51. Procedural failure of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a multicenter US registry
- Author
-
J. Aaron Grantham, Georgios Christopoulos, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Santiago Garcia, Georgios E. Christakopoulos, William Lombardi, R. Michael Wyman, Steven P. Marso, Subhash Banerjee, Anna Kotsia, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Bavana V. Rangan, Craig A. Thompson, Khaldoon Alaswad, James M. McCabe, and James Sapontis
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,General Medicine ,Hybrid approach ,medicine.disease ,Total occlusion ,Surgery ,surgical procedures, operative ,Blunt ,Restenosis ,Occlusion ,Conventional PCI ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Complication ,business - Abstract
Background The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly increased procedural success rates, yet some cases still fail. We sought to evaluate the causes of failure in a contemporary CTO PCI registry. Methods We examined 380 consecutive patients who underwent CTO-PCI at 4 high volume CTO PCI centers in the United States using the “hybrid” approach. Clinical, angiographic, complication, and efficiency outcomes were compared between successful and failed cases. Failed cases were individually reviewed by an independent reviewer to determine the cause of failure. Results Procedural success was 91.3%. Compared with patients in whom CTO PCI was successful, those in whom CTO PCI failed had similar baseline clinical characteristics, but were more likely to have longer occlusion length, more tortuosity, more proximal cap ambiguity and blunt stump, and higher mean J-CTO scores (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0, P
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF