Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a hybrid ablative technique based on applying electroporation (EP) pulses just before conducting radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The rationale was that the EP-induced reduction in blood perfusion could be sufficient to reduce the thermal sink effect and hence to increase the coagulation volume in comparison to that created exclusively by RFA. Materials and methods: A modelling study and in vivo experimental study were used. A Cool-tip RF applicator was used both for EP and RFA. Results: Overall, the results did not show any synergy effect from using the hybrid technique. Applying EP pulses prior to RFA did not increase the coagulation zone obtained and the lesions were almost identical. Additional computer simulations provided an explanation for this; the effect of reducing blood perfusion by thermal damage during RFA completely masks the effect of reducing blood perfusion by EP. This is because both thermal damage and EP affect the same zone, i.e. the tissue around the electrode. Conclusions: Our computer modelling and in vivo experimental findings suggest that the combination of EP and RFA with monopolar applicators does not provide an additional benefit over the use of RFA alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we solve in an analytical way the thermal-optic coupled problem associated with a 1D model of non-perfused homogeneous biological tissue irradiated by a laser beam. We consider a laser pulse duration of 200 μs and study the temperatures of areas very close to the point of laser beam application. We consider that these values of the temporal and spatial variables mean that the problem has to be solved by means of the hyperbolic heat conduction model instead of the classic or parabolic model. We therefore obtain the solution using both models and apply the temperature profiles obtained to a specific biological tissue for comparison. Finally, we theoretically study the effect of the thermal relaxation time on the temperature profiles in the tissue for both heating and cooling phases (i.e. during and after laser application). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In this paper we outline our main findings about the differences between the use of the Bioheat Equation and the Hyperbolic Bioheat Equation in theoretical models for Radiofrequency (RF) ablation. At the moment, we have been working on the analytical approach to solve both equations, but more recently, we have considered numerical models based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). As a first step to use FEM, we conducted a comparative study between the temperature profiles obtained from the analytical solutions and those obtained from FEM. Regarding the differences between both methods, we obtain agreement in less than 5% of relative differences. Then FEM is a good alternative to model heating of biological tissues using BE and HBE in, for example, more complex and realistic geometries.