Search

Purpose: To determine whether the androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, enzalutamide, improves effectiveness of endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer. Patients and Methods: In this phase II trial, patients with HR+/HER2 normal advanced/metastatic breast cancer were randomized 1:1 to exemestane 25 mg with placebo or exemestane 50 mg with enzalutamide 160 mg daily (NCT02007512). Two parallel cohorts enrolled patients with 0 (cohort 1) or 1 (cohort 2) prior ET for advanced disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of each cohort. Biomarkers were evaluated in an exploratory analysis. Results: Overall, 247 patients were randomized (cohort 1, n = 127 and cohort 2, n = 120). PFS was not improved in either cohort of the ITT population [HR, 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–1.26); P = 0.3631 for cohort 1 and HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.66–1.59); P = 0.9212 for cohort 2]. In cohort 1, high levels of AR mRNA were associated with greater benefit of enzalutamide (Pinteraction = 0.0048). This effect was particularly apparent in patients with both high levels of AR mRNA and low levels of ESR1 mRNA [HR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.10–0.60); P = 0.0011]. The most common any grade adverse events in the enzalutamide arms were nausea (39%) in cohort 1 and fatigue (37%) in cohort 2. Conclusions: Enzalutamide with exemestane was well tolerated. While PFS was not improved by the addition of enzalutamide to exemestane in an unselected population, ET-naïve patients with high AR mRNA levels, particularly in combination with low ESR1 mRNA levels, may benefit from enzalutamide with exemestane.

Background Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is expressed in epithelial cancers, including hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG; Trodelvy®) is an antibody–drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody coupled to SN-38 at a high drug-to-antibody ratio via a unique hydrolyzable linker that delivers SN-38 intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment. SG was granted accelerated FDA approval for metastatic triple-negative BC treatment in April 2020. Patients and methods We analyzed a prespecified subpopulation of patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) HR+/HER2− mBC from the phase I/II, single-arm trial (NCT01631552), who received intravenous SG (10 mg/kg) and whose disease progressed on endocrine-based therapy and at least one prior chemotherapy for mBC. End points included objective response rate (ORR; RECIST version 1.1) assessed locally, duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Fifty-four women were enrolled between 13 February 2015 and 1 June 2017. Median (range) age was 54 (33-79) years and all received at least two prior lines of therapy for mBC. At data cut-off (1 March 2019), 12 patients were still alive. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (50.0%), anemia (11.1%), and diarrhea (7.4%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5%–45.6%; 17 partial responses]; median DOR was 8.7 months (95% CI 3.7–12.7), median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.6–7.6), and median OS was 12 months (95% CI 9.0–18.2). Conclusions SG shows encouraging activity in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2− mBC and a predictable, manageable safety profile. Further evaluation in a randomized phase III trial (TROPiCS-02) is ongoing (NCT03901339). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01631552; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01631552

Importance Metformin, a biguanide commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes, has been associated with potential beneficial effects across breast cancer subtypes in observational and preclinical studies. Objective To determine whether the administration of adjuvant metformin (vs placebo) to patients with breast cancer without diabetes improves outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants MA.32, a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, conducted in Canada, Switzerland, US, and UK, enrolled 3649 patients with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving standard therapy between August 2010 and March 2013, with follow-up to October 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized (stratified for hormone receptor [estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor {ER/PgR}] status, positive vs negative; body mass index, ≤30 vs >30; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [ERBB2, formerly HER2 or HER2/neu], positive vs negative; and any vs no chemotherapy) to 850 mg of oral metformin twice a day (n = 1824) or oral placebo twice a day (n = 1825) for 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Of the 8 secondary outcomes, overall survival, distant relapse-free survival, and breast cancer-free interval were analyzed. Results Of the 3649 randomized patients (mean age, 52.4 years; 3643 women [99.8%]), all (100%) were included in analyses. After a second interim analysis, futility was declared for patients who were ER/PgR-, so the primary analysis was conducted for 2533 patients who were ER/PgR+. The median duration of follow-up in the ER/PgR+ group was 96.2 months (range, 0.2-121 months). Invasive disease-free survival events occurred in 465 patients who were ER/PgR+. The incidence rates for invasive disease-free survival events were 2.78 per 100 patient-years in the metformin group vs 2.74 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21; P = .93), and the incidence rates for death were 1.46 per 100 patient-years in the metformin group vs 1.32 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.41; P = .47). Among patients who were ER/PgR-, followed up for a median of 94.1 months, incidence of invasive disease-free survival events was 3.58 vs 3.60 per 100 patient-years, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.30; P = .92). None of the 3 secondary outcomes analyzed in the ER/PgR+ group had statistically significant differences. Grade 3 nonhematological toxic events occurred more frequently in patients taking metformin than in patients taking placebo (21.5% vs 17.5%, respectively, P = .003). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the metformin vs placebo groups were hypertension (2.4% vs 1.9%), irregular menses (1.5% vs 1.4%), and diarrhea (1.9% vs 7.0%). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with high-risk operable breast cancer without diabetes, the addition of metformin vs placebo to standard breast cancer treatment did not significantly improve invasive disease-free survival. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01101438.

Purpose: The recent approval of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapy in combination with nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) highlights the need to understand the role of chemotherapy in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Experimental Design: We examined immune-related gene expression patterns before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a series of 83 breast tumors, including 44 TNBCs, from patients with residual disease (RD). Changes in gene expression patterns in the TIME were tested for association with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we sought to characterize the systemic effects of NAC through single-cell analysis (RNAseq and cytokine secretion) of programmed death-1–high (PD-1HI) CD8+ peripheral T cells and examination of a cytolytic gene signature in whole blood. Results: In non-TNBC, no change in expression of any single gene was associated with RFS or OS, while in TNBC upregulation of multiple immune-related genes and gene sets were associated with improved long-term outcome. High cytotoxic T-cell signatures present in the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer at surgery were associated with persistent disease and recurrence, suggesting active antitumor immunity that may indicate ongoing disease burden. Conclusions: We have characterized the effects of NAC on the TIME, finding that TNBC is uniquely sensitive to the immunologic effects of NAC, and local increases in immune genes/sets are associated with improved outcomes. However, expression of cytotoxic genes in the peripheral blood, as opposed to the TIME, may be a minimally invasive biomarker of persistent micrometastatic disease ultimately leading to recurrence.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is typically performed in the supine position. However, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed in prone, as this improves visibility of deep breast tissues. With the emergence of hybrid scanners that integrate molecular information from PET and functional information from MRI, it is of great interest to determine if the prognostic utility of prone PET is equivalent to supine. We compared PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors) measurements between prone and supine FDG-PET in patients with breast cancer and the effect of orientation on predicting pathologic complete response (pCR). In total, 47 patients were enrolled and received up to 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Prone and supine FDG-PET were performed at baseline (t0, n = 46), after cycle 1 (t1, n = 1) or 2 (t2, n = 10), or after all neoadjuvant therapy (t3, n = 19). FDG uptake was quantified by maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV) with and without normalization to lean body mass, that is, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SULmax, and SULpeak. PERCIST measurements were performed for each paired baseline and post-treatment scan. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the prediction of pCR was performed using logistic regression that included age and tumor size as covariates. SUV and SUL metrics were significantly different between orientation (P &lt, 001), but were highly correlated (P &gt, 98). Importantly, no differences were observed with the PERCIST measurements (P &gt, 6). Overlapping 95% confidence intervals for the receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested no difference at predicting pCR. Therefore, prone and supine PERCIST in this data set were not statistically different.

Capecitabine is important in breast cancer treatment but causes diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS), affecting adherence and quality of life. We sought to identify pharmacogenomic predictors of capecitabine toxicity using a novel monitoring tool. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were prospectively treated with capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day, 14 days on/7 off). Patients completed in-person toxicity questionnaires (day 1/cycle) and automated phone-in assessments (days 8, 15). Correlation of genotypes with early and overall toxicity was the primary endpoint. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled (14 institutions). Diarrhea and HFS occurred in 52% (17% grade 3) and 69% (9% grade 3), respectively. Only 29% of patients completed four cycles without dose reduction/interruption. In 39%, the highest toxicity grade was captured via phone. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diarrhea—DPYD*5 (odds ratio [OR] 4.9; P = 0.0005), a MTHFR missense SNP (OR 3.3; P = 0.02), and a SNP upstream of MTRR (OR 3.0; P = 0.03). GWAS elucidated a novel HFS SNP (OR 3.0; P = 0.0007) near TNFSF4 (OX40L), a gene implicated in autoimmunity including autoimmune skin diseases never before implicated in HFS. Genotype-gene expression analyses of skin tissues identified rs11158568 (associated with HFS via GWAS) with expression of CHURC1, a transcriptional activator controlling fibroblast growth factor (beta = − 0.74; P = 1.46 × 10–23), representing a previously unidentified mechanism for HFS. This is the first cancer pharmacogenomic study to use phone-in self-reporting, permitting augmented toxicity characterization. Three germline toxicity SNPs were replicated, and several novel SNPs/genes having strong functional relevance were discovered. If further validated, these markers could permit personalized capecitabine dosing.

Purpose: Preclinical data demonstrating androgen receptor (AR)–positive (AR+) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to AR antagonists, and PI3K inhibition catalyzed an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional phase Ib/II study TBCRC032. The trial investigated the safety and efficacy of the AR-antagonist enzalutamide alone or in combination with the PI3K inhibitor taselisib in patients with metastatic AR+ (≥10%) breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Phase Ib patients [estrogen receptor positive (ER+) or TNBC] with AR+ breast cancer received 160 mg enzalutamide in combination with taselisib to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase II TNBC patients were randomized to receive either enzalutamide alone or in combination with 4 mg taselisib until disease progression. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks. Results: The combination was tolerated, and the MTD was not reached. The adverse events were hyperglycemia and skin rash. Overall, CBR for evaluable patients receiving the combination was 35.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months. Luminal AR (LAR) TNBC subtype patients trended toward better response compared with non-LAR (75.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.06), and increased PFS (4.6 vs. 2.0 months, P = 0.082). Genomic analyses revealed subtype-specific treatment response, and novel FGFR2 fusions and AR splice variants. Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide and taselisib increased CBR in TNBC patients with AR+ tumors. Correlative analyses suggest AR protein expression alone is insufficient for identifying patients with AR-dependent tumors and knowledge of tumor LAR subtype and AR splice variants may identify patients more or less likely to benefit from AR antagonists.

