Search

Cardiac thromboembolism attributed to atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for up to one-third of ischemic strokes. Stroke may be the first manifestation of previously undetected AF. Given the efficacy of oral anticoagulants in preventing AF-related ischemic strokes, strategies of searching for AF after a stroke using ECG monitoring followed by oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment have been proposed to prevent recurrent cardioembolic strokes. This white paper by experts from the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration summarizes existing evidence and knowledge gaps on searching for AF after a stroke by using ECG monitoring. New AF can be detected by routine plus intensive ECG monitoring in approximately one-quarter of patients with ischemic stroke. It may be causal, a bystander, or neurogenically induced by the stroke. AF after a stroke is a risk factor for thromboembolism and a strong marker for atrial myopathy. After acute ischemic stroke, patients should undergo 72 hours of electrocardiographic monitoring to detect AF. The diagnosis requires an ECG of sufficient quality for confirmation by a health professional with ECG rhythm expertise. AF detection rate is a function of monitoring duration and quality of analysis, AF episode definition, interval from stroke to monitoring commencement, and patient characteristics including old age, certain ECG alterations, and stroke type. Markers of atrial myopathy (eg, imaging, atrial ectopy, natriuretic peptides) may increase AF yield from monitoring and could be used to guide patient selection for more intensive/prolonged poststroke ECG monitoring. Atrial myopathy without detected AF is not currently sufficient to initiate OAC. The concept of embolic stroke of unknown source is not proven to identify patients who have had a stroke benefitting from empiric OAC treatment. However, some embolic stroke of unknown source subgroups (eg, advanced age, atrial enlargement) might benefit more from non–vitamin K-dependent OAC therapy than aspirin. Fulfilling embolic stroke of unknown source criteria is an indication neither for empiric non–vitamin K-dependent OAC treatment nor for withholding prolonged ECG monitoring for AF. Clinically diagnosed AF after a stroke or a transient ischemic attack is associated with significantly increased risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism, in particular, with additional stroke risk factors, and requires OAC rather than antiplatelet therapy. The minimum subclinical AF duration required on ECG monitoring poststroke/transient ischemic attack to recommend OAC therapy is debated.

Aims Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) still remain an important management issue. Recently, the APPLE score had been introduced to predict rhythm outcomes within 12 months after catheter ablation, while the simple MB-LATER score was developed for the prediction of very late recurrence of AF (VLRAF) occurring after 12 months. The aim of this study was to compare APPLE and MB-LATER scores in predicting VLRAF. Methods and results The study population included arrhythmia-free patients within first 12 months after first radiofrequency catheter ablation from The Heart Center Leipzig AF Ablation Registry. The APPLE [one point for Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR 120 ms, LA diameter ≥47 mm, AF Type (persistent AF), Early Recurrence Conclusion Prediction of VLRAF is similar for both APPLE and MB-LATER scores. A better score remains still a clinical unmet need.

PURPOSE: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an effective technique for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To date, there are no risk models to predict very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VLRAF) after CBA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a single-center database was performed. Inclusion criteria included PVI using CBA for atrial fibrillation (AF) without additional ablation targets, follow-up > 365 days, and no recurrent AF between 90 and 365 days after procedure. The primary endpoint was recurrent AF > 30 s > 12 months post-CBA. A risk model was created using clinical variables. RESULTS: Of 674 CBA performed from 2011 to 2016, 300 patients (200 male, 62.0 ± 9.9 years) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 159 (53.0%) patients had paroxysmal AF. Patients had an average of 9.5 ± 2.7 cryoballoon freezes, and no patients required additional radiofrequency ablation lesion sets. Over a follow-up of 995 ± 490 days, 77/300 (25.7%) patients exhibited VLRAF. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that Structural heart disease (1 point), Coronary artery disease (3 points), left Atrial diameter > 43 mm (1 point), Left bundle branch block (3 points), Early return of AF (4 points), and non-paroxysmal AF (3 points) were risk factors for VLRAF. Combining these variables into a risk model, SCALE-CryoAF, (min 0; max 15) predicted VLRAF with an area under the curve of 0.73. CONCLUSION: SCALE-CryoAF is the first risk model to specifically predict first recurrence of AF beyond 1 year, VLRAF, after CBA. Model discrimination demonstrates that SCALE-CryoAF predicts VLRAF after CBA significantly better than other risk models for AF recurrence.

Background Reliable identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients more likely to be AF-free long-term post-single catheter ablation (CA) would facilitate appropriate risk communication to patients. We validated the recently proposed MB-LATER score for prediction of late recurrences of AF (LRAF) post-CA. Methods Patients who underwent CA for symptomatic AF refractory to ≥1 antiarrhythmic drugs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, between March 2003 and December 2015, for whom ≥1-year post-CA follow-up data were available, were enrolled. Results Of 226 patients (median age 58.5 years [IQR: 52.0–65.0], 163 males [72.1%], 142 [62.8%] with paroxysmal AF), LRAF occurred in 133 patients (58.8%) during a median 2-year follow-up (IQR: 1.1–4.1). The mean MB-LATER score was significantly higher in patients with versus those without LRAF (2.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.002) and showed modest but significant predictive ability for LRAF (AUC: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.54–0.69], p = 0.003). A score cut-off value of >2 showed the best predictive ability for LRAF (70.4% [61.5–77.9]), with modest sensitivity (42.9% [34.3–51.7]) and specificity (74.2% [64.1–82.7]). Kaplan-Meyer survival free from AF was significantly better for patients with a MB-LATER score of ≤2 than for those with a score of >2 (log-rank p = 0.005). Conclusion In our study, the MB-LATER score showed a significant but modest predictive ability for LRAF post-AF ablation. Further prospective validation is needed to better define the potential role of the MB-LATER score in patient selection and treatment decision-making post-AF ablation.

