranong: Klong Naka National Park, 24 Nov. 1974, R. Geesink, P. Hiepko & C. Charoenpol 7519, ♀ fr. (BKF, K); ibid., 7 Jan. 1990, S. Hoover 5048, ♀ fr. (E); ibid., 8 Jan. 1990, S. Hoover 5481, ♀ fr. (E); ibid., 13 Jan. 1990, S. Hoover 6329, ♀ fr. (E); Khao Po Ta Luang Kaeo, 31 Jan. 1929, A.F.G. Kerr 16912, ♀ fl. (L, P); No locality, 22 Jan. 1929, A.F.G. Kerr 16805A (BK, K); Kapoe, 15 Jul. 1979, C. Niyomdham et al. 320, ♀ fr. (AAU, BKF, K, L, P); Khao Po Ta Luang Kaeo, 11 Dec. 1979, T. Shimizu, H. Toyokuni, H. Koyama, T. Yahara & C. Niyomdham T-26922 (AAU, BKF, L); Surat Thani: Klong Phanom National Park, 21 Mar. 2005, S. Gardner, P. Sidisunthorn & P. Tippayasri ST1875, �� fl. (QBG); Phangnga: Khao Po Ta Luang Kaeo, 2 Feb. 1929, A.F.G. Kerr 16990, ♀ fl. (BK, BM, K, L); Phuket: Kathu, 12 Mar. 1929, A.F.G. Kerr 17463 (BK, K); Nakhon si thammarat: Ka Rom Waterfalls, 14 Apr. 1985, J.F. Maxwell 85-0396, ♀ fl. (BKF, L); ibid., 30 Oct. 1993, K. Larsen, S.S. Larsen, C.T. Norgaard, K. Pharsen, P. Puudjaa & W. Ueachirakan 44163, ♀ fr. (AAU); Tha Sala, 2 Mar. 1986, J.F. Maxwell 86-0111, ♀ fl. (BKF, L); Thung Song, 19 Jul. 1929, Rabil 93, ♀ fr. (BK, L); Phatthalung: Khao Pu Khao Ya National Park, 16 Nov. 1990, K. Larsen, S.S. Larsen, W. Nanakorn, W. Ueachirakan & P. Sirirugsa 41534, ♀ fl. (AAU, K); Trang: Khao Chong, 13 Jun. 1974, R. Geesink, T. Hattink & C. Charoenpol 7181, ♀ fr. (BKF, K); ibid., 10 Jul. 2000, D.J. Middleton, T. Boonthavikoon, S.J. Davies, C. Hemrat & M.F. Newman 373, ♀ fr. (AAU, BKF); Pa Liang, 24 Apr. 1931, M.C. Laksanakarn 791, ♀ fl. (L, K); Sai Rung Waterfalls, 15 Mar. 2006, S. Gardner & V. Chamchaumroon ST2480, ♀ fl. (QBG); Satun: Ko Ta Ru Tao, 19 Jan. 1918, A.F.G. Kerr 14188, ♀ fl. (BM, K); Klong Ton, 11 Mar. 1928, A.F.G. Kerr 14469, ♀ fl. (L, K); Yala: Bang Lang National Park, 12 Feb. 2004, D.J. Middleton, M. Phuphat, R. Pooma & K. Williams 3011, �� fl. (BKF, E); no locality, 25 Mar. 1998, C. Niyomdham 5331, ♀ fl. (BKF, K). Conservation status This species has rather large populations and is widely distributed in several parts of the country. Therefore, it is considered Least Concern (LC)., Published as part of Kochaiphat, Phongsakorn, Trias-Blasi, Anna & Pornpongrungrueng, Pimwadee, 2016, Two new species of Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planch. (Vitaceae) from Thailand, pp. 1-12 in European Journal of Taxonomy 201 on pages 4-11, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2016.201, http://zenodo.org/record/3840512, {"references":["IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK."]}