PURPOSE In the HER2CLIMB study, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer with brain metastases (BMs) showed statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with tucatinib. We describe exploratory analyses of intracranial efficacy and survival in participants with BMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. All patients underwent baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging; those with BMs were classified as active or stable. Efficacy analyses were performed by applying RECIST 1.1 criteria to CNS target lesions by investigator assessment. CNS-PFS (intracranial progression or death) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in all patients with BMs. Confirmed intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) was evaluated in patients with measurable intracranial disease. RESULTS There were 291 patients with BMs: 198 (48%) in the tucatinib arm and 93 (46%) in the control arm. The risk of intracranial progression or death was reduced by 68% in the tucatinib arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.48; P < .0001). Median CNS-PFS was 9.9 months in the tucatinib arm versus 4.2 months in the control arm. Risk of death was reduced by 42% in the tucatinib arm (OS HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.85; P = .005). Median OS was 18.1 versus 12.0 months. ORR-IC was higher in the tucatinib arm (47.3%; 95% CI, 33.7% to 61.2%) versus the control arm (20.0%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 43.7%; P = .03). CONCLUSION In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with BMs, the addition of tucatinib to trastuzumab and capecitabine doubled ORR-IC, reduced risk of intracranial progression or death by two thirds, and reduced risk of death by nearly half. To our knowledge, this is the first regimen to demonstrate improved antitumor activity against BMs in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in a randomized, controlled trial.

A 49-year-old woman with ER-positive/PR-negative/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer experienced Grade 3 hepatotoxicity following initiation of a clinical trial of fulvestrant, palbociclib, and erdafitinib. Fulvestrant was determined to be the drug most likely responsible for this hepatotoxic effect. This case report details the timing and nature of this drug-induced liver injury, adding support to an area that has yet to be described adequately in the existing literature.

The recent approval of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in combination with nAB-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) highlights the need to understand the role of chemotherapy in modulating the tumor-immune microenvironment (TIME). Patients with TNBC are routinely treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in the pre-treatment diagnostic biopsy are predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR). In patients with residual disease (RD) at surgery, sTILs confer good prognosis. However, the effect of chemotherapy on sTILs and how it influences the TIME are poorly understood. We examined immune-gene expression patterns before and after NAC in a series of 83 breast tumors, including 44 TNBCs, from patients with RD. sTILs were enumerated by standardized guidelines. Gene expression patterns were tested for association with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). T cell receptor sequencing (TCRseq) was performed on a subset (n=15) of tumors. In 4 patients undergoing NAC, PD-1-high and -negative CD8+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were profiled using single-cell RNAseq and multiplexed cytokine secretion assays. Post-NAC sTILs (≥30%) were only predictive of outcome (RFS p=0.019; OS p=0.05) in TNBC patients, but not in non-TNBC patients (RFS p=0.28; OS p=0.78) confirming that the prognostic capacity of sTILs is confined to TNBC. Pre-NAC sTILs were not predictive of outcome in either group, likely due to exclusion of patients experiencing pCR. The change in sTILs during NAC did not prognosticate outcome in TNBC, suggesting that in the post-NAC setting, only the most proximal measurement of sTILs is meaningful. However, these results did suggest that NAC alters the TIME. To examine the interplay among NAC, the TIME, and clinical outcomes, we tested the change in expression of 770 immune-related genes during NAC in univariate cox-proportional hazards models. In non-TNBC, no change in expression of any single gene was associated with RFS or OS at a false-discovery rate (FDR) of 10%. In TNBC, individual changes in 12 genes and 204 genes were identified as associated with RFS and OS, respectively (FDR Citation Format: Justin M Balko, Mellissa Nixon, Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson, Mark A Pilkinton, Wyatt J McDonnell, Violeta Sanchez, Susan R Opalenik, Sherene Loi, Brent Rexer, Vandana Abramson, Valerie Jansen, Simon Mallal, Jonathan D Marotti, Kevin Shee, Todd W Miller, Melinda E Sanders, Ingrid A Mayer, Roberto Salgado. Immunologic correlates of long-term outcome in the residual disease of triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-15.

BackgroundThis study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as a ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP)) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM).Methods and ResultsThis stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/ breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following post-surgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n=209), rates of post-intervention progression to CDP, were assessed over three years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1,200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n=482;TM n=481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n=442;TM n=437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (IQR=22,35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n=89 vs 27.5%, n=120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger was longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95%CI,8.2-12.6 vs 3.9; 95%CI,2.8-4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4%(n=30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n=7 vs 19.2%, n=23; RR=0.41; 95%CI,0.13-0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95%CI,2.3%-20.3%; p = 0.016).ConclusionsAs compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention.Condensed AbstractThis stratified, multi-site, international trial enrolled newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, randomized them to prospective surveillance by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM), and screened them for lymphedema development at frequent intervals for three years after surgery. When subclinical lymphedema was detected a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve and gauntlet intervention was implemented. Overall, 14.4% (n=30) progressed post-intervention to chronic lymphedema, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n=7 vs 19.2%, n=23; RR=0.41; 95%-CI,0.13-0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95%-CI,2.3%-20.3%; p = 0.016). BIS best supported intervention success for prevention of chronic lymphedema compared to TM.

Background: Somatic alterations in the FGFR pathway (mainly FGFR1, amplified in about 15% of ER+ BC) have been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), and more recently, to CDK4/6i as well. Based on our preclinical data showing that the FGFR pan-inhibitor erdafitinib when added to fulvestrant/palbociclib resulted in marked PDX regressions, we initiated a phase Ib trial combining erdafitinib with fulvestrant/palbociclib in patients with ER+/HER2-/FGFR-amplified MBC (NCT03238196) to determine safety, tolerability and anti-tumor activity of this combination. Methods: Patients with evaluable ER+/HER2- MBC with FGFR1-4 amplification (detected on tumor next generation sequencing or plasma ctDNA) exposed to at least one ET regimen (but no more than 2 lines of chemotherapy) in the metastatic setting, were treated with fulvestrant, palbociclib (standard of care dosing/ schedule) and oral erdafitinib, tested in 4 doses ranging from 4 mg to 8 mg daily. Once MTD reached, we planned to enroll 20 patients in the expansion portion of the trial. Tumor blocks were collected for FGFR1 FISH amplification analysis, and plasma ctDNA was collected at baseline, 4 weeks and at treatment discontinuation. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Since August 2017, 26 eligible patients with evaluable ER+/HER2-/FGFR-amplified MBC were enrolled across 4 institutions. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Main grade 1 and 2 adverse events (AE) were consistent with on-target toxicities of erdafitinib and/or palbociclib: mucositis (67%), hyperphosphatemia (61%), dysgeusia (52%), diarrhea (48%), fatigue (48%), neutropenia (47%), hand-foot syndrome (38%), anemia (29%), and onycholysis (14%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5% patients, no cases of central serous retinopathy were seen. Serious AE were rare: one grade 4 elevation of transaminases (DLT; attributed to fulvestrant), one grade 3 colitis (attributed to erdafitinib), and one thromboembolic event (attributed to palbociclib). In combination with fulvestrant/ palbociclib, the MTD of erdafitinib was 6 mg. No drug-drug interaction was seen. 8 patients were deemed non-evaluable for anti-tumor effect as treatment discontinuation (mainly due to AE) occurred prior to first tumor assessment. Of the 18 evaluable patients: 7 had disease progression, 8 had stable disease (4 of which discontinued treatment due to AE), 3 have not completed their first tumor assessment, 4 are still on treatment; median PFS was 3 months and CBR at 6 months was 28%. However, higher PFS (6 months) was seen in 6/8 patients with high levels of FGFR1 amplification (FISH FGFR1:CEP8 ratio >5; gene copy number >10) and in both patients with FGFR3 amplification. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first time an FGFR inhibitor has been tested in combination with ET and CDK4/6i in patients with MBC harboring FGFR alterations. Erdafitinib-related side effects appeared to be on target, leading to treatment discontinuation in several patients despite optimal medical treatment. Clinical activity was seen in heavily pre-treated patients with molecular evidence of high FGFR amplification despite 100% prior exposure to ET and CDK4/6i. Full clinical and correlative work will be presented at the meeting, and a future phase II trial is being planned. Table 126 / 35 patients accrued13 in escalation, 13 in expansion(ongoing)Median age53 (35 - 75)Race/ ethnicityWhite 22Black 1Asian 2Hispanic 1Median number of lines of treatment in the metastatic setting4 (1 - 5)Prior lines of treatment in the metastatic settingEndocrine therapy 100%Fulvestrant 28%CDK4/6i 100%PI3K pathway inhibitor 80%1 line chemo 65%2 lines chemo 45%FGFR1 amplification23FGFR3 amplification2FGFR4 amplification1 Citation Format: Ingrid A. Mayer, Barbara B. Haley, Vandana G. Abramson, Adam Brufsky, Brent Rexer, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Komal L. Jhaveri, Melinda Sanders, Paula I. Ericsson-Gonzalez, Fei Ye, Carlos L. Arteaga. A phase Ib trial of fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib + pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erdafitinib in FGFR-amplified/ ER+/ HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-03.