The implantation of a subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) may be used instead of a traditional transvenous system to prevent sudden cardiac death. Our aim was to compare the characteristics of S-ICD patients from the multi-center registry of S-ICD implantations in Poland with the published results of the European Snapshot Survey on S-ICD Implantation (ESSS-SICDI). We compared data of 137 Polish S-ICD patients with 68 patients from the ESSS-SICDI registry. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy, concomitant diseases, and the rate of primary prevention indication. Polish patients had more advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III: 11.7% vs. 2.9%, NYHA II: 48.9% vs. 29.4%, NYHA I: 39.4% vs. 67.7%, p &lt, 0.05 each). Young age (75.9% vs. 50%, p &lt, 0.05) and no vascular access (7.3% vs. 0%, p &lt, 0.05) were more often indications for S-ICD. The percentage of patients after transvenous system removal due to infections was significantly higher in the Polish group (11% vs. 1.5%, p &lt, 0.05). In the European population, S-ICD was more frequently chosen because of patients’ active lifestyle and patients’ preference (both 10.3% vs. 0%, p &lt, 0.05). Our analysis shows that in Poland, compared to other European countries, subcutaneous cardioverters-defibrillators are being implanted in patients at a more advanced stage of chronic heart failure. The most frequent reason for choosing a subcutaneous system instead of a transvenous ICD is the young age of a patient.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf ESC-EHRA EORP AF General Long-Term Registry Investigators Introduction Data derived from recent observational studies in atrial fibrillation (AF) show how the complexity of the clinical phenotype, beyond baseline thromboembolic risk, can increase risk of major adverse outcomes. Importantly, risk factors tend to occur in clusters, rather than occur individually in isolation. Aims To describe AF patients’ clinical phenotypes among a large contemporary European AF cohort and to analyse the differential impact of these clinical phenotypes on the occurrence of major adverse outcomes. Methods We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis based on Ward’s Method and using Squared Euclidean Distance using 22 clinical covariates. All variables were considered as binary. Examining the distances between cluster coefficients and by visual inspection of the dendrogram produced we identified the optimal number of clusters. Patients with data available for all 22 variables were included. We considered occurrence of cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Results Among the original 11096 patients included, 9363 (84.4%) were available for this analysis. The cluster analysis identified three clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 3634; 38.8%) characterized by older patients with prevalent noncardiac comorbidities; Cluster 2 (n = 2774; 29.6%) characterized by younger patients mainly admitted for first detected and paroxysmal AF with low prevalence of concomitant conditions; Cluster 3 (n = 2955; 31.6%) included patients with high prevalence of permanent AF, cardiac risk factors and comorbidities. Thromboembolic and bleeding risks were higher in Cluster 3 and progressively lower in Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 (both p Conclusions In European AF patients, three main clinical clusters were identified, those with non-cardiac comorbidities, low risk and cardiac comorbidities. Both non-cardiac and cardiac comorbidities clusters were found to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier Curves for Outcomes

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Abbott Vascular Int. (2011–2014), Amgen Cardiovascular (2009–2018), AstraZeneca (2014–2017), Bayer AG (2009–2018), Boehringer Ingelheim (2009–2019), Boston Scientific (2009–2012), The Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance (2011–2016), The Alliance Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH and Eli Lilly and Company (2011–2017), Edwards (2016–2019), Gedeon Richter Plc. (2014–2017), Menarini Int. Op. (2009–2012), MSD-Merck & Co. (2011–2014), Novartis Pharma AG (2014–2017), ResMed (2014–2016), Sanofi (2009–2011), SERVIER (2009–2018). The Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET), conducting the registry in Germany, received support from The Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance (2014–2018) and the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK). Funding from Daiichi-Sankyo and Boehringer-Ingelheim have been received for conducting the registry in Spain. Funding from BMS-Pfizer Alliance was received to support the programme in France Background The 4S-AF scheme (Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation [AF] burden, Substrate severity) has recently been described as a novel approach to in-depth characterization of AF, and included in the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of AF. Purpose In the present study, we validated for the first time the 4S-AF scheme in the Spanish and French cohorts of the EurObservational Research Programme (EORP)-AF Long-Term General Registry. Methods The Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry, were merged and included. The baseline 4S-AF scheme was calculated as follows: Symptom severity (according to EHRA symptom score: 0-2 points), Severity of AF burden (according to AF type: 0-3 points), Substrate severity (according to comorbidities/cardiovascular risk factors: 0-7 points); and related to the primary management strategy (rhythm or rate control). According to the results for these 3 domains, four code colors have been defined. Patients with all domains in "green" should be managed by rhythm control. In patients with one domain in "yellow" or two domains in "green" categories, rhythm control can be attempted. On contrary, for patients with "red" color category, the 4S-AF scheme suggests a rate control strategy. All-cause mortality and the composite of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, major bleeding and all-cause death, were the primary endpoints. These outcomes were recorded during 1-year of follow-up. Results 1479 patients (36.9% females, median age of 72 [IQR 64-80] years) were included (Table 1). The median 4S-AF scheme score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The 4S-AF scheme, as continuous and as categorical, was associated with the management strategy decided for the patient (both p Conclusion Characterization of AF by using the 4S-AF scheme may aid in identifying AF patients that would be managed by rhythm or rate control, and could also help in identifying high-risk AF patients for worse clinical outcomes in a ‘real-world’ setting. Abstract Table 1 and Figures 1A-1B

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction The ESC-EHRA EORP AF General Long-Term Registry provides a contemporary snapshot of European atrial fibrillation (AF) patients’ characteristics and management. Aims: We present data about the final 2-years follow-up observation of AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP AF General Long-Term Registry. Methods A contemporary evaluation of residual risk of adverse outcomes in a cohort of largely anticoagulated AF patients according to the baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risk, defined according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. We determined cardiovascular (CV) events, CV death and all-cause death as outcomes. Results Among the original 11069 patients enrolled, 8409 (76.0%) patients had available follow-up status at the end of the 2-years follow-up. Patients age, female sex and most comorbidities were progressively more prevalent across the spectrum of thromboembolic and bleeding risk. Data on adverse outcomes were available for 10087 (91.1%), over the 2-year observation period. Outcome rates were progressively higher across CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores (all p Conclusions In this large contemporary European-wide cohort of AF patients, both baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were associated to an increased risk of major clinical outcomes. Both scores are reflective of high risk clinical states, and are predictive of major adverse outcomes even in a large cohort of largely anticoagulated patients with a lower residual risk of adverse outcomes. Abstract Figure.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Amiodarone is the most prescribed antiarrhythmic drug, but drug-related side effects sometimes result in drug discontinuation. Not infrequently, physicians discontinue amiodarone without a medical reason. We explored the determinants of such permanent drug discontinuation. Methods A single-centre, longitudinal study included consecutive patients newly prescribed or already taking amiodarone when first seen in our health centre from January 2013 to December 2017. Baseline data were retrieved from the hospital electronic database and patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit in January to March 2019. Results Of 1212 patients taking amiodarone (mean age 64.2 ±11.2 yrs; female n= 358, 29.5%; median follow-up 22.5 months), the drug was permanently discontinued in 489 (40.3 %), see Figure. On univariate Cox regression analysis, female sex (HR 1.55; 95%CI 1.0-2.3; p = 0.032), non-multimorbidity (2.9; 2.0-4.3; p Conclusion Study showed that within the first two years of treatment, despite persistent indication, amiodarone was discontinued in 1 out of 10 patients in the absence of side effects, mostly in younger patients with less comorbidities, which may not always be justified. There is a need for qualitative research to elucidate the reasons for such physicians’ decisions. Table.Multivariable Cox Proportional HAZARD Regression analysis of permanent Amiodarone discontinuation due to physician decisionVariableHR95% CIP valueAge0.9700.95-0.990.003VT/VF/electrical storm0.1390.04-0.450.001VKA therapy0.5980.38-0.940.026Ablation of AF2.5391.38-4.690.003Number of comorbidities ≤32.0241.26-3.270.004VT ventricular tachycardia; VF: ventricular fibrillation.Abstract Figure.

The most recent atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines delivered by European Society of Cardiology (ESC) offer an updated approach to AF management, with the perspective of improved characterization of the arrhythmia, the cardiac substrate and the patients profile in terms of associated risk factors and comorbidities. Recommendations were based on careful scrutiny and assessment of all available evidence with the final aim to offer to practitioners a lower level of uncertainty in the complex process of decision making for patients with AF. The 2020 ESC guidelines on AF propose a paradigm shift in the clinical approach to AF patients, moving from a single-domain AF classification to comprehensive characterization of AF patients. Given the complex nature of AF, an integrated holistic management of AF patients is suggested by the guidelines for improving patients outcomes through the formal introduction of the CC (Confirm AF and Characterize AF) to ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway. In line with this concept, these new guidelines underline the importance of a more comprehensive management of AF patients which should not be limited to simply prescribe oral anticoagulation or decide between a rhythm or rate control strategy. Indeed, each step of the ABC pathway represents one of the pivotal pillars in the management of AF and only a holistic approach has the potential to improve patients' outcomes. In this review we will discuss the background that supports some of the new recommendations of 2020 ESC guidelines, with important implications for daily management of AF patients.

Data supporting the safety of cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) without anticoagulation in patients with AF duration

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex condition requiring holistic management with multiple treatment decisions about optimal thromboprophylaxis, symptom control (and prevention of AF progression), and identification and management of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidity. Sometimes the information needed for treatment decisions is incomplete, as available classifications of AF mostly address a single domain of AF (or patient)-related characteristics. The most widely used classification of AF based on AF episode duration and temporal patterns (that is, the classification to first-diagnosed, paroxysmal, persistent/long-standing persistent, and permanent AF) has contributed to a better understanding of AF prevention and treatment but its limitations and the need for a multidimensional AF classification have been recognized as more complex treatment options became available. We propose a paradigm shift from classification toward a structured characterization of AF, addressing specific domains having treatment and prognostic implications to become a standard in clinical practice, thus aiming to streamline the assessment of AF patients at all health care levels facilitating communication among physicians, treatment decision-making, and optimal risk evaluation and management of AF patients. Specifically, we propose the 4S-AF structured pathophysiology-based characterization (rather than classification) scheme that includes four AF- and patient-related domains—Stroke risk, Symptoms, Severity of AF burden, and Substrate severity—and provide a hypothetical model for the use of 4S-AF characterization scheme to aid treatment decision making concerning the management of patients with AF in clinical practice.

The aim of this survey is to provide a snapshot of current practice regarding antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) comorbid with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). An online survey was distributed to members of the European Heart Rhythm Association. A total of 163 clinicians responded, mostly cardiologists or electrophysiologists (87.7%), predominantly working in University hospitals (61.3%). Most respondents (47.2%) had seen one to five patients with AF comorbid with ICH in the last 12 months. Among patients sustaining an ICH on oral anticoagulation (OAC), 84.3% respondents would consider some form of ATT post-ICH, with 73.2% preferring to switch from a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) to a non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and 37.2% preferring to switch from one NOAC to another. Most (36.6%) would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. Among patients considered unable to take OAC, left atrial appendage occlusion procedure was the therapy of choice in 73.3% respondents. When deciding on ATT, respondents considered patient’s CHA2DS2-VASc score, ICH type, demographics, risk factors, and patient adherence. The main reason for not restarting or commencing ATT was concern about recurrent ICH (80.8%). National or international clinical guidelines would be advantageous to support decision-making (84.3%). Other helpful resources reported were multidisciplinary team involvement (46.9%) and patient education (82%). In summary, most survey respondents would prescribe OAC therapy for patients with AF who have sustained an ICH on OAC and would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. The risk of recurrent ICH was the main reason for not prescribing any ATT post-ICH.

INTRODUCTION: Effective stroke prevention with oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces the risk of stroke and death among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For most patients with AF, treatment options include vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). NOACs have been introduced as an alternative to VKAs, and their use has been steadily increasing in the United Kingdom and Europe over a decade. In randomized clinical trials, NOACs had a favorable risk-benefit profile as compared to warfarin. However, there is a concern about their long-term safety in clinical practice, especially in high-risk patients. There have been a number of registries and surveys based on the real-world patients with AF which has been conducted and published, providing data on contemporary AF management.AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, the authors discuss current trends in the use of OAC in the United Kingdom and Europe, considering the potential directions for future anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF.EXPERT OPINION: The increasing prevalence of AF and AF-related comorbidities proves the need for comprehensive prevention and management strategies. The challenge is the optimization of therapy for each patient. However, there are still gaps in optimal stroke prevention, and the mortality rates remain high in patients with AF.

Background Rhythm control may improve functional capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Long‐term exercise tolerance improvement and its prognostic implications following catheter‐ablation (CA) of paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF are underreported. Methods and Results Consecutive patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing just before and 12 months after their index CA of AF. Follow‐up 24‐hour Holter recordings were obtained at 6‐month intervals post‐CA, and any atrial arrhythmia >30 seconds detected after 3 months postprocedure was considered AF recurrence. Of 110 patients (mean age 57.5±10.6 years, 77.2% males) with paroxysmal AF (n=66) or nonparoxysmal AF (n=44), the 12‐month exercise tolerance improved significantly in those who maintained sinus rhythm during the first 12 months post‐CA (n=96), but not in patients with AF recurrence (n=14). After CA, the 12‐month respiratory exchange ratio at maximal workload significantly increased in patients with paroxysmal AF, whereas those with nonparoxysmal AF significantly reduced their heart rate during the 12‐month cardiopulmonary exercise testing (all P ≤0.001). During the follow‐up of 42.8±7.8 months, a total of 29 patients (26.3%) experienced recurrent AF. On multivariate analysis including patients without recurrent AF at 12 months after CA, the extent of work time improvement at follow‐up cardiopulmonary exercise testing was independently associated with the rhythm outcome beyond 12 months postprocedure (hazard ratio of 0.936 [95% CI, 0.894–0.979] for each 10 seconds increase in the work time following ablation, P =0.004). Conclusions CA of AF was associated with recovery of exercise intolerance in patients with paroxysmal AF or nonparoxysmal AF. Inability to improve exercise capacity at 12 months post‐CA was an independent risk factor for later AF recurrence.

Bayer Pharma AG; Bristol-Myers SquibbBristol-Myers Squibb; Pfizer Alliance; DaiichiSankyo Europe GmbHDaiichi Sankyo Company Limited

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and associated with reduced response to rhythm control strategies. However, there is no practical guidance on testing for OSA in AF patients and for OSA treatment implementation. We sought to evaluate current practices and identify challenges of OSA management in AF. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed with a content-validated survey to evaluate OSA management in AF by healthcare practitioners. Survey review, editing, and dissemination occurred via the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions and direct contact with arrhythmia centres. In total, 186 responses were collected. OSA-related symptoms were ranked as the most important reason to test for OSA in AF patients. The majority (67.7%) indicated that cardiologists perform ‘ad-hoc’ referrals. Only 11.3% initiated systematic testing by home sleep test or respiratory polygraphy and in addition, 10.8% had a structured OSA assessment pathway in place at the cardiology department. Only 6.7% of the respondents indicated that they test >70% of their AF patients for OSA as a component of rhythm control therapy. Various barriers were reported: no established collaboration between cardiology and sleep clinic (35.6%); lack in skills and knowledge (23.6%); lack of financial (23.6%) and personnel-related resources (21.3%). Structured testing for OSA occurs in the minority of AF patients. Centres apply varying methods. There is an urgent need for increased awareness and standardized pathways to allow OSA testing and treatment integration in the management of AF.

The 4S-AF scheme [Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, Substrate severity] has recently been described as a novel approach to in-depth characterization of AF. We aim to determine if the 4S-AF scheme would be useful for AF characterization and provides prognostic information in real-world AF patients.The Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry were included. The baseline 4S-AF scheme was calculated and related to the primary management strategy (rhythm or rate control). Follow-up was performed at 1-year with all-cause mortality and the composite of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death, as primary endpoints. A total of 1479 patients [36.9\ median age 72 interquartile range (IQR 64–80) years] were included. The median 4S-AF scheme score was 5 (IQR 4–7). The 4S-AF scheme, as continuous and as categorical, was associated with the management strategy decided for the patient (both P \lt; 0.001). The predictive performances of the 4S-AF scheme for the actual management strategy were appropriate in its continuous [c-index 0.77, 95\CI) 0.75–0.80] and categorical (c-index 0.75, 95\.72–0.78) forms. Cox regression analyses showed that ‘red category’ classified patients in the 4S-AF scheme had a higher risk of all-cause death (aHR 1.75, 95\.02–2.99) and composite outcomes (aHR 1.60, 95\.05–2.44).Characterization of AF by using the 4S-AF scheme may aid in identifying AF patients that would be managed by rhythm or rate control and could also help in identifying high-risk AF patients for worse clinical outcomes in a ‘real-world’ setting. Aims: The 4S-AF scheme [Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, Substrate severity] has recently been described as a novel approach to in-depth characterization of AF. We aim to determine if the 4S-AF scheme would be useful for AF characterization and provides prognostic information in real-world AF patients. Methods and results: The Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry were included. The baseline 4S-AF scheme was calculated and related to the primary management strategy (rhythm or rate control). Follow-up was performed at 1-year with all-cause mortality and the composite of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death, as primary endpoints. A total of 1479 patients [36.9% females, median age 72 interquartile range (IQR 64-80) years] were included. The median 4S-AF scheme score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The 4S-AF scheme, as continuous and as categorical, was associated with the management strategy decided for the patient (both P < 0.001). The predictive performances of the 4S-AF scheme for the actual management strategy were appropriate in its continuous [c-index 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.80] and categorical (c-index 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.78) forms. Cox regression analyses showed that 'red category' classified patients in the 4S-AF scheme had a higher risk of all-cause death (aHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.02-2.99) and composite outcomes (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05-2.44). Conclusion: Characterization of AF by using the 4S-AF scheme may aid in identifying AF patients that would be managed by rhythm or rate control and could also help in identifying high-risk AF patients for worse clinical outcomes in a 'real-world' setting.