Key to the species of Tetrastigma in Thailand 1. Tendrils5–7palmately branched;leaves palmately3-foliolate........ T. triphyllum (Gagnep.)W.T.Wang – Tendrils simple or bifurcate; leaves simple, palmately 3–5(–7)-foliolate or pedately 5–7(–9)-foliolate........................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Inflorescences on old stems (cauliflorous plants), more than 5 inflorescences per nodes.................................................................................................................................................. T. cauliflorum Merr. – Inflorescences on young branches, 1–3 inflorescences per nodes...................................................... 3 3. Young branches with 4–5 sharp ridges........................................ T. quadrangulum Gagnep. & Craib – Young branches round or nearly round.............................................................................................. 4 4. Leaves palmately 3–5(–7)-foliolate or mixed with simple leaves or all leaves simple..................... 5 – Leaves pedately 5–7(–9)-foliolate rarely mixed with 3-foliolate..................................................... 16 5. Stems verrucose or with corky protuberances................................................................................... 6 – Stems smooth, pubescent or with flaky cork...................................................................................... 8 6. Stems with corky protuberances; leaves ovate to elliptic; stigma distinctly 4-lobed......................... 7 – Stems verrucose; leaves lanceolate; stigma peltate............................................. T. harmandii Planch. 7. Leaves fleshly; stigma cruciform; berries ellipsoid when dry............... T. cruciatum Craib & Gagnep. – Leaves coriaceous or papyraceous; stigma pointed lobes; berries pyriform when dry.................................................................................................. T. assimile (Kurz) C.L.Li ex Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi 8. Shrubs, creeping, erect or decumbent................................................................................................ 9 – Lianas.............................................................................................................................................. 10 9. Leaves simple or mixed with palmately 3(–5)-foliolate; pedicel 0.4–0.6 cm long...................................................................................................................................................... T. bambusetorum Craib – Leaves palmately 3-foliolate; pedicel 0.8–1.2 cm long.................................... T. apiculatum Gagnep. 10. Leaflets glabrous.............................................................................................................................. 11 – Leaflets pubescent or hirsute at least along the midrib on lower leaf surface................................... 15 11. Female flower disc conspicuous, thick and adnate to lower part of ovary........................................ 12 – Female flower disc inconspicuous................................................................................................... 14 12. Terminal leaflets broadly elliptic to rhombic; berries pyriform when dry............................................................................................................................... T. pedunculare (Wall. ex M.A.Lawson) Planch. – Terminal leaflets elliptic, ovate or lanceolate; berries ellipsoid when dry........................................ 13 13. Leaves coriaceous or subcoriaceous.................................................................. T. erubescens Planch. – Leaves papyraceous........................................................................ T. dubium (M.A.Lawson) Planch. 14. Leaflets broadly ovate or broadly elliptic, apex caudate................. T. campylocarpum (Kurz) Planch. – Leaflets lanceolate, apex attenuate..................................................... T. planicaule (Hook.f.) Gagnep. 15. Ovary brownish hirsute; leaves palmately 5-foliolate................ T. obovatum (M.A.Lawson) Gagnep. – Ovary glabrous; leaves palmately 3-foliolate................................. T. dubium (M.A.Lawson) Planch. 16. Leaves 5-foliolate, rarely mixed with 7-foliolate............................................................................. 17 – Leaves 7(–9)-foliolate, rarely mixed with 5-foliolate...................................................................... 29 17. Branches glabrous; leaflets glabrous on both surfaces..................................................................... 18 – Branches more or less pubescent; leaflets pubescent at least along the midvein on lower leaf surface......................................................................................................................................................... 26 18. Secondary branches of peduncle 2....................................................................... T. baenzigeri C.L.Li – Secondary branches of peduncle more than 2.................................................................................. 19 19. Berries pyriform or triangular when dry.......................................................................................... 20 – Berries globose, ovoid or ellipsoid when dry................................................................................... 21 20. Terminal leaflets ovate–lanceolate, 3–4 × 6–9 cm; berries pyriform when dry... T. pyriforme Gagnep. – Terminal leaflets obovate or elliptic, 4–5.5 × 9–12 cm; berries triangular when dry...................................................................................................................... T. rumicispermum (M.A.Lawson) Planch. 21. Inflorescences compound umbel on pseudo-terminal branch or axile, umbelliform, loose; tendrils bifurcate............................................................................................... T. serrulatum (Roxb.) Planch. – Inflorescences compound umbel on axile, globose, compact; tendrils unbranched......................... 22 22. Female flower disc inconspicuous.................................................... T. pachyphyllum (Hemsl.) Chun – Female flower disc conspicuous, thick and adnate to lower part of ovary........................................ 23 23. Stigma peltate, rounded or slightly 4-lobed..................................................................................... 24 – Stigma cruciform, 4-lobed, obtuse, acute or pointed apex............................................................... 25 24. Berries 1.8–3.0 × 1.5–2.5 cm; seed oblongoid; female flower disc 4-angled.......................................................................................................... T. jaichagunii C.L.Li ex Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. – Berries 0.8–1.2 × 0.8–1.2 cm; seed ellipsoid; female flower disc rounded......... T. harmandii Planch. 25. Stigmas 4 acute or pointed lobes, style tubular 0.5–0.8 mm long... T. dubium (M.A.Lawson) Planch. – Stigmas 4 obtuse lobes, style absent............................. T. calcicola Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. 26. Leaflets broadly elliptic or ovate..................................................................................................... 27 – Leaflets narrowly elliptic or lanceolate........................................... T. dubium (M.A.Lawson) Planch. 27. Leaflets pubescent along nerve or at least along the midrib on the lower surface............................ 28 – Leaflets pubescent on both surfaces........................................ T. macrocorymbum Gagnep. ex J.Wen 28. Berries up to 1.5 cm in diameter.............................................................................. T. pilosum C.L.Li – Berries more than 2 cm in diameter....................................................... T. siamense Gagnep. & Craib 29. Berries 2–2.5 cm in diameter................................................................................ T. teaniatum C.L.Li – Berries 0.8–1.5 cm in diameter........................................................................................................ 30 30. Outer petals densely papillose..................................... T. leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston ex Mabb. – Outer petals glabrous....................................................................................................................... 31 31. Secondary vein almost 90° with midrib; old branches verrucose, light brown; stigma 4 pointed lobes.............................................................................................................................. T. delavayi Gagnep. – Secondary vein angle nearly 45° with midrib; old branches flaky, grey; stigma 4 rounded lobes or nearly globose, not lobed............................................................................. T. godefroyanum Planch.

Two new species of Tetrastigma from Thailand, T. calcicola Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. and T. jaichagunii C.L.Li ex Kochaiph. & Trias-Blasi sp. nov. are described and illustrated. Tetrastigma calcicola sp. nov. is a slender climber restricted to the open areas on limestone mountains at high elevation in the northern part of Thailand. The other species, T. jaichagunii sp. nov., is similar to T. harmandii Planch., but differs from it by having more densely verrucose young branches, broader leaflets, 4-lobed thick discs, bigger globose berries and oblongoid seeds. This species occurs along streams or in forest margins in evergreen forest and it is widely distributed in several parts of Thailand.

The names Cissus frutescens and C. arborea have a long history of confusion. Cissus frutescens Blanco belongs to the genus Melicope (Rutaceae) and we herein correct a nomenclatural mistake made by T.G. Hartley in the revision of Melicope. The name Melicope confusa (Merr.) P.S. Liu was accepted for this taxon by Hartley. However, Cissus frutescens Blanco represents the earliest name for this entity and a new combination, Melicope frutescens (Blanco) Appelhans & J.Wen is herein proposed. Neotypification of Cissus arborea Blanco is also provided. Open-Access Publikationsfonds 2016 peerReviewed

Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera ��� Santa-Lucia-di-Moriani: lambeau de ripisylve rud��ralis��e sur la RN198 en face de l���embranchement du CD109, 3.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); SantaMaria-Poggio: bord de la RN198 au sud de Morianiplage pr��s du restaurant Cinderella, 3.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); Porto-Vecchio: broussailles le long de la route littorale pr��s de Marina di Fiori, 1.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); Bonifacio: murets bordant la RN198 en lisi��re de ch��naie verte au sud du Cavallo-Morto, 2.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��). Les r��coltes cit��es correspondent �� des plantes trouv��es hors cultures, distinctes des nombreuses variations de la subsp. sylvestris par leurs feuilles rapidement glabrescentes �� la face inf��rieure et/ou �� sinus basal ferm��, souvent bien plus grandes sur l���ensemble de la plante, et, lorsqu���elles sont fructifi��es, par les p��pins �� bec long. Elles sont par ailleurs tr��s diff��rentes entre elles, mais cette variabilit�� reste compatible avec celle connue chez la subsp. vinifera (cf. GALET, Pr��cis d���amp��lographie pratique, 6e ��d., Paul D��han, Montpellier, 1991) et il n���y a pas de marqueurs ��vidents d���influence d���autres esp��ces. Ces individus semblent dans la m��me situation de survie que V. rupestris, �� ceci pr��s que leurs longues tiges leur permettent de coloniser jusqu����� plusieurs ares; les marqueurs mol��culaires montrent que V. vinifera subsp. vinifera ne se naturalise pas vraiment en Sardaigne (ZECCA et al., Plant Biol. 2009: 2-6, 2009) et on peut pr��sumer qu���il en va de m��me en Corse., Published as part of Jeanmonod, Daniel, 2015, Notes �� la flore de Corse, XXV, pp. 109-140 in Candollea 70 (1) on page 140, DOI: 10.15553/c2015v701a10, http://zenodo.org/record/5720895

Vitis riparia Michx. �� V. rupestris Scheele ��� Belgod��re: maquis d��grad��s le long de la RN197 �� l���ouest de Lozari, 3.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); Santa-Maria-Poggio: bord de la RN198 au sud de Moriani-plage pr��s du restaurant Cinderella, 3.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); Canale-diVerde: bord d���une vigne abandonn��e sur le CD17 �� l���est de l���embranchement du CD42, 3.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��); Porto-Vecchio: ourlets de maquis le long de la RN198 aux environs de la bifurcation de Santa Giulia, diss��min�� et localement abondant, 1.9.201 2, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��). Les seules vignes am��ricaines identifi��es jusqu���ici en Corse sont Vitis rupestris Scheele (LAMBINON, Candollea 61: 93-134, 2006) et V. aff. labrusca L. (TISON, Candollea 67: 293-321, 2012). L���hybride V. riparia �� V. rupestris semble en fait fr��quent dans l�����le; les r��coltes cit��es sont loin d�����tre exhaustives car les stations observ��es sont bien plus nombreuses, en particulier sur la c��te orientale (J.-M. Tison obs. pers., ao��t-septembre 2012). Il s���agit toujours d���une vigne volubile de grande taille, caract��ris��e par ses feuilles �� trois lobes peu profonds, acumin��s et parall��les, �� face inf��rieure munie de touffes de poils axillaires (marqueur de V. riparia), mais �� croissance orthotrope (vs plagiotrope chez V. riparia) et �� sinus foliaire basal en V plus ou moins ouvert (vs subcarr�� chez V. riparia). Tr��s polymorphe, sa morphologie tend plus vers le parent V. riparia en milieu humide (�� l���extr��me, plante atteignant 15 m et limbes allong��s et plans pouvant d��passer 20 cm) et vers le parent V. rupestris en milieu sec (�� l���extr��me, plante de moins de 5 m et limbes isodiam��triques en goutti��re ne d��passant gu��re 10 cm). M��me dans ce dernier cas, il reste bien distinct de V. rupestris (plante de 1 �� 3 m, feuilles glabres �� limbe plus large que long d��passant rarement 5 cm de longueur) souvent pr��sent sur les m��mes sites. Un examen plus attentif montre que ces variations ne sont pas uniquement des ��comorphoses: la proportion inhabitellement forte de plantes �� rupestris -like �� en Corse est sans doute due au choix r��current de portegreffe particuli��rement r��sistants �� la s��cheresse. Soit que ces individus �� rupestris -like �� soient peu dynamiques, soit que les biotopes humides favorables soient trop r��duits, l���hybride est moins encombrant en Corse qu���en France continentale o�� ses variants �� riparia -like �� manifestent un comportement nettement invasif dans les ripisylves m��diterran��ennes (BRUNEL & TISON A method of selection and hierarchization of the invasive and potentially invasive plants in continental Mediterranean France, Proc. International Workshop ��Invasive Plants in Mediterranean Type Regions of the World��, M��ze, France, 25-27 mai 2005, sub V. riparia). Nous avons cependant observ�� quelques belles draperies couvrant des arbres en bordure de for��t entre Moriani-plage et Ghisonaccia. Signalons encore que l���un des individus r��colt��s sur le site de Porto-Vecchio a l���apparence d���un hybride triple issu du croisement spontan�� de V. riparia �� V. rupestris avec V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris, tr��s commun dans la r��gion de Porto-Vecchio., Published as part of Jeanmonod, Daniel, 2015, Notes �� la flore de Corse, XXV, pp. 109-140 in Candollea 70 (1) on page 139, DOI: 10.15553/c2015v701a10, http://zenodo.org/record/5720895

