Search

Your search keyword '"Vazquez, Carmelo"' showing total 271 results
Start Over Author "Vazquez, Carmelo"
271 results on '"Vazquez, Carmelo"'

51. Additional file 1 of Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Shevlin, Mark, Butter, Sarah, McBride, Orla, Murphy, Jamie, Gibson-Miller, Jilly, Hartman, Todd K., Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., McKay, Ryan, Stocks, Thomas VA, Bennett, Kate M, Hyland, Philip, Vallieres, Fr��d��rique, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, Contreras, Alba, Peinado, Vanesa, Trucharte, Almudena, Bertamini, Marco, Panzeri, Anna, Bruno, Giovanni, Granziol, Umberto, Mignemi, Giuseppe, Spoto, Andrea, Vidotto, Giulio, and Bentall, Richard P.

Subjects
endocrine system, endocrine system diseases, mental disorders, behavioral disciplines and activities, humanities
Abstract

Additional file 1: Table S1. Standardised Factor Loadings for PHQ-GAD Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Each Country.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

52. Additional file 2 of Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Shevlin, Mark, Butter, Sarah, McBride, Orla, Murphy, Jamie, Gibson-Miller, Jilly, Hartman, Todd K., Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., McKay, Ryan, Stocks, Thomas VA, Bennett, Kate M, Hyland, Philip, Vallieres, Fr��d��rique, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, Contreras, Alba, Peinado, Vanesa, Trucharte, Almudena, Bertamini, Marco, Panzeri, Anna, Bruno, Giovanni, Granziol, Umberto, Mignemi, Giuseppe, Spoto, Andrea, Vidotto, Giulio, and Bentall, Richard P.

Abstract

Additional file 2: Table S2. Shapiro-Wilk Normality Tests for PHQ and GAD-7 Scores for each Country

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

53. Sharing data to better understand one of the world's most significant shared experiences: data resource profile of the longitudinal COVID-19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, Hartman, Todd, additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Gibson-Miller, Jilly, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Lloyd, Alex, additional, Stocks, Thomas, additional, Bennett, Kate, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, Contreras Cuevas, Alba, additional, Bertamini, Marco, additional, Panzero, Anna, additional, Bruno, Giovanni, additional, and Bentall, Richard, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

55. Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Bennett, Kate M., additional, Stocks, Thomas V. A., additional, Lloyd, Alex, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton P., additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, and Bentall, Richard P., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

56. Sharing data to better understand one of the world’s most significant shared experiences: An overview of the openly accessible longitudinal COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study data

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Gibson Miller, Jilly, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton Philipp, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Lloyd, Alex, additional, Stocks, Thomas Victor Arthur, additional, Bennett, Kate Mary, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, Contreras, Alba, additional, Bertamini, Marco, additional, Panzeri, Anna, additional, Bruno, Giovanni, additional, and Bentall, Richard, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

57. Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 3

Author

McBride, Orla, Butter, Sarah, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, McKay, Ryan, Bennett, Kate M., Gibson-Miller, Jilly, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., Stocks, Thomas VA, Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, and Bentall, Richard P.

Subjects
longitudinal, COVID-19, survey methodology, psychological, general population
Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult population in multiple countries. This paper describes the third wave of the UK survey (the ‘parent’ strand of the Consortium) during July-August 2020. Methods: Adults (N=2025) who participated in the baseline and/or first follow-up surveys were reinvited to participate in this survey, which assessed: (1) COVID-19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours; (2) the occurrence of common mental disorders; as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public’s response to the pandemic. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure that the cross-sectional sample is nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, and representative of the baseline sample characteristics for household composition, ethnicity, urbanicity and born/raised in UK. Results: 1166 adults (57.6% of baseline participants) provided full interviews at Wave 3. The raking procedure successfully re-balanced the cross-sectional sample to within 1% of population estimates across selected socio-demographic characteristics. Conclusion: This paper demonstrates the strength of the C19PRC Study data to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Published
2021

60. Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Shevlin, Mark, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, McBride, Orla, additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Gibson Miller, Jilly, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton Philipp, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Stocks, Thomas Victor Arthur, additional, Bennett, Kate Mary, additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, Contreras, Alba, additional, Peinado, Vanesa, additional, Trucharte, Almudena, additional, Bertamini, Marco, additional, Panzeri, Anna, additional, Bruno, Giovanni, additional, GRANZIOL, UMBERTO, additional, Mignemi, Giuseppe, additional, Spoto, Andrea, additional, Vidotto, Giulio, additional, and Bentall, Richard, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

62. Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3

Author

McBride, Orla, Butter, Sarah, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, McKay, Ryan, Bennett, Kate M., Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., Stocks, Thomas VA, Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, Bentall, Richard P., McBride, Orla, Butter, Sarah, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, McKay, Ryan, Bennett, Kate M., Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., Stocks, Thomas VA, Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, and Bentall, Richard P.

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study aims to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the adult population in multiple countries. This paper describes the third wave of the UK survey (the ‘parent’ strand of the Consortium) during July‐August 2020. Methods: Adults (N = 2025) who participated in the baseline and/or first follow‐up surveys were reinvited to participate in this survey, which assessed: (1) COVID‐19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours; (2) the occurrence of common mental disorders; as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public’s response to the pandemic. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure that the cross‐sectional sample is nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, and representative of the baseline sample characteristics for household composition, ethnicity, urbanicity and born/raised in UK. Results: 1166 adults (57.6% of baseline participants) provided full interviews at Wave 3. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the cross‐sectional sample to within 1% of population estimates across selected socio‐demographic characteristics. Conclusion: This paper demonstrates the strength of the C19PRC Study data to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Published
2021

63. Compassion-based mood regulation after retrieving negative autobiographical memories

Author

Blanco, Ivan, Nicolás, Teodoro Pascual, Zangri, Rosaria Maria, and Vazquez, Carmelo

Subjects
Compassion, Medicine and Health Sciences, Mood induction procedure, Emotion Regulation, Mood Induction, Psychiatry and Psychology, Autobiographical memory, Mindfulness, MIP
Abstract

We present two studies looking at the effect of mood-repair strategies following a negative mood induction via the recall of personal negative events. With this proposal, we intend to create a controlled protocol to help individuals effectively manage the emotions that arise from retrieving negative autobiographical memories. In Study 1, conducted in a population of undergraduate university students, the experimental task consists of the recall of an autobiographical negative event, used to elicit negative mood, followed by one of three mood-repair conditions: self-compassion instructions, positive reappraisal (benefit-finding), and a control condition with no regulation strategy. Individuals will be asked to remember a specific event in their lives in which something went wrong, they had some responsibility for what happened, and the emotions associated with the event were negative ones (e.g., shame, guilt, sadness...). Immediately afterwards, participants will be randomised to one of the 3 mood-repair conditions: self-compassion, benefit-focused reappraisal, or the control condition. Self-report measures will be collected before the negative mood induction (T1), following the recall task (T2), and after the mood repair strategies (T3). In Study 2, the population will comprise participants from mindfulness meditation-based courses: Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT). In this second study, the task will consist of exactly the same negative mood induction procedure as Study 1 but, given the nature of these programs, the mood regulation conditions will only include compassion and control.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

64. Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Bennett, Kate M., additional, Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton P., additional, Stocks, Thomas VA, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, and Bentall, Richard P., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

69. Corrigendum : Psychological Effects of a 1-Month Meditation Retreat on Experienced Meditators: The Role of Non-attachment

Author

Montero-Marin, Jesús, Puebla-Guedea, Marta, Herrera-Mercadal, Paola, Cebolla Marti, Ausias, Soler, Joaquim, Demarzo, Marcelo, Vazquez, Carmelo, Rodríguez-Bornaetxea, Fernando, Garcia-Campayo, Javier, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Montero-Marin, Jesús, Puebla-Guedea, Marta, Herrera-Mercadal, Paola, Cebolla Marti, Ausias, Soler, Joaquim, Demarzo, Marcelo, Vazquez, Carmelo, Rodríguez-Bornaetxea, Fernando, Garcia-Campayo, Javier, and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Published
2020

70. Monitoring the psychological, social, and economic impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the population: Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study

Author

McBride, Orla, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Gibson-Miller, Jilly, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., McKay, Ryan, Stocks, Thomas V.A., Bennett, Kate M., Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, Bentall, Richard, McBride, Orla, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Gibson-Miller, Jilly, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., McKay, Ryan, Stocks, Thomas V.A., Bennett, Kate M., Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, and Bentall, Richard