Stroke prevention is one of the cornerstones of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As part of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway (A: Avoid stroke/Anticoagulation; B: Better symptom control; C: Cardiovascular risk and comorbidity optimisation), stroke risk assessment and appropriate thromboprophylaxis is emphasised. Various guidelines have addressed stroke prevention. In this review, we compared the 2017 APHRS, 2018 ACCP, 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS, and 2020 ESC AF guidelines regarding the stroke/bleeding risk assessment and recommendations about the use of OAC. We also aimed to highlight some unique points for each of those guidelines. All four guidelines recommend the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk assessment, and OAC (preferably NOACs in all NOAC-eligible patients) is recommended for AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (males) or ≥3 (females). Guidelines also emphasize the importance of stroke risk reassessments at periodic intervals (e.g. 4–6 months) to inform treatment decisions (e.g. initiation of OAC in patients no longer at low risk of stroke) and address potentially modifiable bleeding risk factors.

Atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) are defined as asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices with atrial sensing, providing automated continuous monitoring and tracings storage, occurring in subjects with no previous clinical atrial fibrillation (AF) and with no AF detected at conventional electrocardiogram recordings. AHREs are associated with an increased thrombo-embolic risk, which is not negligible, although lower than that of clinical AF. The thrombo-embolic risk increases with increasing burden of AHREs, and moreover, AHREs burden shows a dynamic pattern, with tendency to progression along with time, with potential transition to clinical AF. The clinical management of AHREs, in particular with regard to prophylactic treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs), remains uncertain and heterogeneous. At present, in patients with confirmed AHREs, as a result of device tracing analysis, an integrated, individual and clinically-guided assessment should be applied, taking into account the patients’ risk of stroke (to be reassessed regularly) and the AHREs burden. The use of OACs, preferentially non-vitamin K antagonists OACs, may be justified in selected patients, such as those with longer AHREs durations (in the range of several hours or ≥24 h), with no doubts on AF diagnosis after device tracing analysis and with an estimated high/very high individual risk of stroke, accounting for the anticipated net clinical benefit, and informed patient’s preferences. Two randomized clinical trials on this topic are currently ongoing and are likely to better define the role of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AHREs.

Introduction The impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been largely debated. Aims To describe the relationship between BMI categories and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of European AF patients. Methods We included all AF patients with available baseline BMI and creatinine clearance and 1-year follow-up data enrolled in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Outcomes considered were: i) a composite of any thromboembolic event (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular (CV) death; ii) CV death; iii) all-cause death. Results A total of 7,759 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 55 (0.7%) were underweight, 2,074 (26.7%) were normal weight, 3,170 (40.9%) were overweight, 1,703 (21.9%) were obese and 757 (9.8%) were severe obese. Mean age was progressively lower across the categories (p Conclusions In a large cohort of European AF patients a progressively lower rate of outcomes was found across increasing BMI classes. After full adjustments, no significant association was found between the higher BMI classes and outcomes. Underweight was associated with an increased risk for CV death and all-cause death. Figure 1. Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP programme, several companies have supported it with unrestricted grants

Introduction Frailty is a major health determinant for cardiovascular disease. Thus far, data on frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. Aims To evaluate frailty in a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients, the relationship with oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription and with risk of all-cause death. Methods We analyzed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. A 38-items frailty index (FI) was derived from baseline characteristics according to the accumulation of deficits model proposed by Rockwood and Mitnitsky. All-cause mortality was the primary study outcome. Results Out of the 11096 AF enrolled patients, data for evaluating frailty were available for 6557 (59.1%) patients who have been included in this analysis (mean [SD] age 68.9 [11.5], 37.7% females). Baseline median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were 3 [2–4] and 1 [1–2], respectively. At baseline, median [IQR] FI was 0.16 (0.12–0.23), with 1276 (19.5%) patients considered “not-frail” (FI Conclusions In a European contemporary cohort of AF patients the burden of frailty is significant, with almost 1 out of 5 patients found to be “frail”. Frailty influenced significantly the choice of OAC therapy and was associated with (and predictive of) all-cause death at follow-up. Kaplan-Meier Curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP programme, several companies have supported it with unrestricted grants.

Background Physical activity (PA) may have a beneficial contribution for outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose We aimed to evaluate the impact of self-reported PA in a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients on the risk of all-cause mortality. Methods We analyzed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Self-reported PA was categorized, on the basis of reported time spent exercising, as follows: i) No PA; ii) Occasional PA; iii) Regular PA; iv) Intense PA. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Results Over 11096, a total of 8699 (78.4%) patients (mean age (SD) 69.1 (11.5); 40.7% female) had available data about PA and follow-up observation and were included in the analysis. Of these, 3703 (42.6%) reported no PA, 2829 (32.5%) occasional PA, 1824 (21.0%) regular PA, with only 343 (3.9%) reporting intense PA. With the 4 increasing PA categories, mean age, proportion of female patients, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were progressively lower (all p Conclusions In a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients, self-reported PA was found to be inversely associated with all-cause death and CV death. Kaplan-Meier Curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP, several companies have supported the programme with unrestricted grants

Introduction Increasing age is a well-known determinant for incident atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as for adverse outcomes. With a progressively ageing population in Europe (and elsewhere), contemporary data are needed to investigate the impact of age in relation to major adverse events in AF patients. Purpose To evaluate the impact of increasing age on major adverse outcomes in a contemporary European AF cohort. Methods Patients enrolled in the EORP-AF Long Term General Registry were categorized by age: Results Among the 9762 patients included in this analysis, 2946 (30.2%) were Conclusions In a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients, increasing age was a major determinant of major adverse outcomes. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Curves for All-Cause Death Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP programme, several companies supported its activities with unrestricted grants.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts on patients' quality of life (QoL). An impaired QoL has been associated with worse outcomes even in AF patients, but contemporary data in a large-scale pan-European population are limited. Purpose We aimed to assess temporal changes in AF patients' QoL across 2 years follow-up observation, and the relationship of QoL changes with all-cause death. Methods We analyzed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was used to assess QoL. A Health Utility Score (HUS), indicating the overall health state (1 equals perfect health), was derived. Differences throughout the follow-up (Baseline, 1-Y FU, 2-Y FU) observation were assessed. The study outcome was all-cause mortality. Results Out of a total of 11906 patients, 8097 (73.0%) were available for this analysis. Mean (SD) age was 69.1 (11.5) years; 60.8% males; median CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3 (IQR 2–4) and 1 (1–2), respectively. The mean (SD) HUS at baseline was 0.815 (0.200) and 0.834 (0.196), 0.829 (0.195) at 1-year follow-up and 2-year follow-up, respectively (p Conclusions In a contemporary European-wide cohort of AF patients, significant temporal changes in QoL were found. Patients at higher stroke risk according to CHA2DS2-VASc score showed a significant reduction in the QoL. Age and CAD were independently associated with changes in QoL. A greater reduction in HUS (i.e. worsening QoL) over time was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death. Temporal changes in HUS Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP, several companies have supported the programme with unrestricted grants