These “notes” deal with 110 noteworthy taxa amongst which 21 are new to the island's flora. One of these taxa is native: Reseda alba subsp. hookeri and 20 are introduced: Abies pinsapo, Acer ×coriaceum, Albizia julibrissin, Arundo micrantha, Azolla filiculoides, Bolboschoenus laticarpus, Digitaria ciliaris, Digitaria violascens, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. globulus, Genista januensis subsp. lydia, Hedera helix subsp. maroccana, Morus kagayamae, Oenothera rosea, Paspalum vaginatum, Puccinellia festuciformis subsp. lagascana, Silene fuscata, Solanum mauritianum, Veronica filiformis and Vitis riparia × V. rupestris. The presence of Aegilops ventricosa and Legousia speculum-veneris is presently confirmed. However Carex praecox, Eleocharis quinqueflora, Herniaria hirsuta subsp. cinerea, Juncus acutiflorus and Juncus compressus must be deleted from the Corsican Flora due to their confusion with other related taxa. New localities are given for 48 taxa considered as “very rare” (RR) out of which 10 become “rare” (R) on the one hand, and for 23 taxa considered to be “rare” (R) out of which 12 change their status from “rare” to “not common” (PF) or “localised” (LOC), on the other. Finally, the data published for the 12 remaining taxa (considered as “localised” (LOC) or “not common” (PF) constitute a considerable increase of our knowledge about their distribution. The new sites often correspond to new sectors for these taxa. Fourteen out of 110 taxa are endemic, 11 are part of the red list and 44 are xenophytic species. A distribution map is also provided for Carex extensa and Cerastium siculum.

A grapevine leafminer found recently in table grape orchards and vineyards in the Paarl region (Western Cape, South Africa) is described as Holocacista capensis sp. n. It has also been found on native Rhoicissus digitata and bred on that species in the laboratory. It is closely related to Holocacista salutans (Meyrick, 1921), comb. n. (from Antispila), described from Durban in KwaZulu-Natal, but widespread in southern Africa and a native leafminer of various Vitaceae: Rhoicissus tomentosa, Rhoicissus digitata, Rhoicissus tridentata and Cissus cornifolia. Holocacista capensis has been found on Vitis vinifera both in Gauteng and Western Cape, the earliest record being from 1950 in Pretoria. The initial host shift from native Vitaceae to Vitis must have occurred much earlier. The species is sometimes present in high densities, but hitherto no sizeable damage to the crops has been noted. The genus Holocacista Walsingham & Durrant, 1909, previously known from the single European grapevine leafminer Holocacista rivillei (Stainton, 1855), is expanded and redescribed and for the first time reported from Africa, East and South-East Asia and Australia. It comprises seven named species and at least 15 unnamed species. The following species are also recombined with Holocacista: transferred from Antispilina: South-African Holocacista varii (Mey, 2011), comb. n., feeding on Pelargonium, transferred from Antispila: the Indian species Holocacista micrarcha (Meyrick, 1926), comb. n. and Holocacista pariodelta (Meyrick, 1929), comb. n., both feeding on Lannea coromandelica, and Holocacista selastis (Meyrick, 1926), comb. n. on Psychotria dalzelii. We also remove the following from Antispila: Heliozela anna (Fletcher, 1920), comb. n. and Heliozela argyrozona (Meyrick, 1918), comb. n., whereas the following Indian Vitaceae feeding species are confirmed to belong in Antispila s. str.: Antispila argostoma Meyrick, 1916 and Antispila aristarcha Meyrick, 1916. Holocacista salutans and Holocacista varii are redescribed and diagnosed against Holocacista capensis and other South African Heliozelidae. DNA barcodes are provided for 13 species of Holocacista.

Four species of Tetrastigma are newly recorded for Thailand, including T. assimile (Kurz) C.L.Li ex P.Kochaiphat & Trias-Blasi, T. macrocorymbum Gagnep. ex J.Wen, Boggan & Turland, T. pyriforme Gagnep., and T. triphyllum (Gagnep.) W.T. Wang var. triphyllum. A new combination, T. assimile (Kurz) C.L.Li ex P. Kochaiphat & Trias-Blasi is provided.

Vitis riparia Fig. 3C: ITALY. Tuscany: Portoferraio (Livorno), Case Norsi (WGS84: 42.773118°N 10.346124°E; staz. 24), 37 m, exp. E, margine stradale, 18 June 2008, G. Galasso s.n. (MSNM). Figs. 4E, 5, 6A, 7B: ITALY. Lombardy: Canneto Pavese (Pavia), SP45, Casa San Fermo (WGS84: 45.050277°N 9.296388°E), 20 August & 7 September 2013, N. Ardenghi, no voucher., Published as part of Ardenghi, Nicola M. G., Galasso, Gabriele, Banfi, Enrico, Zoccola, Antonio, Foggi, Bruno & Lastrucci, Lorenzo, 2014, A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago), pp. 163-198 in Phytotaxa 166 (3) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5138388

As resulted from recent floristic investigations conducted in southern and central Europe, the genus Vitis proved to be, in these areas, an intricate critical group, whose interpretation, often influenced by ampelographic approaches, needed to be clarified in a strict taxonomic sense. The current paper analyzes the taxonomy and the distribution of seven taxa recorded in Italy and assigns new names to three nothospecies, naturalized and/or invasive in additional European countries: V. × instabilis (= V. riparia × V. rupestris ), V. × koberi (= V. berlandieri × V. riparia ), V. × ruggerii (= V. berlandieri × V. rupestris ). Nomenclatural and systematic aspects regarding V. vinifera are also discussed. Original and detailed descriptions, identification keys, illustrations and information on distribution and ecology are provided.

Vitis × ruggerii Figs. 3H, 4F, 6G–H, 7F, 18a–f, 18h–j: ITALY. Lombardy: Canneto Pavese (Pavia), SP45, curve between Beria and Casa San Fermo (WGS84: 45.048258°N 9.298191°E), 20 August & 7 September 2013, N. Ardenghi, no voucher. Figs. 4C, 18g: ITALY. Lombardy: Stradella (Pavia), San Zeno (WGS84: 45.058888°N 9.306944°E), 7 September 2013, N. Ardenghi, no voucher., Published as part of Ardenghi, Nicola M. G., Galasso, Gabriele, Banfi, Enrico, Zoccola, Antonio, Foggi, Bruno & Lastrucci, Lorenzo, 2014, A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago), pp. 163-198 in Phytotaxa 166 (3) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5138388

Vitis rupestris Figs. 3E, 4D, 6E–F, 7E, 9a–b, 9d–f: ITALY. Lombardy: Stradella (Pavia), SP201, Beria (WGS84: 45.056280°N 9.301480°E), 7 September 2013, N. Ardenghi, no voucher. Figs. 9c, 9g: ITALY. Lombardy: Calvignano (Pavia), near Stanga (WGS84: 44.988527°N 9.161150°E), 31 May 2013, N. Ardenghi s.n. (Herb. N. Ardenghi)., Published as part of Ardenghi, Nicola M. G., Galasso, Gabriele, Banfi, Enrico, Zoccola, Antonio, Foggi, Bruno & Lastrucci, Lorenzo, 2014, A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago), pp. 163-198 in Phytotaxa 166 (3) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5138388

Vitis labrusca Figs. 1, 2G, 3B: ITALY. Lombardy: Pavia, via Paolo Frisi, between the Hispanic walls and the railroad (WGS84: 45.184641°N 9.165536°E), 9 September 2013, N. Ardenghi, no voucher., Published as part of Ardenghi, Nicola M. G., Galasso, Gabriele, Banfi, Enrico, Zoccola, Antonio, Foggi, Bruno & Lastrucci, Lorenzo, 2014, A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago), pp. 163-198 in Phytotaxa 166 (3) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5138388

Wahlert, Gregory A., Phillipson, Peter B., Nusbaumer, Louis, Gautier, Laurent (2012): Cyphostemma darainense Wahlert & Phillipson (Vitaceae), a new species from northeastern Madagascar. Candollea 67 (2): 277-283, DOI: 10.15553/c2012v672a9

Cyphostemma darainense Wahlert & Phillipson, spec. nova (Fig. 1 - 4). Typus: MADAGASCAR. Prov. Antsiranana: Vohemar, Daraina, forêt d’Andranotsimaty, à 10 km au Nord-est de Daraina, 13°11’04”S 049°42’24”E, 182 m, 14.XI.2005, fr., Randrianaivo & al.1308 (holo-: P; iso-: CNARP, MO [6028348], TAN). Cyphostemma darainense Wahlert & Phillipson issimilar to C. echinocarpa Desc., but differs by the acuteapex of the stipule, the obovateleafletswithrounded or mucronate apices, and the shorter peduncle. Plant a pachycaul, with a swollen, semi-succulent, bottleshaped trunk up to 2 m tall, with 1-few lianescent stems growing from the apex of the trunk. Stems up to 6 m long, subwoody, young stems sparsely pubescent; nodes slightly swollen, pubescent; stipules caducous, narrowly triangular, 3.5-5 0.7-1.1 mm, pubescent, margin ciliate, apex acute; young tendrils sparsely pubescent, apex bifid, subpersistent; mature tendrils becoming glabrous. Leaf compound, imparipinnate with (2-)3 pairs of lateral leaflets, 13-25 cm long (including petiole), 7-11 cm wide; rachis pubescent when young, becoming sparsely pubescent, extending 2-3 cm beyond the upper pair of lateral leaflets; petiole 4.5-8 cm long; lateral and terminal leaflets similar, obovate or rarely ovate or suborbicular, 3-5.8 cm long, 2.2-4.2 cm wide, base cuneate, rounded, or truncate, apex rounded or obtuse, mucronate, mucro 1-3 mm long, margin finely denticulate, ciliate, young leaves densely pubescent, becoming sparsely pubescent or glabrous; petiolules 1-4 mm long, pubescent; primary vein visible on both surfaces, sparsely pubescent on lower surface, minutely pubescent on upper surface towards the base; secondary veins visible on lower surface, not clearly visible on upper surface, sparsely pubescent on lower surface, tertiary venation reticulate. Inflorescence a leaf-opposed, compound dichasial cyme, open, flat-topped, c. 7-10 cm wide, rachis sparsely pubescent, peduncle 3.5-7.5 cm long, bracteoles ovate to broadly triangular, c. 0.3 0.3 mm, margin ciliate. Flower bud cylindrical and slightly constricted near the middle, 1.8-2.5 mm long, 1.4-2 mm wide at the base, glabrous; pedicel 4-12 mm long, thickened near the calyx, sparsely pubescent to glabrous. Calyx a fused membranous flange, 0.4-0.6 mm tall, ciliate at the summit. Corolla pale yellow, petals four, linguiform, glabrous, 3-3.5 mm long, 1-1.5 mm wide at the base, 0.8-1, apex rounded, ± hooded, margin entire, with 6-10 parallel veins. Stamens four, oppositipetalous, 1.8-3.8 mm long, filament 1.7-2.1 mm long, anther dorsifixed, oblate, 0.5-0.7 0.5-0.7 mm; nectary glands four, alternipetalous, square to rectangular, 0.6-0.8 0.7-1.1 mm, fused to the base of the ovary. Ovary ovoid, 0.8-0.9 0.7- 0.8 mm, glabrous, style cylindrical, glabrous, c. 0.6 mm long. Fruit a berry, subspheroid, green, c. 2 1.5 cm, glabrous. Seed reniform-obovoid, beaked, with a raphe, c. 13 7 mm. Etymology. – The specific epithet refers to the locality of Daraina in the central part of the Loky-Manambato region which is the only known region of occurrence for the new species. Distribution. – The species is only known from the forests of Loky-Manambato. Fifty-eight individuals were observed among more than 54,000 plant occurrences identified during a vegetation study of the region. It is frequent in several forests subareas of this region, including: Ampondrabe, Bekaraoka, and Solianampilana, and less frequently in Ankaramy, Bobankora, and Antsahabe. Habitat and ecology. – Cyphostemma darainense grows primarily in dry forests or in ripicolous vegetation within dry forests, and uncommonly to rarely in mesophyllous, arbustive saxicolous, or sclerophyllous forest types. It occurs on thin substrates, generally among stones or on rocky outcrops. The species was observed at low elevations, between 100 and 550 m, on level ground or slopes, but never on ridge crests. The species does not grow in sites that do not provide stability for the swollen, semi-succulent trunk. The absence of the species from crests and steep slopes may indicate that it is susceptible to windthrow. Cyphostemma darainense grows in forests with canopies reaching 8 to 10 m, with emergent trees reaching 10 to 14(- 18) m, with a sparse arbustive strata 2 to 4.5 m high, and a sparse suffrutescent strata less than 1 m high. The most frequent species recorded together with C. darainense in vegetation surveys are, in decreasing abundance: Drypetes perrieri Leandri, Cynometra commersoniana Baill., Dialium occidentale subsp. septentrionale Du Puy & R. Rabev., Grevea madagascariensis Baill., Dracaena reflexa Lam., Strychnos decussata (Pappe) Gilg, Ehretiacymosa Thonn., Baudouiniasollyaeformis Baill., Dracaena xiphophylla Baker, Drocelonciarigidifolia (Baill.) J. Léonard, Mallotus oppositifolius (Geiseler) Müll. Arg., and Gyrocarpus americanus subsp. tomentosus Kubitzki. Potential distribution. – Results from modeling the potential distribution of Cyphostemma darainense show the species to have an affinity with the environmental conditions present in the eastern forests of Loky - Manambato (Fig. 5). The three most important environmental variables that appear to delimit its distribution are: a) annual mean temperature less than 19°C, b) slopes greater than 28° (at higher temperatures), and c) cloud cover less than 20% during the dry season. Conservation status. – With an “Extent Of Occurrence” (EOO) of 551 km 2, an “Area Of Occupancy” (AOO) of 76 km 2, and 8 subpopulations, 5 of which are in the Loky-Manambato protected area, C. darainense is assigned a preliminary status of “Endangered” (EN) following IUCN (2001) (calculation following MOAT, 2007, and CALLMANDER & al., 2007). Paratypi. – Madagascar: Antsiranana Province, Vohemar District, Daraina, Mahatsara, Ambilondambo (Ambilondamba) à 8 km au Nord de Daraina, 13°09’45”S 049°38’49”E, 326 m, 17.XI.2005, fr., Be &al. 292 (CNARP, G, MO, P [2 sheets], TAN); Ampisikina, Tsaratanana, forêt d’Ampondrabe, à 1 km au Nord ouest du village d’Ambaribe, 12°58’18”S 049°41’57”E, 200 m, 4.XI.2005, fr., Rakotonandrasana & al. 968 (CNARP, MO, P, TAN); Daraina, Befarafara, forêt de Solanampilana, Ankoakala, à 2 km au Sud de Befarafara, 13°05’26”S 049°34’ 32”E, 100 m, 15.XI.2005, fr., Rakotonandrasana & al.987 (CNARP, G, MO, P, TAN); Ampisikina (Ampisikinana) Soatanana, Ambarilao, forêt d’Ampondrabe, 12°57’39”S 049°42’ 31”E, 175 m, 5.XI.2005, fl., Ratovoson & al.1060 (MO, P, TAN); Daraina, forêt d’Ankaramy, à 1330 m du point côté 215, au 123°, 13°17’30”S 49°40’47”E, 330 m, 21.XII.2005, fr., Ranirison & Nusbaumer 1037 (G, K, MO, P, TEF).

These “notes” deal with 87 noteworthy taxa amongst which 14 are new to the island's flora. 3 of these taxa are native: Milium montianum, Rorippa palustris, Scleranthus annuus subsp. verticillatus and 8 are introduced: Centaurea jacea subsp. decipiens, Citrullus aff. colocynthis, Eleusine tristachya, Geranium sanguineum, Lampranthus brownii, Oenothera lindheimeri, Paspalum notatum, Vitis aff. labrusca and 3 were present in the past but have probably desappeared from the island: Camelina sativa subsp. microcarpa, Malcolmia maritima, Malcolmia triloba. The presence of Cuscuta suaveolens, Pelargonium graveolens, Ranunculus aquatilis, Sedum litoreum and Vicia narbonensis is once and for all confirmed. New localities are given on one hand for 32 taxa considered as “very rare” (RR) out of which 7 (Brassica rapa, Luzula sylvatica subsp. sieberi, Orchis mascula, Petroselinum crispum, Seseli djianeae, Trifolium phleoides subsp. audigieri and Veronica beccabunga) become “rare” (R). On the other hand 21 taxa considered to be “rare” (R) out of which 9 (Arum cylindraceum, Crassula vaillantii, Elymus caninus, Moenchia erecta subsp. erecta, Lathyrus annuus, Physospermum cornubiense, Scrophularia nodosa, Solanum villosum subsp. villosum and Vicia laeta) change their status from “rare” to “not common” (PF) or “localised” (LOC). Finally, the datas published for the 11 remaining taxa (considered “localised” (LOC)or “not common” (PF) taxa) constitute a considerable increase of our knowledge about their distribution. The new sites correspond often to a new sector for the presence of a given taxon. 14 of the whole lot of 88 taxa are part of the red list and 26 are xenophytic species. A distribution map is also provided for Crassula vaillantii, Platanthera algeriensis, Physospermum cornubiense and Vicia laeta.

Vitis aff. labrusca L. ��� Zonza, marais littoraux �� la partie sud du golfe de Pinarello, grimpant dans les aulnaies embroussaill��es, 20.9.2011, Tison, J.-M. s.n. (Hb. priv��). Taxon naturalis�� nouveau pour la Corse. Plante �� feuilles faiblement lob��es, �� face sup��rieure d���un vert mat obscur, l���inf��rieure couverte d���un tomentum dense et persistant, produisant des raisins noir��tres de taille m��diocre, �� tr��s gros p��pins et �� go��t musqu�� d��sagr��able. Il est d��licat de parler de V. labrusca sans r��serve, car cette esp��ce a rarement ��t�� introduite �� l�����tat pur: en principe il s���agit plut��t d���hybrides �� ph��notype proche, restes des anciens ��c��pages interdits�� du groupe Noah. Ces taxons n���ont jamais servi de porte-greffe et sont en voie d���extinction en culture depuis les ann��es 1960, mais sont en revanche bien naturalis��s dans certaines ripisylves, comme celle de la station cit��e, o�� la plante se m��le �� ce qui semble ��tre V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris (C.C. Gmel.) Hegi. J.-M. TISON, Published as part of Jeanmonod, Daniel & Schl��ssel, Andr��, 2012, Notes et contributions �� la flore de Corse, XXIV, pp. 293-321 in Candollea 67 (2) on page 321, DOI: 10.15553/c2012v672a11, http://zenodo.org/record/5777445

Han sido mucho las investigaciones clínicas que han demostrado la asociación entre reabsorción radicular y movimiento dentario ortodoncico. Desde que Schwarzkopf, en 1887, y Ottolengi, en 1914, observaron la aparición de acortamiento radicular tras el tratamiento. Hasta nuestros días, han sido múltiples los estudios que han tratado de relacionar en términos matemáticos la extensión del fenómeno con factores biológicos. Ketcham, en 1927, encontró reabsorción en el 22% de un grupo de pacientes examinados tras el tratamiento de ortodoncia. Posteriormente, Massler y Malone comunicaron proporciones entre 0,4 y el 14,2 %. Phillips, por su parte, detectó reabsorción en un 31,3% de los pacientes de su muestra. Deshields encontró afectados al 81,7% de los incisivos centrales superiores y al 83,6% de los laterales en otra serie. (1) Entre otros trabajos de interés más recientes destaca el de Linge, que es un estudio sobre los factores clínicos que pueden determinar la reabsorción radicular realizada sobre 485 pacientes ortodoncicos, encontró una pérdida apical media para los dientes anterosuperiores de 0,7 mm en el incisivo central superior derecho, y 1,0 mm en ambos laterales. De 1656 incisivos examinados tras el tratamiento, 118 presentaban una lesión apical de 3 mm o más. En otro estudio previo sobre la reabsorción del área incisiva maxilar en una muestra de 719 pacientes ortodóncicos, el mismo autor encontró cifras de 0,73 mm y 0,67 mm para chicas y chicos, respectivamente.