Background: Chest wall recurrence can occur as a complication of breast cancer. This type of breast cancer is difficult to treat with short-lived responses to therapy, and associated with the development of distant metastases. Better therapies are needed in this setting. Immune checkpoint inhibition is being explored in breast cancer, with an immunotherapy agent currently approved for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesize that pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, may be effective in treating chest wall recurrence of breast cancer given the inflammatory nature of this disease and high expression of PD-1 seen in tumors with lymphovascular invasion that may predispose patients to chest wall recurrence. Platinum chemotherapy may augment anti-tumor immunity, with the combination of pembrolizumab and carboplatin shown to be effective in advanced lung cancer. This study is evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and carboplatin for breast cancer patients with chest wall disease. Methods: In this phase II study, 84 patients are being randomized 2:1 to treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin (Arm A) versus carboplatin alone (Arm B) with an option to cross over to pembrolizumab alone (Arm Bx) on progression. Pembrolizumab is dosed at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin is dosed at AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients may have TNBC, hormone receptor positive (HR)+/HER2- breast cancer that has progressed on 2 prior lines of hormone therapy, or refractory HER2+ breast cancer (may continue herceptin). Patients may have distant metastases, but must have surgically unresectable disease. Prior chest wall radiation is allowed. The primary endpoint is to determine the disease control rate (chest wall and distant sites) at 18 weeks of treatment. Patients undergo chest wall assessments with photography of skin lesions with every cycle of treatment, and imaging (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan) every 2 cycles to evaluate for progression. The study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms A and B (hazard ratio of 0.52, α= 0.10, β= 0.20). Secondary endpoints include response stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, progression free survival, response by irRECIST, and toxicity. The study incorporates many translational studies using chest wall biopsy tissue collected at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment, as well as correlative blood tests, including assessing changes in tumor and blood PD-L1 expression, circulating cell-free DNA, circulating tumor cells, soluble PD-L1 expression, and changes in the expression of MYC, an oncogene that may upregulate the expression of PD-1. Patients are currently being enrolled at 7 sites in the TBCRC. As of July 2019, 30 patients are enrolled. This study is supported by Merck and the TBCRC. (NCT03095352). Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Rita Nanda, Kathy Miller, Vandana Abramson, Paula Pohlmann, Adam Brufsky, Ben Park, Minetta Liu, Andrei Goga, Hope S. Rugo. Pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin versus carboplatin alone in breast cancer patients with chest wall disease: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 44 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-05.

PURPOSE To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario recommendations on the Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer. METHODS Two phase III trials—the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) in women with hormone receptor–positive, node-negative tumors and the Microarray in Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy (MINDACT) trial—provided the evidence for this update. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is appropriate for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. For patients older than age 50 years and whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 26, and for patients age 50 years or younger whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 16, there is little to no benefit from chemotherapy. Clinicians may offer endocrine therapy alone for these patients. For patients age 50 years or younger with recurrence scores of 16 to 25, clinicians may offer chemoendocrine therapy. Patients with recurrence scores greater than 30 should be considered candidates for chemoendocrine therapy. Based on informal consensus, the Panel recommends that oncologists may offer chemoendocrine therapy to patients with Onco type DX scores of 26 to 30. The MammaPrint assay could be used to guide decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive lymph node–negative breast cancer and in select patients with lymph node–positive cancers. In both patients with node-positive and node-negative disease, evidence of clinical utility of the MammaPrint assay was only apparent in those determined to be at high clinical risk; the Panel thus did not recommend use of MammaPrint assay in patients determined to be at low clinical risk. Remaining recommendations from the 2016 ASCO guideline endorsement are unchanged. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Background Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Methods Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. Results A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p

PURPOSE Predictive biomarkers to identify patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer who may benefit from targeted therapy alone are required. We hypothesized that early measurements of tumor maximum standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography would predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab (PT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage II/III, estrogen receptor–negative, HER2-positive breast cancer received four cycles of neoadjuvant PT. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed at baseline and 15 days after PT initiation (C1D15). Eighty evaluable patients were required to test the null hypothesis that the area under the curve of percentage of change in SULmax by C1D15 predicting pCR is less than or equal to 0.65, with a one-sided type I error rate of 10%. RESULTS Eighty-eight women were enrolled (83 evaluable), and 85% (75 of 88) completed all four cycles of PT. pCR after PT alone was 34%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.76 (90% CI, 0.67 to 0.85), which rejected the null hypothesis. Between patients who obtained pCR versus not, a significant difference in median percent reduction in SULmax by C1D15 was observed (63.8% v 33.5%; P < .001), an SULmax reduction greater than or equal to 40% was more prevalent (86% v 46%; P < .001; negative predictive value, 88%; positive predictive value, 49%), and a significant difference in median C1D15 SULmax (1.6 v 3.9; P < .001) and higher proportion of C1D15 SULmax less than or equal to 3 (93% v 38%; P < .001; negative predictive value, 94%; positive predictive value, 55%) were observed. CONCLUSION Early changes in SULmax predict response to four cycles of PT in estrogen receptor–negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. Once optimized, this quantitative imaging strategy may facilitate a more tailored approach to therapy in this setting.

Standard chemotherapy is associated with low response rates and short progression-free survival among patients with pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy is an antibody-drug conjugate that combines a humanized monoclonal antibody, which targets the human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), with SN-38, which is conjugated to the antibody by a cleavable linker. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy enables delivery of high concentrations of SN-38 to tumors.We conducted a phase 1/2 single-group, multicenter trial involving patients with advanced epithelial cancers who received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. A total of 108 patients received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight after receiving at least two previous anticancer therapies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The end points included safety; the objective response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), which was assessed locally; the duration of response; the clinical benefit rate (defined as a complete or partial response or stable disease for at least 6 months); progression-free survival; and overall survival. Post hoc analyses determined the response rate and duration, which were assessed by blinded independent central review.The 108 patients with triple-negative breast cancer had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range, 2 to 10). Four deaths occurred during treatment; 3 patients (2.8%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (in ≥10% of the patients) included anemia and neutropenia; 10 patients (9.3%) had febrile neutropenia. The response rate (3 complete and 33 partial responses) was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.6 to 43.1), and the median duration of response was 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 10.8); as assessed by independent central review, these values were 34.3% and 9.1 months, respectively. The clinical benefit rate was 45.4%. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.3), and overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 13.7).Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy was associated with durable objective responses in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Myelotoxic effects were the main adverse reactions. (Funded by Immunomedics; IMMU-132-01 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01631552.).

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors. Citation Format: Paplomata E, Borges V, Loi S, Abramson V, Hamilton E, Hurvitz S, Lin N, Walker L, Murthy RK. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-08.

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, conjugated to a humanized mAb targeting Trop-2 (trophoblastic antigen-2), which is highly expressed in many epithelial cancers. A phase I/II basket trial (NCT01631552) investigated its activity in patients (pts) with advanced epithelial cancers. Herein, we summarize pooled safety and efficacy findings in 162 pts with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) accrued between 7/2013 and 6/2017 who received at least 2 prior therapies for metastatic disease and were treated with sacituzumab govitecan at the 10 mg/kg dose level. Methods: Patients with triple-negative (N=108) and patients with hormone-receptor positive (N=54) mBC received 10 mg/kg sacituzumab govitecan on days 1 & 8 of a 21-day cycle continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. All pts had measurable disease by CT or MRI. Efficacy was assessed locally by RECIST 1.1 including overall response rate (ORR) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated according to CTCAE v4.0 Results: The patient cohort (161 female /1 male; median age 55 yrs, range 31-80) received a median of 4 prior therapies for metastatic disease (range 2-17), with prior chemotherapy agents in the metastatic setting including taxane (68%), capecitabine (60%), platinum (59%), gemcitabine (44%), eribulin (41%), and anthracycline (38%). 77 pts have died, with 57 in long-term follow-up and 28 still on treatment at data cutoff. The median number of administered sacituzumab govitecan doses was 14 (range 1-88). Treatment was generally well tolerated. 29% of pts had dose reductions, 3% discontinued treatment due to drug-related AEs, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Based on currently available AE data, grade ≥ 3 toxicity included neutropenia (43%), anemia (9.5%), diarrhea (7.0%) and febrile neutropenia (6.3%). For the TNBC subgroup, with a median follow-up of 9.3 months, the ORR was 33% (3 CRs + 33 PRs /108) with a median DOR of 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.8 – 11.6). For the ER+ subgroup, with a median follow-up of 10.0 months, the ORR was 31% (17 PRs/54) with a median DOR of 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.4 – 18.3). The combined HER2Neg ORR was 33% (3 CRs+50 PRs/162), with a median DOR of 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.9 - 10.8), PFS of 5.6 months (95% CI: 5.1 – 6.9) and OS of 13.0 months (95% CI: 11.5 - 15.0). The ORR was comparable for pts ≤ 50 yrs. old [32.2% (19/59)] vs. > 50 yrs old [33.0% (34/103)] and little different for pts with 2 prior therapies [35.4% (17/48)] vs. >2 prior therapies [31.6% (36/114)]. Conclusions: Monotherapy with sacituzumab govitecan was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, and achieved a 30+% objective response rate among heavily pre-treated patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer regardless of ER status. Citation Format: Kalinsky K, Isakoff SJ, Tolaney SM, Juric D, Mayer IA, Vahdat LT, Diamond JR, O'Shaughnessy J, Moroose RL, Santin AD, Shah NC, Abramson V, Goldenberg DM, Sharkey RM, Washkowitz SA, Wegener WA, Iannone R, Bardia A. Safety and efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan (anti-Trop-2-SN-38 antibody-drug conjugate) as ≥3rd-line therapeutic option for treatment-refractory HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HER2Neg mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-01.

