This study compared long-term speech performance after cochlear implantation (CI) between surgical strategies in patients with chronic otitis media (COM). Thirty patients with available open-set sentence scores measured more than 2 yr postoperatively were included: 17 who received one-stage surgeries (One-stage group), and the other 13 underwent two-stage surgeries (Two-stage group). Preoperative inflammatory status, intraoperative procedures, postoperative outcomes were compared. Among 17 patients in One-stage group, 12 underwent CI accompanied with the eradication of inflammation; CI without eradicating inflammation was performed on 3 patients; 2 underwent CIs via the transcanal approach. Thirteen patients in Two-stage group received the complete eradication of inflammation as first-stage surgery, and CI was performed as second-stage surgery after a mean interval of 8.2 months. Additional control of inflammation was performed in 2 patients at second-stage surgery for cavity problem and cholesteatoma, respectively. There were 2 cases of electrode exposure as postoperative complication in the two-stage group; new electrode arrays were inserted and covered by local flaps. The open-set sentence scores of Two-stage group were not significantly higher than those of One-stage group at 1, 2, 3, and 5 yr postoperatively. Postoperative long-term speech performance is equivalent when either of two surgical strategies is used to treat appropriately selected candidates. Graphical Abstract Keywords: Cochlear Implantation, Otitis Media, Tympanomastoidectomy, Speech Performance INTRODUCTION Profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) can occur in patients with chronic otitis media (COM) as a secondary effect of labyrinthitis, a labyrinthine fistula, or iatrogenic injury during surgery. Cochlear implantation (CI) has become the mainstay of auditory rehabilitation in patients with profound SNHL. However, CI was initially contraindicated in COM patients, because insertion of foreign material through a contaminated field into a space featuring potential intracranial communication was thought to be inappropriate (1). As the audiological benefits afforded by CI became better understood, and as surgical skills and radiological techniques improved, CIs have been increasingly performed in patients with COM. Recently, many reports on CI in patients with COM have appeared, addressing several issues, including candidate selection, choice of surgical strategy, and postoperative complications (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). In patients with COM, complete eradication of infected foci in the middle ear cleft prior to CI is essential to avoid development of serious complications and subsequent explantation (8). Therefore, it is essential to consider disease activity status when planning the surgical strategy; either one- or two-stage surgery may be appropriate. Postoperative findings after CI in patients with COM have been evaluated in those treated with one- or two-stage procedures, but among-study differences in results are apparent (2, 3, 7, 9). Hearing rehabilitation is the most important goal of CI, so the evaluation of postoperative speech performance is essential. However, such performance after CI in COM patients has been evaluated in only a few reports (4, 10) and comparisons of speech performance after application of various surgical strategies have not been performed. Hence, in the present study, we analyzed the postoperative complication and post-CI long-term speech performance of patients with COM treated via one- or two-stage surgery.