92. Cissus erosa Rich. Mexico, Central America, South America until the southeast of Brazil (widely distributed), Paraguay. Campos, cerrados, restingas and Forest boards (Lombardi 2002). Selected Voucher:—Macacos, Araújo et al. 618 (UFP); Zambana, Alves-Araújo et al. 637 (UFP)., Published as part of Araújo, Diogo & Alves, Marccus, 2010, Climbing plants of a fragmented area of lowland Atlantic Forest, Igarassu, Pernambuco (northeastern Brazil), pp. 1-24 in Phytotaxa 8 on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.8.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4893863, {"references":["Lombardi, J. A. (2002) Vitaceae. In: Wanderley, M. G. L., Shepherd, G. J. & Giulietti, A. M. (eds.), Flora Fanerogamica do Estado de Sao Paulo 2. FAPESP, Sao Paulo, pp. 365 - 374."]}

93. Cissus verticillata (L.) Nicolson & C.E.Jarvis From Florida and north Mexico, Caribbean, South America, until the north of Argentina, Brazil (widely distributed). Found mainly in forest boards, restingas, rarely in cerrados (Lombardi 2002). Selected Voucher:—Piedade, Araújo et al. 437 (UFP)., Published as part of Araújo, Diogo & Alves, Marccus, 2010, Climbing plants of a fragmented area of lowland Atlantic Forest, Igarassu, Pernambuco (northeastern Brazil), pp. 1-24 in Phytotaxa 8 on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.8.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4893863, {"references":["Lombardi, J. A. (2002) Vitaceae. In: Wanderley, M. G. L., Shepherd, G. J. & Giulietti, A. M. (eds.), Flora Fanerogamica do Estado de Sao Paulo 2. FAPESP, Sao Paulo, pp. 365 - 374."]}

This study was undertaken in fragments of lowland Atlantic Forest surrounded by sugar cane plantations in Igarassu, Pernambuco, Brazil. Amongst the 93 species recorded for the locality, 30 species have a climbing habit. Passiflora is among the most species-rich genera which is novel in a floristic study. Morphological characters such as the presence and position of a tendril, limb form and flower symmetry are the most important for species identification. Here we present a species checklist for the locality, annotated with distribution data. An illustrated key to the climbing species found in Igarassu is also provided.

Protocolo clínico de trabajo para el tratamiento de los procesos inflamatorios pulpares. Fil: Siragusa, Martha. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Odontología. Rosario; Argentina

Vitis laciniosa Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 203. 1753. ���Habitat��� - - ������ RCN: 1644. Type not designated. Original material: Herb. Linn. No. 281.6 (LINN); Herb. Clifford: 74, Vitis 2 (BM); [icon] in Bauhin & Cherler, Hist. Pl. Univ. 2: 73. 1651; [icon] in Cornut, Canad. Pl. Hist.: 182, 183. 1635. Current name: Vitis vinifera L. (Vitaceae)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part V), pp. 911-926 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 926, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Vitis indica Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 202. 1753. "Habitat in India." RCN: 1640. Lectotype (Shetty & Singh in Taxon 37: 169. 1988): Herb. Hermann 1: 36, No. 99 (BM-000594467). Current name: Ampelocissus indica (L.) Planch. (Vitaceae)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part V), pp. 911-926 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 925, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Cissus sicyoides Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, ed. 10, 2: 897. 1759. ["Habitat in Jamaica."] Sp. Pl., ed. 2, 1: 170 (1762). RCN: 954. Lectotype (Nicolson & Jarvis in Taxon 33: 726. 1984): [icon] " Irsiola scandens, foliis oblongo-ovatis ad margines denticulis setaceis refertis " in Browne, Civ. Nat. Hist. Jamaica: 147, t. 4, f. 1, 2. 1756. Current name: Cissus verticillata (L.) Nicolson & C.E. Jarvis (Vitaceae)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C), pp. 370-473 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 419, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Hedera quinquefolia Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 202. 1753. "Habitat in Canada." RCN: 1638. Lectotype (designated here by Reveal): Clayton 116 (BM). Current name: Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. (Vitaceae). Note: See discussion by Fernald (in Rhodora 41: 430. 1939)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part H), pp. 557-585 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 558, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Aquilicia sambucina Linnaeus, Mantissa Plantarum Altera: 211. 1771, nom. illeg. "Habitat in Java." RCN: 1636. Replaced synonym of: Staphylea indica Burm. f. (1768). Lectotype (Smith, Fl. Vitiensis Nova 3: 715. 1985): [icon] " Staphylea indica " in Burman, Fl. Indica: 75, t. 24, f. 2. 1768. Generitype of Aquilicia Linnaeus. Current name: Leea indica (Burm. f.) Merr. (Leeaceae). Note: A superfluous name for Staphylea indica Burm. f. (1768)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part A), pp. 252-342 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 308, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Cissus vitiginea Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 117. 1753. "Habitat in India." RCN: 952. Lectotype (Shetty & Singh in Kew Bull. 44: 473. 1989): Herb. Hermann 2: 35, No. 60 (BM-000594598). Generitype of Cissus Linnaeus. Current name: Cissus vitiginea L. (Vitaceae)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C), pp. 370-473 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 419, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Vitis trifolia Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 203. 1753. "Habitat in India." RCN: 1643. Neotype (Shetty & Singh in Taxon 37: 171. 1988): Samuel Browne 67, Herb. Sloane 165: 84 (BM-SL). Current name: Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin (Vitaceae)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part V), pp. 911-926 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 926, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971

Cissus acida Linnaeus, Species Plantarum, ed. 2, 1: 170. 1762, nom. illeg. "Habitat in America." RCN: 956. Replaced synonym: Sicyos trifoliata L. (1753). Lectotype (Lombardi in Taxon 44: 203. 1995): [icon] " Bryonia alba triphylla geniculata, foliis crassis acidis " in Sloane, Voy. Jamaica 1: 233, t. 142, f. 5, 6. 1707. - Typotype: Herb. Sloane 4: 87, 88 (BM-SL). Current name: Cissus trifoliata (L.) L. (Vitaceae). Note: A superfluous name for Sicyos trifoliata L. (1753)., Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C), pp. 370-473 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 419, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971