Background Symptom-focused management is one of the cornerstones of optimal atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy. Objectives To evaluate the use of rhythm control and rate control strategy. Second, to identify predictors of the use of amiodarone in patients with rhythm control and of the use of rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF in the Balkans. Methods Prospective enrolment of consecutive patients from 7 Balkan countries to the BALKAN-AF survey was performed. Results Of 2,712 enrolled patients, 2,522 (93.0%) with complete data were included: 1,622 (64.3%) patients were assigned to rate control strategy and 900 (35.7%) to rhythm control. Patients with rhythm control were younger, more often hospitalized for AF and with less comorbidities (all p

BACKGROUND: Symptom-focused management is one of the cornerstones of optimal atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of rhythm control and rate control strategy. Second, to identify predictors of the use of amiodarone in patients with rhythm control and of the use of rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF in the Balkans.METHODS: Prospective enrolment of consecutive patients from seven Balkan countries to the BALKAN-AF survey was performed.RESULTS: Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2522 (93.0%) with complete data were included: 1622 (64.3%) patients were assigned to rate control strategy and 900 (35.7%) to rhythm control. Patients with rhythm control were younger, more often hospitalised for AF and with less comorbidities (all P < .05) than those with rate control. Symptom score [European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)] was not an independent predictor of a rhythm control strategy [odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.10, P = .945]. The most commonly chosen antiarrhythmic agents were amiodarone (49.7%), followed by propafenone (24.3%).CONCLUSION: More than one-third of patients in the BALKAN-AF survey received a rhythm control strategy, and these patients tended to be younger with less comorbidities than those managed with rate control. EHRA symptom score is not significantly associated with rhythm control strategy. The most commonly used antiarrhythmic agents were amiodarone, followed by propafenone.

Background: The implementation of quality indicators in the atrial fibrillation (AF) care should be considered to improve quality of management and patient outcome. Methods: In the post-hoc analysis of the BALKAN-AF dataset, we assessed concordance with quality indicators for AF management. Available domains for AF management [patient assessment (baseline), anticoagulation, rate control strategy, rhythm control strategy and risk factor management] were identified and assessed at baseline visit. Results: Among 132 patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 (men) or 1 (women), 75 (56.8%) were prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC). Of 2539 patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 for men and ≥ 2 for women, 1890 (74.4%) were prescribed OAC. Among 1088 patients with permanent AF, 110 (10.1%) individuals were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Of 1616 patients with structural heart disease, 37 (2.2%) were prescribed class IC AADs. Of 1624 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, 59 (3.6%) were offered catheter ablation. Among 2712 AF patients, 2121 (78.2%) had hypertension, 671 (24.7%) were obese, 53 (2.0%) had obstructive sleep apnoea, 110 (4.0%) had alcohol abuse and 340 (12.5%) were smokers. Conclusions: In the BALKAN-AF cohort, the use of OAC for stroke prevention was poorly associated with patients stroke risk. The use of AADs in patients with permanent AF was low. The prescription of class IC AADs to patients with structural heart disease was infrequent. A large proportion of AF patients had their modifiable risk factors identified.

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) may be challenging in clinical practice. Given the complexity of AF patients and the continuous advances in AF clinical management, there is a need for standardized programmes aimed at collecting so-called ‘real-world clinical practice data’ regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic/therapeutic/management practices and assessing adherence to guidelines. Over the past 20 years, the number of registries and surveys based on real-world AF patients has been dramatically increased. In Europe, based on the Euro Heart Survey (EHS) and the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), a large series of studies based on these prospective, observational, large-scale multicentre registries on AF have been published. This narrative review gives an overview of these two projects on AF led by the European Society of Cardiology, focusing mainly on the contribution that these studies have provided to AF management and patient outcomes. Both the EHS and the EORP registries have collected a large amount of data regarding contemporary clinical practice, and despite some limitations, mainly related to their observational nature, these registries have contributed to our knowledge and clinical management of AF patients.

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the utilization of same-day discharge (SDD) in electrophysiology (EP). An online-based questionnaire was shared with the EHRA community between 12 and 30 June 2020 and recorded institutional information, complication assessment, recent experiences, and opinions regarding possible advantages or concerns with SDD. In total, 218 responses from 49 countries provided information on current SDD management. Overall, SDD was implemented in 77.5%, whereas this proportion was significantly higher in tertiary and high-volume centres (83.8% and 85.3%, both P 75% of respondents already implement SDD following EP interventions with a large heterogeneity with regard to specific procedures. Further research is needed to confirm or disprove existing and expected benefits and obstacles.

Aims A plethora of mobile health applications (m-health apps) to support healthcare are available for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) but content and quality vary considerably and few have undergone formal assessment. The aim is to systematically review the literature on m-health apps for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) that examine the impact on knowledge of AF, patient and HCP behaviour, patients’ quality-of-life, and user engagement. Methods and results MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsychInfo were searched from 1 January 2005 to 5 September 2019, with hand-searching of clinical trial registers and grey literature. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported changes in any of the following: (i) knowledge of AF; (ii) provider behaviour (e.g. guideline adherence); (iii) patient behaviour (e.g. medication adherence); (iv) patient quality-of-life; and (v) user engagement. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility. A narrative review was undertaken as included studies varied widely in their design, interventions, comparators, and outcomes. Seven studies were included; six m-health apps aimed at patients and one at HCPs. Mobile health apps ranged widely in design, features, and method of delivery. Four studies reported patient knowledge of AF; three demonstrated significant knowledge improvement post-intervention or compared to usual care. One study reported greater HCP adherence to oral anticoagulation guidelines after m-health app implementation. Two studies reported on patient medication adherence and quality-of-life; both showed improved quality-of-life post-intervention but only one observed increased adherence. Regarding user engagement, five studies reported patient perspectives on usability, three on acceptability, and one on feasibility; overall all m-health apps were rated positively. Conclusion Mobile health apps demonstrate improvements in patient knowledge, behaviour, and quality of life. Studies formally evaluating the impact of m-health on HCP behaviour are scarce and larger-scale studies with representative patient cohorts, appropriate comparators, and longer-term assessment of the impact of m-health apps are warranted.

Atrial fibrillation and acute heart failure frequently co-exist and can exacerbate each other. Their combination leads to increased morbidity and mortality. However, the prevalence and significance, as well as the treatment, of atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure are not well studied. Management of atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Treatment of underlying disease(s), identification and treatment of potentially correctable causes and precipitating factors and anticoagulation are crucial. In this article, current evidence on atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute heart failure is summarised. The recommendations on management of atrial fibrillation in the prehospital stage, the treatment of reversible causes, when and how to use rate or rhythm control, maintenance of sinus rhythm, catheter ablation and pacing, anticoagulation, as well as measures on prevention of atrial fibrillation are provided.

Syncope is a heterogeneous syndrome encompassing a large spectrum of mechanisms and outcomes. The European Society of Cardiology published an update of the Syncope Guidelines in 2018. The aim of the present survey was to capture contemporary management of syncope and guideline implementation among European physicians. A 23-item questionnaire was presented to 2588 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) members from 32 European countries. The response rate was 48%, but only complete responses (n = 161) were included in this study. The questionnaire contained specific items regarding syncope facilities, diagnostic definitions, diagnostic tools, follow-up, and therapy. The survey revealed that many respondents did not have syncope units (88%) or dedicated management algorithms (44%) at their institutions, and 45% of the respondents reported syncope-related hospitalization rates >25%, whereas most (95%) employed close monitoring and hospitalization in syncope patients with structural heart disease. Carotid sinus massage, autonomic testing, and tilt-table testing were inconsistently used. Indications were heterogeneous for implanted loop recorders (79% considered them for recurrent syncope in high-risk patients) or electrophysiological studies (67% considered them in bifascicular block and inconclusive non-invasive testing). Non-pharmacological therapy was consistently considered by 68% of respondents; however, there was important variation regarding the choice of drug and device therapy. While revealing an increased awareness of syncope and good practice, our study identified important unmet needs regarding the optimal management of syncope and variable syncope guideline implementation.

Aims Treatment burden (TB) refers to self-perceived cumulative work patients do to manage their health. Using validated tools, TB has been documented in several chronic conditions, but not atrial fibrillation (AF). We measured TB and analysed its determinants and impact on quality of life (QoL) in an AF cohort. Methods and results A single-centre study prospectively included consecutive adult AF patients and non-AF controls managed from 1 April to 21 June 2019, who voluntarily and anonymously answered the TB questionnaire (TBQ) and 5-item EQ-5D QoL questionnaire; TB was calculated as a sum of TBQ points (maximum 170) and expressed as proportion of the maximum value. Of 514 participants, 331 (64.4%) had AF. The mean self-reported TB was 27.6% among AF patients and 24.3% among controls, P = 0.011. The mean TB was significantly higher in patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs. those taking non-VKA antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC; 29.5% vs. 24.7%, P = 0.006). The highest item-specific TB was reported for healthcare system organization-related items (e.g. visit appointment), diet, and physical activity modifications. On multivariable analyses, female sex, younger age, and permanent AF were associated with a higher TB, whereas NOACs and electrical AF cardioversion exhibited an inverse association; TB was an independent predictor of decreased QoL (all P Conclusion Our study provided clinically relevant insights into self-perceived TB among AF patients. Approximately one in four patients with AF have a high TB. Specific AF treatments and optimization of healthcare system-required patient activities may reduce the self-perceived TB in AF patients.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased risk of death, stroke, and heart failure. Prevalence and incidence of AF are rising due to better overall medical treatment, longer survival, and increasing incidence of cardiometabolic and lifestyle risk factors. Treatment of AF and AF‑related complications significantly increases healthcare costs. In addition, the use of conventional rhythm control strategies (including, antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation) is associated with limited efficacy for sinus rhythm maintenance and serious adverse effects. Aggressive cardiometabolic risk factor management may prevent incident as well as recurrent AF, improve overall health, and reduce mortality. Therefore, modifiable risk factor management became one of the 3 treatment pillars in AF management along with anticoagulation as well as conventional rate and rhythm control strategies. The second part of this review systematically discusses the association between AF and potentially modifiable risk factors for AF, such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, alcohol consumption, and dyslipidemia. We also provide practical guidelines for the risk factor management with respect to primary and secondary prevention of AF.

The Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac ion channel disorder associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Diagnosis is based on a characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern of coved type ST-segment elevation >2 mm followed by a negative T-wave in ≥1 of the right precordial leads V1 to V3. Since the first description of BrS, the definition of disease and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms have been significantly improved in recent years. Also, significant progress has been made in the field of genetic testing in these patients. Still, there are several open questions regarding the management and outcome of these patients. There is more information about patients who would need an implantable cardiac defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (that is, those with spontaneous Type I Brugada ECG pattern and arrhythmia-related syncope), but currently published data concerning asymptomatic patients with Brugada ECG pattern and other less-well defined presentations are conflicting. Whereas the role of cardiac defibrillator in patients with Brugada Syndrome is clear, optimal use of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy needs to be further investigated. In this review, we summarize current evidence and contemporary management of patients with BrS.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are widely used to treat bradyarrhythmias or improve the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). AIMS: To evaluate age-related (≤ 75 vs. > 75 years) attitudes, worries, psychological effects and needs in an Italian CIEDs population. METHODS: Patients attending their periodical ambulatory evaluation received a questionnaire conceived by the European Heart Rhythm Association Scientific Initiatives Committee as part of a multicenter, multinational snapshot survey. Seven countries participated in the study, and 1646 replies were collected. Of these, 437 (27%) were from Italy. Present results refer to the Italian population only. CIEDs were stratified into devices to treat bradycardia or HF. RESULTS: The use of CIEDs was more common in advanced age. Older patients needed less information about CIEDs than younger ones (p = 0.044), who would prefer to be better informed about CIEDs-related consequences on psychologic profile (p = 0.045), physical (p

