Search

The field of nonlinear dynamics has made important contributions toward a mechanistic understanding of cardiac arrhythmias. In recent years, many of these advancements have been in the area of arrhythmia control. This paper reviews the literature on analytical, modeling, and experimental nonlinear dynamical arrhythmia control with a focus on stimulation and pharmacologic techniques that have been developed, and in some cases used in experiments, to control reentrant rhythms (including spiral and scroll waves) and fibrillation. Although such approaches currently have practical limitations, they offer hope that nonlinear dynamical control techniques will be clinically useful in the coming years.

Introduction: The effects of adenosine on atrial tachycardia (AT) remain controversial, and the mechanistic implications of adenosine termination have not been fully established. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the differential effects of adenosine on focal and macroreentrant AT and describe the characteristics of adenosine-sensitive AT., Methods and Results: Thirty patients received adenosine during AT. Tachycardia origins were identified as focal or macroreentrant during invasive electrophysiologic studies. Responses to adenosine were analyzed and characterized as tachycardia termination, transient suppression, or no effect. Electrophysiologic studies demonstrated a focal origin of tachycardia in 17 patients. Adenosine terminated focal tachycardias in 14 patients (dose 7.3 +/- 4.0 mg) and transiently suppressed the arrhythmias in three others (dose 10.0 +/- 6.9 mg). A macroreentrant mechanism was demonstrated in 13 patients; adenosine terminated only one of these tachycardias and had no effect on the remaining 12 patients (dose 10.2 +/- 2.9 mg). Four classes of adenosine-sensitive AT were identified. Class I consisted of nine patients with tachycardia arising from the crista terminalis; these tachycardias also terminated with verapamil (4/4). Class II consisted of four patients with repetitive monomorphic AT arising from diverse sites in the right atrium; these either slowed or terminated in response to verapamil (2/2). Class III consisted of the three patients with transient suppression and demonstrated electropharmacologic characteristics consistent with an automatic mechanism, including insensitivity to verapamil (2/2). In the one patient with macroreentrant AT that was comprised of decremental atrial tissue, adenosine terminated tachycardia in a zone of decremental slow conduction (Class IV); this tachycardia slowed with verapamil., Conclusions: Adenosine-sensitive AT is usually focal in origin and arises either from the region of the crista terminalis (inclusive of the sinus node) or from diverse atrial sites with an incessant nonsustained repetitive pattern. Although most forms of macroreentrant AT are insensitive to adenosine, rarely macroreentrant AT with zones of decremental slow conduction can demonstrate adenosine sensitivity.

Background: Tilt testing is used to establish the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope. However, applicability of the tilt test is limited by test sensitivity and length of time required to perform the test. We hypothesized that adenosine could facilitate the induction of neurally mediated syncope through its sympathomimetic effects and therefore could be used as an alternative to routine tilt testing., Methods and Results: In protocol 1, the yield of adenosine tilt testing (12 mg while upright, followed by 60 degrees tilt for 5 minutes) and a 15-minute isoproterenol tilt test were compared in 84 patients with a negative 30-minute drug-free tilt test. In protocol 2, 100 patients underwent an initial adenosine tilt test followed by our routine tilt test (30-minute drug-free tilt followed by a 15-minute isoproterenol tilt). Six additional control patients underwent microneurography of the peroneal nerve to compare the sympathomimetic effects during bolus administration of adenosine and continuous infusion of isoproterenol. In protocol 1, the yields of adenosine (8 of 84, 10%) and isoproterenol (7 of 84, 8%) tilt testing were comparable (P=NS). In protocol 2, the yields of adenosine (19 of 100, 19%) and routine (22 of 100, 22%) tilt testing were also comparable (P=NS). Although the yield of adenosine tilt testing was comparable in both protocols, patients with a negative adenosine tilt test but a positive routine tilt test usually required isoproterenol to elicit the positive response. Microneurography confirmed discordant sympathetic activation after adenosine and isoproterenol administration., Conclusions: Adenosine is effective for the induction of neurally mediated syncope, with a diagnostic yield comparable to routine tilt testing. However, the discordant results obtained with adenosine and the isoproterenol phase of routine tilt testing suggest that adenosine and isoproterenol tilt testing may have complementary roles in eliciting a positive response. Therefore, a tilt protocol that uses an initial adenosine tilt followed, if necessary, by an isoproterenol tilt would be expected to increase the overall yield and reduce the duration of tilt testing.

Introduction: Adenosine has no direct electrophysiologic function in ventricular tissue, but in the presence of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), stimulation exerts a potent antiadrenergic effect. This effect has been exploited in the recognition and treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to cAMP-mediated triggered activity and automaticity, which are respectively terminated and suppressed by adenosine. However, the effects of adenosine on catecholamine-facilitated reentrant VT are unknown. A pivotal issue is whether termination of VT with adenosine is mechanism specific, or whether it represents a nonspecific antiadrenergic effect. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to define the effects of adenosine in a well-characterized group of patients with catecholamine-facilitated reentrant VT., Methods and Results: Fourteen patients with catecholamine-facilitated reentry were studied. In the 12 patients with structural heart disease (including two with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia), adenosine (260 to 550 microg/kg) failed to slow or terminate VT. Two patients without structural heart disease had intrafascicular tachycardia confined to the left posterior fascicle, a calcium-dependent, verapamil-sensitive arrhythmia. In the absence of isoproterenol, verapamil terminated VT but adenosine did not. However, when isoproterenol was subsequently required for facilitation of tachycardia, adenosine terminated VT in both patients., Conclusion: Adenosine has no antiadrenergic (antiarrhythmic) effect in patients with catecholamine-facilitated VT due to structural heart disease. Patients with verapamil-sensitive, left posterior intrafascicular reentry have an unusual dual response to adenosine. In the unstimulated state, adenosine has no effect on basal inward calcium current and, therefore, no effect on VT. However, when induction of VT requires amplification of the inward calcium current through stimulation of cAMP, adenosine sensitivity of VT becomes manifest. These results indicate that with few exceptions, termination of VT with adenosine is strongly suggestive of a cAMP-mediated triggered mechanism rather than reentry.

Beta-blockers are a first line therapy for neurocardiac syncope, but are not always effective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differential autonomic responses to orthostasis predict the response of patients with neurocardiac syncope to beta-adrenergic blockade. We computed the RMS successive difference of the RR intervals (RMSSD: a measure of cardiac parasympathetic tone) during supine and upright phases of the initial tilt test in 28 patients with syncope and positive tilt tests who were treated with atenolol. Follow-up tilt testing was performed to assess the efficacy of the drug in preventing tilt induced neurocardiac syncope. RMSSD did not differ at baseline (supine) between those who did (n = 20) and did not (n = 8) respond to beta-blockade. However, withdrawal of parasympathetic tone in response to tilt varied inversely with age (r = -0.69; P < 0.01). Reduced age adjusted parasympathetic withdrawal during orthostasis was associated with a 47% versus 8% risk of beta-blockade failure (odds ratio = 11; P = 0.01). Patients with diminished age adjusted parasympathetic withdrawal during orthostatic stress are less likely to respond to beta-blocker therapy of neurocardiac syncope than their counterparts. This may reflect a correspondingly greater sympathetic response to orthostasis in these patients, but the mechanism for this interaction is undetermined.

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in 54 pediatric patients (aged 7-21 years) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were treated with oral prednisone for 1-104 months. The difference in mean IOP between the treated patients (mean +/- SD, 15.62 +/- 4.11 mm Hg) and 55 age-matched controls (13.83 +/- 2.42 mm Hg) was statistically significant (P = 0.007). The IBD patients were classified as group I, IOP less than or equal to 19 mm Hg in both eyes, and group II, IOP greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg in either eye. Twelve of the 54 patients (22.2%) and none of the controls had IOP greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg (P less than 0.001). Seventeen of the 54 patients (31.5%) were characterized as "steroid responders" (IOP of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg, change in IOP of greater than or equal to 6 mm Hg between visits, or difference in IOP of greater than or equal to 6 mm Hg between the two eyes). When the dose of prednisone was reduced to 0-10 mg/day 30 days or more before measurement, 9 steroid responders showed a decrease in IOP to within 2 SD of the mean control IOP; 7 of the 9 showed a decrease in IOP of greater than or equal to 6 mm Hg. These observations indicate that while prednisone is a causative factor in increasing the IOP, susceptibility to average doses of prednisone is highly variable, and patients need to be monitored on an individual basis. Because IBD is a chronic disorder that requires prolonged corticosteroid treatment, these children are at risk of developing steroid-induced glaucoma. Careful ophthalmologic monitoring of pediatric IBD patients, as well as of other pediatric patients who receive corticosteroid therapy, is recommended.