525 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status can be used to identify patients who are eligible for treatment with DNA damaging agents. Using a 3-biomarker Genomic Instability Score (GIS) threshold of ≥42, studies have previously examined the association between HRD status and outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, evidence suggests that a GIS threshold of ≥33 may be more appropriate. Here, we conducted an exploratory analysis evaluating the ability of ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC. Methods: Patients across 5 cohorts (TBCRC0301, TBCRC0082, NCT013725793, PrECOG 01054, combined cisplatin cohort4) were included in this analysis if they had a primary TNBC diagnosis, received neoadjuvant platinum-based treatment, had a valid GIS, and had known pathologic complete response (pCR) status. GIS was determined by a combination of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric-allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions.4,5 BRCA mutation status was defined by loss of function resulting from a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated by comparing binary threshold status and binary pCR status. Results: A total of 204 tumors (158 BRCAwt; 33 BRCAm; 13 unknown) were included; pCR to platinum-based treatment occurred in 55 cases (39 BRCAwt; 14 BRCAm; 2 unknown). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were comparable between the ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds, with the ≥33 threshold producing higher sensitivity values. This was true when thresholds were applied to all samples and to BRCAwt samples only (Table). Among patients who achieved pCR in response to platinum-based treatment, 5.5% of patients in the full cohort and 7.7% of those in the BRCAwt cohort had a GIS between 33-41. Conclusions: To ensure that the majority of patients likely to benefit from treatment are identified, a GIS of ≥33 may be the most appropriate threshold to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC; however, a prospective trial will be needed to confirm these findings. Additional studies will be important to determine whether this threshold may be appropriate to determine eligibility for other DNA-damaging agents such as PARP inhibitors. 1. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1518-25 2. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(1):31-7. 3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):629-38. 4. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(15):3764-73. 5. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;16(6):1-9. [Table: see text]

Purpose Androgen receptor (AR) expression occurs in up to 86% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers. In vitro, AR inhibitors enhance antitumor activity of trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ cell lines. This open-label, single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide, an AR-signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced HER2+ AR+ breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab. Methods Eligible patients had measurable or non-measurable evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 1, no history of brain metastases, and previously received ≥ 1 anti-HER2 regimen for advanced disease. Patients received 160 mg oral enzalutamide daily and 6 mg/kg intravenous trastuzumab every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results Overall, 103 women were enrolled [median age 60 years (range 34–83)]; 62% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior anti-HER2 therapy. CBR24, comprising patients with confirmed partial responses (5%) and durable stable disease at 24 weeks (19%), was 24% in the efficacy evaluable set (n = 89). CBR24 did not seem related to AR-expression levels or hormone receptor status. Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval 2.0–3.8). Overall, 97 (94%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with fatigue most common (34%). Dyspnea (4%) and malignant neoplasm progression (3%) were the only TEAEs grade ≥ 3 reported in ≥ 3 patients. 22 patients (21%) reported serious TEAEs. Four patients (4%) experienced fatal, non-drug-related TEAEs. Conclusions Enzalutamide plus trastuzumab was well tolerated, and a subset of patients in this heavily pretreated population had durable disease control. Determination of biomarkers is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from this combination. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02091960

Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) is a surrogate for ovarian toxicity and associated risk of infertility and premature menopause. Here, we compare CRA rate with paclitaxel (T)-trastuzumab (H) to that with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Patients with T1N0 HER2 + early-stage breast cancer (eBC) enrolled on the ATEMPT trial and were randomized 3:1 to T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every (q) 3 weeks (w) × 17 vs. T 80 mg/m2 with H IV qw × 12 (4 mg/kg load → 2 mg/kg), followed by H (6 mg/kg IV q3w × 13). Enrollees who self-reported as premenopausal were asked to complete menstrual surveys at baseline and every 6–12 months for 60 months. 18-month CRA (no periods reported during prior 6 months on 18-month survey) was the primary endpoint of this analysis. Of 512 ATEMPT enrollees, 123 who began protocol therapy and answered baseline and at least one follow-up menstrual survey were premenopausal at enrollment. 76 had menstrual data available at 18 months without having received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or undergone hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy. Median age was 45 (range 23–53) among 18 who had received TH and 46 (range 34–54) among 58 who had received T-DM1. The 18-month rate of CRA was 50% after TH and 24% after T-DM1 (p = 0.045). Amenorrhea at 18 months was less likely in recipients of adjuvant T-DM1 than TH. Future studies are needed to understand how T-DM1 impacts risk of infertility and permanent menopause, and to assess amenorrhea rates when T-DM1 is administered after standard HER2-directed chemotherapy regimens.

PURPOSE Predictive biomarkers to identify patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer who may benefit from targeted therapy alone are required. We hypothesized that early measurements of tumor maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) on 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) would predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to pertuzumab and trastuzumab (PT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage II or III, estrogen receptor–negative, HER2-positive breast cancer received four cycles of neoadjuvant PT. 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography was performed at baseline and 15 days after PT initiation (C1D15). Eighty evaluable patients were required to test the null hypothesis that the area under the curve of percent change in SULmax by C1D15 predicting pCR is ≤ 0.65, with a one-sided type I error rate of 10%. RESULTS Eighty-eight women were enrolled (83 evaluable), and 85% (75 of 88) completed all four cycles of PT. pCR after PT alone was 22%. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of percent change in SULmax by C1D15 yielded an area under the curve of 0.72 (80% CI, 0.64 to 0.80; one-sided P = .12), which did not reject the null hypothesis. However, between patients who obtained pCR and who did not, a significant difference in median percent reduction in SULmax by C1D15 was observed (63.8% v 41.8%; P = .004) and SULmax reduction ≥ 40% was more prevalent (83% v 52%; P = .03; positive predictive value, 31%). Participants not obtaining a 40% reduction in SULmax by C1D15 were unlikely to obtain pCR (negative predictive value, 91%). CONCLUSION Although the primary objective was not met, early changes in SULmax predict response to PT in estrogen receptor–negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. Once optimized, this quantitative imaging strategy may facilitate tailoring of therapy in this setting.

Purpose:PIK3CA mutations are common in breast cancer and promote tumor progression and treatment resistance. We conducted a phase I/II trial of alpelisib (α-specific PI3K inhibitor) plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and Methods:Eligible patients had HER2-negative MBC with any number of prior chemotherapies. Phase I was 3+3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels of alpelisib (250, 300, and 350 mg) daily plus nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Phase II was according to Simon's two-stage design. PIK3CA mutations in tumor/circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were assessed. Primary endpoints were recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and objective response rate (ORR). Additional endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, progression-free survival (PFS), and association of PIK3CA mutation with outcomes.Results:A total of 43 patients were enrolled (phase I, n = 13 and phase II, n = 30). A total of 84% had visceral disease and 84% had prior taxane. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in phase I. RP2D was alpelisib 350 mg daily plus nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. Hyperglycemia (grade 3, 26% and grade 4, 0%), neutropenia (grade 3, 23% and grade 4, 7%), diarrhea (grade 3, 5% and grade 4, 0%), and rash (grade 3, 7% and grade 4, 0%) were the most common adverse events. Among 42 evaluable patients, ORR was 59% (complete response, 7% and partial response, 52%), 21% of whom had response lasting >12 months; median PFS was 8.7 months. A total of 40% of patients demonstrated tumor and/or ctDNA PIK3CA mutation; patients with tumor/ctDNA mutation demonstrated better PFS compared with those without mutation (11.9 vs. 7.5 months; HR, 0.44; P = 0.027). Patients with normal metabolic status had longer PFS compared with prediabetic/diabetic patients (12 vs. 7.5 months; P = 0.014). No pharmacokinetics interactions were detected.Conclusions:The alpelisib plus nab-paclitaxel combination was well tolerated and shows encouraging efficacy, especially in patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumor/ctDNA. The impact of metabolic status on response to this combination merits further investigation.

Background Cisplatin and paclitaxel are active in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite different mechanisms of action, effective predictive biomarkers to preferentially inform drug selection have not been identified. The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.) detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair and may identify patients with BRCA1/2-proficient tumors that are sensitive to DNA-targeting therapy. The primary objective of TBCRC 030 was to detect an association of HRD with pathologic response [residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/1] to single-agent cisplatin or paclitaxel. Patients and methods This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type/unknown stage I–III TNBC in a 12-week randomized study of preoperative cisplatin or paclitaxel. The HRD assay was carried out on baseline tissue; positive HRD was defined as a score ≥33. Crossover to an alternative chemotherapy was offered if there was inadequate response. Results One hundred and thirty-nine patients were evaluable for response, including 88 (63.3%) who had surgery at 12 weeks and 51 (36.7%) who crossed over to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen due to inadequate clinical response. HRD results were available for 104 tumors (74.8%) and 74 (71.1%) were HRD positive. The RCB-0/1 rate was 26.4% with cisplatin and 22.3% with paclitaxel. No significant association was observed between HRD score and RCB response to either cisplatin [odds ratio (OR) for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 2.22 (95% CI: 0.39–23.68)] or paclitaxel [OR for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 0.90 (95% CI: 0.19–4.95)]. There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and pathologic response to chemotherapy. Conclusions In this prospective preoperative trial in TNBC, HRD was not predictive of pathologic response. Tumors were similarly responsive to preoperative paclitaxel or cisplatin chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer who have disease progression after therapy with multiple HER2-targeted agents have limited treatment options. Tucatinib is an investigational, oral, highly selective inhibitor of the HER2 tyrosine kinase.METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine, who had or did not have brain metastases, to receive either tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival among the first 480 patients who underwent randomization. Secondary end points, assessed in the total population (612 patients), included overall survival, progression-free survival among patients with brain metastases, confirmed objective response rate, and safety.RESULTS: Progression-free survival at 1 year was 33.1% in the tucatinib-combination group and 12.3% in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.71; PCONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases, adding tucatinib to trastuzumab and capecitabine resulted in better progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes than adding placebo; the risks of diarrhea and elevated aminotransferase levels were higher with tucatinib. (Funded by Seattle Genetics; HER2CLIMB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02614794. opens in new tab.)

PURPOSE: Patients with localized breast cancer have a 5-year survival rate >99% compared to patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that have a 5-year survival rate of ~27%. Unregulated PI3K/AKT signaling is a common characteristic of MBC, making it a desirable therapeutic target for tumors with activating mutations in this pathway. Interestingly, inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway can affect signaling in immune cells, which could potentially alter the immune phenotype of patients undergoing therapy with these drugs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how PI3K inhibition affects the immune cells of MBC patients during treatment. METHODS: We investigated the effects of PI3K inhibition on the immune cell populations in peripheral blood of MBC patients enrolled in 4 different clinical trials utilizing PI3K inhibitors. Peripheral blood was drawn at different points in patient treatment cycles to record immune cell fluctuations in response to therapy. RESULTS: MBC patients who responded to treatment with a positive fold-change in cytotoxic T-cell population, had an average duration of treatment response of 31.4 months. In contrast, MBC patients who responded to treatment with a negative fold-change in cytotoxic T-cell population, had an average duration of therapeutic response of 5 months. These data suggest that patients with a more robust, initial anti-tumor T-cell response may have a longer therapeutic response compared to patients who do not have a robust, initial anti-tumor T-cell response CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the potential for PI3K inhibition to sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors, thus providing additional therapeutic options for patients with MBC.

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Background: FGFR1 amplification (amp) occurs in ˜15% of breast cancers (BC) and associates with poor prognosis and resistance to endocrine therapy. CCND1 regulates cell cycle progression and is amplified in 15-20% of BC. Co-amp of FGFR1 occurs in 30-40% of CCND1amp tumors, suggesting the possibility of oncogene cooperativity. CDK4/6 inhibitors, which block the action of cyclin D1/CDK4 complexes at the G1-to-S transition, are approved for treatment of ER+ BC and FGFR inhibitors are in early phase clinical trials. Results: Between 11/2013 and 03/2017, 191 BCs from 188 patients with metastatic (M) or refractory locoregional recurrent (RLRR) BC at Vanderbilt (VICC) were profiled by targeted next gen sequencing (Foundation OneTM). These are included within the 2131 publicly available BC sequencing results in GENIE (Foundation OneTM and MSK-IMPACT). Among the GENIE cohort, rates were: FGFR1amp 7% (n=156), CCND1amp 12% (n=261) and CCND1/FGFR1co-amp 3% (n=58). Additional cases showed FGFR1 missense mutations (n=16) and deep deletions (n=5). When the analysis was limited to the VICC cohort allowing restriction to ER+ BC, FGFR1amp (16%) and CCND1amp (23%) rates are similar to rates in primary BC in TCGA (13% FGFR1 [p = 0.44] and 19% CCND1 [p = 0.24]). In GENIE, the most frequent co-mutations in FGFR1amp tumors were TP53 (31%), PIK3CA (21%), GATA3 (13%), CDH1 (11%) and MAP3K1 (10%). However, TP53 and PIK3CA mutations were less common among FGFR1amp tumors than FGFR1non-amp cases (p 0.016). Histopathologic correlation on tumors from our institution show a majority of FGFR1 and/or CCND1 amp BC (64%) were ER+/HER2–; 33% of ER+/FGFR1amp tumors were PR–. Distinctive histologic features associated with FGFR1 and/or CCND1 amp were lobular histology (17%) and neuroendocrine differentiation (14%), 0-10%TILs (94%) and high proliferative rate (46%). Conclusion: FGFR1amp and CCND1amp rates in TCGA are similar to those seen in MBC/LRRBC (GENIE) suggesting FGFR1 can function as both a driver mutation and de novo mechanism of endocrine resistance early in tumorigenesis. Frequent co-amp with CCND1 and lower rates of TP53 and PIK3CAmut also support a driver role for FGFR1amp and FGFR1/CCND1co-amp. The observation of neuroendocrine features in a subset of these tumors suggests lineage plasticity. This may be a consequence of genomic alterations promoting anti-estrogen resistance and is consistent with recently published BC outcome data associating neuroendocrine differentiation with higher grade ER+ tumors, frequent 8p amp, which includes FGFR1, and worse disease-free and overall survival. The frequency of FGFR1amp suggests genotype specific trials with FGFR inhibitors would be highly feasible. Whether FGFR1/CCND1 co-amplified tumors are candidates for treatment with a combination of FGFR and CDK4/6 inhibitors requires further investigation. Citation Format: Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Estrada MV, Formisano L, Jansen VM, Mayer IA, Rexer BN, Abramson VG, Levy M, Balko JM, Stricker TP, Arteaga CL, Sanders ME. Genenomic landscape of breast cancers with FGFR1 amplification and FGFR1/CCND1 co-amplification revealed by targeted capture next generation sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.

Background: ATR is a critical regulator of the cellular response to replication stress; it signals DNA damage repair, mediated through homologous recombination. Many cancers depend on ATR to survive DNA damage. M6620 is a potent, selective inhibitor of ATR that augments the anticancer activity of cisplatin in preclinical triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) models. Given the high prevalence of TP53 mutations in TNBC and limited platinum responsiveness in patients lacking a BRCA1/2 mutation, this study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of M6620 in combination with cisplatin in an expansion cohort of patients with BRCA1/2 wild-type advanced/metastatic TNBC. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced/metastatic ER-, PR-, and HER2- breast cancer with 0-2 prior non–platinum-based therapies and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1. First line patients were eligible if relapse occurred ≥3 months after prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Of a maximum 50 patients planned for enrollment, ≥30 were required to have BRCA1/2 germline wild-type status and basaloid molecular subtype tumors on central testing. Patients received intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with intravenous M6620 140 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle. In patients intolerant of cisplatin or at investigator's discretion, cisplatin could be switched to carboplatin AUC 5 with M6620 90 mg/m2. Results: At the time of abstract submission, 35 female patients were enrolled in this study; 18 patients with confirmed BRCA1/2 wild-type and basaloid metastatic TNBC who received ≥1 cycle of study drug and had ≥1 baseline scan and ≥1 on-treatment scan at the time of the data cut were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (90% CI, 1.6-6.9 months). PFS was ≥ 6 months in 2 patients and ≥ 3 months in 8 patients. Preliminary unconfirmed objective response [complete response or partial response (PR)] was observed in 38.9% (90% CI, 19.9%-60.8%) of patients. All 7 patients with preliminary objective response had PR as best overall response; the longest duration of response was 183 days. Response was ongoing in 4 patients with PR at the time of data cutoff. Grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 16 of 35 patients: neutropenia (n=8), anemia (n=5), vomiting (n=4), nausea (n=3), and, in 1 patient each, thrombocytopenia, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, hypokalemia, generalized weakness, rigors, and acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Combination of M6620 and cisplatin shows encouraging antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC. The study is ongoing; updated safety and efficacy results will be presented. Citation Format: Telli ML, Lord S, Dean E, Abramson V, Arkenau H-T, Murias C, Becerra C, Tang R, Penney MS, Pollard J, Conboy G, Fields SZ, Shapiro G, Tolaney SM. ATR inhibitor M6620 (formerly VX-970) with cisplatin in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Preliminary results from a phase 1 dose expansion cohort (NCT02157792) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-07.

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in >75% of hormone receptor (HR)+ tumors. AR signaling has been associated with resistance to endocrine therapy (ET). Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) divert estrogen precursors to androgens; in preclinical models enzalutamide (ENZA) blocked both estrogen- and androgen-mediated growth of HR+ cells. In a phase 1 study of ET+ENZA in breast cancer, doubling the dose of exemestane (EXE) to 50 mg was necessary to restore exposure observed with 25 mg.1 Methods: This placebo (PBO)–controlled phase 2 trial randomized patients (pts) with HR+/HER2-normal advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to either 25 mg EXE+PBO or 50 mg EXE+160 mg ENZA daily (NCT02007512). Two parallel cohorts enrolled pts who had no prior ET (C1) or who had received 1 prior ET for MBC (C2). Randomization was stratified on resistance to prior ET and prior exposure to AI. Tissue samples for biomarker development were mandatory. Brain metastases or a history of seizure was exclusionary. One prior chemotherapy regimen for MBC was permitted. Response was assessed every 8 weeks for 48 weeks, then every 12 weeks. Crossover to ENZA+EXE was allowed at disease progression. A gene signature–based biomarker (Bmkr) indicating AR signaling predictive of response to ENZA was developed using a training set of RNAseq data from 2/3 of randomized pts and validated using a test set of data from the remaining 1/3 of pts. Progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1 was the primary endpoint in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in the Bmkr+ subgroup of each cohort. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24), best overall response, and safety. Results: A total of 247 pts were randomized (C1, n=127; C2, n=120). In C1, 50 pts (39.4%) were Bmkr+; in C2, 35 pts (29.2%) were Bmkr+. Statistically significant improvements in median PFS and CBR24 were observed only in the Bmkr+ population with no prior ET (Table). The most common adverse events (AEs) reported in the ENZA+EXE arms were nausea (39%) in C1 and fatigue (37%) in C2. In C1, 9 pts (15%) and 10 pts (16%) discontinued the study due to AEs in the ENZA+EXE and PBO+EXE arms, respectively. In C2, 11 pts (18%) and 5 pts (8%) discontinued due to AEs in the ENZA+EXE and PBO+EXE arms, respectively. Conclusions: In the first reported randomized trial of ENZA in HR+ MBC, ENZA+EXE was well tolerated with no new safety signals. The study met its primary endpoint in pts with Bmkr+ MBC with no prior ET. 1. Schwartzberg et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 9 [Epub ahead of print]. C1: No Prior ETC2: 1 Prior ET ITTBmkr+ITTBmkr+EXE+ENZA | PBOENZA | PBOENZA | PBOENZA | PBO n=63 | n=64n=24 | n=26n=60 | n=60n=15 | n=20Primary endpointPFS, median, months11.8 | 5.816.5 | 4.33.6 | 3.96.0 | 5.3(95% CI)(7.3, 15.9) | (3.5, 10.9)(11.0, NR) | (1.9, 10.9)(1.9, 5.5) | (2.6, 5.4)(2.3, 26.7) | (1.8, 6.7)Hazard ratio0.820.441.020.55(95% CI)(0.54, 1.26)(0.21, 0.96)(0.66, 1.59)(0.23, 1.36)P value0.36310.03350.92120.1936Secondary endpointCBR24, n (%)39 (62) | 29 (45)20 (83) | 10 (38)12 (20) | 19 (32)6 (40) | 6 (30)(95% CI)(49, 74) | (33, 58)(63, 95) | (20, 59)(11, 32) | (20, 45)(16, 68) | (12, 54)P value0.06090.00120.14430.5374 Citation Format: Krop I, Abramson V, Colleoni M, Traina T, Holmes F, Estevez L, Hart L, Awada A, Zamagni C, Morris P, Schwartzberg L, Chan S, Wheatley D, Gucalp A, Biganzoli L, Steinberg J, Gianni L, Trudeau M, Tudor IC, Markova D, Barry E, Tarazi J, Stewart R, Winer E, Yardley DA. Results from a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial evaluating exemestane ± enzalutamide in patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.