Background: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) may be an alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). Aim: We sought to evaluate factors determining the choice of S-ICD vs. TV-ICD in Polish patients in comparison to other European countries. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent TV-ICD or S-ICD implantation in centres participating in the European Heart Rhythm Association prospective snapshot survey were included. Results: During an eight-week study period, 429 patients were recruited, including 136 (31.7%) ICD patients from Poland (eight with S-ICD). In comparison to other European centres, the proportion of S-ICD implantations in Poland was lower (7% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), whereas the ratio of cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator implantations was higher (43% vs. 26%; p < 0.001). Subjects receiving S-ICD in Poland were more often over 75 years old (25% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), in New York Heart Association class II (87.5% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001), with chronic kidney disease (37.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.003), and with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (32% [14%–50%] vs. 50% [25%–60%], p = 0.04), compared to other European countries. Additionally, in comparison to subjects from other European centres, Polish patients were significantly more often implanted with S-ICD due to prior infection (37.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) and a lack of venous access (25% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), whereas the largest subset of patients in other European countries were implanted with S-ICD because of young age (50% vs. 25%, p = NS). Conclusions: The main reasons leading to S-ICD implantations in Polish patients differ from the indications adopted in other European countries. In Poland, patients referred for TV-ICD or S-ICD implantation had more advanced heart failure and more comorbidities in comparison to subjects from other European countries. S-ICD is still underused in Polish patients.

Background: Obesity or overweight is related to worse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation (CA). The role of being underweight in relation to recurrent arrhythmias post AF ablation is less certain. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the association of body mass index (BMI) with arrhythmia outcomes in AF patients undergoing CA. Methods: In a cohort of 1410 AF patients (mean age 57.2 ± 11.6 years; 68% male) undergoing single CA, the association between BMI and AF ablation outcome was analyzed using BMI as a continuous variable and by four BMI categories (

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) prospective snapshot survey is to assess peri-procedural practices, implantation techniques, and short-term procedure-related complications associated with implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) or transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD), across tertiary European electrophysiology centres. An internet-based electronic questionnaire concerning implantation settings, peri-procedural routines, techniques, personnel, complications, and patient outcomes was sent to the centres routinely implanting both TV-ICDs and S-ICDs. The centres were requested to prospectively include consecutive patients implanted with either TV-ICD or S-ICD during the 8-week enrolment period. Overall, 20 centres from 6 countries enrolled 429 consecutive patients. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (20%) compared with TV-ICD were implanted mainly under general anaesthesia (72% vs. 14%), in the surgical operation room settings (69% vs. 43%), with more frequent prophylactic antibiotic administration (82% vs. 91%), and post-implant defibrillation testing (85% vs. 7%, all P < 0.05). Feasibility (implantation duration of 45 min) and short-term complication rates (4%) were comparable for S-ICDs and TV-ICDs, but the spectrum of complications varied, despite different baseline characteristics of patients undergoing the S-ICD vs. TV-ICD implantation. This EHRA snapshot survey provides important insights into the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation routines and patient outcomes. Our study showed differences between the S-ICD and TV-ICD implantation routines with respect to implantation settings, peri-procedural management, and pre-defined procedural endpoints. However, the comparable duration of S-ICD or TV-ICD implantation and similar rates of peri-procedural complications indicate that both devices can be routinely used in clinical practice.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are increasingly prevalent in the general population and share common risk factors such as older age, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The presence of CKD increases the risk of incident AF, and, likewise, AF increases the risk of CKD development and/or progression. Both conditions are associated with substantial thromboembolic risk, but patients with advanced CKD also exhibit a paradoxical increase in bleeding risk. In the landmark randomized clinical trials that compared non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF, the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD were similar to those in patients without CKD. Dose adjustment of NOACs as per the prescribing label is required in this population. Owing to limited trial data, evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with AF and severe CKD or end-stage renal disease on dialysis are lacking. Observational cohort studies have reported conflicting results, and the management of these particularly vulnerable patients remains challenging and requires careful assessment of stroke and bleeding risk and, where appropriate, use of warfarin with good-quality anticoagulation control.

Aims To develop quality indicators (QIs) that may be used to evaluate the quality of care and outcomes for adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results We followed the ESC methodology for QI development. This methodology involved (i) the identification of the domains of AF care for the diagnosis and management of AF (by a group of experts including members of the ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force for AF); (ii) the construction of candidate QIs (including a systematic review of the literature); and (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs (using a modified Delphi method). Six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF were identified: (i) Patient assessment (baseline and follow-up), (ii) Anticoagulation therapy, (iii) Rate control strategy, (iv) Rhythm control strategy, (v) Risk factor management, and (vi) Outcomes measures, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In total, 17 main and 17 secondary QIs, which covered all six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF, were selected. The outcome domain included measures on the consequences and treatment of AF, as well as PROMs. Conclusion This document defines six domains of AF care (patient assessment, anticoagulation, rate control, rhythm control, risk factor management, and outcomes), and provides 17 main and 17 secondary QIs for the diagnosis and management of AF. It is anticipated that implementation of these QIs will improve the quality of AF care.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, which can be effectively prevented using oral anticoagulation (OAC) with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. Until recently, VKAs were the only available means for OAC treatment. NOACs had similar efficacy and were safer than or as safe as warfarin with respect to reduced rates of hemorrhagic stroke or other intracranial bleeding in the respective pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients. Increasing “real-world” evidence on NOACs broadly confirms the results of the RCTs. However, individual patient characteristics including renal function, age, or prior bleeding should be taken into account when choosing the OAC with best risk–benefit profile. In patients ineligible for OACs, surgical or interventional stroke prevention strategies should be considered. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons, the left atrial appendage excision, ligation, or amputation may be the best option. Importantly, residual stumps or insufficient ligation may result in even higher stroke risk than without intervention. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, although requiring minimally invasive access, failed to demonstrate reduced ischemic stroke events compared to warfarin. In this review article, we summarize current treatment options and discuss the strengths and major limitations of the therapies for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF.