Search

Background: Lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a severe complication of bone marrow transplantation. The EBV strain causing LPD is of either donor or recipient origin, however, available data are limited to only a small number of cases. To obtain solid evidence, comparison of the EBV strain that caused the EBV-LPD with pre-stem cell transplantation (SCT) EBV strains of donor and recipient is imperative. Available techniques rely on the production of EBV transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and lack sensitivity., Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a simple method for EBV sequence analysis on mouth washings (MWs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)., Study Design: EBV DNA was extracted from MWs and PBMCs that were collected from 20 healthy individuals. DNA was used for sequence analysis, using a polymerase chain reaction for the C-terminus of the LMP-1 gene., Results: In seropositive individuals EBV DNA could be detected in 11/14 (79%) MWs and in 13/14 (93%) PBMC samples. Sequence analysis showed that in 11 out of 14 (79%) healthy individuals sequence patterns could be established. In these 11 healthy individuals 13 sequence patterns could be detected. Eleven of these 13 patterns (84.6%) were unique. These results encouraged us to explore the feasibility of this method on EBV DNA isolated from plasma from 9 EBV-LPD patients at time of EBV reactivation. In 7 EBV-LPD patients 8 sequence patterns were detected. Six out of 8 sequence patterns (75%) were unique., Conclusion: Our method is suitable for strain identification and we intend to use this technique to evaluate EBV origin in EBV-LPD patients.

Here, the influence of T vs T and B cell depletion on the incidence of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-LPD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is analyzed. From 1982 to 1997 the soy bean agglutinin/sheep red blood cell (SBA/SRBC) method was used for T cell depletion. This technique is well established, but the use of SRBC has a risk of transmitting prions or viruses. Therefore, a new T cell depletion method was introduced, using CD2 and CD3 monoclonal antibodies (CD2/3 method) instead of SRBC. Unfortunately, this led to an unexpected high number of EBV-LPDs in patients receiving transplants from MUDs. SBA depletion was reintroduced and combined with the CD2/3 method (SBA/CD2/3) in this patient population, later replaced by B cell-specific (CD19 and CD22) antibodies (CD3/19/22 method). The number of T (x 10(5)/kg) and B (x 10(5)/kg) cells in the graft was 1.5 +/- 0.8 and 2 +/- 1 (T/B ratio 0.75), 2.2 +/- 2.0 and 41 +/- 21 (ratio 0.055), 5.0 +/- 0.0 and 2 +/- 1 (ratio 2.5), 2.5 +/- 1.2 and 10 +/- 6 (ratio 0.25) using the SBA/SRBC, CD2/3, SBA/CD2/3 and CD3/19/22 techniques, respectively. When B cell depletion was performed (SBA/SRBC, SBA/CD2/3, CD3/19/22) four out of 31 patients (13%) receiving a BMT from a MUD developed an EBV-LPD. Without B cell depletion (CD2/3) this occurred in five out of seven patients (71%) (P < 0.05). A T/B cell ratio in the graft of > or = 0.25 seems sufficient to significantly reduce the incidence of EBV-LPD after BMT from MUDs.