Background: mTNBC has an aggressive course with limited therapeutic options. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is a novel antibody drug conjugate consisting of SN-38, the active metabolite of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan, conjugated to a humanized mAb targeting Trop-2, which is highly expressed in most epithelial cancers, including TNBC. A phase I/II basket trial (NCT01631552) was conducted in patients (pts) with multiple, advanced epithelial cancers. We previously reported preliminary results in mTNBC (N=69; objective response rate [ORR] = 30%, Bardia et al., JCO 2017;35:2141-2148). In 2016, sacituzumab govitecan was granted Breakthrough Designation based on this encouraging data, and we resumed enrollment in a more defined patient population (≥3rd-line setting in mTNBC). Methods: Pts received sacituzumab govitecan on days 1 & 8 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligibility included > 2 prior lines of therapy for metastatic disease, measurable disease by CT or MRI and prior taxane. Efficacy was assessed locally by RECIST 1.1 and confirmed by independent centralized blinded review. ORR, DOR, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. Adverse events (CTCAE v4.0), immunogenicity, and Trop-2 expression in archived tumor samples, when available, were evaluated. Results: 110 mTNBC pts (109 female, 1 male; median age 55 yrs, range 31-81), including 53 from the previously reported cohort of 69 pts who had received ≥2 prior regimens for metastatic disease, were accrued between 7/2013 and 2/2017. As of data cutoff on 6/30/2017, 71 are deceased, 23 in long-term follow-up, and 16 still on treatment. All pts were treated at the 10 mg/kg IMMU-132 dose level, receiving 14.5 median doses (range 1-88). Treatment was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths, 2 treatment discontinuations for toxicity, and no anti-drug antibodies detected. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity (≥10%) included neutropenia, 39%; leukopenia, 14%; anemia, 10%; the incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (7%). By local radiologist assessment, the ORR is 34% (37/110), including 3 CRs and 34 PRs, the clinical benefit rate (CBR: CR+PR+SD>6 mo.) is 46%, the KM median DOR and PFS are 7.6 mo. (95% CI: 4.8 to 11.3) and 5.5 mo. (95% CI: 4.8 to 6.6), respectively, including 10% (11 pts) with long-term PFS (12 to 30+ mo.), and the KM median OS is 12.7 mo. (95% CI: 10.8 to 13.6). Results of the independent central blinded review along with sensitivity analyses of prior treatment regimens, including checkpoint inhibitor use, and exploratory biomarker analysis of Trop-2 expression will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant clinical activity as a single agent in the ≥3rd-line setting for patients with relapsed/refractory mTNBC. Given the high unmet medical need, data from this trial is being submitted for consideration of accelerated approval, and a global confirmatory randomized Phase III trial (NCT02574455) is underway. Additional studies including rational combinations are currently being evaluated for mTNBC and other breast cancer subsets. Citation Format: Bardia A, Vahdat LT, Diamond J, Kalinsky K, O'Shaughnessy J, Moroose RL, Isakoff SJ, Tolaney SM, Santin AD, Abramson V, Shah NC, Govindan SV, Maliakal P, Sharkey RM, Wegener WA, Goldenberg DM, Mayer IA. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an anti-Trop-2-SN-38 antibody-drug conjugate, as ≥3rd-line therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): efficacy results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-07.

Purpose: This phase Ib study was designed to determine the MTD, safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the HER3 (ErbB3) mAb SAR256212 in combination with the oral PI3K inhibitor SAR245408 for patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: Patients received the combination of intravenous SAR256212 and oral SAR245408 in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design until occurrence of disease progression or dose-limiting toxicity. Objective response rate, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and PIK3CA mutational status were also evaluated. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Thirteen of 20 patients tested (65%) had a hotspot-activating mutation in PIK3CA in their tumor. The MTD was determined to be SAR256212 at 40 mg/kg loading dose followed by 20 mg/kg weekly, plus SAR245408 200 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicities included rash and hypotension; the most frequent treatment-related side effect was diarrhea (66.7%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for efficacy, of which 12 patients (52.2%) had stable disease and 11 patients (47.8%) had progression of disease as best response. In this study with a limited sample size, there was no difference in best response between patients with PI3KCA-mutant versus PIK3CA wild-type tumors (P = 0.07). The concurrent administration of SAR245408 and SAR256212 did not appear to have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug. Conclusions: The combination of SAR256212 and SAR245408 resulted in stable disease as the best response. Side effects seen in combination were similar to the profiles of each individual drug. Patient outcome was the same regardless of tumor PI3KCA mutation status. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3520–8. ©2016 AACR.

Introduction Mutations/deregulations in the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway are common in breast cancer, Inhibition of the PI3K pathway is recognized as a promising target for the treatment of breast cancer. Although taxanes are effective early on in advanced stage breast cancer, resistance often develops. It has been demonstrated that activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway confers resistance to paclitaxel, and in preclinical models, concomitant inhibition of the PI3K pathway enhances the efficacy of taxanes. BYL719 is a potent oral, class I PI3K inhibitor which strongly inhibits the PI3K alpha isoforms and is significantly less active against the other class I isoforms. Targeting the alpha isoform of PI3K is expected to improve the therapeutic window over inhibitors with less isoform specificity. Nab-Paclitaxel is a solvent-free, nanoparticle, albumin-based paclitaxel which takes advantage of the antitumor activity of paclitaxel while decreasing the toxicities typically associated with the solvent (Cremophor) used to administer the most common formulation of paclitaxel. Methods A 3+3 dose-escalation design evaluated three dose levels of BYL719 (250mg, 300mg, and 350mg) administered PO once daily (D1-28) with nab-Paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 intravenously D 1, 8, 15) every 28 days in patients with metastatic HER 2 negative breast cancer. The aims of the study were to 1) determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of BYL719 + nab-Paclitaxel, 2) assess pharmacokinetics of BYL and nab-paclitaxel, and 3) assess preliminary efficacy. Results 10 patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels of BYL719 and 3 patients were enrolled in expansion cohort at the RPTD of BYL719 of 350 mg PO daily plus nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 (D 1, 8, 15). Median age was 61years; 54% (7/13) of patients were hormone receptor positive and 46% (6/13) triple negative. 85% (11/13) had visceral disease, 69% (9/13) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and 85% (11/13) had received prior taxane in adjuvant/metastatic setting. There were no DLTs in the three cohorts and the MTD of BYL was not reached. Hyperglycemia (G3:31%, G4:0%) and neutropenia (G3:15%, G4:8%), were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. There were no Grade 3/4 diarrhea or rash. Best overall response for 12 patients was 58% (7/12) (complete response=1, partial response=6), and an additional 33% (4/12) demonstrated stable disease. Objective responses were noted in both hormone positive and triple negative disease. Median duration of response is 6.5 months (range 2-14 months). No pharmacokinetic interactions were detected when BYL and nab-paclitaxel were co-administered. Discussion: This phase I study demonstrates that combination of BYL719 and nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated and shows encouraging efficacy in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer. Enrollment in the phase II portion of the trial at the RPTD (BYL719 350mg PO daily plus nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 D1,8,15 every 28 days) continues. Ongoing analysis of PI3K pathway alterations in tumor and cfDNA will be correlated with clinical response. Citation Format: Sharma P, Abramson VG, O'Dea A, Lewis S, Scott JN, Ward J, De Jong JA, Lehn C, Brown AR, Williamson SK, Perez RP, Komiya T, Godwin AK, Reed GA, Khan QJ. Safety and efficacy results from phase I study of BYL 719 plus nab-paclitaxel in HER 2 negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-08.

Background. mTNBC has an aggressive course with limited effective therapy options and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2-4 months (mos) with standard therapy. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an ADC targeting Trop-2, an antigen present in many epithelial cancers, including TNBC, and delivering SN-38, a topoisomerase I inhibitor as its therapeutic moiety. IMMU-132 was awarded Breakthrough Therapy designation by FDA based on its previously reported activity in relapsed/refractory mTNBC patients. Here we present updated results from the mTNBC cohort of an ongoing phase I/II study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01631552). Methods. mTNBC patients (pts) received IMMU-132 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Trop-2 expression was not required for enrollment, but available tumor specimens underwent immunohistological (IHC) testing. Efficacy was assessed locally by RECIST 1.1; ORR, PFS and overall survival (OS) were determined for all pts. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated in select pts with adequate blood sampling. Immunogenicity to IMMU-132 was examined in all pts. Results. We previously reported preliminary efficacy results in 51 mTNBC patients. Here we present data on 69 patients with data cutoff June 5, 2016. Median age was 56 years (31-81) and a median of 5 prior therapies (range 1-12), with 66 evaluable for response; ORR was 29% (19/66) 2 confirmed complete (CR) and 17 confirmed partial responses (PR). The median intention-to-treat PFS is 5.6 mos (95% CI, 3.6-7.1 mos) and median OS is 14.3 mos (95% CI, 10.5-18.8 mos). PRs included 2 pts whose tumors did not respond to anti-PD-L1 therapy. The duration of response in the 19 confirmed responders (8 continuing therapy) is 11.5 mos (95% CI = 7.6 to 12.7). The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD>6 mos) for the 66 assessable patients is currently 45.5%. The majority (88%) of archival tumor specimens were moderately (2+) to strongly (3+) positive by IHC for Trop-2, precluding using Trop-2 expression as a selection criterion. Among current adverse events, grade >3 drug-related toxicities included neutropenia (35%), leukopenia (16%), anemia (13%), vomiting (9%), diarrhea (10%), and febrile neutropenia (4%). Clearance kinetics in 8 pts showed IMMU-132 and IgG had a terminal half-life of 15.3 ± 2.7 h and 86.5 ± 40.5 h, respectively, with area under the curve for free SN-38 (unbound) only 3% of the total amount of SN-38 (e.g., IgG bound). Thus, most SN-38 remains bound to the conjugate, and is released at a rate predicted from in vitro serum stability studies. No pt developed anti-IMMU-132 antibodies. Conclusion The Trop-2-targeting ADC, IMMU-132, delivering cytotoxic doses of SN-38, shows high objective and durable tumor responses with manageable toxicity in heavily-pretreated pts with mTNBC in this updated cohort, supporting further development in this population with an unmet medical need. Citation Format: Bardia A, Diamond JR, Mayer IA, Isakoff SJ, Abramson V, Starodub AN, O'Shaughnessy J, Kalinsky K, Moroose R, Shah N, Juric D, Shapiro GI, Guarino M, Ocean AJ, Messersmith WA, Berlin JD, Wegener WA, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM, Vahdat LT. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an anti-Trop-2-SN-38 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Updated results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-15.

Background In a randomized trial (CREATE-X) patients who had residual disease following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved survival with the addition of adjuvant capecitabine. For patients who required radiation (RT), capecitabine was given sequentially. Concurrent capecitabine-RT may be more efficacious. We hypothesized that the safety, feasibility, and toxicity of adjuvant capecitabine-RT is not significantly different compared to adjuvant RT alone. Patient and Methods We retrospectively studied patients with stage I-III invasive mammary carcinoma. Patients treated with capecitabine-RT were matched 1:3 with control patients treated with RT alone. Logistic regression evaluated predictors of radiation dermatitis. Results A total of 64 patients were enrolled including 16 patients treated by capecitabine-RT and 48 treated by RT alone. Cohorts were balanced with regard to clinicopathologic factors. No treatment in either cohort resulted in hospitalization, short-term disability, or fatality. Most toxicities of capecitabine-RT were related to radiation dermatitis. Radiation dermatitis was not significantly different between the capecitabine-RT and RT cohort at either the grade 2 level (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.38-4.93, p=0.63) or grade 3 level (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.85-10.63, p=0.09) or after multivariable analysis. However, patients treated with capecitabine-RT were more likely to require modifications in the radiation schedule, including treatment breaks or cancelled fractions (44% versus 17%, OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.12-13.52, p=0.03). Conclusion Capecitabine-RT appears to be safe in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with comparable toxicity to RT alone. It may lead to more treatment adjustments. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination.

PURPOSE: This open-label, phase Ib, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study (NCT01862081) evaluated taselisib with a taxane in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC) and/or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received taselisib (2-6 mg tablet or 3-6 mg capsule) plus docetaxel or paclitaxel. Primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and identification of a recommended phase II dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity assessment. RESULTS: Eighty patients (BC: 72; NSCLC: 7; BC/NSCLC: 1) were enrolled (docetaxel-receiving arms: 21; paclitaxel-receiving arms: 59). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to death were reported in 90.5%, 42.9%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 78.9%, 40.4%, and 3.5% of patients, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Eight patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded with 3 mg taselisib (capsule) for 21 consecutive days plus 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and not exceeded with 6 mg taselisib (tablet) for 5 days on/2 days off plus 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Objective response rates and clinical benefit rates were 35.0% and 45.0%, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 20.4% and 27.8%, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Exposure for paclitaxel or docetaxel plus taselisib was consistent with the single agents. CONCLUSIONS: Taselisib in combination with a taxane has a challenging safety profile. Despite evidence of antitumor activity, the benefit-risk profile was deemed not advantageous. Further development is not planned. ispartof: BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT vol:178 issue:1 pages:121-133 ispartof: location:Netherlands status: published

Background The PI3K/AKT pathway is activated through PIK3CA or AKT1 mutations and PTEN loss in breast cancer. We conducted a phase II trial with an allosteric AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in patients with advanced breast cancer who had tumors with PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations and/or PTEN loss/mutation. Methods The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were 6-month progression-free survival (6 m PFS), predictive and pharmacodynamic markers, safety, and tolerability. Patients had pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies as well as collection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) were performed. Results Twenty-seven patients received MK-2206. Eighteen patients were enrolled into the PIK3CA/AKT1 mutation arm (cohort A): 13 had PIK3CA mutations, four had AKT1 mutations, and one had a PIK3CA mutation as well as PTEN loss. ORR and 6 m PFS were both 5.6% (1/18), with one patient with HR+ breast cancer and a PIK3CA E542K mutation experiencing a partial response (on treatment for 36 weeks). Nine patients were enrolled on the PTEN loss/mutation arm (cohort B). ORR was 0% and 6 m PFS was 11% (1/9), observed in a patient with triple-negative breast cancer and PTEN loss. The study was stopped early due to futility. The most common adverse events were fatigue (48%) and rash (44%). On pre-treatment biopsy, PIK3CA and AKT1 mutation status was concordant with archival tissue testing. However, two patients with PTEN loss based on archival testing had PTEN expression on the pre-treatment biopsy. MK-2206 treatment was associated with a significant decline in pAKT S473 and pAKT T308 and PI3K activation score in PBMC and PRPs, but not in tumor biopsies. By IHC, there was no significant decrease in median pAKT S473 or Ki-67 staining, but a drop was observed in both responders. Conclusions MK-2206 monotherapy had limited clinical activity in advanced breast cancer patients selected for PIK3CA/AKT1 or PTEN mutations or PTEN loss. This may, in part, be due to inadequate target inhibition at tolerable doses in heavily pre-treated patients with pathway activation, as well as tumor heterogeneity and evolution in markers such as PTEN conferring challenges in patient selection. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01277757. Registered 13 January 2011. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1154-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data demonstrating androgen receptor (AR)-positive (AR+) TNBC cells are sensitive to AR antagonists and PI3K inhibition catalyzed an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional phase Ib/II study TBCRC032. The trial investigated the safety and efficacy of the AR-antagonist enzalutamide alone or in combination with the PI3K inhibitor taselisib in patients with metastatic AR+ (≥10%) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase Ib patients (ER+ or TNBC) with AR+ breast cancer received 160 mg enzalutamide in combination with taselisib to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase II TNBC patients were randomized to receive either enzalutamide alone or in combination with 4 mg taselisib until disease progression. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks. RESULTS: The combination was tolerated and the MTD was not reached. The adverse events were hyperglycemia and skin rash. Overall, CBR for evaluable patients receiving the combination was 35.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months. Luminal AR (LAR) TNBC subtype patients trended towards better response compared to non-LAR (75.0% vs. 12.5%, p=0.06), and increased PFS (4.6 vs. 2.0 months, p=0.082). Genomic analyses revealed subtype-specific treatment response; and novel FGFR2 fusions and AR splice variants. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of enzalutamide and taselisib increased CBR in TNBC patients with AR+ tumors. Correlative analyses suggest AR protein expression alone is insufficient for identifying patients with AR-dependent tumors and knowledge of tumor LAR subtype and AR-splice variants may identify patients more or less likely to benefit from AR-antagonists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, Identifier: NCT02457910. Registered on May 29, 2015.

1076 Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) upregulate genes involved in antigen presentation machinery and increase expression of natural killer group 2, member D ligands (NKG2DL), thus resulting in enhanced tumor cell recognition and response to PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. Cisplatin and HDACi combination synergistically induces cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and DNA damage. This phase I-II trial investigated combination of romidepsin (HDACi) plus cisplatin and nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in mTNBC. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had mTNBC with any number of prior chemotherapies. Phase I was 3+3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels of romidepsin (8, 10, 12mg/m2, D2, 9) plus cisplatin 75mg/m2 D 1 every 21 days. Phase II treatment included romidepsin plus cisplatin plus nivolumab 360mg every 21 days and was designed according to Simon’s two stage minimax design. Primary endpoints were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and objective response rate (ORR). Additional endpoints included safety, PFS, and pharmacokinetics. Results: 51 patients were enrolled (N=13 phase I, N=38 phase II) between 2015-2020. 69% had received ≥1 prior metastatic chemotherapy, 47% had prior platinum, 53% had liver metastasis, 12% had BRCA1/2 mutation, and 11% had PD-L1 positive disease. There were no dose limiting toxicities in phase I. The RP2D was romidepsin 12mg/m2 D2,9 + cisplatin 75mg/m2 D1 + nivolumab 360mg D1 every 21 days. Thrombocytopenia (G3:27%, G4:0%), neutropenia (G3:25%, G4:0%), anemia (G3:22%, G4:0%), nausea (G3:22%, G4:0%), and vomiting (G3:20%, G4:0%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. 21% of patients had immune AEs (G3-4:8%). Among 34 evaluable phase II patients, ORR was 44% (Table), median PFS was 4.4 months, and 1-year PFS was 23%. Median OS was 10.3 months and 1-year OS was 43%. No pharmacokinetic interactions were detected with co-administration of romidepsin-cisplatin-nivolumab. Conclusions: The triplet combination of romidepsin plus cisplatin and nivolumab was well tolerated and shows encouraging efficacy in pretreated mTNBC, including in patients with PD-L1 negative disease and in those with liver metastasis. Correlative biomarker work is ongoing. This combination warrants further evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02393794 .[Table: see text]

TPS1111 Background: Chest wall recurrence is a subtype of breast cancer that is challenging to treat, and associated with a short duration of response to treatment and an increased risk of development of distant metastases. Given the inflammatory nature of this disease and the association of chest wall disease with lymphovascular invasion, which is correlated with higher programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expression, we hypothesized that immunotherapy may be beneficial as treatment. Combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy have a synergistic effect and demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study is evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in combination with carboplatin, in patients with chest wall infiltration from breast cancer. This drug combination has shown efficacy in advanced lung cancer. Methods: This is a multicenter, 2:1 randomized phase II study of pembrolizumab/carboplatin (Arm A, 56 patients) vs. carboplatin (Arm B, 28 patients) in 84 patients with chest wall disease from breast cancer, with or without distant metastases. Patients may have TNBC, hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (following receipt of 2 prior hormone therapies), or HER2 positive breast cancer (with option to continue trastuzumab on study). Pembrolizumab is administered as 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin as AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients on Arm A may continue pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin (Arm Ax) after completion of 6 cycles of treatment, while patients in Arm B can cross-over to pembrolizumab (+/- carboplatin) on progression (Arm Bx). Patients must have adequate organ function, performance status ≤ 2, and may have received any number of lines of prior chemotherapy. Patients undergo serial chest wall photography and imaging (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan) at baseline and every 6 weeks, as well as blood collection for correlative studies and chest wall biopsies at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint is disease control rate (RECIST 1.1) at 18 weeks of treatment, and the study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms (HR 0.52, a = 0.10, ß = 0.20). An interim analysis will occur for Arm B after 18 patients are enrolled, with a stopping rule for futility. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, toxicity (NCI CTCAE), and response based on irRECIST and tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Exploratory objectives include evaluating changes in soluble PD-L1, tumor and peripheral blood immune composition, circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA, and MYC oncogene expression. This study (NCT03095352) is open at 7 sites in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC). 52 patients are enrolled. Grant funding is provided by Merck and UCSF. Clinical trial information: NCT03095352 .