Abstract

Objectives: The C19PRC study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult population of the UK, Republic of Ireland, and Spain. This paper describes the conduct of the first two waves of the UK survey (the "parent" strand of the Consortium) during March-April 2020. Methods: A longitudinal, internet panel survey was designed to assess: (1) COVID-19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; (2) the occurrence of common mental health disorders as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public's response to the pandemic. Quota sampling (age, sex, and household income) was used to recruit a nationally representative sample of adults. Results: Two thousand and twenty five adults were recruited at baseline, and 1406 were followed-up one-month later (69.4% retention rate). The baseline sample was representative of the UK population in relation to economic activity, ethnicity, and household composition. Attrition was predicted by key socio-demographic characteristics, and an inverse probability weighting procedure was employed to ensure the follow-up sample was representative of the baseline sample. Conclusion: The C19PRC study data has strong generalizability to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research on important public health questions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Published
2020

74. Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 3

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Butter, Sarah, additional, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Bennett, Kate Mary, additional, Gibson Miller, Jilly, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Martinez, Anton Philipp, additional, Stocks, Thomas Victor Arthur, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, and Bentall, Richard, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

75. Monitoring the psychological, social, and economic impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the population: Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton P., additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Stocks, Thomas VA, additional, Bennett, Kate M., additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, and Bentall, Richard P., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

82. An overview of the context, design and conduct of the first two waves of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study

Author

McBride, Orla, primary, Murphy, Jamie, additional, Shevlin, Mark, additional, Gibson Miller, Jilly, additional, Hartman, Todd K., additional, Hyland, Philip, additional, Levita, Liat, additional, Mason, Liam, additional, Martinez, Anton P, additional, McKay, Ryan, additional, Stocks, Thomas Victor Arthur, additional, Bennett, Kate Mary, additional, Vallières, Frédérique, additional, Karatzias, Thanos, additional, Valiente, Carmen, additional, Vazquez, Carmelo, additional, and Bentall, Richard, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

88. Automatic and effortful processing in depression

Author

Hartlage, Shirley, Alloy, Lauren B., Vazquez, Carmelo, and Dykman, Benjamin

Subjects
Depression, Mental -- Psychological aspects, Cognitive psychology -- Research, Psychology and mental health
Abstract

Automatic processes require few attentional resources, but effortful processes use attentional capacity. Research on cognitive processing by depressed individuals is reviewed and the following is concluded: (a) Depression interferes with effortful processing. The degree of interference is determined by the degree of effortfulness of the task, the severity of depression, and the valence of the stimulus material to be processed. (b) Depression interferes only minimally with automatic processes. Hypothetical causal mechanisms for interference in effortful processes by depression, whether interference in effortful processing is unique to depression or characteristic of psychopathology in general, and whether negative automatic thoughts are associated with current depression or depression proneness also are addressed. The effortful-automatic perspective has implications for understanding depressive clinical features, treating depression, and conducting future research.

Published
1993

91. Monitoring the psychological, social, and economic impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the population: Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study.

Author

McBride, Orla, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, Hartman, Todd K., Hyland, Philip, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., McKay, Ryan, Stocks, Thomas VA, Bennett, Kate M., Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, and Bentall, Richard P.

Subjects
ECONOMIC impact of disease, COVID-19, COVID-19 pandemic, PSYCHOLOGICAL research, POLITICAL attitudes, POLITICAL psychology
Abstract

Objectives: The C19PRC study aims to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the adult population of the UK, Republic of Ireland, and Spain. This paper describes the conduct of the first two waves of the UK survey (the "parent" strand of the Consortium) during March–April 2020. Methods: A longitudinal, internet panel survey was designed to assess: (1) COVID‐19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; (2) the occurrence of common mental health disorders as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public's response to the pandemic. Quota sampling (age, sex, and household income) was used to recruit a nationally representative sample of adults. Results: Two thousand and twenty five adults were recruited at baseline, and 1406 were followed‐up one‐month later (69.4% retention rate). The baseline sample was representative of the UK population in relation to economic activity, ethnicity, and household composition. Attrition was predicted by key socio‐demographic characteristics, and an inverse probability weighting procedure was employed to ensure the follow‐up sample was representative of the baseline sample. Conclusion: The C19PRC study data has strong generalizability to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research on important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results