Search

BACKGROUND: Benefits of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in long-term kidney transplant patients remain uncertain. METHODS: ASCERTAIN was a 24-month, open-label, multicenter study. Kidney transplant patients more than 6 months posttransplant receiving CNI (baseline glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 30-70 mL/min/1.73 m) were randomized to everolimus with CNI elimination (n=127) or CNI minimization (n=144), or continued CNI unchanged (controls, n=123) to assess the effect on measured GFR at month 24 after randomization. RESULTS: Renal function was stable in all groups to month 24. Mean measured GFR at month 24, the primary endpoint, was 48.0±22.0 mL/min/1.73 m, 46.6±21.1 mL/min/1.73 m, and 46.0±20.4 mL/min/1.73 m in the CNI elimination, CNI minimization, and control groups, respectively. Differences between CNI elimination (1.12 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.51 to 5.76, P=0.63) and CNI minimization (0.59 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% CI -3.88 to 5.07, P=0.79) versus controls at month 24 were nonsignificant that is, the primary endpoint was not met. No efficacy endpoint differed significantly between groups. Post hoc analyses showed that patients with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) more than 50 mL/min had a significantly greater increase in measured GFR after CNI elimination versus controls (difference 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% CI 2.1 to 20.8 mL/min/1.73 m, P=0.017). Adverse events resulted in discontinuation in 36 (28.3%) CNI elimination patients, 24 (16.7%) CNI minimization patients, and 5 (4.1%) controls (P

Transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. Without appropriate prophylaxis, as many as 80% of solid organ transplant recipients may experience CMV infection. In addition to the direct effects of CMV, infection may be associated with a range of indirect effects, including an increase in risk of other infections, as well as a higher incidence of rejection, graft loss and death. The indirect effects of CMV infection can vary depending on the transplanted organ. For example, CMV-infected kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while CMV infection in liver transplant recipients may potentiate hepatitis C infection and increase the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Indirect effects result from a number of pathological processes, including immune modulation and immunosuppression, generation of cytotoxic, pro-inflammatory responses, and smooth muscle proliferation. Prophylactic treatment with antiviral medication can reduce the risk of CMV disease, thereby improving graft survival and overall outcomes, particularly in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis should be considered for all patients at risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation. In this paper we review the main indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients, and the impact of CMV prophylaxis on these effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing cancer compared with the general population. Tumours can arise de novo, as a recurrence of a preexisting malignancy, or from the donated organ. The ATOS (Aula sobre Trasplantes de Órganos Sólidos; the Solid-Organ Transplantation Working Group) group, integrated by Spanish transplant experts, meets annually to discuss current advances in the field. In 2011, the 11th edition covered a range of new topics on cancer and transplantation. In this review we have highlighted the new concepts and best practices for managing cancer in the pre-transplant and post-transplant settings that were presented at the ATOS meeting. Immunosuppression plays a major role in oncogenesis in the transplant recipient, both through impaired immunosurveillance and through direct oncogenic activity. It is possible to transplant organs obtained from donors with a history of cancer as long as an effective minimization of malignancy transmission strategy is followed. Tumour-specific wait-periods have been proposed for the increased number of transplantation candidates with a history of malignancy; however, the patient's individual risk of death from organ failure must be taken into consideration. It is important to actively prevent tumour recurrence, especially the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant recipients. To effectively manage post-transplant malignancies, it is essential to proactively monitor patients, with long-term intensive screening programs showing a reduced incidence of cancer post-transplantation. Proposed management strategies for post-transplantation malignancies include viral monitoring and prophylaxis to decrease infection-related cancer, immunosuppression modulation with lower doses of calcineurin inhibitors, and addition of or conversion to inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin.

Contains fulltext : 96886.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Operational tolerance is defined as stable renal function in transplants without immunosuppression for at least 1 year. We present histological assessments of two patients with operational tolerance. The first withdrew immunosuppression in 2005 and presents stable renal function (creatinine 1.5 mg/dL) without proteinuria. The biopsy showed mild chronic tubulointerstitial changes without inflammation. The second withdrew immunosuppression in 2009 and maintains stable renal function (creatinine 1.6 mg/dL) with mild proteinuria. Histology showed chronic humoural rejection and Class II anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were detected. These cases suggest that a renal biopsy may be useful to rule out subclinical pathology in patients with operational tolerance.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the leading cause of return to dialysis after transplantation. At present, no efficient therapies are available to modify the natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy, mainly because of difficulties in designing prospective clinical trials to prevent or treat this entity. The main risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, the utility of protocol biopsies in the design of trials, and different strategies to prevent or treat this problem are reviewed.

Fascin-1; Nephrotoxicity; Transplant Fascina-1; Nefrotoxicitat; Trasplantament Fascina-1; Nefrotoxicidad; Trasplante Immunosuppression based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has greatly improved organ transplantation, although subsequent nephrotoxicity significantly hinders treatment success. There are no currently available specific soluble biomarkers for CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and diagnosis relies on renal biopsy, which is costly, invasive and may cause complications. Accordingly, identification of non-invasive biomarkers distinguishing CNI-induced kidney tubular damage from that of other etiologies would greatly improve diagnosis and enable more precise dosage adjustment. For this purpose, HK-2 cells, widely used to model human proximal tubule, were treated with CNIs cyclosporine-A and FK506, or staurosporine as a calcineurin-independent toxic compound, and secretomes of each treatment were analyzed by proteomic means. Among the differentially secreted proteins identified, only fascin-1 was specifically released by both CNIs but not by staurosporine. To validate fascin-1 as a biomarker of CNI-induced tubular toxicity, fascin-1 levels were analyzed in serum and urine from kidney-transplanted patients under CNIs treatment presenting or not isometric vacuolization (IV), which nowadays represents the main histological hallmark of CNI-induced tubular damage. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and healthy volunteers were used as controls. Our results show that urinary fascin-1 was only significantly elevated in the subset of CNI-treated patients presenting IV. Moreover, fascin-1 anticipated the rise of sCr levels in serially collected urine samples from CNI-treated pulmonary-transplanted patients, where a decline in kidney function and serum creatinine (sCr) elevation was mainly attributed to CNIs treatment. In conclusion, our results point towards fascin-1 as a putative soluble biomarker of CNI-induced damage in the kidney tubular compartment.