Background: Chest wall recurrence may occur in up to 30% of patients with breast cancer, and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that immunotherapy may be beneficial in this setting because of the inflammatory nature of this disease, and the association of chest wall disease with lymphovascular invasion. Combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect. In this study, we combined pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody with carboplatin, in patients with chest wall disease. This combination has previously been shown to be effective in advanced lung cancer. Trial design: This is a 2:1 randomized phase II study of pembrolizumab and carboplatin (Arm A) versus carboplatin alone (Arm B) in patients with chest wall involvement from breast cancer. Pembrolizumab is dosed at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin is dosed at AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients on Arm A have the option to continue on pembrolizumab alone after 6 cycles of combination treatment (Arm Ax). Patients on Arm B have the option to cross-over to pembrolizumab (+/- carboplatin) after 6 cycles of carboplatin alone (Arm Bx). Patients with HER2 positive disease may continue trastuzumab in addition to the study treatment. Patients undergo chest wall biopsies and peripheral blood collection for correlative studies at enrollment and after 2 cycles of treatment, and also imaging with CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan every 3 cycles. Eligibility criteria: Patients must have chest wall involvement from breast cancer, with or without distant metastases. Patients may have triple-negative breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER2- disease (after two prior lines of hormone therapy), or refractory HER2 positive disease. Patients may have received any number of lines of prior chemotherapy. A prior platinum is allowed as long as there was not disease progression on this agent. Specific Aims: 1. (Primary aim) Disease control rate in the chest wall and other distant sites at 18 weeks of treatment using RECIST 1.1 criteria, 2. progression-free survival, 3. toxicity, 4. response based on tumor PD-L1 expression, and 5. response based on irRECIST. Exploratory aims include evaluating: 1. Soluble PD-L1 expression, 2. changes in tumor and peripheral blood immune composition, 3. peripheral blood circulating tumor cells, 4. peripheral blood cell-free DNA, and 5. the association of MYC with PD-1 and TIM-3 on tumor cells, based on preclinical data to suggest that MYC may upregulate these inflammatory markers. Statistical Methods: 84 patients (56 in Arm A and 28 in Arm B) are being enrolled at 7 sites in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. The study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms (HR 0.52, α= 0.10, ß=0.20). A futility analysis was originally planned to occur for Arm B after 18 patients are enrolled, but a subsequent amendment has enabled an earlier assessment after 14 patients were enrolled. Accrual: Present accrual is 40 patients. (NCT03095352). This trial is funded in part by Merck and a Development Program Grant from the University of California San Francisco. Contact information: Neelima Vidula, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Rita Nanda, Kathy Miller, Paula Pohlmann, Vandana Abramson, Leisha A. Emens, Ben H. Park, Minetta C. Liu, Andrei Goga, Hope S. Rugo. Translational breast cancer research consortium 044 trial: Randomized phase 2 study of pembrolizumab and carboplatin versus carboplatin alone for chest wall recurrence of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-13-09.

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) panel considered the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) recommendations on the role of patient and disease factors in selecting adjuvant therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer for endorsement. Methods ASCO staff reviewed the CCO guideline for methodologic rigor, and an ASCO panel of content experts reviewed the content of the recommendations. CCO Recommendations For making decisions regarding adjuvant therapy, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion are relevant; Oncotype DX score and Adjuvant! Online may be used as risk stratification tools; and age, menopausal status, and medical comorbidities should be considered. Chemotherapy should be considered for patients with positive lymph nodes, ER-negative disease, HER2-positive disease, Adjuvant! Online mortality greater than 10%, grade 3 lymph node–negative tumors (T > 5 mm), triple-negative (ER-negative, PgR-negative, HER2-negative) tumors, lymphovascular invasion positivity, or estimated distant relapse risk of greater than 15% at 10 years based on Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS). Chemotherapy may not be beneficial or required for small node-negative tumors (T < 5 mm) without high-risk features or for patients with HER2-negative, strongly ER-positive, and PgR-positive cancer with micrometastatic nodal disease, T less than 5 mm, or Oncotype DX RS with an estimated distant relapse risk of less than 15% at 10 years. ASCO Panel Conclusion The ASCO panel endorses the recommendations with minor suggested revisions and highlights three areas that warrant further consideration: tumor histology and adjuvant therapy recommendations, risk stratification tools and proposed Oncotype DX RS thresholds to guide decisions about chemotherapy, and patient factors in decision making.

Background: A novel genomic signature that identifies androgen receptor (AR)-driven disease (PREDICT AR) is being developed for its ability to select patients (pts) who may benefit from enzalutamide (ENZA), a potent AR inhibitor.1 In a phase 2 study of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) pts treated with ENZA (NCT01889238) ≈ half of pts had PREDICT AR+ TNBC, with improved clinical outcomes in this sub-population.2 Because pts with hormonally driven (estrogen-receptor/progesterone-receptor[ER/PR]+) BC are thought to have a better prognosis, we investigated whether the outcomes observed in pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC could be explained by prognosis alone. Methods: PREDICT AR was assessed on advanced TNBC from 118 ENZA-treated pts.2 Because the duration of treatment (Tx) typically decreases with each subsequent Tx, exploratory analyses included median progression-free survival (mPFS) on ENZA vs duration of Tx prior to ENZA (used as a PFS surrogate) in pts who had received ≤1 prior Tx (data cutoff 24Mar15). Baseline characteristics by PREDICT AR status were also evaluated. An independent non-ENZA-Tx TNBC data set (after neo/adjuvant Tx)3 was probed for PREDICT AR status and clinical outcomes. Results: ENZA-Tx pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC (n=56; 47%) were older (66 years vs 52 years), had a longer disease-free interval (DFI) (37 vs 20 months), more bone involvement (57% vs 24%), were more likely to have had prior ER/PR+ BC (30% vs 8%), and a longer median duration on the first-line Tx (29 vs 19 weeks[wks]) vs pts with PREDICT AR- TNBC (n=62;53%). Table 1. mPFS from ENZA-Tx pts and duration of prior Tx by PREDICT AR status and line of Tx.PREDICT AR StatusTx prior to ENZAmPFS on ENZA (wks)Median duration of prior Tx (wks)PREDICT AR+ (n=26)No prior Tx (n=10)32-- 1 prior Tx (n=16)4034PREDICT AR- (n=36)No prior Tx (n=11)8-- 1 prior Tx (n=25)1317 The prevalence of PREDICT AR+ primary TNBC from the non-ENZA-Tx dataset was 51% (n=182). DFI after neo/adjuvant therapy was not statistically different (p=0.605) between pts with PREDICT AR+ vs PREDICT AR- TNBC, and pathologic complete response rates were 23% vs 38% in PREDICT AR+ vs PREDICT AR- TNBC, respectively. Conclusion: mPFS in pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC who received first-line ENZA was longer than first-line Tx duration in those who received prior Tx (32 vs 29 weeks). In pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC who received second-line ENZA, mPFS was longer than the median duration of their first-line Tx (40 vs 34 weeks). This trend was not observed in pts with PREDICT AR- TNBC. Key demographic differences did not explain these outcomes, suggesting benefit from ENZA. Duration of first-line non-ENZA-Tx was shorter in pts with PREDICT AR- TNBC vs pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC who received second-line ENZA (17 vs 34 weeks), suggesting a better prognosis in pts with PREDICT AR+ advanced TNBC; however, PREDICT AR status was not associated with DFI following neo/adjuvant treatment for primary TNBC. PREDICT AR may identify a hormonally driven subset of pts with advanced TNBC who have a better prognosis and who may benefit from ENZA. 1. Parker J et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(suppl): abstr 1083. 2. Traina TA et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(suppl): abstr 1003. 3. Hatzis C et al. JAMA 2011;305:1873-1881. Citation Format: Miller K, Krop I, Schwartzberg L, Abramson V, Garcia-Estevez L, Eakle J, Nanda R, Yardley D, Ademuyiwa F, Chan S, Crown J, Danso M, Gelmon K, Ma L, Martinez-Janez N, Gradishar W, Steinberg J, Tudor IC, Uppal H, Paton VE, Parker J, Hudis CA, Traina TA. Improved clinical outcomes on enzalutamide observed in patients with PREDICT AR+ triple-negative breast cancer: prognosis or prediction?. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-25.

BACKGROUND HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794) primary results have been reported previously (Murthy, NEJM 2019). We report results of exploratory efficacy analyses in pts with brain metastases (BM). METHODS All HER2+ MBC pts enrolled had a baseline brain MRI. Pts with BM were eligible and randomized 2:1 to receive tucatinib (TUC) or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Efficacy analyses were performed by applying RECIST 1.1 to the brain based on investigator evaluation. CNS-PFS and OS were evaluated in BM pts overall. Intracranial (IC) confirmed ORR-IC and DOR-IC were evaluated in BM pts with measurable IC disease. After isolated brain progression, pts could continue study therapy until second progression, and time from randomization to second progression or death was evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 291 pts (48%) had BM at baseline: 198 (48%) in the TUC arm and 93 (46%) in the control arm. There was a 68% reduction in risk of CNS-PFS in the TUC arm (HR: 0.32; P CONCLUSIONS In pts with previously treated HER2+ MBC with BM, TUC in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine doubled the ORR-IC, reduced risk of IC progression or death by two-thirds and reduced risk of death by nearly half.