Search

Your search keyword '"Virk, Michael S."' showing total 316 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Author "Virk, Michael S." Remove constraint Author: "Virk, Michael S."
316 results on '"Virk, Michael S."'

Search Results

52. Variation in Cervical Pedicle Morphology: Important Considerations for Posterior Cervical Procedures

53. Development of new postoperative neck pain at 12 and 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study

54. Differences in postoperative quality of life in young, early elderly, and late elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy

57. Do comorbid self-reported depression and anxiety influence outcomes following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

58. Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.

59. Development of new postoperative neck pain at 12 and 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study.

60. 113 Clinical Presentation Phenotypes of Patients Operated for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

61. An actionable map of arm and hand muscle responses to electrical stimulation of the dorsal cervical spinal cord in humans

63. Classifying Patients Operated for Spondylolisthesis

64. Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

65. Does reduction of the Meyerding grade correlate with outcomes in patients undergoing decompression and fusion for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis?

66. Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database

67. Classifying Patients Operated for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

70. Contributors

72. Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database

73. Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

74. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database

75. Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

78. The MISDEF2 algorithm: an updated algorithm for patient selection in minimally invasive deformity surgery

80. "July Effect" Revisited: July Surgeries at Residency Training Programs are Associated with Equivalent Long-term Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery.

81. Sexual Dysfunction: Prevalence and Prognosis in Patients Operated for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

82. Outcomes and Risks With Age in Spondylolisthesis: A Comparison of the Elderly From the Quality Outcomes Database

83. Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

84. Addition of Fusion to Decompression for Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis is Associated With Greater Patient-Reported Outcome Improvements at Twenty-Four-Month Follow-Up: A Multicenter Study Using the Quality Outcomes Database

85. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database

86. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression Alone for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

87. Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database

89. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database

90. Obese Patients Benefit, but do not Fare as Well as Nonobese Patients, Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

92. Sexual Dysfunction: Prevalence and Prognosis in Patients Operated for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

93. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

94. Obese Patients Benefit, but do not Fare as Well as Nonobese Patients, Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.

95. 168 Decompression versus Fusion for Grade 1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis A Multicenter Assessment of 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Quality Outcomes Database

96. 169 Similar Proportions Return to Work Following Fusion and Decompression Alone for Degenerative Grade 1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Though the Trajectories Differ

99. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database

100. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources