Search

To investigate the effect of motivation on improvements in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores in subacute stroke patients with cognitive impairment. This retrospective cohort study included 358 consecutive subacute stroke patients with first-ever stroke and Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤23 at admission. We determined motivation and rehabilitation outcome using the vitality index and FIM-motor gain, respectively. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the factors at admission related to FIM-motor gain. Of 80 participants enrolled in this study (mean age: 74.2 ± 11.3 years). The median (interquartile range) vitality index at admission and FIM-motor gain were 7 (4) and 23 (22) points, respectively. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that age (B, −0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.65–(−0.21); β, −0.31; P <.001), duration from stroke onset to admission (B, −0.18; 95% CI, −0.33–(−0.04); β, −0.20; P =.014) and Stroke Impairment Assessment Set-motor function (B, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.92–1.61; β, 0.78; P <.001), FIM-motor (B, −0.80; 95% CI, −1.01–(−0.60); β, −0.95; P <.001), and vitality index (B, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.37–5.21; β, 0.50; P <.001) scores at admission were significantly associated with the FIM-motor gain. The vitality index was significantly associated with FIM improvement in subacute stroke patients with cognitive impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) in patients with vascular cognitive impairment has not been explored, and no studies investigating CST in the convalescent rehabilitation phase have been reported. This study examined the effect of CST on the cognitive function of patients with vascular cognitive impairment. A randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, single-centered trial with two parallel groups was conducted in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Twenty participants were randomly allocated to CST (n=10) and control (n=10) groups. Participants in the CST group underwent two CST sessions a day, five times a week for 8 weeks, in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Participants in the control group underwent conventional rehabilitation only. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and the outcome between the groups was compared using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The mean (standard deviation) scores of MMSE increased by 3.50 (3.08) points and 4.50 (1.61) points from baseline to the end of the study (week 8) in the CST and control groups, respectively. The GLMM showed a significant effect of TIME on MMSE (F=21.121, P<0.001), whereas no significant effect on MMSE was observed for GROUP (intervention vs. control, P=0.817) or the interaction term (TIME×GROUP, P=0.649). Although a significant improvement in cognitive function was observed in each group, no significant effect of CST was evident. This result indicates that the effect may have been masked by improvements caused by natural history or rehabilitation. Future studies with a sufficient sample size are required to confirm the findings.

An oral food challenge (OFC) is useful for managing food allergies. However, because OFCs have the risk of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, conducting OFCs under this situation without allergy specialists is difficult. To investigate the safety of a low-dose OFC for eggs, milk, and wheat in a general hospital without allergy specialists. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of children who were hospitalized in a general hospital without allergy specialists for a low-dose OFC of egg, milk, or wheat between April 2018 and March 2021. The records of 108 patients were evaluated. The median age was 15.8 months (range: 7.5-69.3 months). Challenged foods were eggs (n = 81), milk (n = 23), and wheat (n = 4). Fifty-three (49.0%) patients showed positive allergic reactions. Thirty-five (66.0%) patients showed grade 1 (mild), 18 (34.0%) showed grade 2 (moderate), and none showed grade 3 (severe) reactions. The interventions comprised antihistamines (n = 18), prednisolone (n = 3), inhaled Β2-agonist (n = 2). No patients required adrenaline and no deaths occurred. Low-dose OFCs may be safe in a general hospital without allergy specialists. Conducting a low-dose OFC may be essential in food allergy practice.